Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+27
nomadski
Kiko
RTN
kvs
miketheterrible
walle83
Hole
jhelb
Isos
PhSt
PapaDragon
dino00
Arrow
Cyberspec
Tsavo Lion
henriksoder
magnumcromagnon
nemrod
Tyloe
max steel
George1
GarryB
TR1
collegeboy16
Viktor
Sujoy
Russian Patriot
31 posters

    PLA Rocket Force Thread

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40537
    Points : 41037
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  GarryB Fri Dec 02, 2022 3:51 pm

    They are fucking geniuses at the Pentagon... who else would have guessed that all the sanctions and human rights accusations from the west, not to mention the bullying and other bullshit from the west and all of a sudden and with no reason at all the Chinese want to increase the number of nuclear weapons they have to defend themselves with...

    What a shocker... those bastards... those aggressive evil Chinese people... did they misunderstand all those peaceful friendly acts by the US Navy and US military in general...

    Who does America think it is fooling?

    America has suggested the expected large increase in numbers of nuclear weapons by the Chinese might lead the US to increase its inventory of nuclear weapons itself... hahahaha.

    Well no need to worry about New Start negotiations... that is over, which is good because the US would never be fair about Poseidon and Thunderbird et all.

    Hole, Broski and Podlodka77 like this post

    avatar
    ALAMO


    Posts : 7489
    Points : 7579
    Join date : 2014-11-26

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  ALAMO Fri Dec 02, 2022 4:18 pm

    You should hear Grandpa Joe from time to time, that would make you smile more often.

    A hypersonic missile is just like any other missile, only it can't be intercepted.

    Feel relaxed? Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing

    GarryB, Hole, Broski and Podlodka77 like this post

    Podlodka77
    Podlodka77


    Posts : 2589
    Points : 2591
    Join date : 2022-01-06
    Location : Z

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  Podlodka77 Wed Feb 08, 2023 7:20 pm

    February 8, 00:46

    WSJ: China surpasses US in number of ICBM launchers

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Efyjp410


    China is rapidly approaching nuclear parity, Congressman Mike Rogers says.

    NEW YORK, 8 February. /TASS/. The PRC has more launchers for land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) than the United States. This was reported by The Wall Street Journal on Tuesday, citing data from the Strategic Command (STRATCOM) of the US Armed Forces.

    "The number of launchers for silo-based intercontinental ballistic missiles and mobile ICBM launchers in China exceeds the number of launchers for ICBMs in the United States," the publication quotes an excerpt from a letter from the head of STRATCOM to the armed services committees of both houses of the US Congress. Currently, this military department is headed by Air Force General Anthony Cotton.

    At the same time, the US military assured members of Congress that the US surpasses China in the number of land-based ICBMs, in addition, these missiles are equipped with a large number of nuclear warheads. Also, the data provided by the military department did not take into account submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), as well as long-range bombers. In these areas, the publication claims, the United States has a clear advantage over China.

    According to the newspaper, some lawmakers are calling for an increase in the country's nuclear potential to confront China and Russia.

    "China is rapidly approaching [nuclear] parity. We can't let that happen. It's time to change the balance of power and expand our capabilities," Congressman Mike Rogers (R-Alabama), chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, was quoted by the paper as saying. US Congress.

    At the same time, The Wall Street Journal points out, arms control supporters believe that it is more profitable for the United States to maintain the Treaty on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms (START) with Russia and start arms control talks with China.

    About START


    Last week, Russian Ambassador to the United States Anatoly Antonov said that Moscow has been impeccably observing START throughout the years, unlike Washington. The diplomat stressed that the responsibility for the escalation of the situation around the treaty lies entirely with the United States. He commented on a report prepared earlier by the US State Department, which claims that Russia allegedly did not comply with the terms of the START and can return to its full compliance by allowing inspections on its territory, and also agreeing to a meeting of the advisory commission.

    The US and Russia signed the treaty in 2010. According to its terms, each of the parties reduces its strategic offensive weapons in such a way that seven years after the entry into force of the document and thereafter, their total numbers will not exceed 700 deployed intercontinental ballistic missiles, ballistic missiles of submarines and heavy bombers, 1,550 warheads on them, 800 deployed and non-deployed launchers of ICBMs, SLBMs and HBs. The agreement, designed for 10 years, expired on February 5, 2021, however, the document provides for the possibility of extension by mutual agreement of the parties. In February 2021, Moscow and Washington extended the agreement for the maximum possible five years.




    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40537
    Points : 41037
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  GarryB Thu Feb 09, 2023 2:36 pm

    American politicians giving a false impression again... As usual.

    Most American nuclear weapons are on their subs and their large fleet of bombers.

    I suspect they are likely also lying about Chinese ICBM numbers because many will be intermediate and medium range missiles they are comparing with their own much longer range intercontinental missiles.

    Explains their recent claims Russia is not complying with the New START treaty... How long before they rip that up too?

    Hole, Broski and Podlodka77 like this post

    Broski
    Broski


    Posts : 772
    Points : 770
    Join date : 2021-07-12

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  Broski Thu Feb 09, 2023 9:07 pm

    Explains their recent claims Russia is not complying with the New START treaty... How long before they rip that up too?
    Couldn't happen soon enough, Russia has been hamstrung by that treaty like all the other bad deals they've signed with the duplicitous west over the last 30 years that are always secretly broken when they want to gain nuclear primacy over Russia, the best arms control Russia could have is superior A2/AD combined with 1000's of air/ground/sea launched, long ranged, nuclear tipped, hypersonic missiles to obliterate NATO if they decide to commit suicide-by-Russia.

    GarryB, Hole and Podlodka77 like this post

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40537
    Points : 41037
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  GarryB Fri Feb 10, 2023 11:47 am

    I have to say the first SALT (limitation treaties) and START (reduction treaties) only became possible when the west feared the power of the Soviet Union in terms of nuclear weapons.

    I don't think they honestly feared the Soviet conventional military because it was always optimised for defence rather than attack.... if you want to go to different places and fight through enemy territory you have a different focus and a different force structure... well you have HATOs force structure... combat based on air power that can be deployed anywhere and moved anywhere as you progress through places.

    A mobile military... like HATO had and like the Soviets didn't have... the Soviets didn't have nearly enough logistics to push very deep into western Europe, but of course they were never going to capture and occupy western Europe.... they were going to nuke it.

    It was threat elimination, not land acquisition... they already have plenty of land and resources.
    avatar
    walle83


    Posts : 976
    Points : 986
    Join date : 2016-11-13
    Location : Sweden

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  walle83 Fri Feb 10, 2023 8:59 pm

    No way China deployes over 450 ICBMs. Even 300 seems to high. Best gess is probably around 100-150 with a mix of old DF-5s and newer DF-31 and 41s.
    They are building three new missile fields that could hold up to 300 missiles, but I doubt the missile production is going to fill all those silos for some years.
    Podlodka77
    Podlodka77


    Posts : 2589
    Points : 2591
    Join date : 2022-01-06
    Location : Z

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  Podlodka77 Sat Feb 11, 2023 1:31 am

    To Walle

    What you "think" is not relevant at all, just like what I think is not relevant.
    The only authoritative is the factual situation or approximately correct data.
    Even the Washington Post writes that China has between 250 and 350 nuclear weapons.
    It is not specified whether it is the total number of nuclear warheads, but it is stated that China has 145 silos under construction for future ICBMs. The text is from 2021.

    https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjn4Kj0vIv9AhW8AxAIHSroD9wQFnoECD0QAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fnational-security%2Fchina-nuclear-missile-silos%2F2021%2F06%2F30%2F0fa8debc-d9c2-11eb-bb9e-70fda8c37057_story.html&usg=AOvVaw0gDHytv3aJcR-5kEgIzl2K
    avatar
    walle83


    Posts : 976
    Points : 986
    Join date : 2016-11-13
    Location : Sweden

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  walle83 Sat Feb 11, 2023 6:27 am

    Well most sources say that China has less then 400 warheads in total. So about 100 ICBMs should then be "approximately correct data".

    If China would have 450 ICBM today it would mean they constructed over 400 missiles in the last 10-12 years. Also the DF-41, that is supose to be the new main missile system, just came in service a few years ago.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40537
    Points : 41037
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  GarryB Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:21 am

    I have to laugh Walle83.... you are crowing about China producing ships like destroyers and cruisers and carriers like they are making sausages... but when it comes to ICBMs they can't make 350?

    Have you noticed their new missiles on TEL trucks... you don't need to build silos to have ICBMs in the 21st century.
    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11601
    Points : 11569
    Join date : 2015-11-07

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  Isos Sat Feb 11, 2023 3:56 pm

    Some reports from russian and US official state that China is massively increasing its nuclear warhead number.

    But I agree with him. If you have 400 nuk warhead you make just 400 missiles. Maybe a bit more as decoys but certainly not thousands of them.
    Podlodka77
    Podlodka77


    Posts : 2589
    Points : 2591
    Join date : 2022-01-06
    Location : Z

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  Podlodka77 Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:34 pm

    02/11/2023 05:37 PM (updated: 02/11/2023 05:49 PM)

    Media: China approved plans to triple its nuclear arsenal by 2035
    Kyodo: China plans to increase its nuclear arsenal by 2035

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 18065110
    © AP Photo / Ng Han Guan

    MOSCOW, February 11/ Radio Sputnik. China is considering tripling its nuclear warhead stockpile by 2035, Kyodo News reports.
    According to the agency, the plan was approved by Chinese President Xi Jinping.
    The decision of the country's authorities is associated with a possible increase in tension between China and the United States in connection with the situation around Taiwan, Kyodo sources suggested.

    According to them, China can increase the number of nuclear warheads to 550 by 2027, and to 900 by 2035.
    Earlier, Sputnik radio reported that China had warned the United States of a high price in the event of military aggression.

    https://radiosputnik.ria.ru/20230211/yadernoe-oruzhie-1851431244.html

    GarryB and Broski like this post

    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18519
    Points : 19024
    Join date : 2011-12-23
    Location : Greece

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  George1 Fri Sep 27, 2024 3:10 am

    GarryB likes this post

    Sujoy
    Sujoy


    Posts : 2417
    Points : 2575
    Join date : 2012-04-03
    Location : India || भारत

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  Sujoy Fri Sep 27, 2024 2:59 pm

    Significant development because China has tested the DF 41 to its full range, the first time they have tested an ICBM to its max range in 44 years. Perhaps new engines, sensors, decoys have been installed on thd DF 41. Plus the end of START Treaty.

    https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2024/09/25/asia-pacific/china-icbm-missile-pacific/
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40537
    Points : 41037
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  GarryB Fri Sep 27, 2024 3:12 pm

    Growing unease in the US?

    You fucking hypocrites... you are the one imposing sanctions on Russia and China and bullying them and making them your enemy and now you are upset that they are moving to create weapons to defend themselves from your irrational behaviour?

    You created QUAD to do to Taiwan and China what HATO has done to Ukraine and Russia... WTF were you expecting you idiots.

    Kiko likes this post

    lancelot
    lancelot


    Posts : 3172
    Points : 3168
    Join date : 2020-10-18

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  lancelot Fri Sep 27, 2024 4:03 pm

    Sujoy wrote:Significant development because China has tested the DF 41 to its full range, the first time they have tested an ICBM to its max range in 44 years. Perhaps new engines, sensors, decoys have been installed on thd DF 41. Plus the end of START Treaty.
    The US politicos seem to think they can nuke China without consequences. This is just a wake up call. The Chinese have had this capability to nuke the entire Continental US with road mobile ICBMs for like a decade and a half.

    As for START it never applied to China. It was a bilateral treaty between the US and the Soviets.

    GarryB likes this post

    avatar
    Arrow


    Posts : 3472
    Points : 3462
    Join date : 2012-02-13

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  Arrow Sat Sep 28, 2024 6:46 pm

    The question is how advanced is the DF-41? It's a big mystery. It's said to be a heavy missile at the level of the RT-23, but it's a huge leap forward for China. Even now, Russia and the US are not creating heavy ICBMs with solid fuel.
    Sujoy
    Sujoy


    Posts : 2417
    Points : 2575
    Join date : 2012-04-03
    Location : India || भारत

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  Sujoy Sun Sep 29, 2024 7:08 pm

    China has test fired the DF 31AG and not the DF 41 as was speculated earlier. Nonetheless, significant development given that it was tested to its max range of over 12,000 kms.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40537
    Points : 41037
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  GarryB Mon Sep 30, 2024 8:41 am

    As for START it never applied to China. It was a bilateral treaty between the US and the Soviets.

    It is relevant to start because the US isn't going to limit itself to 1,500 warheads with Russia having the same number if China has 1,500 warheads or more... but most importantly has no limits on how many warheads it can have.

    This is of course a double standard because Britain and France had nukes that were not included in negotiations between Russia and the US or the Soviets and the US, and at the time China didn't have a lot more than those two countries so the US didn't care.

    Now it will care because Britain and France are not in any economic situation where they could match China in nuclear weapons to create a balance so the US is going to want the same number as Russia but also extra to counter China and the only way they could do that would be to include China in START... and while the US sees China and Russia as joint enemies of the US... mostly because they have made them enemies of course, Russia and China are independent countries that are not joined at the hip like US vassals in Europe and they wont want the US to have the same number of warheads as they both have combined.

    Equally new types of nuclear strategic weapons like Thunderbird (unlimited range nuclear powered nuclear armed cruise missile) and Poseidon are not included in the START negotiations AFAIK and the US will be keen to include them so their number can be limited and they can get more information about them and where they are deployed...

    It really does not make sense for Russia to sign a new START treaty with such a hostile and untrustworthy leadership in the US and EU.
    lancelot
    lancelot


    Posts : 3172
    Points : 3168
    Join date : 2020-10-18

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  lancelot Mon Sep 30, 2024 2:48 pm

    The Chinese will never accept playing second fiddle to the US in terms of nuke count long term.

    GarryB likes this post

    Sujoy
    Sujoy


    Posts : 2417
    Points : 2575
    Join date : 2012-04-03
    Location : India || भारत

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  Sujoy Tue Oct 01, 2024 12:53 am

    GarryB wrote:Britain and France are not in any economic situation where they could match China in nuclear weapons to create a balance
    China and Pakistan are both major supporters of Britain. Pakistan has the world's second fastest growing nuclear arsenal after China and Pakistan hosts nukes on behalf of Britain.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40537
    Points : 41037
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  GarryB Tue Oct 01, 2024 9:24 am

    You keep saying that but all evidence seems to contradict that...

    China is no friend of the UK... just look at Hong Kong... and the UK follows US sanctions against China and Russia too...

    The UK is becoming rather insignificant anyway.... they have nukes but they aren't even a gas station... more like a lemonade stand, but they don't add sugar to the lemon juice so they don't get repeat customers.
    avatar
    Arrow


    Posts : 3472
    Points : 3462
    Join date : 2012-02-13

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  Arrow Tue Oct 01, 2024 5:51 pm

    lancelot wrote:The Chinese will never accept playing second fiddle to the US in terms of nuke count long term.

    They will certainly equal their potential with the US and Russia. Especially since the strategic nuclear arsenal of Russia and the US has been greatly reduced. Only 1,500 warheads.
    avatar
    ALAMO


    Posts : 7489
    Points : 7579
    Join date : 2014-11-26

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  ALAMO Tue Oct 01, 2024 6:07 pm

    Sujoy wrote:
    China and Pakistan are both major supporters of Britain. Pakistan has the world's second fastest growing nuclear arsenal after China and Pakistan hosts nukes on behalf of Britain.

    There is not a single sane opinion of yours as only Pakistan or China appear on the horizon.
    Brits owns sole nuclear capable weapon system, which is Trident.
    Even if it carries warheads called Holbrook and used to be manufactured in the UK, it is nothing else than a localized W76 warhead of US origin.
    By the way, they have ceased to produce them almost 3 decades ago, which might give you some hint.
    There is perfectly zero chance that the US would allow to spread its own core missile warhead technology to a country as unstable and unpredictable as Pakistan is.
    And the fact that they operate a weapon system that is practically 4 decades old, says more than any words can say.
    Not to mention that there are some serious and high level concerns, if the Brits can even use their own nukes if the Washington won't allow them to do so Twisted Evil

    GarryB likes this post

    avatar
    Arrow


    Posts : 3472
    Points : 3462
    Join date : 2012-02-13

    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  Arrow Tue Oct 01, 2024 6:16 pm

    The Americans, along with the development of the Sentinel program, are developing a new thermonuclear warhead. In total, this will be the new RV in over 30 years.

    The British nuclear arsenal is basically an extension of the American one. Everything is based on US components. Only France, as far as NATO is concerned, is independent in this respect.

    Sponsored content


    PLA Rocket Force Thread - Page 6 Empty Re: PLA Rocket Force Thread

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Thu Nov 21, 2024 5:24 pm