More thoughts on who done it from MoA. There are visuals at the first link. Sorry its so long but I dug it out so that you didn't have to with links.
The PavewayIV (he knows what he is writing about) is very interesting. Starts at my highlight.
The Nord Stream 2 Pipeline Sabotage
https://www.monkeywerxus.com/blog/the-nord-stream-2-pipeline-sabotage
Okay, let’s dig into what we know about the subject. First and foremost, everything I have shown and discovered is open source - meaning it is available to anyone around the world.
I just happen to know where to look and have the tools that give me the opportunity to find the data.
That said, the Russians also have this data and it certainly didn’t help our case that Biden told them we would take the pipeline out should the Russians invade Ukraine. We have seen Biden “slip up” on many occasions so this isn’t a surprise.
You would think that the bobbleheads would have at least put someone in the game that would have the cognitive ability to at a minimum play the game, but that clearly isn’t the case.
Here are a few facts about the sabotage:
1. Biden said we were going to do it
2. It happened “overnight” on the 26th of September
3. We have a US Navy P8 fly from the United States to a refueling rendezvous point over Grudziądz Poland at 0210 hrs GMT
4. The two aircraft, Callsign N/A, and BART12 sync up at 26,400 ft for an extended 1:20 minute refueling, disconnecting at 0328 hrs GMT
5. The BART12 air refueler RTB’d to Spangdahlem Air Base Germany and one should note the flight record has been wiped
6. The Navy P8 then continues onto the Nord Stream Pipeline location and descends to an altitude of <10,000 ft at 0345 hrs GMT
7. The Navy P8 exits the area just prior to 0700 hrs and is the only aircraft over the area the entire time
8. At 0709 hrs GMT the Navy P8 returns back to the United States. Note: the US Navy P8 HexCode is AE6851 and is NOT listed in the aircraft database. Furthermore, the aircraft flew as “masked” meaning it did not want to be tracked
9. Datapoint, there were recorded 2.3 magnitude shakes in the area at that same time
10. The following morning NATO Forces announce that overnight the Nord Stream 2 Pipeline has been sabotaged
11. A Poland Ministry Official posts a tweet thanking the United States for taking out the Pipeline
12. On September 29th in front of the UN Security Council a Russian Federation spokesperson presents the known facts and asks the United States representative directly in a yes or no requested response, “did the United States take out the Nord Stream 2 Pipeline” in which the US representative did not confirm nor deny it and didn’t answer the question, but instead took an offensive posture.
October 1, 2022, the United States has no official statement on the sabotage although Biden is pushing the standard doublespeak rhetoric and as they say, the best defense is a good offense.
There is, however, an official release from the White House back in February 2022 that states the United States will take further action with Germany to end the Nord Stream Pipeline 2
So let’s look at the flight data logically…
The United States has Navy P8’s stationed in the UK so why fly an aircraft all the way from the United States and not land in the UK for refueling, but instead hook up for an hour plus with another US Air Force refueler out of Germany?
Could it be that the UK’s new Prime Minister would not condone the activity?
We have already seen her call out Nancy Pelosi who we know is a bobblehead and not in line with the New World Order, and we know the new UK PM is indeed a WEF appointee which is part of the NWO.
Clearly, the United States did not want to land in the UK or anywhere else for a reason.
Could it also be because it was armed with external weapons or they didn’t want any record of the aircraft in the area?
Landing would create a log and even though we see them wipe the flight record data, the airport log is still intact.
Let’s talk about the P8 weaponry for a minute.
The Navy P8 Poseiden has 11 external hardpoints for mounting weapons as well as an internal bomb bay, and one weapon, in particular, is a High Altitude Anti-Submarine Warfare Weapon Capability (HAAWC) system.
HAAWC is an all-weather add-on glide kit that enables the Mk54 torpedo to be launched near or below the cruising altitude of the P8 Poseidon.
What that means: the flight path and altitude of the P8 in question are indeed capable of conducting a “bomb run” on the Nord Stream 2 Pipeline.
Now let’s look at the flight specifics.
Note the last flight path just before exiting the area runs right along the pipeline in which they could have released the ordinance and continued their climb out, thus exiting the area and returning to the United States.
Also, note the little hump just before the climb out (red arrow).
That is consistent with a weapons release.
Pitch down, increased AoA, weapon release, little bubble up, then a climb out (the blue line is the inbound leg of the same flight).
You may also not the flight path. It circles over the area first, then flies downrange and starts the initial bomb run, then it does a quick readjustment on a final bomb run, releases, and exits immediately.
Okay let us talk about the motive: Why would the United States take out this pipeline? Reason - because it is a very large source of revenue for Russia and the sanctions to date have not worked, in fact, they have backfired on the United States.
Also, note the timing as Poland and Norway announce a new Baltic Pipeline just days after the sabotage and the EU has secured a deal with Israel going forward so they will no longer rely on Russia for the gas and oil.
We simply waited until everything was shored up and made our move.
Alright, I know I have hit you with a firehose of data for you to mull over and I will leave it to you to decide based on the data presented.
One thing for sure, in our current environment this was not a good move and it could very well be what kicks this entire powder keg off.
So as always, stay frosty and keep that powder dry.
God bless,
Monkey out.
Posted by: Melaleuca | Oct 4 2022 4:33 utc | 253
melaleuca 259 and monkey wirks
hard for me to believe that one torpedo from that P8 damaged three (?) pipes
easy to believe that P8 was there as alleged
and that it had something to do with the pipeline damage
perhaps it was just "dawn patrol" to check out the damage already done?
this is NOT an assertion, it is merely a question
Posted by: downtownhaiku | Oct 4 2022 4:59 utc | 256
USS Kearsarge is conveniently missing from the narrative.
Posted by: Norwegian | Oct 4 2022 5:35 utc | 258
Kearsarge is missing.. not sure if that’s because “convenient”.. dunno.. you could possibly sign on to his account and ask him..
I’m not an ordnance guy… is it possible the US Navy P8 was there to “trigger” something explosive that had previously been placed during the June July August exercises and drills and training in that exact location?
The one piece of “evidence” that does exist, is that the Russians were absolutely categorically *not* in that location in the months, days, hours prior.
An argument can run with what a Russian motive might be to blow their own pipeline…. it’s a facile argument, but many (especially msm are running it)
Russians have the “means”… they have lotsa shit that can blow things up.
But no argument or evidence can be made for the “opportunity”.
If the Russians could penetrate that location immediately and directly under the nose of USA+NATO…
either USA + NATO surveillance tools are complete and total shit
Or
Russians have perfected super alien-tier invisibility tech.
Cui bono + Occam’s razor says the US did it…
(And the Poles, {and others/Danes/Swedes} were aware and acquiescent).
Posted by: Melaleuca | Oct 4 2022 5:59 utc | 259
Melaleuca | Oct 4 2022 4:33 utc | 259 - more on HAAWC. This is a Mk 54 lightweight torpedo (upgraded version = faster to catch nuke subs) with a flight kit (wings) and GPS guidance. This is a new weapon. The older versions were basically an older version of a Mk 54 dropped on a parachute to the sea surface. You had to be very nearly right over the target due to the torpedo's relatively limited speed and range. And dropping it from higher altitudes introduced profound wind drift, so it was generally dropped from lower altitudes. The HAAWC allows an aircraft (P-8 anti-sub warfare in this case) to drop what is essentially a glide bomb from high altitudes/airspeeds some distance from the target and have it 'fly' to preset GPS coordinates before splashing down, jettisoning the backpack/wings/guidance unit and continuing on as a normal Mk 54 torpedo.
Here's where it gets interesting:
The Swedish National Seismic Network reported two seismic events that Monday that were explosions - One at 2:03 A.M. and a larger one at 7:04 P.M. of magnitude M2.3 (I'm assuming Central European Summer Time or GMT+2). The Swedish SVT site linked above does not mention the amount of explosives needed. When reports first started coming out, there were mentions by other seismologists of several hundred kg of explosives needed to produce that kind of magnitude of seismic event. Those disappeared quickly and were replaced in western MSM with estimates of "around 100 kg of TNT" explosives. That number seems preposterous for an M2.3 event - I'm going by seismic events resulting from mining activity using several hundred kg of explosives barely registering over M1.0 or so.
Now here's the reason they may have been trying to scrub the magnitude/explosives estimate. The Mk 54 torpedo uses a warhead of about 44 kg of PBXn explosive. More energetic than TNT but let's say 75 kg TNT equivalent. That puts it somewhat in the 100 kg TNT rang figure that popped up in MSM, but is still far too small of a charge to register anything significant on the Swedish network and certainly not anything that would produce a M2.3 event.
Monkey Werx puts the P-8 over the pipeline during the first, smaller explosion, not during the second explosion. If the P-8 dropped some conventional HAAWCs, then I would expect a seriously small seismic signal barely above background. 100 kg of TNT is what some old-timey miner would use. Modern mining blasts use dozens of charges that size simultaneously and still only produce M1.x shocks. I'm thinking something in the low sub-kiloton range was used - if not in the first explosion, then in the second on later that day. In order for a HAAWC to produce that much energy, it would have to have a small 'tactical' nuclear warhead. 3rd generation nukes can be engineered to produce almost no measurable residual radiation at sub-kiloton yields. The only evidence we would have of their use is evidence of a blast an order or two of magnitude larger than a conventional warhead could produce. And it looks like the seismic evidence narrative is already being created by the MSM to suggest a far smaller (conventional) charge. Just in case someone gets caught with their hand in the nuclear cookie jar.
Now Monkey Werx didn't (that I know of) put any US aircraft over the area of the second explosion at the same time, so we can't say if that was a P-8 HAAWC on a pre-set delay, or if it was something else (Brit ships in the area, etc.). I would really like to see some good estimates of explosion magnitude and respective TNT-equivalents for that first blast from seismologists. The science is pretty well known and well within the capability to determine if the first explosion's seismic signal could have been produced with 44kg of PBXn or something far more powerful - like a tactical nuke warhead.
I think I'm starting to understand the latest hysteria about 'Russia might use tactical nukes' and the urgency for a false flag now. If it turned out that the US has already used tactical nukes and worse, against our NATO allies critical energy infrastructure, well... that would just be damn uncomfortable to explain to the rest of the world.
Posted by: PavewayIV | Oct 4 2022 6:34 utc | 263
Bornholm, Denmark and close to Sweden. How many listening devices? American warship nearby. American spy plane flying around the explosion time.
But Russians did it. How moronic is that ?
Posted by: RB | Oct 4 2022 7:28 utc | 268