Agriculture and Industry killing us

Don't waste your time with doctors and their LDL obsession. They are quacks.

The poison in sugar is fructose (50% of it, honey has almost 60%). Fructose is similar to alcohol in the way it is metabolized. It needs
to be processed by the liver and produces similar to byproducts and impacts such as fatty liver, which is a major liver dysfunction.

It is peculiar why pure glucose is never sold as a sweetener. It is just like regular starch. The gylcation potential of glucose is 10 times
less than fructose. Eating moderate amounts of carbs (i.e. glucose) is OK. It has been the advent of excess consumption of sucrose
(glucose + fructose) and fruits (which you can now consume in large quantities year round) that has been one of the primary reasons
for the metabolic syndrome pandemic. The other is the large intake of omega-6 fatty acids (mostly linoleic acid) from industrial seed
oils.

If you want a sweetener, then use erythritol. It is actually good for your teeth since it disrupts biofilms. The sweetener, xylitol, used in
toothpaste does the same job. It is not fluoride that is doing all the work. Avoid synthetic sweeteners such as aspartame and sucralose
at all costs, they are neurotoxins and toxins in general. Erythritol is a natural polyol form Monk fruit. The body makes polyols and can handle
them. But the synthetic compounds, as usual, have "unexpected" impacts.

A subject that receives no coverage today is the effects of induction cookers. They seem like a great idea at first. Efficient with no
hot surface, what a great thing. But is this a free lunch? The food still gets cooked and it is via a high frequency oscillating magnetic
field. If the food gets cooked then what about the human near the cooker?

Magnetic fields cannot be shielded. The only safety is how far you are from the source. But if you are standing a foot from the cooker
then you are not really far. You may not feel like you are being burned, but you are being dosed with obviously high levels of
EM energy. If it was low energy then the food would not be cooking. This is in the same category as putting a cell phone to your
ear and EM dosing your brain. The cell phone is likely safer since the EM intensity is much lower so holding it half an inch from your head
is likely giving a dose lower than the induction cooker a foot away.

I expect that in the coming years we will have induction cooking cancer becoming a covered subject. But there is no excuse about
"who could have known".

The clip in the video of the presentation by Sally Fallon-Morrell is pure gold. The "cholesterol" risk graph pimped in the "trust the science"
literature is grade A con artist BS.

The Russian criminal liberast hiding out in the UK died from eating sorrel soup and not from poisoning by "Putin".

After 11:50 we have exposure of the WHO as a criminal organization.   It's claim that red meat causes colon cancer is totally fraudulent.

The WHO is another corrupted outfit like WADA.   Serving the political agendas of its paymasters and staffed by clowns chosen by the
paymasters.

Trust the media. Die the death you deserve.

The pattern of policy reactions to various health aspects is consistent: maximal BS. There is no reason why every population on the planet
would not be deficient in key nutrients. It's not like every such population has adapted to the local conditions over millions of years. And
even if they did, their modern diet is likely messing them up and badly.

In the case of vitamin D we have an interesting problem. If humans developed in Africa, then how did they deal with lack of vitamin D
from exposure to the Sun? It is safe to assume that at early stages they were covered in some form of fur and must have always had
a high melanin concentration. This resembles the situation in the Middle East where people are covered up and dark skinned. This
implies that other sources of vitamin D were available to early humans that are currently not available to the people of the Middle East.
This also involves "anti-sources" and something in the diet could be reducing the effectiveness of the vitamin D available.

"Trust the science" but only if you manage to actually get access to it before the mafia censors it.

We are being spammed with corporate propaganda.

The US is totally corrupt.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5938543/

MSG acts on the glutamate receptors and releases neurotransmitters which play a vital role in normal physiological as well as pathological processes (Abdallah et al., 2014[1]). Glutamate receptors have three groups of metabotropic receptors (mGluR) and four classes of ionotropic receptors (NMDA, AMPA, delta and kainite receptors). All of these receptor types are present across the central nervous system. They are especially numerous in the hypothalamus, hippocampus and amygdala, where they control autonomic and metabolic activities (Zhu and Gouaux, 2017[22]). Results from both animal and human studies have demonstrated that administration of even the lowest dose of MSG has toxic effects. The average intake of MSG per day is estimated to be 0.3-1.0 g (Solomon et al., 2015[18]). These doses potentially disrupt neurons and might have adverse effects on behaviour. Animal studies have demonstrated that neonatal MSG consumption sets a precedent for the development of obesity later on. Insulin resistance and reduced glucose tolerance in rodents due to MSG consumption raise concerns about the development of obesity in MSG consuming humans.

There is misinformation out there about how benign this shit is. It's just like salt they say.

The latest diet fad is Ozempic. I can tell what is wrong with this hack.

1) It plays around with chemical signalling of satiation. So people on this wonder drug eat much less.

2) The problem is that they are still eating and releasing insulin.

3) So Ozempic is equivalent to low calorie diets. Studies have established that such diets are harmful. Elevated insulin prevents the use of body
fat for energy which induces a down-regulation of the metabolic rate to compensate the reduced calorie intake.

Real fasting is the only valid approach since it maintains insulin at its lowest level. We are evolved to handle this regime. We are not evolved to
handle Ozempic and moronic self-applied calorie restriction diets. For millions of years human ancestors either had food or they did not. They
did not diet. They also had to work hard to get their food instead of sitting on their asses and restricting calories. Sufficient exercise offsets the
insulin released from even small amounts of food. So they could tap into their fat reserves.

There is substantial misunderstanding of the effect of fasting improperly called "starvation". It does not lower the metabolic rate since base-line
insulin allows fat usage. There is actually a small uptick in the metabolic rate for 72 hour fasts. Very few people today are so lean that they cannot
utilize any body fat. People who appear thin often have substantial visceral fat (the worst kind) which happens to be the fat that is utilized the fastest
regardless of insulin resistance. By contrast insulin resistance can make subcutaneous fat hard to utilize.

There is no substitute for will power and proper self-control about food intake. Some drug is not going to give you a free lunch.

The problem with increasing insulin in pre-diabetic patients is that it is sending their pancreas over the edge of failure. The idea that Ozempic can
restore insulin production in diabetic patients is nonsense. The beta cells are essentially destroyed in these people and that is why they need to inject
insulin. No wonder drug can stimulate insulin production. Perhaps some sort of stem cell therapy could restore the beta cells but that also requires
the patients to consume zero carbs and sugars for several years to unwind the catastrophic insulin resistance. The reason for the beta cell die off is
the insulin resistance. To maintain blood sugar levels pre-diabetic patients require higher and higher insulin levels which overloads the beta cells
leading to toxic byproduct production and cell death. Stimulating new cell growth is at best a marginal effect and also useless since the underlying
problem, spiraling insulin resistance, is not addressed.

Suppressing glucagon is a stupid idea since it is a counter-balancing hormone for insulin. The problem is not gluconeogenesis but dietary sugar (carbs
included) consumption. The reason that cortisol is problematic is because of regimes of stress which fail to stimulate adrenaline. Cortisol is supposed
to be balanced by adrenaline. Such balancing is an essential feature of homeostasis. It's not optional for proper health.

Hack remedies that cause new problems is characteristic of Big Pharma products. That is why we have "polypharmacy" where typically elderly people
take a large number of pharmaceuticals which are a chain of fixes for side effects of the preceding drug in the chain. The most potent medicine for
long term health is proper food consumption (which is not what is considered normal in society and according to the government) and sufficient physical
activity, which also controls unbalanced cortisol. Proper food consumption involves intermittent fasting to engage autophagy. Society has forgotten
the biologically appropriate food intake regime. Even if you get cancer and need to get chemo you still greatly benefit from longer duration fasting
during the chemo sessions. But the clowns feed cancer patients high carb meals in hospitals. As if carbs are an essential nutrient.

When you hear about some "study", do not assume it has any validity. Who paid for it and what methodology did it use. Medicine is corrupt
with agendas, corporate and social. There are too many vegan zealots out there who want to force you to eat their way.

Where are the carnivore documentaries? Ah, that's right, they don't exist because the owner class does not want you to eat a natural diet
and instead wants to pacify you and keep low grade sick with an all plant diet. Starch and fiber and poorly absorbable proteins swimming in
lectins and phyto-toxins. So healthy.

Make sure to guzzle that linoleic acid laden "vegetable" oil.

Don't trust the doctors. They never had any education in nutrition and do not know the actual science.

Enjoy your metabolic poison at McDononald's. I guess one type of industrial seed oil is not enough, they need several. Must have something to
do with the spectrum of mutagens and carcinogens produced both during processing and cooking.