Questions and Ideas

China will not behave like US globally . US isn't going to collapse economically get this straight and its about bringing yuan to international market for currency exchange so that China can rise . Moreover , they don't want whole world to shove yuan up their asses . They want to create an alternate apart from dollar and euro . Little do you know but Yuan has entered in world's top 5 currencies . Got it . It all depends on Europe if they pivot towards China , US will lack partners to exhibit its hegemony .


That old fart Breiznsiki told US to stop Eurasian Union formation . EAU will be a problem in their ass . That's why after Georgia , Ukraine except color revolutions to start in Central Asia . Like Kyrgyzstan . Though fortunately Kyrgyzs are already aware of it and they protested against murican ambassador scum .



FCUK THE NATO

My point is that russia and china will take the place of us. Because people dont want anymore a usa that takes money and money and care just a bit of local development. Recently bank of china was established and does same thing as imf and wb. China and russia know that today alot depends on how many allies they have. In order to do that well established relations whit third and second world countryes must be maked. After all those countryes want some independence , local taking of decision , independence upon religion and mentality and a fair trade whit a great power. That is why usa fuels the story of bad russia to isolate russia. In tbis they have preferential acces to resources , their currency is used , have local bases for deploy weapons in case of war etc etc. But what usa does not offer is the oportunity that a middle class arise in that countryes , well documented and whit some necesary socialist parties that keep some kind of equality. They wanna masses remain stupid and not trying anything that would go to a population that want big salary from foreing investors , and not trying to blame american monopol on markets. In other words they dont wanna third world countryes that go to second world. Instead russia and china has socialist background so they care about development of mases and equality of chances. Notice that in europe whit all usa intervention is always a socialist party very strong and that is a well practice

If a message is sent in radio spectrum in a codified way such that when you receive signal to know what is missing and how much of message was jammed.

Jamming doesn't remove data from a data transmission.

Most of the time it is like extra data transmitted along with the message.

Imagine a 4 Terabyte file made up of all the letters of the alphabet with the letters "Hello Friend" mixed in randomly. with trillions of other letters mixed in there is little to no chance to find the original text...

Short language sent could make also all easier. Also transmiting same message on different devices and different frecvency and carryer would make all easier.

Hiding the signal or scrambling it across several frequencies at one time.

max steel wrote:US isn't going to collapse economically get this straight

That's exactly what everyone was saying about the USSR - a few years before it collapsed.

Just sayin'

Us is going from inertia right now

Did you know russian language is just a form of old bulgarian which developed in a different direction from today's modern bulgarian? If you read original old bulgarian language it sounds very similar to today's russian and in medieval times the 2 languages were indescernable.
Also we bulgarians find all other south slavic languages completely idescernible while most of us can almost completely understand russian. Logic suggests it would have to be the opposite since russian is from a different family(east).

That's because the cyrillic alphabet was originally created for the bulgarians and thus the bulgarian languages became a template for a universal orthodox slavic church service language, old church slavonic which is 100% old bulgarian.

When russia converted the old church slavonic language(bulgarian) was introduced as an official language for the newly orthodox kingdom and thus replaced the original pagan russian langauge which was far more closer to polish.

Also did you know the word moscow comes from finnish Maskaa Va which means great bear? This shows that russians aren't purely slavic and also have finnougric roots, not necessarilly finnish but closer to the uralic tribes like udmurts and mari. IMHO belarussians are the purest slavs.

KomissarBojanchev wrote:Did you know  russian language is just a form of old bulgarian which developed in a different direction from today's modern bulgarian? If you read original old bulgarian language it sounds very similar to today's russian and in medieval times the 2 languages were indescernable.
Also we bulgarians find all other south slavic languages completely idescernible while most of us can almost completely understand russian. Logic suggests it would have to be the opposite since russian is from a different family(east).

That's because the cyrillic alphabet was originally created for the bulgarians and thus the bulgarian languages became a template for a universal orthodox slavic church service language, old church slavonic which is 100% old bulgarian.

When russia converted the old church slavonic language(bulgarian) was introduced as an official language for the newly orthodox kingdom and thus replaced the original pagan russian langauge which was far more closer to polish.

Ughh, our language was originally close to Polish?

Man we must have sounded more retarded than even the Ukranians.

Well good to know anyway, I like our language the way it is now - if we Bulgaria to thank for that than so be it.

BTW though I personally Serbian no more difficult to read than Bulgarian.

I saw that a ECCM practice is that someone burn your equipment. There is somehow a atenuating of power material that would prevent burn of equipment?

GarryB wrote:

If a message is sent in radio spectrum in a codified way such that when you receive signal to know what is missing and how much of message was jammed.

Jamming doesn't remove data from a data transmission.

Most of the time it is like extra data transmitted along with the message.

Imagine a 4 Terabyte file made up of all the letters of the alphabet with the letters "Hello Friend" mixed in randomly. with trillions of other letters mixed in there is little to no chance to find the original text...

Short language sent could make also all easier. Also transmiting same message on different devices and different frecvency and carryer would make all easier.

Hiding the signal or scrambling it across several frequencies at one time.

Well...if the missile had on its computer the exact scheme of frecvecies that own troops will emit would help to something? Also i ask myself if a receiver on the missile could ignore enemis frecvencies and adopt just ones that are needed? And a missile could establish where exacly frecvencies are coming from? Cause i think if yes they could have in their computer the location of own troops.

GarryB wrote:

Short language sent could make also all easier. Also transmiting same message on different devices and different frecvency and carryer would make all easier.

Hiding the signal or scrambling it across several frequencies at one time.

Well but the missile that receive does not having multiple receiving devices that does not having nothing whit the frecvencies designated to the each other ? I mean a receiver receive all signals or specified ones like a emiting device emit in some frecvencies but not others?

After all point is how much power of calculation has the computer of missile , how much power have the equipment and how much equipment you fit into the missile. So ....is about the construction of missile too.

Question: can a missile guide herself from the sun? Like old sailors?

KomissarBojanchev wrote:Did you know  russian language is just a form of old bulgarian which developed in a different direction from today's modern bulgarian? If you read original old bulgarian language it sounds very similar to today's russian and in medieval times the 2 languages were indescernable.
Also we bulgarians find all other south slavic languages completely idescernible while most of us can almost completely understand russian. Logic suggests it would have to be the opposite since russian is from a different family(east).

That's because the cyrillic alphabet was originally created for the bulgarians and thus the bulgarian languages became a template for a universal orthodox slavic church service language, old church slavonic which is 100% old bulgarian.

When russia converted the old church slavonic language(bulgarian) was introduced as an official language for the newly orthodox kingdom and thus replaced the original pagan russian langauge which was far more closer to polish.

I am sure somebody has recently made up that fiction, but why did you believe that? Give some reason.

Please, just go and make one of your fantasy spaceship drawings; I voted up your latest drawing yesterday.

And, stop picking topics to believe in. Bulgaria was a case just like Georgia, Estonia, ... It never existed before getting forced out of Russia, a la Georgia, Estonia, ...

Morpheus Eberhardt wrote:It never existed before getting forced out of Russia, a la Georgia, Estonia, ...

Stupidest thing I have read all day.

Your Russia strong historical revisionism is pathetic.

TR1 wrote:

Morpheus Eberhardt wrote:It never existed before getting forced out of Russia, a la Georgia, Estonia, ...

Stupidest thing I have read all day.

Your Russia strong historical revisionism is pathetic.

Ohh we found a historian...

Morpheus Eberhardt wrote:

KomissarBojanchev wrote:Did you know  russian language is just a form of old bulgarian which developed in a different direction from today's modern bulgarian? If you read original old bulgarian language it sounds very similar to today's russian and in medieval times the 2 languages were indescernable.
Also we bulgarians find all other south slavic languages completely idescernible while most of us can almost completely understand russian. Logic suggests it would have to be the opposite since russian is from a different family(east).

That's because the cyrillic alphabet was originally created for the bulgarians and thus the bulgarian languages became a template for a universal orthodox slavic church service language, old church slavonic which is 100% old bulgarian.

When russia converted the old church slavonic language(bulgarian) was introduced as an official language for the newly orthodox kingdom and thus replaced the original pagan russian langauge which was far more closer to polish.

I am sure somebody has recently made up that fiction, but why did you believe that? Give some reason.

Please, just go and make one of your fantasy spaceship drawings; I voted up your latest drawing yesterday.

And, stop picking topics to believe in. Bulgaria was a case just like Georgia, Estonia, ... It never existed before getting forced out of Russia, a la Georgia, Estonia, ...

Bulgaria was under the Ottoman yoke for centuries. Imperial Russia helped liberate it. That is why they have a statue of
Alexander II in Sofia (Monument to the Czar Liberator). Bulgaria was never part of the Russian Empire. But the Bulgars
did migrate to the Balkans from the region of Tatarstan around the Volga River during the 7th century AD. They are a mixture of Turkic,
Slavic and more indigenous Balkan peoples.

Werewolf wrote:

TR1 wrote:

Morpheus Eberhardt wrote:It never existed before getting forced out of Russia, a la Georgia, Estonia, ...

Stupidest thing I have read all day.

Your Russia strong historical revisionism is pathetic.

Ohh we found a historian...

More like a drive-by urinator.

kvs wrote:

Morpheus Eberhardt wrote:

KomissarBojanchev wrote:Did you know  russian language is just a form of old bulgarian which developed in a different direction from today's modern bulgarian? If you read original old bulgarian language it sounds very similar to today's russian and in medieval times the 2 languages were indescernable.
Also we bulgarians find all other south slavic languages completely idescernible while most of us can almost completely understand russian. Logic suggests it would have to be the opposite since russian is from a different family(east).

That's because the cyrillic alphabet was originally created for the bulgarians and thus the bulgarian languages became a template for a universal orthodox slavic church service language, old church slavonic which is 100% old bulgarian.

When russia converted the old church slavonic language(bulgarian) was introduced as an official language for the newly orthodox kingdom and thus replaced the original pagan russian langauge which was far more closer to polish.

I am sure somebody has recently made up that fiction, but why did you believe that? Give some reason.

Please, just go and make one of your fantasy spaceship drawings; I voted up your latest drawing yesterday.

And, stop picking topics to believe in. Bulgaria was a case just like Georgia, Estonia, ... It never existed before getting forced out of Russia, a la Georgia, Estonia, ...

Bulgaria was under the Ottoman yoke for centuries.   Imperial Russia helped liberate it.   That is why they have a statue of
Alexander II in Sofia (Monument to the Czar Liberator).    Bulgaria was never part of the Russian Empire.   But the Bulgars
did migrate to the Balkans from the region of Tatarstan around the Volga River during the 7th century AD.   They are a mixture of Turkic,
Slavic and more indigenous Balkan peoples.  

What you wrote is part of the Scaligerian "history", which I studied thoroughly as a kid; so you didn't need to write that excerpt on my account. The problem with the Scaligerian "history" is that there is no truth in it at all, and this can be proven scientifically.

Morpheus Eberhardt wrote:

kvs wrote:

Morpheus Eberhardt wrote:

KomissarBojanchev wrote:Did you know  russian language is just a form of old bulgarian which developed in a different direction from today's modern bulgarian? If you read original old bulgarian language it sounds very similar to today's russian and in medieval times the 2 languages were indescernable.
Also we bulgarians find all other south slavic languages completely idescernible while most of us can almost completely understand russian. Logic suggests it would have to be the opposite since russian is from a different family(east).

That's because the cyrillic alphabet was originally created for the bulgarians and thus the bulgarian languages became a template for a universal orthodox slavic church service language, old church slavonic which is 100% old bulgarian.

When russia converted the old church slavonic language(bulgarian) was introduced as an official language for the newly orthodox kingdom and thus replaced the original pagan russian langauge which was far more closer to polish.

I am sure somebody has recently made up that fiction, but why did you believe that? Give some reason.

Please, just go and make one of your fantasy spaceship drawings; I voted up your latest drawing yesterday.

And, stop picking topics to believe in. Bulgaria was a case just like Georgia, Estonia, ... It never existed before getting forced out of Russia, a la Georgia, Estonia, ...

Bulgaria was under the Ottoman yoke for centuries.   Imperial Russia helped liberate it.   That is why they have a statue of
Alexander II in Sofia (Monument to the Czar Liberator).    Bulgaria was never part of the Russian Empire.   But the Bulgars
did migrate to the Balkans from the region of Tatarstan around the Volga River during the 7th century AD.   They are a mixture of Turkic,
Slavic and more indigenous Balkan peoples.  

What you wrote is part of the Scaligerian "history", which I studied thoroughly as a kid; so you didn't need to write that excerpt on my account. The problem with the Scaligerian "history" is that there is no truth in it at all, and this can be proven scientifically.

Fomenko lost the plot totally when he inserted his own retarded "chronology" in place of the original flawed one. It's totally unscientific.

kvs wrote:Fomenko lost the plot totally when he inserted his own retarded "chronology" in place of the original flawed one.  It's totally unscientific.

I am not familiar with the "retarded "chronology""; I can only venture a guess that it has something to do with ...

However, Fomenko is affiliated, among other things, with a branch of science known as the "new chronology".

But, do you know what branches of science the new chronology, itself, is based on, especially its mathematical foundation?

By the way, have you read the new chronology series of books by him, the four translated into English, that is? What other books/articles on the new chronology have you read?

Also, if you don't mind, can you please tell me a bit about your background, especially regarding your background in science (including math—as anybody can guess, I have a predominantly empiricist view of the philosophy of mathematics)?

Morpheus Eberhardt wrote:

kvs wrote:

Morpheus Eberhardt wrote:

KomissarBojanchev wrote:Did you know  russian language is just a form of old bulgarian which developed in a different direction from today's modern bulgarian? If you read original old bulgarian language it sounds very similar to today's russian and in medieval times the 2 languages were indescernable.
Also we bulgarians find all other south slavic languages completely idescernible while most of us can almost completely understand russian. Logic suggests it would have to be the opposite since russian is from a different family(east).

That's because the cyrillic alphabet was originally created for the bulgarians and thus the bulgarian languages became a template for a universal orthodox slavic church service language, old church slavonic which is 100% old bulgarian.

When russia converted the old church slavonic language(bulgarian) was introduced as an official language for the newly orthodox kingdom and thus replaced the original pagan russian langauge which was far more closer to polish.

I am sure somebody has recently made up that fiction, but why did you believe that? Give some reason.

Please, just go and make one of your fantasy spaceship drawings; I voted up your latest drawing yesterday.

And, stop picking topics to believe in. Bulgaria was a case just like Georgia, Estonia, ... It never existed before getting forced out of Russia, a la Georgia, Estonia, ...

Bulgaria was under the Ottoman yoke for centuries.   Imperial Russia helped liberate it.   That is why they have a statue of
Alexander II in Sofia (Monument to the Czar Liberator).    Bulgaria was never part of the Russian Empire.   But the Bulgars
did migrate to the Balkans from the region of Tatarstan around the Volga River during the 7th century AD.   They are a mixture of Turkic,
Slavic and more indigenous Balkan peoples.  

What you wrote is part of the Scaligerian "history", which I studied thoroughly as a kid; so you didn't need to write that excerpt on my account. The problem with the Scaligerian "history" is that there is no truth in it at all, and this can be proven scientifically.

So you're saying bulgarians were never under ottoman muslim slavery and genocide that lasted more than 5 centuries?


I've never heard of your "scaligerian history" but the fact all bulgarian kingdoms  after Old Great Bulgaria which spanned from the caucasus to the crimea existed in the balkans, not in Russia. Every single historical map will show you that.

When Rus' converted it logically adopted the official church service slavic which happened to be the slavic spoken in the bulgarian kingdom due to it converting first.
The names of the founding Knyazes of Kiev also show that the preorthodox russian language was very different; they were called Bzik and Horiw. Do they sound presently east slavic to you?
The split between east and west slavic languages happened by the adoption of orthodoxy and old church slavonic( old bulgarian) forming the former while adoption of catholicism allowed west slavic langauges to develop on their own.

Did you know that the resilience of a metal can suddenly be down if you frozen the metal? That mean if first apply a very low temperature and then you make a blast the metal will easily broke.

victor1985 wrote:Question: can a missile guide herself from the sun? Like old sailors?

What would the missile do if its night-time, cloudy, or it's too close to sunrise/sunset and it's not possible to calculate the sun's angles to the horizon precisely enough?
Also don't forget that much of Russia rests at severe northern latitudes; where the sun is very close to the horizon for half the year - for the but few hours each day when it's visible. Good luck determining how far north or east/west you are from that.

Even in ideal conditions, the resolution you would gain from determining your position from the sun's position in the sky won't be good enough for any sort of precision weapon.