Home
Latest images
Register
Log in
Shit. When we were fighting Iranians they where more advanced than this poor Afghans are now. Those Zionists have no shame!
+34
Zhar666
Anonymous Fighter
JanWar
JohninMK
MilitaryAttractions
baron8201
Godric
Elbows
KiloGolf
NationalRus
pampa14
Svyatoslavich
George1
OminousSpudd
Captain Nemo
max steel
Zivo
Pirate
TR1
Trexonian
nemrod
Regular
Hannibal Barca
Airbornewolf
Viktor
GarryB
higurashihougi
Mike E
Flyingdutchman
magnumcromagnon
sepheronx
Werewolf
F-15E
Austin
38 posters
US Military Photos and Videos:
Hannibal Barca- Posts : 1457
Points : 1467
Join date : 2013-12-13
Shit. When we were fighting Iranians they where more advanced than this poor Afghans are now. Those Zionists have no shame!
F-15E- Posts : 103
Points : 94
Join date : 2014-09-04
F-15E- Posts : 103
Points : 94
Join date : 2014-09-04
F-15E- Posts : 103
Points : 94
Join date : 2014-09-04
C17
Cockpit
Cockpit
F-15E- Posts : 103
Points : 94
Join date : 2014-09-04
Ah64
Simulator
Arleigh Burke
LPD of San Antonio class
LCS2
USMC
F35
MQ1
Hellfire on MQ1
MQ9
Simulator
Arleigh Burke
LPD of San Antonio class
LCS2
USMC
F35
MQ1
Hellfire on MQ1
MQ9
Pirate- Posts : 28
Points : 41
Join date : 2009-11-30
Age : 35
Location : Russia, Tula
Pirate- Posts : 28
Points : 41
Join date : 2009-11-30
Age : 35
Location : Russia, Tula
F-15E wrote:Ah64
Simulator
Arleigh Burke
LPD of San Antonio class
LCS2
USMC
F35
MQ1
Hellfire on MQ1
MQ9
F-15E- Posts : 103
Points : 94
Join date : 2014-09-04
[img]https://2img.net/h/s2.postimg.cc/tkz36ssyh/1747843.jpg[img]
[img]https://2img.net/h/s2.postimg.cc/cxpyn9rq1/1747927.jpg[img]
Zivo- Posts : 1487
Points : 1511
Join date : 2012-04-13
Location : U.S.A.
Stryker MGS
magnumcromagnon- Posts : 8138
Points : 8273
Join date : 2013-12-05
Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan
Quick question why did the U.S. Navy decide to choose 2 Littoral Combat Ships designs, instead of just 1? Both the radical and conventional design were chosen, which to me is a head scratcher, especially logistic wise. The radical boat design being the Independence-Class and the more traditional boat design being the Freedom-class:
Independence-Class...
Freedom-class...
Independence-Class...
Freedom-class...
Mike E- Posts : 2619
Points : 2651
Join date : 2014-06-19
Location : Bay Area, CA
Couple of reasons...magnumcromagnon wrote:Quick question why did the U.S. Navy decide to choose 2 Littoral Combat Ships designs, instead of just 1? Both the radical and conventional design were chosen, which to me is a head scratcher, especially logistic wise. The radical boat design being the Independence-Class and the more traditional boat design being the Freedom-class:
Independence-Class...
Freedom-class...
First, they are built for slightly different requirements, and as such are better optimized in certain areas. The Independence has a larger cargo hold and is more adaptable, while the Freedom is more maneuverable.
And because of corruption.
TR1- Posts : 5435
Points : 5433
Join date : 2011-12-06
magnumcromagnon wrote:Quick question why did the U.S. Navy decide to choose 2 Littoral Combat Ships designs, instead of just 1? Both the radical and conventional design were chosen, which to me is a head scratcher, especially logistic wise. The radical boat design being the Independence-Class and the more traditional boat design being the Freedom-class:
Independence-Class...
Freedom-class...
The same reason Russia is buying 2 (well, 3 ) attack helo types.
So that both yards get work.
max steel- Posts : 2930
Points : 2955
Join date : 2015-02-12
Location : South Pole
The modern US army: unfit for service?
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/aug/31/us-army-racism-iraq-afghanistan
This is a stinging criticism of the U.S. Army and in some respects i am correct, but it does not target the real culprits, the U.S. policy makers who control the quality of the enlisted ranks..
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/aug/31/us-army-racism-iraq-afghanistan
This is a stinging criticism of the U.S. Army and in some respects i am correct, but it does not target the real culprits, the U.S. policy makers who control the quality of the enlisted ranks..
Guest- Guest
Who would've thunk that there is such a good collection of US military photos on a site virtually dedicated to the Russian Military?
Keep it up F-15E! I for one enjoy seeing these pictures.
Keep it up F-15E! I for one enjoy seeing these pictures.
Captain Nemo- Posts : 40
Points : 53
Join date : 2015-05-06
Location : Croatia
US soldier on a Ural bike in Iraq.
Source
Group picture on Ural sidecar
Source
Group picture on Ural sidecar
Werewolf- Posts : 5928
Points : 6117
Join date : 2012-10-24
Ivan the Colorado wrote:Who would've thunk that there is such a good collection of US military photos on a site virtually dedicated to the Russian Military?
Keep it up F-15E! I for one enjoy seeing these pictures.
That guy was banned for trolling and insults...nothing to keep up.
nemrod- Posts : 839
Points : 1333
Join date : 2012-09-11
Age : 59
- Post n°67
Helicopter Door US Marine Gunner Shoots Down Target Drone
nemrod Sun Aug 09, 2015 12:15 am
I could do better, it took me few seconds to down this 
damn drone. 
damn drone.
Guest- Guest
Russian style.
GarryB- Posts : 40541
Points : 41041
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
Must be photoshopped because only Russians do that... and they do it because Russian armour is so poor it is safer sitting on the outside... NOT. 
Werewolf- Posts : 5928
Points : 6117
Join date : 2012-10-24
GarryB wrote:Must be photoshopped because only Russians do that... and they do it because Russian armour is so poor it is safer sitting on the outside... NOT.
Maybe it is a new Abrams model with an autoloader and the autoloader just ate someones arm so they decided to drive on top of it to avoid interaction with the arm eating autoloader, because autoloaders prefer "loading" arms over ammunition.
OminousSpudd- Posts : 942
Points : 947
Join date : 2015-01-03
Location : New Zealand
Werewolf wrote:GarryB wrote:Must be photoshopped because only Russians do that... and they do it because Russian armour is so poor it is safer sitting on the outside... NOT.
Maybe it is a new Abrams model with an autoloader and the autoloader just ate someones arm so they decided to drive on top of it to avoid interaction with the arm eating autoloader, because autoloaders prefer "loading" arms over ammunition.
Oh really? I thought they were sitting on top to demonstrate how the clearly superior gas turbine engine of the Abrams can haul so much ass.
This is a bit of a circle-jerk but hey, Russia is kicking arse and taking names, so it's a good time to chill and mock the Americans.
Guest- Guest
Werewolf wrote:GarryB wrote:Must be photoshopped because only Russians do that... and they do it because Russian armour is so poor it is safer sitting on the outside... NOT.
Maybe it is a new Abrams model with an autoloader and the autoloader just ate someones arm so they decided to drive on top of it to avoid interaction with the arm eating autoloader, because autoloaders prefer "loading" arms over ammunition.
Remember having exercise during my infantry training with tank servicemen on M84A when we were joking about autoloader "eating" your arm, and one lieutenant said: "If your arm gets into loader, you do not deserve that arm anyways".
Guest- Guest
Americans forgot they were riding tanks too in past, till M60 came around.
Its Sheridan M551A1 if anyone wonders in Panama 1989.
Brits:
Its Sheridan M551A1 if anyone wonders in Panama 1989.
Brits:
George1- Posts : 18520
Points : 19025
Join date : 2011-12-22
Location : Greece
GarryB- Posts : 40541
Points : 41041
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
Funny thing is that in the 1980s I used to scan the Moscow parades for all the one armed tank men units...