GarryB Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:09 am
They need aircraft carriers for precisely nothing.
Of course.
They can just rely on their western allies for support... the world policeman America will always have their back... their navy is special and does not need air support.
Their Army has developed assuming it does not and will not have control of the air, their navy has developed along the same way... yet they still have an air component in their Army and their Navy and they also have an Air Force... but missiles and UAVs will do everything in the future and they wont need aircraft...
The British made that mistake... thinking they could have a swing wing interceptor and a swing wing strike aircraft and a VSTOL fighter, but of course they would only have the VSTOL fighter operating after the first week because all the runways would be destroyed, while Harriers will operate from Mall carparks.
Bloodhound missiles will clear the skies of enemy air power...
The result is that their current fighter, the Typhoon, is not even ready yet as a fully multirole aircraft... EFA started development in the 1990s... so your super new STOVL fighters might get onboard ships by about 2040... by then they will be too late.
In fact icebreakers are the best example of why ships need aircraft... they can scout ahead and look for easier passages in the iceflow...
Actually I would say an ideal weapon for an icebreaker would be a 240mm mortar for cracking thick ice...