Big_Gazza wrote:eehnie wrote:Taking into account that it is known in which units served the Tu-160, is not as difficult to see which aircraft were replaced by the Tu-160.
184th Guards Heavy Bomber Aviation Regiment: Tu-160 (supersonic) replaced Tu-16 (subsonic)
http://www.ww2.dk/new/air%20force/regiment/bap/184gvtbap.htm
http://www.ww2.dk/new/air%20force/division/bad/13gvtbad.htm
http://www.ww2.dk/new/air%20force/division/bad/201tbad.htm
121st Guards Heavy Bomber Aviation Regiment: Tu-160 (supersonic) replaced Tu-22 (supersonic). Previously the Tu-22 (supersonic) replaced Tu-16 (subsonic).
http://www.ww2.dk/new/air%20force/regiment/bap/121gvtbap.htm
http://www.ww2.dk/new/air%20force/division/bad/15gvtbad.htm
http://www.ww2.dk/new/air%20force/division/bad/22gvtbad.htm
Unfortunately for your argument, the relation of succession is very clear inside the units the aircrafts served in. And not there is not basis to say that today the Tu-95/142 (subsonic) must be replaced by subsonic aircrafts. In the past subsonic aircrafts were replaced by supersonic aircrafts.
Unfortunately for your argument, neither the Tu-16 or Tu-22 were strategic bombers with intercontinental range. Tu-16 ~ 7,200 kms, Tu-22 ~4,900 kms compared to Tu-160 ~12,300. Tu-160 had supersonic performance and the range to truly attack continental US. It didn't replace either Tu-16/Tu-22 - it was a whole new capability.
BTW the Tu-22 was hopelessly short-ranged due to its fuel-guzzling engines and was only fit for theater use.
Anyhow, none of this has anything to do with PAK DA being subsonic or supersonic or some mystical Vannian mega-turbo-hypersonic. My point is that until the Tu-160 entered service, the USSR did not have a supersonic strategic bomber (ie one able to attack continental US and return to own airfield). Neither Tu-16 or Tu-22/22M fulfilled that role. The Tu-95 did the job, but at a much more sedate pace and lacked penetration ability.
Obviously the Tu-160 added new capabilities to the units it was deployed in, but your denial has not a real basis. There is a clear material succession in the concrete units the Tu-160 served, and is exposed in the links.
Again, as habitual here, the word of some people vs the facts exposed in the links.