How is it bullshit?
What can ISIS do when USA decides to go full genocidal? I tell you, nothing.
You are claiming the US is omnipotent and always gets it way... it can't even make Mexico build a wall for goodness sake, and while it can expertly bomb and attack and destroy most countries, the truth of the matter is that they simply can't do that to most countries... only the small weak ones.
The US wanted to keep Vietnam out of the sphere of the Soviets and communist Chinese... and they failed... they wanted north korea to be controlled by south korea and they failed. They failed in Cuba and Venezuela and Somalia and an enormous number of times in Iraq... but now that they won they have lost there too because the majority are not anti Iranian like they are... in fact the US had more in common with Saddam in terms of local politics in the region than they have with the people that are in power now.... only a matter of time... and of course Syria and Libya are both shitholes and largely anti US shitholes now too... just like Afghanistan...
Even pro America Pakistan is no longer a friend of the US...
There are probably more small countries hostile to the US than there are pro right now.... and the recent voting on the islands the Brits stole off the coast of India shows... over 116 countries voted against the US and UK and 70 abstensions... this is almost 30 years after the end of the cold war... it is supposed to be all peace and love now isn't it? The fruits of peace should be booming economies for everyone... the peace dividend... but it never came... just more petty little wars...
Humans are quite good in erasing evry single specimen bigger than a mouse in a certain region.
Never happened... even testing nuclear weapons they evacuated populations, but they have never gone full nazi and tried to exterminate a group of people, though the Israelis are giving it a damn good go of course.
That's true Garry, but MONEY TALKS. How do you fight a country that is more richer than you are ?
Money does talk and so does prosecution for bribery and a ban on secrecy laws for the finances of all political figures so you know exactly where the money comes from. Make sure there are no donations to political figures... allocate each party guaranteed time on all media, with clear and open rules so the rich don't get more air time and the poor don't get no air time. It is not that hard. Ban financial contributions to politicians or their families... that is corruption and collusion.
Have you noticed that in all Western democracies the party that is more rich, generally wins.
Support from media moguls certainly seems to help... especially the air time you get and the negative air time your opponents get, though it did not work against Trump... but these people in their ivory towers don't understand most people... our politicians have people talking in their ears... ban semi automatic rifles and there will be no gun crime because people who like semi automatic guns are the killers that kill people so take away their guns and they will be frustrated but disarmed. Of course most of the people who like and own semi automatic guns are not criminals, while the people who go on rampages often don't actually like guns but see them as a means to do what they want, which is to get famous by getting a kill count... 10 minutes of fame.
In western democracies where the laws allow enormous donations to be anonymous or not registered, and you can donate to anyone... which basically means you can buy anyone... is very undemocratic. These people are not curing cancer. Donations are not to help Schools or Orphanages or animal welfare groups feed stray animals... this is all corruption pure and simple and it is not only tolerated in the US it is encouraged.
How many people living in a trailer park in the US because they can't afford a normal house could do with a $50,000 donation? I would say most of them.
If US, UK, France, China has to invade a country they will spend billions of $$ to buy several locals, organizations in those countries. Then use these locals, organizations against their own country.
So the key is to monitor this, confiscate the money and put the people in prison as foreign agents, and then evict the diplomats from the country of origin.
I would also separate the Chinese from the others... the others will generally bribe a government official to win a tender they wouldn't otherwise win or change a law so they can treat local workers like shit with no chance of legal action no matter what they do.
From what I have seen the Chinese invest in the local economy and upgrade local infrastructure, like building roads and schools and hospitals and doing things you thought the west was doing but they weren't really... they were just screwing the locals.
The Chinese certainly wont over pay the locals but they seem to give them a much better deal than the west and very much most important, they don't tell the locals what laws they need to change... in other words they don't demand the locals act more like they do...
The western countries will demand things from the locals but wont pay a living wage or promote workers rights or health and safety or anything that might benefit the locals and cost them more.
An African minor might find a nugget of gold or diamond and the western company might give him $10 for it... in a market in London they will get hundreds of thousands of dollars for that nugget but the guy who found it gets a pittance...
These days you hear in western circles about fair prices being paid for resources, but it is all talk most of the time... big companies go to these poor countries because they know they can get cheap labour and exploit the workers... that isn't going to change, but if China and Russia start sharing the wealth with those that are creating it it means it is much more likely they will get contracts over the western companies who steal...
And the west will be forced to use Americas current tactics to get access to markets and deal with competition... it started with the Ukraine... the coup in the Ukraine was because the anti Russian Ukrainian leader was going to go with the Russian/Chinese deal and not the EU deal and that was simply because the EU deal was shit. It has continued from there and they are only hurting themselves.... so let them keep doing it... don't stop them, and don't point out their error because it is making them look bad and weakens their position to continue this way.
Home
Latest images
Register
Log in
