Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+80
Isos
LMFS
kvs
KomissarBojanchev
eridan
Pierre Sprey
d_taddei2
RTN
[ F l a n k e d ]
AlfaT8
zg18
JohninMK
Swede55
onwiththewar
Hole
marcellogo
havok
Mindstorm
magnumcromagnon
dino00
archangelski
Manov
tomazy
rambo54
JackRed
The-thing-next-door
Tsavo Lion
Peŕrier
YG_AJ
GRIM 44
BKP
SeigSoloyvov
Dr.Snufflebug
TheArmenian
Neutrality
medo
Azi
MC-21
wilhelm
KiloGolf
Stealthflanker
Luq man
Cyberspec
Tingsay
thegopnik
Nasr Hosein
flamming_python
AMCXXL
ZoA
iwanz
par far
T-47
GarryB
Cheetah
miketheterrible
OminousSpudd
Singular_Transform
chicken
ATLASCUB
berhoum
Vann7
Big_Gazza
hoom
Viktor
HM1199
Cyrus the great
tanino
coolieno99
franco
jaguar_br
Svyatoslavich
mack8
yavar
Benya
George1
Austin
higurashihougi
Rmf
Kimppis
Project Canada
84 posters

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40557
    Points : 41059
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  GarryB Thu May 17, 2018 10:57 am

    It was a genuine multirole aircraft... which the MiG-25 never was... but to suggest it was a better interceptor than a MiG-25 is ridiculous...

    It was not ideal against small manouverable fighters but had plenty of engine power and lots of missiles... add a gun and improve the missiles a bit and you have an excellent fighter/bomber.

    It would be an OK interceptor, but not in the same game as the MiG-25.

    Comments about the F-4 being used as a strike bomber are interesting... it reminded me of the old British Buccaneer... a carrier based plane that was derided as being subsonic, yet with a bucket of instant sunshine under each wing at low level if was faster than an F-16 and could fly further... and could do so from an aircraft carrier...
    avatar
    Swede55


    Posts : 23
    Points : 28
    Join date : 2014-08-28

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Pak-fa

    Post  Swede55 Fri May 18, 2018 6:37 am

    Yes, the Buccaneer was awesomely efficient.
    Hole
    Hole


    Posts : 11124
    Points : 11102
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 48
    Location : Scholzistan

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  Hole Fri May 18, 2018 10:59 am

    How did we get from the Su-57 to the Buccaneer? unshaven
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon


    Posts : 13475
    Points : 13515
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  PapaDragon Fri May 18, 2018 1:49 pm

    Hole wrote:How did we get from the Su-57 to the Buccaneer? unshaven

    Don't have a clue. Here is fresh photo of I-30 engine test to get things back on track. Also every Su-57 should get that red stripe, it look awesome thumbsup

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 229921

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 229984

    New engine is tiny in comparison to old one, once it's up and running it will do wonders.

    https://bmpd.livejournal.com/3202227.html
    Hole
    Hole


    Posts : 11124
    Points : 11102
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 48
    Location : Scholzistan

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  Hole Fri May 18, 2018 4:59 pm

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 23000110
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40557
    Points : 41059
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  GarryB Sat May 19, 2018 1:33 am

    Well actually while many in the west think of the F-35 as being a stealthy F-16/Harrier jump jet all rolled in to one, I think of it as a stealthy Bucc... which will be something the Su-57 will come up against repeatedly in its future no doubt...
    JohninMK
    JohninMK


    Posts : 15656
    Points : 15797
    Join date : 2015-06-16
    Location : England

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  JohninMK Mon May 21, 2018 11:40 pm

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Dduon8YU8AEyyxH
    LMFS
    LMFS


    Posts : 5169
    Points : 5165
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  LMFS Fri May 25, 2018 3:26 pm

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 QOn0u_ynikw

    We need more news about this guy here... the Russians test and test the Izd. 30 and say NOTHING about it! Very Happy
    JohninMK
    JohninMK


    Posts : 15656
    Points : 15797
    Join date : 2015-06-16
    Location : England

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  JohninMK Fri May 25, 2018 3:53 pm

    LMFS wrote:
    We need more news about this guy here... the Russians test and test the Izd. 30 and say NOTHING about it! Very Happy
    Its classified.
    LMFS
    LMFS


    Posts : 5169
    Points : 5165
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  LMFS Fri May 25, 2018 4:35 pm

    JohninMK wrote:
    LMFS wrote:
    We need more news about this guy here... the Russians test and test the Izd. 30 and say NOTHING about it! Very Happy
    Its classified.
    Therefore the smile...
    F-119 data remains classified until today so imagine Izd.30
    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon


    Posts : 8138
    Points : 8273
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  magnumcromagnon Fri May 25, 2018 6:09 pm

    Shoigu: Su-57 struck terrorists in Syria with cruise missiles

    zg18
    zg18


    Posts : 888
    Points : 958
    Join date : 2013-09-26
    Location : Zagreb , Croatia

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  zg18 Fri May 25, 2018 8:37 pm



    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 DeD-wm3XUAA6Kmx

    https://twitter.com/WaelAlRussi/status/1000079234335956992
    LMFS
    LMFS


    Posts : 5169
    Points : 5165
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  LMFS Fri May 25, 2018 8:45 pm

    zg18 wrote:

    Just saw it on Twitter... great!

    It seems a Kh-59MK2, quite new weapon and launched from rear weapons bay. This means this rear bay is also capable for big air to ground ordnance. This doubles the ground attack capacity of the F-35 with notably superior kinematics too. thumbsup

    I have the suspicion that the T-50s were in Syria for longer than stated and were only removed when it was leaked or allowed to leak their presence there. This would have been a good test of their stealth on the one hand and a warning to hot heads on the other, what do you think?
    Hole
    Hole


    Posts : 11124
    Points : 11102
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 48
    Location : Scholzistan

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  Hole Fri May 25, 2018 9:07 pm

    The were deployed without special hangars like the planes of some other countries.
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon


    Posts : 13475
    Points : 13515
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  PapaDragon Fri May 25, 2018 9:16 pm

    LMFS wrote:.....

    I have the suspicion that the T-50s were in Syria for longer than stated and were only removed when it was leaked or allowed to leak their presence there. This would have been a good test of their stealth on the one hand and a warning to hot heads on the other, what do you think?

    I would bet that 2 of them were there for a while and that news broke when second paid arrived and got filmed. They were all pulled out afterwards.

    As for this missile strike, this is officially first time we got to see bomb bay doors open.

    If it can hold 2 of these missiles in one internal bay than it means that it can carry 4 cruise missiles and 2 AA missiles all internally.

    Not bad at all. thumbsup


    Hole wrote:The were deployed without special hangars like the planes of some other countries.

    They are designed to operate in East European/Siberian weather. Compared to that Syrian desert is factory environment.
    LMFS
    LMFS


    Posts : 5169
    Points : 5165
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  LMFS Fri May 25, 2018 9:59 pm

    PapaDragon wrote:
    If it can hold 2 of these missiles in one internal bay than it means that it can carry 4 cruise missiles and 2 AA missiles all internally.

    Not bad at all. thumbsup
    Exactly.

    Forgot to say, but given it can supercruise it not doubles but multiplies by four times the bombing rate of a F-35... not to talk of stand-off range and survivability... it is only me or is this a massive advantage on the Russian side???
    ZoA
    ZoA


    Posts : 145
    Points : 147
    Join date : 2017-08-20

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  ZoA Sat May 26, 2018 11:50 am

    No way it can fit 4 Kh-59MK2 in that thing. Maybe 2 can fit, but my guess is most probably single heavy missiles like Kh-59 occupies entire central bay, so in addition to it it can carry only 2 more short range a-a missile in side bays for self defence.

    If they want to fit 4 bombs / missile in central bay they will most lilly use Kh-38 that are much shorter and could fit in.
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon


    Posts : 13475
    Points : 13515
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  PapaDragon Sat May 26, 2018 2:46 pm

    ZoA wrote:No way it can fit 4 Kh-59MK2 in that thing. Maybe 2 can fit, but my guess is most probably single heavy missiles like Kh-59 occupies entire central bay, so in addition to it it can carry only 2 more short range a-a missile in side bays for self defence.

    If they want to fit 4 bombs / missile in central bay they will most lilly use Kh-38 that are much shorter and could fit in.

    They definitely fit, have you even seen the video?

    Missile is designed from the get go to fit into weapons bay, one pair of missiles per bag, four total.

    Look at the photos from the missile and then look at photos of underside of the Su-57. They fit perfectly.

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 5506764_original

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 5506513_original
    LMFS
    LMFS


    Posts : 5169
    Points : 5165
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  LMFS Sat May 26, 2018 3:54 pm

    ZoA wrote:No way it can fit 4 Kh-59MK2 in that thing. Maybe 2 can fit, but my guess is most probably single heavy missiles like Kh-59 occupies entire central bay, so in addition to it it can carry only 2 more short range a-a missile in side bays for self defence.

    If they want to fit 4 bombs / missile in central bay they will most lilly use Kh-38 that are much shorter and could fit in.
    Agree with PapaDragon.

    All weapons designed for Su-57 are 420 x 40 x 40 cm. The MK2 has even recessed sections to accommodate wings and tail surfaces.
    The bays are 4.5 x 1 m, so it most probably can carry 4. No sense in designing the missile so carefully to stay within that 40 x 40 cm section if you are just going to carry one in a 1 m wide bay.
    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11603
    Points : 11571
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  Isos Sat May 26, 2018 5:00 pm

    The bays are 4.5 x 1 m, so it most probably can carry 4. No sense in designing the missile so carefully to stay within that 40 x 40 cm section if you are just going to carry one in a 1 m wide bay.

    Kh-38 are 4.2 x 0.31m and larger with wings so it can't carry more than 4 too just like kh-59 unless they make it smaller to have 3 per bays.

    They will need to work on weapons too. They have long range kh'59, smaller range kh-35U and they need a new kh-25/38 class misslle. And gliding bombs.
    LMFS
    LMFS


    Posts : 5169
    Points : 5165
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  LMFS Sat May 26, 2018 6:08 pm

    Isos wrote:Kh-38 are 4.2 x 0.31m and larger with wings so it can't carry more than 4 too just like kh-59 unless they make it smaller to have 3 per bays.

    They will need to work on weapons too. They have long range kh'59, smaller range kh-35U and they need a new kh-25/38 class misslle. And gliding bombs.
    Yes, aprox. 40 cm section appears to be the upper limit of what can be carried inside the bay, 3 x 31 cm + folding wings does not fit, besides clearances are needed.

    They have the -59, 35, 38, Groms, -58, KAB250 and 500... they are doing it properly, developing the weapons together with the carrier AFAIK thumbsup
    marcellogo
    marcellogo


    Posts : 680
    Points : 686
    Join date : 2012-08-02
    Age : 55
    Location : Italy

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  marcellogo Sat May 26, 2018 6:19 pm

    Isos wrote:
    The bays are 4.5 x 1 m, so it most probably can carry 4. No sense in designing the missile so carefully to stay within that 40 x 40 cm section if you are just going to carry one in a 1 m wide bay.

    Kh-38 are 4.2 x 0.31m and larger with wings so it can't carry more than 4 too just like kh-59 unless they make it smaller to have 3 per bays.

    They will need to work on weapons too. They have long range kh'59, smaller range kh-35U and they need a new kh-25/38 class misslle. And gliding bombs.

    0.31m+ 0.31m+ 0.31m= 0.93m i.e. by a narrow margin but they can fit, just need to carry the central one a little forward so that the wings didn't add to the total width...
    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11603
    Points : 11571
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  Isos Sat May 26, 2018 6:34 pm

    marcellogo wrote:
    Isos wrote:
    The bays are 4.5 x 1 m, so it most probably can carry 4. No sense in designing the missile so carefully to stay within that 40 x 40 cm section if you are just going to carry one in a 1 m wide bay.

    Kh-38 are 4.2 x 0.31m and larger with wings so it can't carry more than 4 too just like kh-59 unless they make it smaller to have 3 per bays.

    They will need to work on weapons too. They have long range kh'59, smaller range kh-35U and they need a new kh-25/38 class misslle. And gliding bombs.

    0.31m+ 0.31m+ 0.31m= 0.93m i.e. by a narrow margin but they can fit, just need to carry the central one a  little forward so that the wings didn't add to the total width...

    yeah but you can't just put them with only few cm between them. When released they could touch one another and destroy the aircraft. And that's if you don't take the wing into account. They have wingspan of 1.14 m.

    Wiki page says they have folding wings but yet it still adds some cm to the width so you still can't put 3 per bays.

    The best solution is to use the design of kh-59mk2.
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon


    Posts : 13475
    Points : 13515
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  PapaDragon Sat May 26, 2018 8:05 pm

    Isos wrote:
    marcellogo wrote:
    Isos wrote:
    The bays are 4.5 x 1 m, so it most probably can carry 4. No sense in designing the missile so carefully to stay within that 40 x 40 cm section if you are just going to carry one in a 1 m wide bay.

    Kh-38 are 4.2 x 0.31m and larger with wings so it can't carry more than 4 too just like kh-59 unless they make it smaller to have 3 per bays.

    They will need to work on weapons too. They have long range kh'59, smaller range kh-35U and they need a new kh-25/38 class misslle. And gliding bombs.

    0.31m+ 0.31m+ 0.31m= 0.93m i.e. by a narrow margin but they can fit, just need to carry the central one a  little forward so that the wings didn't add to the total width...

    yeah but you can't just put them with only few cm between them. When released they could touch one another and destroy the aircraft. And that's if you don't take the wing into account. They have wingspan of 1.14 m.

    Wiki page says they have folding wings but yet it still adds some cm to the width so you still can't put 3 per bays.

    The best solution is to use the design of kh-59mk2.

    In that case why did they make them so thin? Just make them wider with bigger payload and range.

    They fit side by side no problem.
    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11603
    Points : 11571
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  Isos Sat May 26, 2018 9:10 pm

    They can also carry them on the wings. They have 500+ range and they are stealth missile so they shouldn't increase su-57s rcs. They will launch them far away from the target and before than a potential interception happen.

    Btw su-57 is supposed to be able to carry 4 kh-58 so it should be able to carry 4 kh-59 too.

    Sponsored content


    PAK-FA, T-50: News #4 - Page 28 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sat Nov 23, 2024 8:32 am