Talking bollocks thread

Walther von Oldenburg wrote:Huntington mistakes the effect for the cause. Superiority in tech was the factor that allowed Europeans to win over large parts of the world.

Walther von Oldenburg wrote:Tech was the reason Europe "won" the world. Huntington was just a political scientist and not an expert in history of science and technology.

Werewolf wrote:Nothing of what Samual Huntington said goes against history, he is absolutley correct with what he said but appareantly we have a xenophobic here.

The fact I list are all real, then it is the facts others are more ruthless than whites, such as mongols, Japanese.

sepheronx wrote:Why post it then other than to degrade this thread? Daily beast? It is a known tabloid in UK.

KoTeMoRe wrote:Oh God it's Davis Axe, the guy who writes more shit than an Indian Al you can eat buffet could eve dream of inducing.

Guy from War Is Boring...

GarryB wrote:Why did you post that flamebait bullshit here Militarov?

Militarov wrote:

GarryB wrote:Why did you post that flamebait bullshit here Militarov?

Because its related to the topic? Or we are allowed to post only stuff that exclusively everyone likes? Or from the authors that must be "pro-Russian" ?

I never said i agree with a guy, he had few on spot comments, some utter BS, but i dont see problem with sharing it, its Forum.                                            

OminousSpudd wrote:

Militarov wrote:

GarryB wrote:Why did you post that flamebait bullshit here Militarov?

Because its related to the topic? Or we are allowed to post only stuff that exclusively everyone likes? Or from the authors that must be "pro-Russian" ?

I never said i agree with a guy, he had few on spot comments, some utter BS, but i dont see problem with sharing it, its Forum.                                            

"A few on spot comments." Wut. Literally nothing in that article had any bearing on reality...

GarryB wrote:Don't try to pull that shit on me... you know full well I accept all sorts of criticism of Russian equipment when it has merit.

This is just flamebait dirt as I said.

You don't have a right to post anything you like on this forum, this is not a democracy.

The criteria for posting is not just being on topic... you can add value with information or you can ask questions or discuss things on topic.

What I don't want to see is members digging up horseshit from crappy websites and posting it here like it is worth reading.

I know some members like to post this sort of crap and enjoy seeing it ripped to shreds, but I expect better from you.

How would you like the serbian threads polluted with the memoires of Madeline Allbright... posting her opinion on all things Balkans?  It would be on topic... it would also be bullshit.

The reason we don't is respect for Serbian members and respect for common sense and manners.

Please return that respect and don't post this sort of rubbish here again.

Book. wrote: David axe. Ba English degree..
No technic. No army. No science study

Only stopid blogger

You know that on this forum have members that are flooding your threads with shit, BS, insults, sourceless posts, trolling, made up shit, fake "RUSSIA LOST ANOTHER BOMBER IN HOMS" news and what not. Posters with multiple accounts some of which are even one "Forum contributors" pulling your nose around.

... and you instead dealing with all that decide to pick up on me at least once in two weeks coz i posted something from a source you consider as not worthy? And in post i more than clearly expressed my skepticism towards some of the claims from the article?

Now i am wondering are you trying to make me leave this forum? Coz if its the latter one i am out in a moment i am not getting paid here or anything there are places on this dear World Wide Web where i am very well respected and understood and not getting trolled by forum staff like i am 13 years old World of Tank player.

That article was clicked more times than any article on PAK-FA written in last 6 months hands down. Isnt it sort of "smart" to read the damn thing so you know what "other side" (however stupid that sounds) is claiming?

I shall repeat this once more, as i did already few times, read what i post, if you dont like it, block me... if you want.. ban me, but seriously do not force some shit on me that makes very little sense whatsoever + ppl like Vann, Solc, ult and few others are raping your threads with BS that DOES NOT EVEN HAVE A SOURCE.

You know already what you can expect from DailyBeast and War is Boring, doesnt mean there are not some nice stuff there between "Russia sucks" and "Putin is Evil" lines.

The T-50—Russia’s answer to the U.S. Air Force’s F-22—is far from war-ready. Indeed, the twin-engine, radar-evading warplane is suffering such serious design, quality-control, and financing problems that it might never enter frontline service in large numbers.

But the cash injection was short-lived—and could only do so much good, anyway, considering the deplorable condition of the Russian aerospace industry. The air force managed to repair hundreds of Soviet-era aircraft and buy additional hundreds of new planes. But the “new” planes are, in fact, almost all upgraded versions of Soviet-vintage jets. While Russian industry has devised new radars and missiles, the T-50 is one of Russia’s few truly new airframe designs—and it’s a mess.

Specially shaped to avoid detection by radar, the T-50 shares the powerful engines, sensors, and missiles of older Russian warplanes.

India had offered to co-develop the T-50 and buy scores of copies. But in 2014, Indian officials blah blah blah...

By comparison, the U.S. Air Force possesses more than 180 F-22s

The Russian planes have flown hundreds of missions, targeting ISIS fighters, U.S.-backed moderate rebels and even civilians in rebel-held territory.

Not only is the Russian air force indiscriminately bombing civilians in Syria...

The costly Syria intervention has all but maxed out Russia’s capacity for aerial warfare. True, on paper the Kremlin possesses nearly 3,000 military aircraft. But even after Putin’s reforms, only a few hundred of the planes and helicopters are fully modern. Experienced pilots are in even shorter supply.  

In mid-2014, Moscow had a choice. It could expand its annexation of Crimea to include a direct attack on eastern Ukraine—an assault that would have required heavy air support. Or the Russian government could, as tradition dictated, plan for the annual Victory Day parade that, every May 9, commemorates the Soviet Union’s defeat of Nazi Germany—and includes a huge flyover of Moscow involving up to a hundred military aircraft, with scores more waiting nearby as back-ups in case some planes or copters break down.

The flyover required months of preparation and rehearsal—and effectively precluded another war. “From the beginning of intensive training, there was little capacity left for a military intervention,” Stefan Buettner wrote in Combat Aircraft, a trade magazine.

GarryB wrote:

You know that on this forum have members that are flooding your threads with shit, BS, insults, sourceless posts, trolling, made up shit, fake "RUSSIA LOST ANOTHER BOMBER IN HOMS" news and what not. Posters with multiple accounts some of which are even one "Forum contributors" pulling your nose around.

So your first argument is everyone else is doing it... not a good start.

... and you instead dealing with all that decide to pick up on me at least once in two weeks coz i posted something from a source you consider as not worthy? And in post i more than clearly expressed my skepticism towards some of the claims from the article?

So your second argument is that I am picking on you.

Perhaps instead of scepticism, perhaps not posting crap would have been a better move?

Now i am wondering are you trying to make me leave this forum? Coz if its the latter one i am out in a moment i am not getting paid here or anything there are places on this dear World Wide Web where i am very well respected and understood and not getting trolled by forum staff like i am 13 years old World of Tank player.

If I did not respect you I would have let your stupid post pass... and BTW I have the tools to make any member leave this forum if I choose... and I is something I choose not to use unless absolutely necessary.

That article was clicked more times than any article on PAK-FA written in last 6 months hands down. Isnt it sort of "smart" to read the damn thing so you know what "other side" (however stupid that sounds) is claiming?

Couldn't give a shit what that dork thinks about the PAK FA. Not interested.

I shall repeat this once more, as i did already few times, read what i post, if you dont like it, block me... if you want.. ban me, but seriously do not force some shit on me that makes very little sense whatsoever + ppl like Vann, Solc, ult and few others are raping your threads with BS that DOES NOT EVEN HAVE A SOURCE.

The source in this case is an asshole... I would rather read a members uneducated opinion than this dribble.

You know already what you can expect from DailyBeast and War is Boring, doesnt mean there are not some nice stuff there between "Russia sucks" and "Putin is Evil" lines.

So exactly what part of this bilge is nice stuff?

What has it brought to this thread that is new?

What value has it added to this thread?

This post and most of the posts before it have added nothing to this thread except wasted some bandwidth... say what you want to say... tomorrow when I log on I am going to remove these posts.