Excellent work TheArmenian...
What are the pluses and minuses of Ak-12 assult rifle ?
Just looking at the drawing (and unable to understand the text) I would think this is a rather good attempt to solve the main issues with the AK-74M, while at the same time not wasting energy making a radically new design.
It is clearly not a balanced recoil mechanism, which is very disappointing to me, however if accuracy and range are being emphasised by the Russian military then the old practise of firing in bursts will likely be changed to short range practise... in which case a balanced recoil mechanism is not so important anymore.
If we look at the problems they had with the original AK... the difficulty in fitting new items is clearly solved with top, bottom and side mounted rails. They seem to be lower profile and the side mounted rails are short and don't interfere with grip.
The standard bayonet lug is present as is the lug used to attach the standard grenade launcher.
It looks like the cocking handle has been moved to the left side of the rifle and by the look of the selector it is likely present on both sides.
The buttstock appears to be both adjustible for angle and length as well as being a folding stock and the iron sights now use a peep rear sight, which some people prefer.
The muzzle brake seems to be longer and perhaps also reduces flash and blast during firing, though that might just be the way it is drawn.
The mag will likely be a 60 round mag which will reduce the number of mag changes required.
Overall I think it is a good weapon that should be straight forward to make and in the western calibres in semi auto only might sell well as a "hunting rifle" as it will be easy to mount western scopes etc.
What happens to the famed AK-200 rifle if AK-12 gets selected or will they both compete and winner takes it all ?
My answer here is wrong. The AK-200 is different from the AK12, the AK-200 appears to be a standard AK-74M with a length adjustible stock, and rails on the top, sides and lower front stock area. The AK-12 on the other hand has a new design adjustible stock plus redesigned safety and cocking handle and mechanism.
I rather suspect the AK12 is better and without the balanced recoil mechanism cheaper and easier to use.The AK-200 and the AK-12 are the same thing.
The AK-200 was the upgrade of the AK-74M like the T-90AM was the upgrade of the T-90S. The difference is that they want the AK-200 to be accepted into service in 2012, so they have named it AK-12.
Keep in mind that this is from one company and there are several other gun makers that will put their rifles into the ring to get a piece of the pie.
Kovrov (AEK-xxx), KBP (ADS), and of course Abakan (AN-94) will all want this interim contract.
This weapon will likely be bought and used in small numbers for special forces testing... who knows what could happen. The VDV and naval infantry already tested the ADS and it is possible they might adopt it, so there could be several different rifles adopted in the short term till a new from scratch weapon has been developed and perfected.
Here is the other side of the AK-107 prototype:
So while it has rails, it retains the side rail mount for standard Soviet and Russian scopes.
Note: This photo does not have the AK-12 among the other firearms
Nice... any bigger shots?
Looks like a mix of ADS and ASh-12 although the two middle ASh-12s have different magazines, with the upper rifle having a shorter magazine perhaps with a heavier calibre round for sniper use, while the lower rifle could be the assault rifle version...
Thanks for posting... very interesting.