4,500 tanks and other vehicles will be modernized this year. Of those 800 will be "deeply" modernized.
800 "deeply" modernized = 800 T-72B3?
Or maybe BTR-82 is also considered deep modernization?
Viktor wrote:.....during 2014 it seems we will see truly robust rearmament of Russian Ground troops.
TR1 wrote:Jesus:
http://s5.uploads.ru/3fIHi.jpg
TR1 wrote:Jesus:
http://s5.uploads.ru/3fIHi.jpg
A bunch of ridiculous awesome stuff:
http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?99988-Russian-Photos-%28updated-on-regular-basis%29/page3676
Last two pages.
TR1 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahimtOnk4tk
13:23.
Koalition turret test stand.
Jesus this video is a freaking gold mine.
Zivo wrote:TR1 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahimtOnk4tk
13:23.
Koalition turret test stand.
Jesus this video is a freaking gold mine.
Kurganets-25 model at 5:33?
Aside from the Koalition model, interesting vehicle on the left on the Armata chassis.
GarryB wrote:Very interesting video... I don't speak Russian but the section from 6.50-7.10 looked to me to be liquid fuel being pumped into and mixed in a gun chamber... anyone who does speak Russian confirm or deny this section was about liquid propellent and mixing fuels in the chamber... :)or is it just for cleaning barrels..
yep, checked it too, velocity of water it says on the side of simulation. what a letdown, tho I dont think spraying a fine mist of propellant (works for gasoline engines)would generate the necessary increase in muzzle velocity, more like a couple tens of liters of the stuff.medo wrote:
It is about liquid cooling on gun barrels, how to most effectively cool them. I think naval guns have liquid cooling for their rapid fire.
Let down ? I'm no expert, but wouldn't it be too much disadvantages for such method? The way I imagine liquid fuel would be used as travelling charge, what are Russian developments on this?collegeboy16 wrote:yep, checked it too, velocity of water it says on the side of simulation. what a letdown, tho I dont think spraying a fine mist of propellant (works for gasoline engines)would generate the necessary increase in muzzle velocity, more like a couple tens of liters of the stuff.medo wrote:
It is about liquid cooling on gun barrels, how to most effectively cool them. I think naval guns have liquid cooling for their rapid fire.
TR1 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahimtOnk4tk
13:23.
Koalition turret test stand.
Jesus this video is a freaking gold mine.