Anyone knows the numbers situation with Akulas?
How many in service, how many in overhaul and how many slated for scraping?
PapaDragon wrote:
Anyone knows the numbers situation with Akulas?
How many in service, how many in overhaul and how many slated for scraping?
franco, dino00, JohninMK, LMFS and owais.usmani like this post
PapaDragon wrote:
- 5 never completed construction: Irbis, Kuguar, Rys + 2 with no names
owais.usmani likes this post
Krepost wrote:PapaDragon wrote:
Anyone knows the numbers situation with Akulas?
How many in service, how many in overhaul and how many slated for scraping?
Here is the info I have:
- 4 in active service: Gepard, Vepr, Pantera and Kuzbass
- 5 in overhaul/modernization: Volk, Samara, Tigr, Leopard and Magadan (Magadan will probably be leased to India)
- 1 waiting for overhaul/modernization: Nerpa (which was leased to India but now has been returned)
- 1 to be written-off: Bratsk
- 4 already written off: Bars, Kashalot, Akula and Barnaul
- 5 never completed construction: Irbis, Kuguar, Rys + 2 with no names
owais.usmani likes this post
owais.usmani, Mir and Arkanghelsk like this post
George1 likes this post
GarryB, Isos and Mir like this post
The overhaul of Russia’s fleet of third-generation Project 971 (Akula class) nuclear-powered attack submarines could take at least a decade, the Zvyozdochka shipyard said Friday.
MOSCOW, December 13 (RIA Novosti) – The overhaul of Russia’s fleet of third-generation Project 971 (Akula class) nuclear-powered attack submarines could take at least a decade, the Zvyozdochka shipyard said Friday.
“The planned modernization schedule [for each boat] is at least three years,” Zvyozdochka general director Vladimir Nikitin said in an exclusive interview with RIA Novosti.
The first Akula-class boat, the Leopard, is already being upgraded at the shipyard, but the work on that vessel will take much longer compared with subsequent submarines because the development of the documentation and technological processes for the necessary repairs have not been yet completed, Nikitin said.
The overhaul will involve replacement of the electrical wiring, electronics, missile systems and other equipment. The upgraded vessels will also feature better “stealth” capabilities.
Big_Gazza and LMFS like this post
The last time similar claims were made "involving Russian Navy" and British warship it turned out that it was actually a BBC documentary. This incident is probably no different.Isos wrote:It seems that one of the Akula could have been involved in a weired accident in the Atlantic back in 2020. It collided with a british towed array sonar from a UK frigate.
The sub's periscope was spoted by the frigate's helicopter before that which led the frigate to tryvto track it.
It seems UK lost a big part of the sonar and back then I saw someone saying in the commebts of a youtube video that one of the commander of a akula sub received a prestigious medal in the same year...
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/01/06/world/british-warship-collides-with-russian-submarine/index.html
It was even caught on camera by a UK documentary crew :
Big_Gazza wrote:I'd like to think that the Russian military has a RN towed array in a warehouse somewhere, with specialists crawling over it like army ants on a dead grasshopper...
I like even more the idea of the Russians snickering to themselves that the NATO tech isn't that impressive and is inferior to their own arrays.
Pure conjecture I admit, but it gives a small warm glow inside.
GarryB likes this post
dino00, LMFS and Mir like this post
LMFS likes this post
RTN wrote:The last time similar claims were made "involving Russian Navy" and British warship it turned out that it was actually a BBC documentary. This incident is probably no different.Isos wrote:It seems that one of the Akula could have been involved in a weired accident in the Atlantic back in 2020. It collided with a british towed array sonar from a UK frigate.
The sub's periscope was spoted by the frigate's helicopter before that which led the frigate to tryvto track it.
It seems UK lost a big part of the sonar and back then I saw someone saying in the commebts of a youtube video that one of the commander of a akula sub received a prestigious medal in the same year...
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/01/06/world/british-warship-collides-with-russian-submarine/index.html
It was even caught on camera by a UK documentary crew :
dino00, Isos and lancelot like this post
Mir wrote:Russians showing the middle finger!
GarryB likes this post
GarryB likes this post
I mean british propaganda was gloating that the british frigate had already detected and was tracking the russian submarine, while the russian submarine had no idea there was a british frigate in the area and just bumbled onto the the towed array, which supposedly proves that russian subs aren't stealthy and lack situational awareness..Big_Gazza wrote:I'd like to think that the Russian military has a RN towed array in a warehouse somewhere, with specialists crawling over it like army ants on a dead grasshopper...
I like even more the idea of the Russians snickering to themselves that the NATO tech isn't that impressive and is inferior to their own arrays.
Pure conjecture I admit, but it gives a small warm glow inside.
limb wrote:I mean british propaganda was gloating that the british frigate had already detected and was tracking the russian submarine, while the russian submarine had no idea there was a british frigate in the area and just bumbled onto the the towed array, which supposedly proves that russian subs aren't stealthy and lack situational awareness..Big_Gazza wrote:I'd like to think that the Russian military has a RN towed array in a warehouse somewhere, with specialists crawling over it like army ants on a dead grasshopper...
I like even more the idea of the Russians snickering to themselves that the NATO tech isn't that impressive and is inferior to their own arrays.
Pure conjecture I admit, but it gives a small warm glow inside.
Isos and Broski like this post
Big_Gazza wrote:limb wrote:I mean british propaganda was gloating that the british frigate had already detected and was tracking the russian submarine, while the russian submarine had no idea there was a british frigate in the area and just bumbled onto the the towed array, which supposedly proves that russian subs aren't stealthy and lack situational awareness..Big_Gazza wrote:I'd like to think that the Russian military has a RN towed array in a warehouse somewhere, with specialists crawling over it like army ants on a dead grasshopper...
I like even more the idea of the Russians snickering to themselves that the NATO tech isn't that impressive and is inferior to their own arrays.
Pure conjecture I admit, but it gives a small warm glow inside.
Does anyone really care what stupid bullshittery those limey bastards come out with? These idiots are under the false impression that their pissant nation is something special, or that anything they say has some value. Small insigificant people...
GarryB, Big_Gazza, Hole and Broski like this post
GarryB and Big_Gazza like this post
George1, Big_Gazza, LMFS and Hole like this post
GarryB, Ned86 and Arkanghelsk like this post
I did watch and from there I extracted an info that Obninsk is at Nerpa for repairs and possible some additional upgrade (even though it passed modernization in 2013).ALAMO wrote:Highly recommend watching Combat approval, it was released 3 weeks ago if I remember, and all about those subs.
Interesting part, after the repair/modernization they are considered as frontline boats.
GarryB, ALAMO and Arkanghelsk like this post