+45
ALAMO
ArgentinaGuard
andalusia
lancelot
ucmvulcan
AlfaT8
Finty
George1
Isos
SeigSoloyvov
dino00
Tsavo Lion
KiloGolf
archangelski
kvs
Khepesh
starman
kristov_ginter
OminousSpudd
Walther von Oldenburg
max steel
SturmGuard
Svyatoslavich
BlackArrow
Regular
flamming_python
Werewolf
KoTeMoRe
Cucumber Khan
higurashihougi
PapaDragon
JohninMK
Odin of Ossetia
Morpheus Eberhardt
Vann7
Cowboy's daughter
AirCargo
HeNeArKrXeRn_
Giulio
DTA
GarryB
TheGeorgian
TR1
magnumcromagnon
Cyberspec
49 posters
Great Patriotic War (USSR in World War II)
archangelski- Posts : 624
Points : 641
Join date : 2015-04-25
Correct : "Aleksandr Suvorov".
archangelski- Posts : 624
Points : 641
Join date : 2015-04-25
Gorky Park with captured German aircrafts on show :
Svyatoslavich- Posts : 399
Points : 400
Join date : 2015-04-22
Location : Buenos Aires
Very interesting. By the way, what happened to all these captured aircraft? Western allies still have lots of them in museums, but it seems none survived in the former USSR.
archangelski- Posts : 624
Points : 641
Join date : 2015-04-25
Svyatoslavich wrote:Very interesting. By the way, what happened to all these captured aircraft? Western allies still have lots of them in museums, but it seems none survived in the former USSR.
The fate of all these captured aircraft in Soviet Union is unknown to me...some survived to be tested ... others were placed in museums, at least until the early 70s ... but the majority was unfortunately scrapped
starman- Posts : 763
Points : 761
Join date : 2016-08-10
archangelski wrote:
The fate of all these captured aircraft in Soviet Union is unknown to me...some survived to be tested ... others were placed in museums, at least until the early 70s ... but the majority was unfortunately scrapped
Just like most American aircraft after the war. Some of each type should be preserved but there isn't much point in keeping a bunch intact long after they become obsolete.
archangelski- Posts : 624
Points : 641
Join date : 2015-04-25
starman wrote:archangelski wrote:
The fate of all these captured aircraft in Soviet Union is unknown to me...some survived to be tested ... others were placed in museums, at least until the early 70s ... but the majority was unfortunately scrapped
Just like most American aircraft after the war. Some of each type should be preserved but there isn't much point in keeping a bunch intact long after they become obsolete.
The Kubinka Tank Museum is full of unique pieces, some preserved from WWII, then why did they not also keep some planes ? A Bf-109G-2 was in Tsagi collection (with, at least, a Mustang Mk.1 and a Kittyhawk in US markings and a P-400 Airacobra and a Hurricane with British roundels)...then disappeared for an unknown destination.
Last edited by archangelski on Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:21 pm; edited 1 time in total
archangelski- Posts : 624
Points : 641
Join date : 2015-04-25
archangelski- Posts : 624
Points : 641
Join date : 2015-04-25
KiloGolf- Posts : 2481
Points : 2461
Join date : 2015-09-01
Location : Macedonia, Hellas
Great vid
archangelski- Posts : 624
Points : 641
Join date : 2015-04-25
KiloGolf- Posts : 2481
Points : 2461
Join date : 2015-09-01
Location : Macedonia, Hellas
archangelski wrote:
That was a great little plane that the Soviets loved!
The photos are quite telling on the contribution of Allied kit in helping the USSR sustaining itself during 1941 and 1942.
archangelski- Posts : 624
Points : 641
Join date : 2015-04-25
GarryB- Posts : 40562
Points : 41064
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
That was a great little plane that the Soviets loved!
The photos are quite telling on the contribution of Allied kit in helping the USSR sustaining itself during 1941 and 1942.
The Soviets did like the Aircobra but they used it as an air to air interceptor and not a ground attack aircraft like the west thought they did.
Most of the material supplied in 41-42 was second rate cast offs... the Russians got British Aircobras because the British didn't want them.
Of course anything is better than nothing but claiming it helped win the war is a joke.
BTW it is amusing as the pilots that had the best kill records in American planes in the European theatre were Soviet pilots in Aircobras.
Odin of Ossetia- Posts : 948
Points : 1035
Join date : 2015-07-03
GarryB wrote:
That was a great little plane that the Soviets loved!
The photos are quite telling on the contribution of Allied kit in helping the USSR sustaining itself during 1941 and 1942.
The Soviets did like the Aircobra but they used it as an air to air interceptor and not a ground attack aircraft like the west thought they did.
Most of the material supplied in 41-42 was second rate cast offs... the Russians got British Aircobras because the British didn't want them.
Of course anything is better than nothing but claiming it helped win the war is a joke.
BTW it is amusing as the pilots that had the best kill records in American planes in the European theatre were Soviet pilots in Aircobras.
I find it curious that often the same persons who claim that the Lend-Lease had some sort of "miraculous" impact on the Eastern Front often downplay the role of the resistance movements in the winning of the Second World War.
So the Lend-Lease had a huge impact but the efforts of the partisans and other members of the resistance movements did not?
So why did German troops on the Eastern Front did not receive their Christmas of 1943 gifts until May of 1944? You can read about it in an English-language Western book about the Luftwaffe Field Divisions. Allied aerial bombings? I doubt it, since there were very few of these carried out over Poland and the occupied part of the Soviet Union. Some of these delays could have been actually caused by the Soviet air attacks, but most certainly not all.
You can check some related links on this matter:
Polish Partisans
http://michalw.narod.ru/index-ZiemiLubelskiej.html
http://michalw.narod.ru/index-SynowieMazowsza.html
http://michalw.narod.ru/index-ZiemiKieleckiej.html
http://michalw.narod.ru/index-GL.html
http://michalw.narod.ru/index-GL42.html
http://michalw.narod.ru/index-Rablow.html
Soviet Partisan "Railway Aces"
http://www.wio.ru/galgrnd/podryvnk.htm
archangelski- Posts : 624
Points : 641
Join date : 2015-04-25
archangelski- Posts : 624
Points : 641
Join date : 2015-04-25
archangelski- Posts : 624
Points : 641
Join date : 2015-04-25
archangelski- Posts : 624
Points : 641
Join date : 2015-04-25
archangelski- Posts : 624
Points : 641
Join date : 2015-04-25
archangelski- Posts : 624
Points : 641
Join date : 2015-04-25
archangelski- Posts : 624
Points : 641
Join date : 2015-04-25
George1- Posts : 18526
Points : 19031
Join date : 2011-12-22
Location : Greece
TASS remembers the largest tank battle in history.
More:
http://tass.com/defense/1018342
More:
http://tass.com/defense/1018342
starman- Posts : 763
Points : 761
Join date : 2016-08-10
George1 wrote:TASS remembers the largest tank battle in history.
More:
http://tass.com/defense/1018342
In recent years, revisionist works have challenged the standard narrative. IIRC Nipe determined, from records at the National Archives, that Prokhorovka involved only about 300 German tanks, which destroyed 650 Soviet tanks while losing only 70. The offensive was called off because of Soviet attacks elsewhere (Mius?) and the allied landing in Sicily, not because of Prokhorovka.
GarryB- Posts : 40562
Points : 41064
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
Well a simple thing called terrain means you can't have a battle where 2,000 tanks face off against 2,000 tanks.
The offensive was called off at Kursk because the Soviets stopped its forward progress and they (the Germans) had already committed more than 100% of their capacity there... they even delayed the start so other vehicles could be made available for the attack which still was stopped and pushed back.
The Soviets took the territory and therefore could reclaim and restore armour that was recovered from the battlefield, and the germans had little choice but to retreat, knowing their time was up because it was the first time they had been defeated in a summer offensive with full preparation and no excuses like Hitler screwed it up for us, or it was a little bit cold...
In the air the Soviet air force was also asserting itself with new aircraft like the La-5FN at least as good as any German equivalent turning the tide...
The offensive was called off at Kursk because the Soviets stopped its forward progress and they (the Germans) had already committed more than 100% of their capacity there... they even delayed the start so other vehicles could be made available for the attack which still was stopped and pushed back.
The Soviets took the territory and therefore could reclaim and restore armour that was recovered from the battlefield, and the germans had little choice but to retreat, knowing their time was up because it was the first time they had been defeated in a summer offensive with full preparation and no excuses like Hitler screwed it up for us, or it was a little bit cold...
In the air the Soviet air force was also asserting itself with new aircraft like the La-5FN at least as good as any German equivalent turning the tide...
kvs- Posts : 15873
Points : 16008
Join date : 2014-09-11
Location : Turdope's Kanada
The video has a recording of Hitler talking about Soviet tanks. This is a clear instance proving that he was drinking the
Reich propaganda koolaid like all western leaders always do.
1) He claims that 34,000 out of an initial 35,000 Soviet tanks were destroyed on the eastern front.
2) He assumes that 35,000 tanks were there from the beginning.
On both counts he is full of shit. The USSR was producing T-34s and other tanks from 1941 to 1945. It did not
have some huge pool of tanks that it depleted. Here he is dismissing Soviet industrial capacity since he believes
Russians and other peoples of the USSR were mud hut dwellers. In this line of BS-think he is surprised that
the USSR had so many.
Then we have the claim that the Reich was taking out basically 100% of the Soviet tanks. This is utter rubbish.
In no major eastern front battle after 1941 did the Reich completely destroy every Soviet tank. And there is
no way they encountered 35,000 tanks in 1941 and 1942. There were 35,119 T-34 units produced from 1941 to 1945.
There were 29,430 T-34-85 tanks produced after 1943. The other models had much smaller numbers.