Non-sense on russian military equipment

One time I decided to check it out, expecting a generally low level of discourse but some good discussion that aren't biased, since 4chan contains mostly people who don't buy their government's propaganda. Boy was I wrong. The place has hundreds of magnitudes higher pro-western bias than F-16.net. If you post even anything slightly positive or neutral about Russian or Chinese weapons other than AKs, you'll immediately be called a paid Russian troll(so much for western contrarians not buying their news). The people there have such an almost genocidal hatred of "slavshits" that its it seems like a neocon echo chamber, quite unusual for most 4chan boards.

Wait are you saying you went on bloody 4chan for serious discussion? Seriously you went on a forum known for illogical and deranged content that evolved from a bloody weebsite for serious discussion about the Russian military of all things what is wrong with you?

The-thing-next-door wrote:Wait are you saying you went on bloody 4chan for serious discussion? Seriously you went on a forum known for illogical and deranged content that evolved from a bloody weebsite for serious discussion about the Russian military of all things what is wrong with you?

I never went there for serious discussion. I wanted to check if there was even some semblance of unbiased, if simplistic discussion.

KomissarBojanchev wrote:

The-thing-next-door wrote:Wait are you saying you went on bloody 4chan for serious discussion? Seriously you went on a forum known for illogical and deranged content that evolved from a bloody weebsite for serious discussion about the Russian military of all things what is wrong with you?

I never went there for serious discussion. I wanted to check if there was even some semblance of unbiased, if simplistic discussion.

I have never actauly visited that site myself What kind of people are on it?

The-thing-next-door wrote:

I have never actauly visited that site myself What kind of people are on it?

Pedophiles and people too broke to pay for porn.

Vladimir79 wrote:

The-thing-next-door wrote:

I have never actauly visited that site myself What kind of people are on it?

Pedophiles and people too broke to pay for porn.

A lot of good porn is free anyway.

I am probably glad that I never visited.

Does anyone know what the origin of the site was the word "chan" seems to imply anime?

Anyway if what you say is true maby some internet censorship is in order?

The-thing-next-door wrote:I am probably glad that I never visited.

Does anyone know what the origin of the site was the word "chan" seems to imply anime?

Anyway if what you say is true maby some internet censorship is in order?

The "chan" is for channel. Back in the day chat channels were popular. But the format really
was only suited for ADD retards since all you have is a chaotic stream of snippy exchanges without
any serious text on anything. Think of skater dweebs talking trash at the kerb and showing
off to each other by annoying the residents of the street.

miketheterrible wrote:

A lot of good porn is free anyway.

Not the kind of garbage they look for.

The site is based upon a popular Japanese board that was of a similar fashion many many years ago. As Vlad stated, it's a degenerate board with it's issues. I used to visit it in terms of ck (cooking) and v (video games) but the other boards like B and alike are just outright disgusting and ridiculous. Because people are "anonymous" they think it's alright to post ridiculous crap like porn or gore.

I wouldn't venture there to be honest. It's all just garbage. If you are interested in just weapons, firearms blog is good enough.

Oh, now site is hosted to a lot of pro Nazi garbage too.

I whould have thought that Nazis although hypocirtical would not be that hypocritical as the Nazis are supposed to view themselvs as superior.

To be ohnest I prefer Nazi commonters to pro western ones as the Nazis are typically less annoying and I find their whining about how their plan for a "better world" was crushed by the Soviets and how "unfairly" treated they are rather amusing but then agin maby its just me.

Pro western commenters are just annoying retards that bring up truckloads of bullshit in an argument and cannot be persauded by anything and don't get me started on thier arrogance. They also have the habit of poluting eavery single English speaking pro Russian sector of the internet with their crap.

But anyway who do you think is worse?

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/21/russian-missile-with-unlimited-range-crashed-after-only-22-miles.html?__source=sharebar|twitter&par=sharebar

Arrow wrote:https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/21/russian-missile-with-unlimited-range-crashed-after-only-22-miles.html?__source=sharebar|twitter&par=sharebar

Nice of you to post CNBC link in attempt to give it some veneer of credibility but this story originally appeared on Business Insider (AKA Daily Bullshit)

So, marks for effort but overall F nonetheless

PapaDragon wrote:

Arrow wrote:https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/21/russian-missile-with-unlimited-range-crashed-after-only-22-miles.html?__source=sharebar|twitter&par=sharebar

Nice of you to post CNBC link in attempt to give it some veneer of credibility but this story originally appeared on Business Insider (AKA Daily Bullshit)

So, marks for effort but overall F nonetheless

Every new weapon during its tests has something going wrong. There was a report of anormal radiations in europe last year, it could be this. That just proves that they successfully designed the missile and are testing it inflight. So they are close to finish the work if they haven't alredy finished it.

Btw, I'm not saying the source or the info are saying the truth.

CNBC. Isn´t Rachel Madcow working there?

Arrow wrote:https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/21/russian-missile-with-unlimited-range-crashed-after-only-22-miles.html?__source=sharebar|twitter&par=sharebar

So what is the source again? Oh yeah, not one mentioned. Wonder why? Oh, and evidence of such is also none.

But keep parading American propaganda with no evidence and no names given. Lol

miketheterrible wrote:

Arrow wrote:https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/21/russian-missile-with-unlimited-range-crashed-after-only-22-miles.html?__source=sharebar|twitter&par=sharebar

So what is the source again? Oh yeah, not one mentioned. Wonder why? Oh, and evidence of such is also none.

But keep parading American propaganda with no evidence and no names given. Lol

Karl Rove was one of the first hints that the US regime has entered an infantilism stage. They really believe that they
can create reality through the force of their will. Fantasy projection and wishful thinking in the US dominated western
media is the norm now.

Reality and wishful thinking-originated propaganda cannot cohesist in western media those days.

Obviously ,to the exact contrary of what spread-out in those trash publications the groups of weapons systems presented in Federation's President speech (representing only a fraction of the most cutting edge domestic systems, without any foreign counterpart, now in different degree of development) has been all repeatedly successfully tested since several years by now.

About the weapon in question first successful tests begin a decade ago......


https://riafan.ru/1059313-eto-ikh-i-besit-klincevich-oproverg-utverzhdeniya-ssha-o-yakoby-neudachnykh-ispytaniyakh-rossiiskikh-raket

Where can we know more about the other cutting Edge systems...?

Send your questions to wladimir-putin@kremlin.ru.

Some russian expert said on Sputnik that this media morons probably confused some throw or drop tests with real engine tests.

dino00 wrote:Where can we know more about the other cutting Edge systems...?

Putin had no intention of giving away every state secret to wake up the morons running NATO. Western arrogance
about its innate intellectual superiority over Russians is going to come back and bite it in the ass, and hard. History
has established this pattern and no amount of pathetic appeals to General Winter can hide it.

Hole wrote:Send your questions to wladimir-putin@kremlin.ru.

Some russian expert said on Sputnik that this media morons probably confused some throw or drop tests with real engine tests.

This is one of those usual PR crap dumpings designed to relax the victims population. Same as ABM myth.

What Russia should do once this thing is up an running full time is to strap air traffic transponder on it and send it to do several laps over Central Pacific to drill the concept into people's heads before controlled descent back in the Arctic.

NORAD can do a live broadcast just like with Santa during Christmas.

Mindstorm wrote:
Reality and wishful thinking-originated propaganda cannot cohesist in western media those days.

Obviously ,to the exact contrary of what spread-out in those trash publications the groups of weapons systems presented in Federation's President speech (representing only a fraction of the most cutting edge domestic systems, without any foreign counterpart, now in different degree of development) has been all repeatedly successfully tested since several years by now.

About the weapon in question first successful tests begin a decade ago......


https://riafan.ru/1059313-eto-ikh-i-besit-klincevich-oproverg-utverzhdeniya-ssha-o-yakoby-neudachnykh-ispytaniyakh-rossiiskikh-raket

Thats nice