Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+59
chicken
mutantsushi
Strizh
Kyo
Big_Gazza
victor1985
OminousSpudd
AbsoluteZero
GarryB
kvs
Notio
higurashihougi
sepheronx
George1
Werewolf
Vann7
Cpt Caz
Vympel
volna
fragmachine
acatomic
Sujoy
Mike E
Asf
Cyberspec
mack8
magnumcromagnon
Stealthflanker
zg18
russianumber1
etaepsilonk
a89
NickM
AlfaT8
Regular
Neoprime
AJ-47
gaurav
Deep Throat
Viktor
Morpheus Eberhardt
Hachimoto
xeno
runaway
collegeboy16
Pugnax
Russian Patriot
flamming_python
Shadåw
Dima
KomissarBojanchev
Mindstorm
medo
marcellogo
AZZKIKR
Austin
TheArmenian
TR1
Zivo
63 posters

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Cpt Caz
    Cpt Caz


    Posts : 86
    Points : 95
    Join date : 2013-09-08

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  Cpt Caz Wed Nov 19, 2014 6:49 pm

    Russia’s tank manufacturer criticized for high prices of new generation tanks: http://en.itar-tass.com/russia/760399


    MOSCOW, November 18. /TASS/. The price of the new Armata tank is too high, Oleg Bochkaryov, the deputy chairman of Russia’s Military-industrial Commission said Tuesday. The contract on production of Armata tanks will be signed with Russia’s leading tank manufacturer Uralvagonzavod for three years, and the price of combat vehicles has already been defined, Bochkaryov said.

    Bochkaryov confirmed that the first Armata will be will be produced by the end of the year, and on May 9 the new tanks will take part in the Victory Day parade in Moscow. According to Bochkaryov, 24 machines on Armata platforms will be shown – 12 tanks and 12 heavy combat vehicles.

    It is suggested that the tank will have a remote control gun and the crew will be placed in an isolated crew cell.
    The Uralvagonzavod reacted to the accusations saying it will work on lowering the price.

    I hope the designers won't be forced to cut any corners because of this.
    Viktor
    Viktor


    Posts : 5796
    Points : 6429
    Join date : 2009-08-26
    Age : 44
    Location : Croatia

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  Viktor Thu Nov 20, 2014 1:39 am

    Cpt Caz wrote:I hope the designers won't be forced to cut any corners because of this.

    Nice thumbsup

    "Uralvagonzavod" promised to reduce the price of "Armata"
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40510
    Points : 41010
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  GarryB Thu Nov 20, 2014 7:09 am

    They might mean that the Armata MBT is not 70 tons... at 50 tons it is a medium sized tank, but of course will be a Russian Heavy tank for heavy brigades.
    Sujoy
    Sujoy


    Posts : 2415
    Points : 2573
    Join date : 2012-04-03
    Location : India || भारत

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  Sujoy Thu Nov 20, 2014 2:25 pm

    The planned advantage of the new Armata tank is its lightweight armor, the 44S-SV-SH. The developers( Scientific Research Institute of Steel,Moscow) managed to increase the hardness of steel while retaining its plasticity (the process of course is classified). This combination allows the reduction of the thickness of the armor plate by 15 percent without reducing its security features.
    kvs
    kvs


    Posts : 15845
    Points : 15980
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : Turdope's Kanada

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  kvs Fri Nov 21, 2014 5:27 am

    These days anti-tank munitions are so effective that armour thickness is not longer a major factor like it was back in WWII.
    The only hope is all the reactive armour and perhaps ceramic layering. The tank design has to evolve and I think mobility is one
    of the obvious aspects to enhance.

    I heard from a Canadian tank crew member being interviewed long ago that in modern tank warfare the tank that gets the first
    shot wins. This must form the basis of tank warfare planning.
    Cyberspec
    Cyberspec


    Posts : 2904
    Points : 3057
    Join date : 2011-08-08
    Location : Terra Australis

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  Cyberspec Fri Nov 21, 2014 6:43 am

    Also, 'low observability' to enemy sensors will be an important feature. The Armata will reportedly have such features according to a Nii Stali spokesman.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40510
    Points : 41010
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  GarryB Fri Nov 21, 2014 3:17 pm

    Getting the first shot is important but being able to take hits and continue fighting is also important... the APS system is supposed to be able to stop current threats (ie 1,700m/s) while a new system in development is supposed to be able to stop even faster threats (2,500m/s-3,000m/s)

    the standard APS for medium and light vehicles is called Standard, while the system for the heavy vehicles (armata) is called Afghanistan. The new system for faster threats is called Zaslon apparently.
    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon


    Posts : 8138
    Points : 8273
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  magnumcromagnon Sat Nov 22, 2014 1:14 am

    GarryB wrote:Getting the first shot is important but being able to take hits and continue fighting is also important... the APS system is supposed to be able to stop current threats (ie 1,700m/s) while a new system in development is supposed to be able to stop even faster threats (2,500m/s-3,000m/s)

    the standard APS for medium and light vehicles is called Standard, while the system for the heavy vehicles (armata) is called Afghanistan. The new system for faster threats is called Zaslon apparently.

    2.5 - 3 km/sec? That's ridiculously fast, like Mach 8.8/9, if Zaslon can live up to expectations than I may end up sh*tting bricks!
    avatar
    Asf


    Posts : 471
    Points : 488
    Join date : 2014-03-27

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  Asf Sat Nov 22, 2014 2:50 am

    You're wrong, zaslon is a ukraininan thing.
    Cyberspec
    Cyberspec


    Posts : 2904
    Points : 3057
    Join date : 2011-08-08
    Location : Terra Australis

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  Cyberspec Sat Nov 22, 2014 5:01 am

    Asf wrote:You're wrong, zaslon is a ukraininan thing.

    In the latest article on Armata a Russian 'Zaslon' is mentioned which is apparently going to replace the 'Afghan' APS.

    New armor - is not the only means of protecting the crew of "Armata". According to some, this will be the first tank, on which it will be installed new means of active protection against rocket-propelled grenades and sabots. This is the latest development of the Kolomna Engineering Bureau - "Afghan".

    From open sources about it is known that the radar system is operating in the millimeter range, the first to use the protective ammunition warhead type percussion core, not fragmentation as before. Middle line interception missiles, rocket-propelled grenades or projectiles of 15-20 meters and a maximum speed of interception armor-piercing projectiles - 1700 m / s.

    In the future, "Armata" is planned to establish a more perfect system of protection "Barrier (Zaslon)". It will already be able to intercept targets flying at a speed of 2500 to 3000 m / s.

    Full article: http://tvzvezda.ru/news/forces/content/201411211239-uvb5.htm
    avatar
    Vann7


    Posts : 5385
    Points : 5485
    Join date : 2012-05-16

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  Vann7 Sat Nov 22, 2014 11:10 am

    Thats quite nice..  3000m/s is about mach 8.7 . Traditional Tanks kinetic salvo fly at mach 5.5  .So in theory
    the active protection could intercept even a plane hypersonic air to ground missile. Shocked  Hellfire is like 10 times slower ,less than Mach 1.0 its speed ,same , TOmahawks missiles too , so we are speaking here about what? RAil Guns projectiles? Brahmos2 ? thats very fast hypersonic weapons.. mmm.. seems overkill . For sure even if a heavy missile like tomahawk is intercepted the shock wave will still wipe the tank or at very least totally disable /damage all its electronics and sensors and optics and seriously injure the operators for the shock wave.


    Last edited by Vann7 on Sat Nov 22, 2014 11:17 am; edited 1 time in total
    Werewolf
    Werewolf


    Posts : 5927
    Points : 6116
    Join date : 2012-10-25

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  Werewolf Sat Nov 22, 2014 11:12 am

    Vann7 wrote:

    Thats quite nice..  3000m/s is about mach 8.7 . Traditional Tanks kinetic salvo fly at mach 5.5  .So in theory
    the active protection could intercept even a plane hypersonic air to ground missile. Shocked  Hellfire is like 10 times slower ,less than Mach 1.0 its speed ,same , TOmahawks missiles too , so we are speaking here about what? RAil Guns projectiles? Brahmos2 ? thats very fast hypersonic weapons.. mmm.. seems overkill . For sure even if a heavy missile like tomahawk is intercepted the shock wave will still wipe the tank..

    The tomahawk will crush the tank by kinetic energy alone. Like a bowling ball against a pin.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40510
    Points : 41010
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  GarryB Sat Nov 22, 2014 1:11 pm

    Kinetic energy alone the tomahawk would shatter and have a marginal effect, but if its 100+kg warhead goes off the contents of the tank will be turned into jam.

    the main focus of the 3km/s interception capability is reportedly self forging fragments and future rail guns afaik.

    SMERCH and GRAD and URAGAN already have a wide range of top attack self forging fragment munitions with MMW radar and IR guidance... and have done for some time.

    3km/s is about 9.2 mach, with the speed of sound near sea level being about 320m/s.

    Most tank shells leave the muzzle at about 1.5-1.7km/s but by the time they get to the target they are travelling slower.
    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18514
    Points : 19019
    Join date : 2011-12-23
    Location : Greece

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  George1 Sun Nov 23, 2014 3:19 am

    Russia’s tank manufacturer criticized for high prices of new generation tanks

    MOSCOW, November 18. /TASS/. The price of the new Armata tank is too high, Oleg Bochkaryov, the deputy chairman of Russia’s Military-industrial Commission said Tuesday. The contract on production of Armata tanks will be signed with Russia’s leading tank manufacturer Uralvagonzavod for three years, and the price of combat vehicles has already been defined, Bochkaryov said.

    Bochkaryov confirmed that the first Armata will be will be produced by the end of the year, and on May 9 the new tanks will take part in the Victory Day parade in Moscow. According to Bochkaryov, 24 machines on Armata platforms will be shown – 12 tanks and 12 heavy combat vehicles.

    It is suggested that the tank will have a remote control gun and the crew will be placed in an isolated crew cell.

    The Uralvagonzavod reacted to the accusations saying it will work on lowering the price.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    What kind of vechile will be the "heavy combat" one? IFV/APC based on Armata?
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40510
    Points : 41010
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  GarryB Sun Nov 23, 2014 4:07 pm

    This tank will have all the bells and whistles, including radar, and a range of optronic sensors, as well as APS and the latest ERA and the latest version of Nakidka etc etc.

    Of course the first production models will be expensive... but with the chassis standardised it will be produced in large numbers with a variety of electronics suites...

    It could even have a gun launched UAV... The three crew positions will have modular controls so from any one position you could be driver, gunner, or commander.
    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18514
    Points : 19019
    Join date : 2011-12-23
    Location : Greece

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  George1 Thu Nov 27, 2014 11:05 pm



    translation of some key points of this interview :

    Nothing specific was said. Since its still classified for the most part, he didn't reveal any details. He confirmed what is already known:

    - will definitely be shown on May 9th Victory Day parade. There is also a chance it will be shown in September at an arms expo.
    - very high crew survivability
    - tons of automation
    - brand new design as a whole: suspension, armor, various systems
    - advanced targeting systems

    Armata is expected to be given to the army in 2017. Per presidents orders the Armata MBT's production will roughly number in 2300 units, with productions running into year 2020. This is just the MBT numbers, not counting all the other new armor fighting vehicles and etc.
    The rest of the interview is about the armor industry as a whole around the world. Indian partnership is going very smooth, lots of technology being licensed both ways, his corporation is helping India on their own Arjun tank upgrades and production. He talks about the homegrown operations - his corporation has come a long way, able to combine their efforts with other companies at home. They are now able to produce 10x more units than before, lots of money being put towards more R&D and future investments into the operation.

    Mentions Ukraine, the interviewer asks what the Ukrainian tank factories state will be after this whole ordeal. His company is not affected, or the whole homegrown operation. Majority of the parts were being supplied from Russia to Ukraine to build some of the components. All production issues will be mitigated and produced at home.

    In general the company is very active around the world, took on more orders at home and abroad than ever before and will continue to increase capacity and production numbers.
    TR1
    TR1


    Posts : 5435
    Points : 5433
    Join date : 2011-12-07

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  TR1 Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:35 am

    http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1078047.html

    Armata is dubbed T-14.

    IFV Armata being bought for sure, I am pleased.
    sepheronx
    sepheronx


    Posts : 8834
    Points : 9094
    Join date : 2009-08-06
    Age : 35
    Location : Canada

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  sepheronx Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:08 am

    TR1 wrote:http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1078047.html

    Armata is dubbed T-14.

    IFV Armata being bought for sure, I am pleased.

    So is this why they never bothered to go with the BMPT and BMPT72?
    TR1
    TR1


    Posts : 5435
    Points : 5433
    Join date : 2011-12-07

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  TR1 Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:32 am

    BMPT = fire support vehicle.

    Armata is being bought in IFV variant, so functions as a troop carrier.

    If there will be an Armata BMPT variant, we will not see it in the parade, at least according to available info.
    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon


    Posts : 8138
    Points : 8273
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  magnumcromagnon Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:52 am

    sepheronx wrote:
    TR1 wrote:http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1078047.html

    Armata is dubbed T-14.

    IFV Armata being bought for sure, I am pleased.

    So is this why they never bothered to go with the BMPT and BMPT72?

    What makes you say that? The main reason they didn't go with the BMPT72 is the same reason why they didn't go with T-90 AM/MS, their moving on completely to a different platform. Just because they didn't go with the BMPT72 doesn't mean they gave up on the BMPT concept, and while technically and IFV version of the Armata platform can act as the de facto BMPT, the reality is that a pure BMPT would have superior performance because it was designed for that very purpose. The IFV would have the anti-infantry armaments no doubt, but because much of the space would be dedicated to carrying soldiers, the IFV Armata would be limited to how much ammo and variety of weapons it could have mounted at any given time (lets not forget separating ammo from crew members concept). A pure-bred BMPT will have most of the crew space dedicated to ammo storage, combined with more ammo types and more weapon types could be equipped due to that significantly greater flexibility, making the pure BMPT have significantly greater potential and performance than a IFV acting as the de facto BMPT.
    Zivo
    Zivo


    Posts : 1487
    Points : 1511
    Join date : 2012-04-13
    Location : U.S.A.

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  Zivo Mon Dec 01, 2014 4:24 pm

    I'm guessing the reason they chose to go with displaying the MBT and BMP variants is because they will likely be the most common models, and they have a significant amount of front and rear engine hulls for testing and training. Maybe KBTM's BMPT model put a bit of doubt in the minds the Russian military about the twin 30mm/ATGM layout.

    So, will the T-14 BMP have a 100/30mm, or the 57mm gun?
    higurashihougi
    higurashihougi


    Posts : 3400
    Points : 3487
    Join date : 2014-08-13
    Location : A small and cutie S-shaped land.

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  higurashihougi Mon Dec 01, 2014 5:49 pm

    Zivo wrote:I'm guessing the reason they chose to go with displaying the MBT and BMP variants is because they will likely be the most common models, and they have a significant amount of front and rear engine hulls for testing and training. Maybe KBTM's BMPT model put a bit of doubt in the minds the Russian military about the twin 30mm/ATGM layout.

    So, will the T-14 BMP have a 100/30mm, or the 57mm gun?

    I thought T-14 is the name for the tank version of Armata only Question Question
    TR1
    TR1


    Posts : 5435
    Points : 5433
    Join date : 2011-12-07

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  TR1 Tue Dec 02, 2014 2:28 am

    Zivo wrote:I'm guessing the reason they chose to go with displaying the MBT and BMP variants is because they will likely be the most common models, and they have a significant amount of front and rear engine hulls for testing and training. Maybe KBTM's BMPT model put a bit of doubt in the minds the Russian military about the twin 30mm/ATGM layout.

    So, will the T-14 BMP have a 100/30mm, or the 57mm gun?

    Probably just Epoha-lite with 30mm for now.
    sepheronx
    sepheronx


    Posts : 8834
    Points : 9094
    Join date : 2009-08-06
    Age : 35
    Location : Canada

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  sepheronx Tue Dec 02, 2014 6:01 am

    TR1 wrote:BMPT = fire support vehicle.

    Armata is being bought in IFV variant, so functions as a troop carrier.

    If there will be an Armata BMPT variant, we will not see it in the parade, at least according to available info.

    OK. So this armata bmp will be predominantly a troop carrier with some firepower than. A heavy troop carrier. Sounds awesome. Cant wait to see this.

    -------

    https://www.russiadefence.net/viewtopic.forum?t=3691
    TR1
    TR1


    Posts : 5435
    Points : 5433
    Join date : 2011-12-07

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  TR1 Tue Dec 02, 2014 6:59 am

    sepheronx wrote:
    TR1 wrote:BMPT = fire support vehicle.

    Armata is being bought in IFV variant, so functions as a troop carrier.

    If there will be an Armata BMPT variant, we will not see it in the parade, at least according to available info.

    OK. So this armata bmp will be predominantly a troop carrier with some firepower than. A heavy troop carrier. Sounds awesome. Cant wait to see this.

    A BMP is by definition the Russian equivalent of IFV.
    Armor level does not determine if it is an IFV or not, but generally speaking the armament (though in this case, it does appear to be a super-Puma type or something).
    It looks like they are buying both IFV and APC Kurganets for example- so in Russia there will be a Kurganets BTR as well as a BMP Kurganets.

    Sponsored content


    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1 - Page 27 Empty Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #1

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sun Nov 17, 2024 10:48 pm