GarryB wrote:... because those AN-26s and Yak-40s and L-410s are not getting any younger....
But the L-410s are manufactured in Russia now.
GarryB wrote:... because those AN-26s and Yak-40s and L-410s are not getting any younger....
limb and Russian_Patriot_ like this post
GarryB, dino00, Russian_Patriot_ and Mir like this post
Russian_Patriot_ wrote:The engines are different. The Il-112B uses a forced version of the engine from the Il-114-300PapaDragon wrote:
That same engine is supposed to be used on Il-114 which is a civilian airliner so that's a bigger problem than it looks
Russian_Patriot_ likes this post
dino00, Kiko and Mir like this post
kvs wrote:Russian_Patriot_ wrote:The engines are different. The Il-112B uses a forced version of the engine from the Il-114-300PapaDragon wrote:
That same engine is supposed to be used on Il-114 which is a civilian airliner so that's a bigger problem than it looks
That is likely the source of the problem. Either build the right sized engines or go home. Forcing is a cost saving hack.
Meanwhile Ukr-tards are masturbating themselves silly with this tragedy. God I hate these losers.
JohninMK wrote:It came down quite suddenly. Maybe the pilots, recognising their fate, rather than bringing it down in a residential area, spotted a clear space and went for instant death rather than burning alive in a wreck whilst saving other's lives. However it happened it was a sad end. RIP.
miketheterrible dislikes this post
limb wrote:JohninMK wrote:It came down quite suddenly. Maybe the pilots, recognising their fate, rather than bringing it down in a residential area, spotted a clear space and went for instant death rather than burning alive in a wreck whilst saving other's lives. However it happened it was a sad end. RIP.
Is it possible to cut fuel supply to turboprops BTW? If yes, does it help with slowing the fire from spreadin to the fuel tanks?
Its really worrying that russia cannot produce larger turboprop engines. Putting new turboprop engines would take 10-15 more years which is unfeasible. Is there a way for Russia to buy chinese light transport aircraft, or just their copies of the ivchenko Al-20 which is more powerful than the tv3-117?
Mir likes this post
But the L-410s are manufactured in Russia now.
Is it possible to cut fuel supply to turboprops BTW? If yes, does it help with slowing the fire from spreadin to the fuel tanks?
Its really worrying that russia cannot produce larger turboprop engines.
Is there a way for Russia to buy chinese light transport aircraft, or just their copies of the ivchenko Al-20 which is more powerful than the tv3-117?
miketheterrible wrote:limb wrote:JohninMK wrote:It came down quite suddenly. Maybe the pilots, recognising their fate, rather than bringing it down in a residential area, spotted a clear space and went for instant death rather than burning alive in a wreck whilst saving other's lives. However it happened it was a sad end. RIP.
Is it possible to cut fuel supply to turboprops BTW? If yes, does it help with slowing the fire from spreadin to the fuel tanks?
Its really worrying that russia cannot produce larger turboprop engines. Putting new turboprop engines would take 10-15 more years which is unfeasible. Is there a way for Russia to buy chinese light transport aircraft, or just their copies of the ivchenko Al-20 which is more powerful than the tv3-117?
Wow, another dumb post by limb.
Now on ignore list.
A safety feature during engine fires is to cut off hydraulic and fuel lines to the engine that is burning to cut the fuel to the fire so to speak.
No point going back to old obsolete crap... spending money going backwards to something they wont produce is money wasted...
limb wrote:miketheterrible wrote:limb wrote:JohninMK wrote:It came down quite suddenly. Maybe the pilots, recognising their fate, rather than bringing it down in a residential area, spotted a clear space and went for instant death rather than burning alive in a wreck whilst saving other's lives. However it happened it was a sad end. RIP.
Is it possible to cut fuel supply to turboprops BTW? If yes, does it help with slowing the fire from spreadin to the fuel tanks?
Its really worrying that russia cannot produce larger turboprop engines. Putting new turboprop engines would take 10-15 more years which is unfeasible. Is there a way for Russia to buy chinese light transport aircraft, or just their copies of the ivchenko Al-20 which is more powerful than the tv3-117?
Wow, another dumb post by limb.
Now on ignore list.
It seems like the turth is too painful.
Show me a russian turboprop engine in development in the same class as the rolls royce AE2100 for example.
What options do the Russians have, oh genius procurment planner? Keep using obvious forced TV3-117 versions? Magically poofing a 4000-5000hp modern indigenous turboprop engine before 2030?
Rodion_Romanovic wrote:
By the way, Russia is working on engines for both aircrafts and helicopters of 4000-5000 hp (similar power as the g222/c27J and C130 engines).
https://en.topcor.ru/15348-rossija-gotovitsja-k-sozdaniju-aviadvigatelja-novogo-pokolenija-pdv-4000.html
miketheterrible and lyle6 like this post
limb wrote:
Is it possible to cut fuel supply to turboprops BTW? If yes, does it help with slowing the fire from spreadin to the fuel tanks?
limb wrote:
Its really worrying that russia cannot produce larger turboprop engines. Putting new turboprop engines would take 10-15 more years which is unfeasible. Is there a way for Russia to buy chinese light transport aircraft, or just their copies of the ivchenko Al-20 which is more powerful than the tv3-117?
limb wrote:
Show me a russian turboprop engine in development in the same class as the rolls royce AE2100 for example.
limb wrote:
Engines take a lot of time to develop and produce from scratch, even simple ones with proven technology. Also the PD-8 has been in development since the early 2010s from the PD-14 and still hasnt been tested in flight. Even an enlarged modification of the TV3-117 would take a substantial amount to design and test, given it takes a long time to get the PD-8, PD-18 and PD-35 ready. That's not counting international safety certification time, though this doesnt apply to military aircraft.
Good thing light transports are a lower priority, and combat aircraft development is going to plan.
Why didnt the pilots cut the fuel supply?
By that logic the motorsich M55 and M70 are also obsolete crap, but theyre modernized by saturn to be technologically competitive again.
Rodion_Romanovic wrote:limb wrote:
Show me a russian turboprop engine in development in the same class as the rolls royce AE2100 for example.
What options do the Russians have, oh genius procurment planner? Keep using obvious forced TV3-117 versions? Magically poofing a 4000-5000hp modern indigenous turboprop engine before 2030?
It is clear that you do not read this thread before posting.
A couple of pages ago, in the last post of page 16 (post 400) I posted exactly about that.Rodion_Romanovic wrote:
By the way, Russia is working on engines for both aircrafts and helicopters of 4000-5000 hp (similar power as the g222/c27J and C130 engines).
https://en.topcor.ru/15348-rossija-gotovitsja-k-sozdaniju-aviadvigatelja-novogo-pokolenija-pdv-4000.html
Why didnt the pilots cut the fuel supply?
By that logic the motorsich M55 and M70 are also obsolete crap, but theyre modernized by saturn to be technologically competitive again.
Show me a russian turboprop engine in development in the same class as the rolls royce AE2100 for example.
Hole, The_Observer and Broski like this post
GarryB, dino00 and Hole like this post
TMA1 likes this post
hoom wrote:I think engine/prop going into reverse pitch is a less bad fault than if the wing controls had got damaged by the relatively short fire.
It was clear something caused a sudden loss of control.
Also notable that they were on final landing approach -> speed will have been down.
Twin prop planes get designed with a min-safe speed where the tail is able to cope with asymmetric thrust from an engine failure.
Having not just a failure but the engine going into reverse would be unlikely to be recoverable at low speeds.
Jebusafter it went into serial production, not during testing
hoom wrote:Jebusafter it went into serial production, not during testing
Airbus Defence andSpace confirms that an A400M aircraft has been involved in an accident near Sevilla (Spain) Airport on May 09, 2015 around 13:00 local time.
The aircraft with the serial number MSN023, was making the first production flight and had departed from Sevilla Airport at 12:45 pm local time.
(...)
MSN023 was foreseen to be the third aircraft to be delivered to the Turkish customer. The formal delivery was scheduled for June 2015.
Current and former employees of the Aviation Complex named after V.I. S.V. Ilyushin (PJSC "Il") and the Voronezh Joint-Stock Aircraft Building Company (PJSC "VASO"). A few days ago, an Il-112V plane crash occurred in Kubinka near Moscow, which claimed the lives of three of our comrades: Honored Test Pilot Hero of Russia Nikolai Dmitrievich Kuimov, Honored Test Pilot, Commander of the Order of Courage Dmitry Alexandrovich Komarov and onboard test engineer 1 class Nikolai Khludeev. Each of us and all Russian aviation suffered an irreparable loss.
The Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation has created a commission that must give an answer about the reasons and circumstances of the incident. However, on the day of the catastrophe, two videos were released for a wide audience on your YouTube channel, in which you put “responsibility for the death of the plane and the death of people” on one person - the former general director of PJSC “Il” Alexei Dmitrievich Rogozin. We declare that the information you are distributing discredits not only his honor and dignity, but discredits the work of thousands of specialists who worked at PJSC "IL", PJSC "VASO" and other enterprises of the industry.
You deliberately kept silent that Rogozin Alexey Dmitrievich was the CEO of PJSC Il only from 2017 to 2019 (after him another manager was replaced, and before him, since 2014, four more CEOs). With his leadership and with his direct participation, the Il-112V aircraft was able to successfully complete the first long-awaited flight on March 30, 2019. The flight was the result of the work of a large team and was carried out in full compliance with the requirements of the legislation, as evidenced by, among other things, the decisions of the chief designers, the flight test service of PJSC "IL", as well as the positive opinion of military representatives and all experts of the experimental aviation methodological council on flight tests at LII them. M.M. Gromov. The second flight of the Il-112V was completed without his participation exactly two years later - on March 30, 2021.
Almost all of your other statements are false, including that after the first flight, Hero of Russia Nikolai Dmitrievich Kuimov, “when he landed 40 minutes later, danced around the plane with happiness that he returned alive”.
Your speeches humiliate the people who worked on the Il-112V project, and may create a misconception among the relatives of the victims about the causes of the plane crash.
We suggest that you stop using the tragedy for personal or political purposes and voluntarily refute the information you have published. Otherwise, we reserve the right to apply to the court and the Prosecutor's Office with claims for defamation and protection of honor and dignity.
GarryB, franco, dino00, x_54_u43, LMFS, Russian_Patriot_ and Mir like this post
TMA1 likes this post