Russian Navy: Status & News #3

SeigSoloyvov wrote:however to shut this clown up.

https://russiamil.wordpress.com/2017/11/27/russias-military-modernization-plans-2018-2027/

"The only new class of surface ships expected to be built in the next eight years are the so-called Super Gorshkov-class, an 8,000-ton frigate that is increasingly seen as a cheaper and more practical alternative to the 14,000-ton Lider-class destroyers"

The russian themselves have said this, now shut up buddy you have been proven wrong.

From what i understand, considering current rhetoric, the Super-Gorshkov will most likely be built first, and afterwords the Lider.
This is mostly because the systems meant for the Lider simply haven't been developed yet, such as naval S-500.

Until those systems are ready, the SG be the priority.
In the future, i can see the Lider and SG as the successors to the Kirov and the Slava.

eehnie wrote:The first unit of the Project 23560 Lider Cruiser/Destroyer seems to be under constrution.

http://russianships.info/eng/warships/project_23560.htm

Good news for Russia.

The first unit of the Project 23560 under construction at this point means that this is a ship which construction begins under the State Armament Program 2011-2020 (likely thanks to the Mistral funds). The State Armament Program 2018-2025 is not still in force.

I would not be surprised if there is something similar coming for the first unit of the Project 23000. In this case it would not be necessary new orders of big ships under the State Armament Program 2018-2025.

PapaDragon wrote:...

It would be a big blow for the US and all you if Russia gets the first unit of the Project 23560 (under construction at this point) and the first unit of the Project 23000 (likely coming soon) in part thanks to the 2 Mistral ships money. A good upgrade for Russia.

What to expect from you  

The ship's composition of the Russian Navy (warships of 1-2 rank, NK - from 2,000 tons full) as of 01/01/2018





https://navy-korabel.livejournal.com/

what do various colors in the table mean? which is for "under construction", which for active service, which for being decomissioned and what not?

PapaDragon wrote:

eehnie wrote:................

I would not be surprised if there is something similar coming for the first unit of the Project 23000. In this case it would not be necessary new orders of big ships under the State Armament Program 2018-2025.

Oh so they will be building 100k carrier in secret as well?

What a double plot twist indeed.... You don't happen to know where are they being built oh Informed One?  

This shit keeps getting better and better....

As i already said few weeks ago, its being bult in secret underwater high-tech shipyard in Far North, built with the help of South Korea, and its so big you can construct 10 Shtorms at the same time. Funds are being pulled from smart investments of Russia in Oz.

Militarov wrote:

PapaDragon wrote:

eehnie wrote:................

I would not be surprised if there is something similar coming for the first unit of the Project 23000. In this case it would not be necessary new orders of big ships under the State Armament Program 2018-2025.

Oh so they will be building 100k carrier in secret as well?

What a double plot twist indeed.... You don't happen to know where are they being built oh Informed One?  

This shit keeps getting better and better....

As i already said few weeks ago, its being bult in secret underwater high-tech shipyard in Far North, built with the help of South Korea, and its so big you can construct 10 Shtorms at the same time. Funds are being pulled from smart investments of Russia in Oz.

Our species of pro-US "Serbians" with US accent and humor, tend to have bad digesting with the Russian achievements on shipyards, and even worse with the case of the Project 23560.

http://russianships.info/eng/warships/project_23560.htm
http://russianships.info/boevye/23560.htm

Quick, get the repair kit out, 156 Yamal has had a bump.

I have no idea how acurate this is but https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=9&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjimpG-r8vYAhUrI8AKHRs1BYkQFghQMAg&url=http%3A%2F%2Fweaponews.com%2Fnews%2F5614-the-first-destroyer-of-project-leader-will-assign-the-name-orlov-chesm.html&usg=AOvVaw3U1IRmH1AUTC4ylSl3yEo-

They better be sure that the naval S-500 is going to be ready bofore they start its contruction or they might have a problem.

JohninMK wrote:Quick, get the repair kit out, 156 Yamal has had a bump.

WTF happened?

marat wrote:

JohninMK wrote:Quick, get the repair kit out, 156 Yamal has had a bump.

WTF happened?

Looks like a large UAV or small aircraft crashed into it at a 45 degree angle.

Why has it got thoes 2 sections of plating over the hole?

eehnie wrote:


Our species of pro-US "Serbians" with US accent and humor, tend to have bad digesting with the Russian achievements on shipyards, and even worse with the case of the Project 23560.

http://russianships.info/eng/warships/project_23560.htm
http://russianships.info/boevye/23560.htm

Thats it, that is undisputable proof. Please Papa admit him that he is right.

PapaDragon wrote:

marat wrote:

eehnie wrote:
Our species of pro-US "Serbians" with US accent and humor, tend to have bad digesting with the Russian achievements on shipyards, and even worse with the case of the Project 23560.

http://russianships.info/eng/warships/project_23560.htm
http://russianships.info/boevye/23560.htm

Thats it, that is undisputable proof. Please Papa admit him that he is right.

He is right, I am separate species: Homo SerbicUS Accentus  

JohninMK wrote:Quick, get the repair kit out, 156 Yamal has had a bump.

I saw pictures of russian su-24 damaged in syria also. They faced some drone attacks maybe tgat that. But the ship look like it colided with something maybe at port in syria. A drone should be huge to do such damage.