Mysteries and Bizarre Things:

I think they are real. I doubt the stone structures were free-standing. There must have been a wooden framework that has long turned to
soil after it was buried. The WEF is all about information control and herd management. This site violates the BS official archaeology story.

For some reason the elites are hell bent on pushing the nonsense that civilization emerged in the Biblical window over the last 6000 years.
Considering their paranoia and xenophobia, the elites must be worried about any narrative where reasonably advanced civilizations of the past
were deleted save for a few megaliths. The question as to why this happened is uncomfortable. Could the same happen to our own
"advanced" civilization. Was it all because the elites of the past f*cked up. I know it seems like a ho-hum thing to worry about to the point
of burying it and pushing BS alternative histories. But it makes sense to keep the sheeple pacified with the notion that our current epoch
is somehow singular. We will make it even though previous primitive civilizations didn't. They were primitive, we are not...

But the current academic establishment and its rot cannot be forgotten. We have a lot of careers invested in BS.

The Fermi Paradox may have a solution waiting for us to see here on Earth. The problem is not the emergence of advanced civilizations,
but their window of existence. Ours is really less than 200 years. It already looks like we may delete ourselves in the next 100 years.
A 300 year window may be too small for any advanced aliens to "call us". Are we trying to call them? No. Why should they be calling us?
The Dune scenario of ancient advanced civilizations is likely to be total BS.

Another massive nail in the coffin of establishment archaeology narratives.   Totally out of place high precision granite chambers in India supposedly
make 3000 years ago but obviously not. These are not burial chambers, so what are they for such a vast amount of effort that does not conform
to level of technology of the time?

I think these are some sort of chambers designed for instrumentation. Obviously the devices placed there have long gone and were probably portable.
What were they measuring? The selection of granite indicates something. Why not carve such chambers out of softer rock? The rock itself must
have the right properties, either as a filter of EM and particle precipitation or as a resonance for select portions of the EM spectrum. They really
should do EM analysis on these chambers.

I think that these structures could not be made by hand. They had to have some sort of device for polishing the granite to the high degree that
is mentioned in the video. I can see some undulations here and there but they are not enough to attribute this to hand labour over long periods of time.

Granite is piezo-electric so I think that the choice of the rock to make these chambers is very deliberate. The simplicity of these chambers points to them
being utilitarian and not ceremonial and decorative.

I don't think we need aliens for any of these megalithic constructions. We just need to flush down the toilet the BS that human civilization appeared in
the last 6000 years. If modern humans have existed for 800,000 years, then there have been three glaciation cycles that they have lived through.
There would have been plenty of time to bootstrap civilization over this period of time. The emergence of civilization in the last 10,000 years is just
another instance and not the all-time event that archaeologists claim it to be.

The lack of pottery shards, clay writing tablets, wall paintings and buried technology from these earlier civilizations is all due to time. No technology
would survive above or below ground. The most obvious evidence are the megalithic structures and we cannot radio-carbon date them at all. The
ruins in Peru, Egypt and India could be hundreds of thousands years old. We also do not know what is under the water in shelf regions that
were exposed during the glaciation maximum stages. This period of time is long enough for sedimentary rock to form. I bet that archaeologists did not
try to look for pottery shards in sedimentary rock layers.

I will make a disclaimer. I do not fully sign on to the views of Bright Insight and other alt-archaeology individuals. They like to pile all sorts of outlandish
garbage on top of their valid observations about the failings of establishment archaeology. If you listen to the recent interview by Joe Rogan involving
Jimmy Corsetti and Ben van Kerkwyk (#1928) you can find cringe nonsense about how the Earth's pole of rotation jumped 90 degrees at some stage
in the not-so-distant past. This garbage is utter nonsense since there would be no physical process to produce such changes in the Earth's rotational
state. Orbital dynamics producing such violent effects would guarantee for the Earth to be ejected from the solar system at some stage. We are
long past any such drama at the earliest stage of planetary formation. A 90 degree jump in the axis of rotation would not just produce absurd ocean
and atmosphere flow anomalies, it would produce massive geological upheaval. Such shit simply did not happen.

The clown archaeologist who "debated" Graham Hancock is a lying sack of shit.

I have not seen any examples of hand polished granite where large scale geometry is preserved.   There is no way these chambers were polished by
hand even supposing they could make corundum dust polishing pads or whatnot.    These structures required machines.  Anyway there is zero
evidence of such tools concurrent with the supposed construction period of these chambers.   And that is precisely the point.   Obviously
humans made them in the past, but it was not the humans claimed by BS con-artists calling themselves archaeologists.  

This Fling Dibble faggot was yapping how alt-archaeologists are trying to rob precious non-white aboriginals of their heritage.   No, it is fucks
like him who are trying to rob humanity of its heritage.

Once again, megalithic monuments show more complexity than smug archaeology foists on them.

Nobody knows what this image is supposed to be.

But it is a side show to the great pyramids themselves which do not conform to establishment archaeology in any metric.

GarryB wrote:It is BBC news... next they will be saying that the discovery of a USB C socket in one of the stones reveals the ancient druids were rather more sophisticated than old people today...

The source of the information has absolutely nothing to do with its relevance and validity. Dragging a massive boulder from Scotland at a time when there were no roads
and boats were a joke is an actual mystery.

The problem is that too many clowns have polluted this space with their retarded fantasies about aliens and whatnot. At the same time establishment archaeology is a
total joke with its Mickey Mouse attributions and claims that are devoid of physics and engineering competence. Like the attribution of a pyramid to Kufu because some
tiny statuette was found near by (not inside the pyramid). For alleged tombs of pharaohs these structures are utterly devoid of hieroglyphs and even fragments of contents
that one finds in the real tombs in the Valley of the Kings.

So they plant trees on an archaeological site. This is obvious destruction and suppression of any proper excavation.

Actual science from "amateurs". You can believe that all of this is a fraud and that mainstream archaeology is God's revealed truth, but that would
be your vapid choice...

Anyway, we have direct evidence of advanced metal tools used to process the precision granite vases found in Egypt. Metals that Egyptians
had no access to or even had knowledge of were used to make tools. The embedded metal in the granite proves this. You can't contaminate
granite with random dust this way. Also, random dust would not have such composition since such dust comes from rocks and no rocks on this
planet produce such metal dust. It does not matter that rocks contain metal deposits. They are in oxide form and do not have the associations of
different metals (e.g. titanium and iron) found here.

Basically, none of the official history in most of the world reflects reality. It is some BS foisted on the proles by the elites. My theory is that the elites
are perpetually paranoid about losing power. So they have a compulsion to manage the proles who may develop "thinking modes" that can lead to
loss of power. For example, if people were aware that advanced civilizations were utterly deleted in the past, then they would ask questions as
to why. The potential answers to such questions would put the elites in the spotlight. Sure, one could wave the hands and say that climate
anomalies or other cataclysms did in these civilizations, but that would be lame. Supposedly our advanced global civilization can weather such shocks.
But maybe it can't. And here we have the germination of a problem for the elites. They cannot admit weakness and vulnerability of the foundation
of the system. This applies to any country on the planet. It is not about the west or capitalism. It is about social organization and reliance on
resources and food. Can the deciders be expected to lead humanity away from termination? If the real past is any guide, they cannot and
are likely to lead us to oblivion.

Basically alternative amateur archaeologists are outclassing the so-called experts. I don't know what to call this, inverse "Dunning-Kruger" maybe.
The experts are the ones suffering from Dunning-Kruger so that the non-experts who are not trapped in this mental pathology are doing a better job.
Invoking "coincidence" to explain away globally distributed characteristics in statues and megalithic construction is simply BS. This is not science.
There is no freaking way that the megalithic stonework in Peru and Egypt are some random chance overlap. There is absolutely no reason to carve
with the same tight tolerances and to shape the corner pieces in the same way (i.e. short-L lips instead of just adjacent placement of the same
basic shape). Why the f*ck would Easter Island have megalithic construction in the same style as well. This is distinct from the soft volcanic ash
rock statutes that get all the attention. It is clear that the Inca and the Easter Islanders did not produce this architecture. The same goes for
dynastic Egyptians who did not produce the great pyramids and only hacked around with imitations made from mud or at best wood and stone
construction in the case of the bent pyramid. The more this subject is explored objectively the more it becomes apparent that great civilization(s)
preceded the alleged 6,000 year window claimed by mainstream archaeology.