Syrian War: News #14

calm wrote:Quneitra: Regime BMP destroyed at S. entrance of Baath City
BMP probably destroyed by IDF. Reports another Regime vehicle & a gun/cannon also targeted in Quneitra countryside.

franco wrote:Is the EU waking up?

https://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/article165905578/Trump-s-Red-Line.html

calm wrote:Reports of new Israel airstrike on SAA just now.

Less than 18 km to separate #Daesh in 2 sides , #SAA continue moving from #Raqqa towards #Ithriya after capture #Syriatel checkpoint.

Vann7 wrote:

Christoph Hörstel, Federal Chairman of the new political force in Germany: The "German Center" offers his respectful greetings to President Bashar al-Assad, the legitimate president of the Syrian Arabic Republic and to the dear Syrian people.

JohninMK wrote:

eehnie wrote:

PS: To take into account that according to himself, he is an US soldier working in Syria. Saying us "the prettiest secrets of the US military forces in Syira", and still not in the jail.

Am pretty sure he has not said that. You might prove me wrong but I am pretty sure he has never said who he works for. He could be an in country contractor working for who knows who. There are a few options there.

I find his posts interesting, not sure why he is here, it could be for disinformation, but as his stuff is pretty low level and this is a fairly obscure Russian site, it seems unlikely.

SeigSoloyvov wrote:United States.

This will likely be my last post here for a while.

eehnie wrote:

JohninMK wrote:

eehnie wrote:

PS: To take into account that according to himself, he is an US soldier working in Syria. Saying us "the prettiest secrets of the US military forces in Syira", and still not in the jail.

Am pretty sure he has not said that. You might prove me wrong but I am pretty sure he has never said who he works for. He could be an in country contractor working for who knows who. There are a few options there.

I find his posts interesting, not sure why he is here, it could be for disinformation, but as his stuff is pretty low level and this is a fairly obscure Russian site, it seems unlikely.

Fairly wrong.

https://www.russiadefence.net/t6442p200-syrian-civil-war-news-13#195520

SeigSoloyvov wrote:United States.

This will likely be my last post here for a while.

OminousSpudd wrote:I'm wondering if the IAF should suffer a sudden and mysterious loss of an aircraft. Israel is like the little prick who thinks he's Mr. Tough, until he gets belted for six by the principal.

SeigSoloyvov wrote:

eehnie wrote:

JohninMK wrote:

eehnie wrote:

PS: To take into account that according to himself, he is an US soldier working in Syria. Saying us "the prettiest secrets of the US military forces in Syira", and still not in the jail.

Am pretty sure he has not said that. You might prove me wrong but I am pretty sure he has never said who he works for. He could be an in country contractor working for who knows who. There are a few options there.

I find his posts interesting, not sure why he is here, it could be for disinformation, but as his stuff is pretty low level and this is a fairly obscure Russian site, it seems unlikely.

Fairly wrong.

https://www.russiadefence.net/t6442p200-syrian-civil-war-news-13#195520

SeigSoloyvov wrote:United States.

This will likely be my last post here for a while.

Now now I do not post "classified" things, in fact, I have said anything I post here is no grand secret and can be confirmed fairly easy. What you are basically saying Mr. Armchair Expert is that I am feeding super secret stuff when really I post super low-level shit that doesn't violate any terms of my contract.

Are you truly so full of yourself you think I would risk my ass? cute.

Now if I was posting...aircraft flight plan data, or intelligence data (in current operations). Sure then you would have a point, Yes I work for the United States, I said that in my first post here. I never said in what way nor do I plan to. so please enjoy your half-baked assumptions.

Because....get this buddy I give a rats butt what an armchair expert thinks~. Now if this bothers you, I easily stop posting here. I wanted to make this clear to you just once.

kvs wrote:

calm wrote:Quneitra: Regime BMP destroyed at S. entrance of Baath City
BMP probably destroyed by IDF. Reports another Regime vehicle & a gun/cannon also targeted in Quneitra countryside.

When dealing with a foreign sponsored regime change operation using head-chopping Wahabbi maggots against a duly elected
and popular government, we need to use the term "regime" to describe the government and "rebels" to describe the Wahabbis.
Take this propaganda drivel elsewhere.

JohninMK wrote:

SeigSoloyvov wrote:

eehnie wrote:

JohninMK wrote:

eehnie wrote:

PS: To take into account that according to himself, he is an US soldier working in Syria. Saying us "the prettiest secrets of the US military forces in Syira", and still not in the jail.

Am pretty sure he has not said that. You might prove me wrong but I am pretty sure he has never said who he works for. He could be an in country contractor working for who knows who. There are a few options there.

I find his posts interesting, not sure why he is here, it could be for disinformation, but as his stuff is pretty low level and this is a fairly obscure Russian site, it seems unlikely.

Fairly wrong.

https://www.russiadefence.net/t6442p200-syrian-civil-war-news-13#195520

SeigSoloyvov wrote:United States.

This will likely be my last post here for a while.

Now now I do not post "classified" things, in fact, I have said anything I post here is no grand secret and can be confirmed fairly easy. What you are basically saying Mr. Armchair Expert is that I am feeding super secret stuff when really I post super low-level shit that doesn't violate any terms of my contract.

Are you truly so full of yourself you think I would risk my ass? cute.

Now if I was posting...aircraft flight plan data, or intelligence data (in current operations). Sure then you would have a point, Yes I work for the United States, I said that in my first post here. I never said in what way nor do I plan to. so please enjoy your half-baked assumptions.

Because....get this buddy I give a rats butt what an armchair expert thinks~. Now if this bothers you, I easily stop posting here. I wanted to make this clear to you just once.

Excellent response. Ignore him, keep the words coming.

So eehie, for the avoidance of doubt (in case you don't know, that is a powerful legal phrase in English Law), as you clearly have a limited grasp of the finer points of English and Seig clearly has much better things to do than piss in the wind with you whilst I, as a retired person with time to kill doesn't, am going to spell out to you in words of one syllable what he just said on the key point.

Seig said this in his second, expanded, comment "Yes I work for the United States, I said that in my first post here. I never said in what way nor do I plan to." Whilst that does not exclude the possibility, it does not in any way state that he is, as you potentially slanderously and dangerously for him put it, a US soldier.

I said "You might prove me wrong but I am pretty sure he has never said who he works for. He could be an in country contractor working for who knows who. There are a few options there." which by not excluding US soldiering is pretty much spot on.

Please eehie do not argue with English speakers who may have a better grasp of the language than you, unless you are on much stronger grounds than this. But more important than that I would suggest that you do not make accusations that can put fellow posters at risk.

Anyway, that is me done on this subject too.