Status of Russian Military Industrial Complex (MIC)

Note sure where to put this, please move if wrong.

Тоби айоделе -Tboy

@TobiAyodele

·
6h


Former deputy head of Il PJSC A. Novozhilov was sentenced to 6 years in prison on charges of fraud in the development of the Il-76 MD-90A military transport aircraft.

Also, the former director of the Center for Design Technologies (CPCT) of the Moscow Aviation Institute, Vyacheslav Khvan, was sentenced to 5 years in prison. 


The third person involved in the case, the ex-head of the planning and dispatch department of the Center for Transport and Communications, Igor Titov, received a suspended 4.5-year prison sentence.

I hope they organize a Construction Bureau in jail for them, like in Stalins time.

GarryB wrote:Honestly would be shocked if RUSI ever said anything nice about Russia or gave it genuine credit for anything.

I am dubious about numbers of missiles being cited in random articles. These are not public figures and a most likely state secrets in Russia. Yet
we have "50" being quoted as if it is common knowledge. The same goes for production rates. Unless the government releases this data, which it
won't, any numbers are pure speculation.

Putin announced a multiple increase in the production of in-demand weapons in Russia

In May, Rostec State Corporation CEO Sergei Chemezov noted that the corporation supplies almost 80% of all weapons that Russian military personnel use during the air defense war. According to him, over the past two years,
-the production and major repairs of tanks have increased by 3.5 times
-light armored vehicles by three times.
-The production of ammunition for tanks and infantry fighting vehicles has increased almost ninefold,
-shells for barrel artillery by six times
-rocket artillery by eight times.

https://iz-ru.translate.goog/1761793/2024-09-19/putin-zaiavil-o-kratnom-roste-v-rf-vypuska-vostrebovannykh-vooruzhenii?_x_tr_sl=ru&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp

Hole wrote:I hope they organize a Construction Bureau in jail for them, like in Stalins time.

Problem is that it'll be composed purely of corrupt managers, not scientists and engineers

They wouldn't be able to design a campfire altogether, much less an aircraft

They could start a company that embezzles money from the west. 

Hole wrote:They could start a company that embezzles money from the west. 

If they did from the beginning then they'd be walking around with Hero of Russia medals, not rotting in jail

After they get out of prison, they should have another think about how to be a corrupt **** at someone else's expense, but only as long that someone else is not the Russian state

franco wrote:

The number of new armored vehicles is also growing. For example, the Kurganmashzavod plant produced 100 BMP-3 infantry fighting vehicles during the first quarter of 2023. In the second quarter, this figure increased to 108 vehicles. In the third quarter, 120 BMP-3s rolled off the assembly line, and in the fourth quarter, 135 vehicles were produced.

This growth may seem modest, but it shows that Russia is steadily increasing its production capacity.

I would not be surprised if the number of BMPs produced in a year exceeds the number of European analogues produced in 10 years.

"This growth may seem modest", yeah.

I have read somewhere they can produce 50-60 BMP-3s a month. So even those numbers seem kind of low.

Does Russia possess weather manipulation technology like (HAARP) like the United States and is Russia aware that the US could use this as warfare on Russia?


https://www.newstreason.com/post/haarp-the-truth-behind-the-government-s-secret-weather-control-program

https://www.globalresearch.ca/haarp-secret-weapon-used-for-weather-modification-electromagnetic-warfare/20407

https://geopolitics.co/2015/06/06/us-air-force-admits-they-can-control-weather/

https://t.me/Viktor_Murakhovskiy/706

The creative team of the sobering-up center of reality explains the digital. Discussion of the topic with the deputy general designer of the defense industry holding company developing hypersonic products, including the Zircon, excerpts:

"We are now designing all products in "digital" and developing working design documentation (RDD) in "digital" as well. But since the current regulatory documentation, and most importantly in the requirements of the tactical and technical assignments (TTZ) for experimental design work (EDW), does not provide for the transfer of RDD to the customer in electronic form, we are preparing a full set of drawings on paper for presentation to military acceptance.

The existing regulatory framework, determining the procedure for performing work at the stages of the life cycle of weapons and military equipment, assumes the use of computer modeling only at the stage of "Research and justification of development", but even at this stage, each virtual experiment must be confirmed by a FULL-SCALE test.

There is no talk of saving, all contract prices are fixed, and the number of samples for testing is specified in the technical specifications for the R&D project. Today, we cannot include costs associated with computer modeling and rental of high-performance resources in the calculation and costing materials for the R&D project. They are not taken into account by the customer as separate costs. Such costs are included in overhead costs, which are already quite large. At the same time, investing own funds is problematic, after all, these are significant amounts. Today, part of the full-scale tests provided for by the current regulatory documentation can be easily replaced by virtual experiments on a "digital twin" of the product in an environment simulated on a supercomputer. However, until the technical specifications for the R&D project provide for the possibility of presenting the results of computer modeling as test results, the customer will not accept them. And, naturally, the customer WILL NOT ACCEPT the enterprise's costs for such virtual tests, although they can be several times less than the costs of full-scale testing."