+80
Isos
LMFS
kvs
KomissarBojanchev
eridan
Pierre Sprey
d_taddei2
RTN
[ F l a n k e d ]
AlfaT8
zg18
JohninMK
Swede55
onwiththewar
Hole
marcellogo
havok
Mindstorm
magnumcromagnon
dino00
archangelski
Manov
tomazy
rambo54
JackRed
The-thing-next-door
Tsavo Lion
Peŕrier
YG_AJ
GRIM 44
BKP
SeigSoloyvov
Dr.Snufflebug
TheArmenian
Neutrality
medo
Azi
MC-21
wilhelm
KiloGolf
Stealthflanker
Luq man
Cyberspec
Tingsay
thegopnik
Nasr Hosein
flamming_python
AMCXXL
ZoA
iwanz
par far
T-47
GarryB
Cheetah
miketheterrible
OminousSpudd
Singular_Transform
chicken
ATLASCUB
berhoum
Vann7
Big_Gazza
hoom
Viktor
HM1199
Cyrus the great
tanino
coolieno99
franco
jaguar_br
Svyatoslavich
mack8
yavar
Benya
George1
Austin
higurashihougi
Rmf
Kimppis
Project Canada
84 posters
PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
ATLASCUB- Posts : 1154
Points : 1158
Join date : 2017-02-13
- Post n°276
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
What's the latest prototype flying? 11?
Austin- Posts : 7617
Points : 8014
Join date : 2010-05-08
Location : India
- Post n°277
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
In the network published a photo of the secret "Product 30" for the Su-57
In the web there were photos of the new engine for the Russian fighter of the 5th generation of the Su-57 (PAK FA).
The new jet engine has the factory designation "Product 30". It was developed by NPO Saturn in almost ten years. Such an impressive time is due to the fact that this is not a modernization of any of the existing engines in aviation, but a completely new unit. It uses completely new design solutions, some are unique, not having world analogues.
"Product 30" significantly exceeds the engine AL-41F1, which is on the plane PAK FA at the moment. Its non-flexural traction is 11000 kgf versus 8800 kgf for the AL-41F1. On the afterburner - 19000 kgf against 15000 kgf. There are other differences: higher reliability, economical fuel consumption, increased overhaul interval, cost of operation.
Flight tests of the Su-57 with new engines should begin before the end of 2017.
KomissarBojanchev- Posts : 1429
Points : 1584
Join date : 2012-08-05
Age : 27
Location : Varna, Bulgaria
- Post n°278
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
So what is it? Al41 with Izd30 nozzle or whole Izd30?
Cyberspec- Posts : 2904
Points : 3057
Join date : 2011-08-08
Location : Terra Australis
- Post n°279
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
How are we suppose to know for sure
Austin's article says it's Izd 30
Austin's article says it's Izd 30
jaguar_br- Posts : 35
Points : 37
Join date : 2015-03-07
- Post n°280
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
What about this pictures?
Allegedly the nozzle of a Iz-30
From aviaforum.ru
Allegedly the nozzle of a Iz-30
From aviaforum.ru
KomissarBojanchev- Posts : 1429
Points : 1584
Join date : 2012-08-05
Age : 27
Location : Varna, Bulgaria
- Post n°281
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
Cyberspec wrote:How are we suppose to know for sure
Austin's article says it's Izd 30
Through comparison with the Al41. I checked pictures of it and they look very similar aside from some pipe layout.
Cyberspec- Posts : 2904
Points : 3057
Join date : 2011-08-08
Location : Terra Australis
- Post n°282
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
KomissarBojanchev wrote:Through comparison with the Al41. I checked pictures of it and they look very similar aside from some pipe layout.
Doesn't prove they're the same....unless your a engineer familiar with the Al-41 I doubt you could say for sure
jaguar_br wrote:What about this pictures?
Allegedly the nozzle of a Iz-30
From aviaforum.ru
Said to be an early prototype of the Izd 30 nozzle
Big_Gazza- Posts : 4882
Points : 4872
Join date : 2014-08-25
Location : Melbourne, Australia
- Post n°283
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
jaguar_br wrote:What about this pictures?
From an AL-41F1S (Su-35S) if I am not mistaken.
jaguar_br- Posts : 35
Points : 37
Join date : 2015-03-07
- Post n°284
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
Big_Gazza wrote:jaguar_br wrote:What about this pictures?
From an AL-41F1S (Su-35S) if I am not mistaken.
So there are plans/experiment/projects for a low-observable nozzle for the Su-35S?
Big_Gazza- Posts : 4882
Points : 4872
Join date : 2014-08-25
Location : Melbourne, Australia
- Post n°285
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
jaguar_br wrote:So there are plans/experiment/projects for a low-observable nozzle for the Su-35S?
I doubt it. I think they simply used the nozzle from a Su-35S and serrated the petal tips to trial it for RCS improvements?
For comparison:
GarryB- Posts : 40487
Points : 40987
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°286
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
Well the low observable tube on the F-35 just has serrated edges so doesn't that make this serrated edge model the stealthy one?
wilhelm- Posts : 347
Points : 351
Join date : 2014-12-09
- Post n°287
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
So, It's official.
The Izd-30 has flown in the Su-57.
Pic in the link below.
http://uacrussia.ru/ru/press-center/news/sostoyalsya-pervyy-polet-letayushchey-laboratorii-t-50-s-dvigatelem-2-go-etapa
The Izd-30 has flown in the Su-57.
Pic in the link below.
http://uacrussia.ru/ru/press-center/news/sostoyalsya-pervyy-polet-letayushchey-laboratorii-t-50-s-dvigatelem-2-go-etapa
PapaDragon- Posts : 13463
Points : 13503
Join date : 2015-04-26
Location : Fort Evil, Serbia
- Post n°288
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
wilhelm wrote:So, It's official.
The Izd-30 has flown in the Su-57.
Pic in the link below.
http://uacrussia.ru/ru/press-center/news/sostoyalsya-pervyy-polet-letayushchey-laboratorii-t-50-s-dvigatelem-2-go-etapa
Well this will blow some specific minds
Attached image, not necessarily one in question:
ATLASCUB- Posts : 1154
Points : 1158
Join date : 2017-02-13
- Post n°289
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
Nice. They put the engine on an old prototype?
chicken- Posts : 110
Points : 115
Join date : 2014-09-04
- Post n°290
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
Is it just me or is the new engine shorter?
ATLASCUB- Posts : 1154
Points : 1158
Join date : 2017-02-13
- Post n°291
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
chicken wrote:Is it just me or is the new engine shorter?
Not just you....yeah it's shorter.
Big_Gazza- Posts : 4882
Points : 4872
Join date : 2014-08-25
Location : Melbourne, Australia
- Post n°292
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
Izd 30 is noticeably less smoky on full afterburner during takeoff. That's a signature of a high tech engine delivering full combustion
Kimppis- Posts : 617
Points : 617
Join date : 2014-12-23
- Post n°293
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
B-b-but Gorenburg told us that it won't be ready before 2027?
And many Western publications proclaimed that Russia can't develop new engines? Certainly not anytime soon. Massive delays. How is this possible?
(I'm not an expert on engine development, but there's no way it's going to take another 10 years to become fully operational, right? Su-57 is already flying with one, ffs.)
And many Western publications proclaimed that Russia can't develop new engines? Certainly not anytime soon. Massive delays. How is this possible?
(I'm not an expert on engine development, but there's no way it's going to take another 10 years to become fully operational, right? Su-57 is already flying with one, ffs.)
Project Canada- Posts : 662
Points : 663
Join date : 2015-07-20
Location : Canada
- Post n°294
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
Kimppis wrote:
(I'm not an expert on engine development, but there's no way it's going to take another 10 years to become fully operational, right? Su-57 is already flying with one, ffs.)
The West will always find another excuse like what they did with Olympics to get Russia banned. Russia needs and should retaliate hard.
Luq man- Posts : 67
Points : 69
Join date : 2016-03-26
Location : The Netherlands
- Post n°296
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
Big_Gazza wrote:Izd 30 is noticeably less smoky on full afterburner during takeoff. That's a signature of a high tech engine delivering full combustion
Afterburner is not engaged during this take-off. But the no smoke observation is a positive sign for good quality.
Isos- Posts : 11593
Points : 11561
Join date : 2015-11-06
- Post n°297
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
Afterburner is not engaged during this take-off. But the no smoke observation is a positive sign for good quality.
Maybe the engine was not working hahaha
They could reduce the price of the engine making more of them for future su-30 and su-35. So that maintenance of Su-57-30-35 will be the same and it will be simplier and faster.
Big_Gazza- Posts : 4882
Points : 4872
Join date : 2014-08-25
Location : Melbourne, Australia
- Post n°298
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
Luq man wrote:Afterburner is not engaged during this take-off. But the no smoke observation is a positive sign for good quality.
Day-um... why didn't I notice that.... Oh well, I'll put it down to a long day at work...
PapaDragon- Posts : 13463
Points : 13503
Join date : 2015-04-26
Location : Fort Evil, Serbia
- Post n°299
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
MC-21 wrote:
OK folks, now we have new engine that is quite a bit shorter than old one. Here is a pic of airframe with covered engines. Once they put new engine in airframe like this one only thing that will be sticking out will be tip of the nozzle.
So one more nail in the coffin of the old ''Russia cannot into stealth'' fairytale.
Someone cold draw how the whole thing will fit now that we have both covers and engine size.
KomissarBojanchev- Posts : 1429
Points : 1584
Join date : 2012-08-05
Age : 27
Location : Varna, Bulgaria
- Post n°300
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #4
Absolutely great progress . Now the T-50 has a much higher T/W ratio than the F-22 or any other fighter being designed.
BTW is it possible for a serrated round nozzle to be made as stealthy as an f-22's flattened nozzle?
BTW is it possible for a serrated round nozzle to be made as stealthy as an f-22's flattened nozzle?