Amidst fears of Russia invading Ukraine, the USAF sent a dozen 5th Generation fighter aircraft to Europe.
On the afternoon of 16 February 2022, twelve Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning IIs from the 34th Fighter Squadron arrived at Spangdahlem air base (Germany).
Based at Hill AFB (UT), the 34th Fighter Squadron, named the Rude Rams, were taken from the USAF's toolbox when additional forces are required for a designated Lead Wing, also known as Lead Wings in Extremis.
USA 34th FS patch 320Recently, the 388th Fighter Wing with its squadrons, including the 34th FS, were assigned to provide enabling requirements when needed.
At this moment Scramble Magazine assesses that Spangdahlem's 52nd Fighter Wing has become the lead wing. It is not known how long the Hill based F-35As will stay or even if they will stay at Spangdahlem. We assess that his will depend on further developments in Ukraine
+71
diabetus
billybatts91
Big_Gazza
nomadski
thegopnik
The-thing-next-door
Rodion_Romanovic
walle83
Belisarius
TMA1
Arkanghelsk
Podlodka77
AZ-5
lyle6
RTN
zepia
ALAMO
GreyHog
Finty
lancelot
Backman
miketheterrible
mnztr
Arrow
kvs
jhelb
LMFS
Hole
Isos
d_taddei2
PapaDragon
Odin of Ossetia
airstrike
OminousSpudd
Walther von Oldenburg
Solncepek
JohninMK
Werewolf
Kyo
AlfaT8
AirCargo
sepheronx
max steel
nemrod
victor1985
magnumcromagnon
andalusia
Airbornewolf
ATošić
higurashihougi
Hannibal Barca
Mike E
TR1
Sujoy
Mindstorm
Russian Patriot
medo
IronsightSniper
SOC
GarryB
KamovHelicopter
Viktor
nightcrawler
ahmedfire
NationalRus
solo.13mmfmj
milky_candy_sugar
Jelena
Vladislav
Turk1
Admin
75 posters
US Air Force: Discussion and News
Finty- Posts : 539
Points : 545
Join date : 2021-02-10
Location : Great Britain
- Post n°476
Rude Rams deployed to Europe
https://www.scramble.nl/military-news/rude-rams-deployed-to-europe
GarryB- Posts : 40489
Points : 40989
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°477
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
Sent them to Germany?
Probably expecting to use them against Kaliningrad in a little tit for tat land grab if things get nasty?
This could spread very rapidly if western powers don't take this seriously.
Probably expecting to use them against Kaliningrad in a little tit for tat land grab if things get nasty?
This could spread very rapidly if western powers don't take this seriously.
lancelot- Posts : 3139
Points : 3135
Join date : 2020-10-18
- Post n°478
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
GarryB wrote:Probably expecting to use them against Kaliningrad in a little tit for tat land grab if things get nasty?
If NATO tries to take Kaliningrad the Baltics are gonski.
GarryB and Hole like this post
Arkanghelsk- Posts : 3899
Points : 3905
Join date : 2021-12-08
- Post n°479
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
They cant take kaliningrad or even use those F35s with the new S400s now sitting at Grodno and Minsk , Belarus changes the operational picture of eastern and even central europe
GarryB and magnumcromagnon like this post
GarryB- Posts : 40489
Points : 40989
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°480
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
You two know that, and I know that, but do western politicians actually believe the BS they spread or do they understand this too?
Isos- Posts : 11593
Points : 11561
Join date : 2015-11-06
- Post n°481
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
lancelot wrote:GarryB wrote:Probably expecting to use them against Kaliningrad in a little tit for tat land grab if things get nasty?
If NATO tries to take Kaliningrad the Baltics are gonski.
London and Washington are also gonski. They weren't testing their nuks today for a firework sow.
GarryB and owais.usmani like this post
PapaDragon- Posts : 13463
Points : 13503
Join date : 2015-04-26
Location : Fort Evil, Serbia
- Post n°482
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
lancelot wrote:GarryB wrote:Probably expecting to use them against Kaliningrad in a little tit for tat land grab if things get nasty?
If NATO tries to take Kaliningrad the Baltics are gonski.
Entire European continent is gonski and that's just the warning salvo
Kaliningrad isn't Tartus or Karabah, it's Russian territory
GarryB, Hole and owais.usmani like this post
George1- Posts : 18510
Points : 19013
Join date : 2011-12-22
Location : Greece
- Post n°483
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
The first Boeing T-7A training aircraft of an experimental batch for the US Air Force was built
lancelot likes this post
TMA1- Posts : 1191
Points : 1189
Join date : 2020-11-30
- Post n°484
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
Hideous. Doesnt deserve to take the place of the lovely northrop t-38 talon. Ruskies now have the sexiest trainer aircraft. Used to be the opposite and we had the fairest gem while ruskies had the ugly czech l-29.
lancelot- Posts : 3139
Points : 3135
Join date : 2020-10-18
- Post n°485
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
Calling it a Boeing is a bit of a stretch though. It was designed by SAAB. It is basically a neutered cost reduced Gripen and even uses the same engine. Supposedly the avionics are based on the ones on the Gripen as well.
GarryB likes this post
GarryB- Posts : 40489
Points : 40989
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°486
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
Their efforts to create something new and great have not gone well.... F-22 and F-35... so maybe a little off the shelf mature design (F-15 and perhaps modified new build F-16) is what they need going forward.
I mean going all Star Trek is fine, but for most jobs older aircraft could already do the job just fine.
Personally the prettiest LIFT I have seen is the Rafale... yeah I know it is supposed to be a fighter but it is so small and that fixed inflight refuelling probe makes it look like a LIFT.
(Have always had a soft spot for the F-5 and though the F-20 should have done much better than it did... it could have been a KISS light cheap simple fighter with AAMs and a good cannon... the FSW F-29 looked interesting too... with the paddles thrust vectoring...)
I mean going all Star Trek is fine, but for most jobs older aircraft could already do the job just fine.
Personally the prettiest LIFT I have seen is the Rafale... yeah I know it is supposed to be a fighter but it is so small and that fixed inflight refuelling probe makes it look like a LIFT.
(Have always had a soft spot for the F-5 and though the F-20 should have done much better than it did... it could have been a KISS light cheap simple fighter with AAMs and a good cannon... the FSW F-29 looked interesting too... with the paddles thrust vectoring...)
TMA1 likes this post
Belisarius- Posts : 860
Points : 860
Join date : 2022-01-04
- Post n°487
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
out of 186 F-22 Raptor fighters, only about 93 are ready to fly at any time...
https://topwar.ru/198538-parni-na-chem-voevat-budete.html
https://topwar.ru/198538-parni-na-chem-voevat-budete.html
GarryB, zardof and Hole like this post
TMA1- Posts : 1191
Points : 1189
Join date : 2020-11-30
- Post n°488
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
Me too bro. As a kid the f-5 was my favorite. I used to hate Russian fighters as a kid, now they are my obsession. We used to make such lovely fighters like the f-104, f-105... damn thing looked like a cadillac with wings I love it. Our last glory was the teen fighters.
GarryB- Posts : 40489
Points : 40989
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°489
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
I used to hate Russian fighters as a kid, now they are my obsession.
I used to find some Soviet fighters a bit boring... the tubes with wings like the MiG-15/17/19/21 and Su-7/9/11/17/22, and even the Tu-128 and Tu-95, but that was probably because that was all we really saw most of the time. The Su-15 is a pretty plane and in many ways looks like a super F-5...
As an adult I have learned to appreciate more aircraft for what they do... the An-2 for instance... first flight in 1949 and still a very good aircraft for the job... if they found a warehouse with brand new aircraft you could continue to use them another 70 years because they are simple and cheap with astounding flight performance. In a strong headwind they can almost hover above one point on the ground.
The MiG-25 is just the other end of the spectrum and is a rocket ship.
TMA1 likes this post
JohninMK- Posts : 15594
Points : 15735
Join date : 2015-06-16
Location : England
- Post n°490
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
By Ryan Finnerty7 July 2022
Save article
The US Air Force (USAF) is partnering with the UK’s Reaction Engines to improve the performance of hypersonic and near-hypersonic engines.
The partnership between the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) and Oxfordshire-based Reaction will focus expanding the performance envelope of a cooling technology that enables high-Mach engines to function more efficiently, the company says on 7 July.
J79 and GSE
Source: Reaction Engines
Reaction Engines has been testing its hypersonic cooling system in Colorado using a GE Aviation J79 turbojet engine, which formerly powered the Vietnam-era McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom
Reaction Engines specialises in developing methods for managing the build-up of heat in a variety of aerospace functions, including hypersonic-capable engines. That is generally defined as flight at speeds of Mach 5 (6,174 km/h) or above.
Although the US military typically develops sensitive new technologies with domestic companies, the Defense Department’s Foreign Comparative Testing (FCT) programme provides a path for non-US companies with ground-breaking technology to work with the Pentagon.
“FCT demonstrates US commitment to a ‘two-way street’ for defence procurements with both allied and friendly nations,” says USAF FCT manager William Reed. “Reaction Engines technology is world-class and is a great fit for the FCT programme.”
The company is developing the Synthetic Air Breathing Rocket Engine (SABRE), which Reaction says can function at speeds in excess of M5.
Key to the operation of SABRE at hypersonic speeds is a proprietary coolant system, known as precooler, which can rapidly reduce the temperature of intake air from 1,000°C (1,832°F) to ambient levels, according to Reaction.
The company says SABRE has the potential to provide air-breathing thrust from standstill on the runway to speeds more than five times the speed of sound in the atmosphere. The engine also has potential applications in space propulsion.
Individual components of the engine have been successfully demonstrated on the ground.
The latest test programme aims to further expand upon those capabilities. Reaction says the goal is to increase the delivered air mass flow rate of its cooling system, which it the company hopes “will result in a three-fold increase in the total energy transfer”.
Andrew Piotti, Reaction’s US engineering manager, says if the new test programme goes well, the precooler technology could help boost the performance of existing jet engines
“The exciting outcome that I am looking forward to over the coming weeks is the validation that our technology could enable current jet engines to operate from takeoff up through Mach 4 and beyond,” Piotti says.
Reaction Engines has been conducting research testing at the Colorado Air and Space Port near Denver.
https://www.flightglobal.com/engines/us-air-force-partners-with-reaction-engines-on-high-mach-engine-testing/149320.article
Save article
The US Air Force (USAF) is partnering with the UK’s Reaction Engines to improve the performance of hypersonic and near-hypersonic engines.
The partnership between the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) and Oxfordshire-based Reaction will focus expanding the performance envelope of a cooling technology that enables high-Mach engines to function more efficiently, the company says on 7 July.
J79 and GSE
Source: Reaction Engines
Reaction Engines has been testing its hypersonic cooling system in Colorado using a GE Aviation J79 turbojet engine, which formerly powered the Vietnam-era McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom
Reaction Engines specialises in developing methods for managing the build-up of heat in a variety of aerospace functions, including hypersonic-capable engines. That is generally defined as flight at speeds of Mach 5 (6,174 km/h) or above.
Although the US military typically develops sensitive new technologies with domestic companies, the Defense Department’s Foreign Comparative Testing (FCT) programme provides a path for non-US companies with ground-breaking technology to work with the Pentagon.
“FCT demonstrates US commitment to a ‘two-way street’ for defence procurements with both allied and friendly nations,” says USAF FCT manager William Reed. “Reaction Engines technology is world-class and is a great fit for the FCT programme.”
The company is developing the Synthetic Air Breathing Rocket Engine (SABRE), which Reaction says can function at speeds in excess of M5.
Key to the operation of SABRE at hypersonic speeds is a proprietary coolant system, known as precooler, which can rapidly reduce the temperature of intake air from 1,000°C (1,832°F) to ambient levels, according to Reaction.
The company says SABRE has the potential to provide air-breathing thrust from standstill on the runway to speeds more than five times the speed of sound in the atmosphere. The engine also has potential applications in space propulsion.
Individual components of the engine have been successfully demonstrated on the ground.
The latest test programme aims to further expand upon those capabilities. Reaction says the goal is to increase the delivered air mass flow rate of its cooling system, which it the company hopes “will result in a three-fold increase in the total energy transfer”.
Andrew Piotti, Reaction’s US engineering manager, says if the new test programme goes well, the precooler technology could help boost the performance of existing jet engines
“The exciting outcome that I am looking forward to over the coming weeks is the validation that our technology could enable current jet engines to operate from takeoff up through Mach 4 and beyond,” Piotti says.
Reaction Engines has been conducting research testing at the Colorado Air and Space Port near Denver.
https://www.flightglobal.com/engines/us-air-force-partners-with-reaction-engines-on-high-mach-engine-testing/149320.article
walle83- Posts : 976
Points : 986
Join date : 2016-11-13
Location : Sweden
- Post n°491
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
lancelot wrote:Calling it a Boeing is a bit of a stretch though. It was designed by SAAB. It is basically a neutered cost reduced Gripen and even uses the same engine. Supposedly the avionics are based on the ones on the Gripen as well.
Saab also developt the software for the airplane. Probably more a Saab project then a Boeing if you look on every detail. But Boeing is paying so they get top billing.
George1- Posts : 18510
Points : 19013
Join date : 2011-12-22
Location : Greece
- Post n°492
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
Contracts issued for the development of engines for the promising American NGAD fighter
https://bmpd.livejournal.com/4576157.html
https://bmpd.livejournal.com/4576157.html
Rodion_Romanovic- Posts : 2646
Points : 2815
Join date : 2015-12-30
Location : Merkelland
- Post n°493
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
https://redstate.com/streiff/2022/09/18/unexpectedly-the-usaf-finds-itself-with-a-critical-shortage-of-pilots-while-it-says-it-has-too-many-white-officers-n629231
Unexpectedly, the USAF Finds Itself With a Critical Shortage of Pilots While It Says It Has Too Many White Officers
The authors go on to propose a solution. The USAF should create a major incentive program that would keep those majors and lieutenant colonels in the Air Force and available for flight duty if needed.
I think the authors aren’t looking at the real problem. If a lack of incentives were the problem, the officers they are trying to retain would never have made it to this point in their Air Force career. The problem is that mid-career aviators have been told that they aren’t wanted. By told, I don’t mean it has been hinted at; I mean they have seen it in writing from the three-star general who runs Air Force recruiting. This is from Major General Ed Thoma, USAF recruiting poohbah, in October 2020
https://www.yahoo.com/video/86-of-air-force-pilots-are-white-men-heres-why-this-needs-to-change-155046366.html
The USAF has responded to the challenge by eliminating prior flight training as a “plus” on pilot selection. They found that such training favored applicants who could afford private flight lessons. It has also announced that it intends to reduce the number of white officers from 80% to 67.5%.
Compounding the outright racism and bigotry involved in these “goals,” the Department of Defense’s new Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity oberführer, Kelisa Wing, is, to be charitable, a pathological and virulent racist, tweeting out such nuggets of wisdom as
Suppose you are a mid-career officer and pondering your professional future. On one hand, you are looking at a higher salary and a more stable domestic environment for your family, along with a lot less risk. But, on the other hand, your employer is sending clear signals that your contribution and actual presence is not valued but detrimental to organizational goals, and they bring in a blatant racist to oversee the race-based policies that will determine your future. What do you do? Hang around and wait for the axe to fall, see your career stall, or leave? I know what I’d do.
Unexpectedly, the USAF Finds Itself With a Critical Shortage of Pilots While It Says It Has Too Many White Officers
The authors go on to propose a solution. The USAF should create a major incentive program that would keep those majors and lieutenant colonels in the Air Force and available for flight duty if needed.
I think the authors aren’t looking at the real problem. If a lack of incentives were the problem, the officers they are trying to retain would never have made it to this point in their Air Force career. The problem is that mid-career aviators have been told that they aren’t wanted. By told, I don’t mean it has been hinted at; I mean they have seen it in writing from the three-star general who runs Air Force recruiting. This is from Major General Ed Thoma, USAF recruiting poohbah, in October 2020
https://www.yahoo.com/video/86-of-air-force-pilots-are-white-men-heres-why-this-needs-to-change-155046366.html
We simply can no longer afford for significant segments of our society to be underrepresented in our U.S. Air Force or our newest branch, the U.S. Space Force.
To be clear, the Air and Space Forces are not setting quotas based on race or gender. We will, however, focus intensely and concentrate our efforts in traditionally underserved communities. It wouldn’t be legal or productive to hold recruiters accountable for bringing in a certain number of recruits from various demographic groups. But if we see that we’re not hitting recruiting targets that mirror the qualified population in those categories, we will adjust to concentrate on areas where we can get a more representative balance in our applicant pool. To use a fishing analogy, recruiters must not only cast a wide net but ensure we are spending time in the right fishing holes.
And by measuring those targets, we’ll employ the old management axiom that what gets measured gets done. And we’ll get it done.
While we are meeting or exceeding nearly all demographic targets in our enlisted ranks, inside our cockpits is where we have the greatest disparities and opportunities for improvement. In all, 86 percent of our aviators are white males. Less than 3 percent of our fighter pilots are females. This is why we established a detachment within Air Force recruiting two years ago charged with improving diversity for those who wear flight suits. The mission of Detachment 1 is to bring a singular focus to recruiting qualified women and minorities who have not always felt they belonged.
The USAF has responded to the challenge by eliminating prior flight training as a “plus” on pilot selection. They found that such training favored applicants who could afford private flight lessons. It has also announced that it intends to reduce the number of white officers from 80% to 67.5%.
Compounding the outright racism and bigotry involved in these “goals,” the Department of Defense’s new Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity oberführer, Kelisa Wing, is, to be charitable, a pathological and virulent racist, tweeting out such nuggets of wisdom as
Suppose you are a mid-career officer and pondering your professional future. On one hand, you are looking at a higher salary and a more stable domestic environment for your family, along with a lot less risk. But, on the other hand, your employer is sending clear signals that your contribution and actual presence is not valued but detrimental to organizational goals, and they bring in a blatant racist to oversee the race-based policies that will determine your future. What do you do? Hang around and wait for the axe to fall, see your career stall, or leave? I know what I’d do.
GarryB, lancelot and Broski like this post
GarryB- Posts : 40489
Points : 40989
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°494
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
I wonder if they will assign race and sexuality profiles to AI... that would be a good way to get the diversity up very quickly...
Hole likes this post
Hole- Posts : 11109
Points : 11087
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
- Post n°495
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
GarryB, Belisarius and Podlodka77 like this post
Podlodka77- Posts : 2589
Points : 2591
Join date : 2022-01-06
Location : Z
- Post n°496
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
RAW VIDEO: F-35 crashes during test flight at Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Fort Worth
Arrow- Posts : 3440
Points : 3430
Join date : 2012-02-12
- Post n°497
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
The-thing-next-door- Posts : 1389
Points : 1445
Join date : 2017-09-18
Location : Uranus
- Post n°498
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
It looks more like i light bomber more than a fighter or interceptor, and the lack of supercruise or maneuverability in its requirements brings into question it's utility in it's intended role.
Though it is possible that the high payload could mean that the pindos might accidentally make a decent strike aircraft.
It is possible that they intend it to use missiles for self defence, but considering that the Russians have talked bout clustered terminal stages for long range air to air missiles that may become a rather difficult task.
Though it is possible that the high payload could mean that the pindos might accidentally make a decent strike aircraft.
It is possible that they intend it to use missiles for self defence, but considering that the Russians have talked bout clustered terminal stages for long range air to air missiles that may become a rather difficult task.
thegopnik- Posts : 1815
Points : 1817
Join date : 2017-09-20
- Post n°499
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
Based on my previous conversations with another user here with my conclusion. https://defencehub.live/threads/3-stream-cycle-engines.11702/
If you want to piss off U.S. aviation fanboys more than Pierre Sprey, you simply call the NGAD a 5th gen +
If you want to piss off U.S. aviation fanboys more than Pierre Sprey, you simply call the NGAD a 5th gen +
GarryB likes this post
GarryB- Posts : 40489
Points : 40989
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°500
Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News
But does it exceed the performance specs of 5th gen... do any of their 5th gen jets?
Perhaps the F-22 and F-35 and this new NGAD are just 5 minus generation jets... not quite 5th gen for various reasons...
Perhaps the F-22 and F-35 and this new NGAD are just 5 minus generation jets... not quite 5th gen for various reasons...
The-thing-next-door and Broski like this post