TR1 wrote:Flagship Victory wrote:TR1 wrote:Flagship Victory wrote:rtech wrote:I agree but in terms of supplies like ammo,food etc there RF plays major role.flamming_python wrote:rtech wrote:However i dont understand why it is a bad thing for RF to supply NAF with weapons
The more the merrier, as far as I'm concerned.
As for Russian advisors and supplied equipment - they're there but its severely overblown.
There is no definitive proof that RF has supplied ammo to NAF. If that were so, we'd have seen NAF using black tipped armor piercing bullets. We have not seen that. Lugansk manufactures Ukraine's small arms cartridges and Donbas has no shortage of ammo.
They send them Kornets but no small arms ammo.
Dude................
There is no proof that NAF has Kornets. I've never seen NAF vids showing Kornets. They all show Konkurs and Fagots.
True, expended Kornet tubes and other pieces found in the combat areas got there via other means.
Not the most logical- from Russia to the seps.
Good grief.
Not definitive proof. Ukraine could have sent some men to Syria and retrieved some expended Kornet fragments and tubes from there and brought those back to Ukraine. The only proof is if NAF vids show Kornets.