Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+50
dino00
The-thing-next-door
owais.usmani
Hole
PapaDragon
GJ Flanker
miketheterrible
mnztr
saynow
AK-Rex
TheRealist
Project Canada
AlfaT8
kvs
Tsavo Lion
ult
Rmf
Arrow
jhelb
artjomh
max steel
Stealthflanker
Vann7
zg18
Big_Gazza
magnumcromagnon
Morpheus Eberhardt
Mike E
macedonian
collegeboy16
TR1
navyfield
gaurav
flamming_python
KomissarBojanchev
TheArmenian
George1
Cyberspec
Gagydza
IronsightSniper
nightcrawler
coolieno99
Austin
Viktor
GarryB
Hitman
sepheronx
Russian Patriot
Turk1
Admin
54 posters

    Bulava SLBM Thread:

    artjomh
    artjomh


    Posts : 150
    Points : 184
    Join date : 2015-07-16

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  artjomh 06/11/15, 05:01 am

    jhelb wrote:1. Why does the first 2 stage uses solid fuel and the third stage liquid fuel? In other words, why not have solid fuel for the third stage as well?

    Don't listen to stupid people, jhelb. Bulava has 3 solid-fuel stages.

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 REqJyZm

    jhelb wrote:2. The CEP of the Bulava is stated to be 350m. Isn't that a bit too high?

    Says who exactly?
    avatar
    Arrow


    Posts : 3495
    Points : 3485
    Join date : 2012-02-12

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  Arrow 06/11/15, 06:46 am

    Bulava has a smallest trow weight then other SLBM. Only about 1150 kg. Comparing Sineva has 2800 kg similary Trident II. Triden I has about 1500 kg. M-51 has about 2000 kg ?. This missile can carry more heavier warhead and decoy, anti ABM systems.
    jhelb
    jhelb


    Posts : 1095
    Points : 1196
    Join date : 2015-04-03
    Location : Previously: Belarus Currently: A Small Island No One Cares About

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  jhelb 06/11/15, 08:53 am

    artjomh wrote:Says who exactly?

    The corrupt media and I fell for their lies.


    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Untitl11


    http://www.nti.org/analysis/articles/russian-ballistic-cruise-missile-models/#Bulava


    Rmf
    Rmf


    Posts : 462
    Points : 441
    Join date : 2013-05-30

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  Rmf 06/11/15, 09:24 am

    the final stage for incertion of individual multiple reentry warheads is liquid fueled cince it needs multiple fireings.
    max steel
    max steel


    Posts : 2930
    Points : 2955
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  max steel 06/11/15, 09:34 am

    Arrow wrote:Bulava has a smallest trow weight then other SLBM. Only about 1150 kg. Comparing Sineva has 2800 kg similary Trident II. Triden I has about 1500 kg. M-51 has about 2000 kg ?. This missile can carry more heavier warhead and decoy, anti ABM systems.

    Bulava is made and designed just to evade western abm shields.


    Last edited by max steel on 07/11/15, 06:13 am; edited 1 time in total
    artjomh
    artjomh


    Posts : 150
    Points : 184
    Join date : 2015-07-16

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  artjomh 06/11/15, 09:49 am

    Rmf wrote:the final stage for incertion of individual multiple reentry warheads is liquid fueled cince it needs multiple fireings.

    Not necessarily.

    R-36M had a solid-fuel warhead bus. Same with RSD-10. You are not absolutely required to have a liquid-fuelled PBV on a MIRV'd missile.
    Rmf
    Rmf


    Posts : 462
    Points : 441
    Join date : 2013-05-30

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  Rmf 07/11/15, 03:43 am

    werent those single warhead icmbs? !
    artjomh
    artjomh


    Posts : 150
    Points : 184
    Join date : 2015-07-16

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  artjomh 07/11/15, 06:35 am

    Rmf wrote:werent those single warhead icmbs? !

    No

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 AI1AlBb
    Rmf
    Rmf


    Posts : 462
    Points : 441
    Join date : 2013-05-30

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  Rmf 09/11/15, 01:50 pm

    not to derail but pioneer was more of a medium range missile- it didnt reach orbit.
    artjomh
    artjomh


    Posts : 150
    Points : 184
    Join date : 2015-07-16

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  artjomh 09/11/15, 02:17 pm

    Rmf wrote:not to derail but pioneer was more of a medium range missile- it didnt reach orbit.

    How is that even relevant?
    Stealthflanker
    Stealthflanker


    Posts : 1459
    Points : 1535
    Join date : 2009-08-04
    Age : 36
    Location : Indonesia

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  Stealthflanker 10/11/15, 10:35 pm

    Rmf wrote:not to derail but pioneer was more of a medium range missile- it didnt reach orbit.

    Then ? There are no Ballistic missile doing a "true orbit" except FOBS.

    Plus.. Apogee of Pioneer is 1375 Km above the earth.
    jhelb
    jhelb


    Posts : 1095
    Points : 1196
    Join date : 2015-04-03
    Location : Previously: Belarus Currently: A Small Island No One Cares About

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  jhelb 11/11/15, 08:38 am

    Stealthflanker wrote:Then ? There are no Ballistic missile doing a "true orbit" except FOBS.

    Plus.. Apogee of Pioneer is 1375 Km above the earth.


    If the Bulava is launched against a country can the missile be aborted/destroyed in flight by the Russian Navy ? Maybe because the Navy feels that by launching the missile itself they have put the point across & do not actually have to hit the target in an enemy country. Thanks.
    artjomh
    artjomh


    Posts : 150
    Points : 184
    Join date : 2015-07-16

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  artjomh 11/11/15, 09:06 am

    jhelb wrote:
    Stealthflanker wrote:Then ? There are no Ballistic missile doing a "true orbit" except FOBS.

    Plus.. Apogee of Pioneer is 1375 Km above the earth.


    If the Bulava is launched against a country can the missile be aborted/destroyed in flight by the Russian Navy ? Maybe because the Navy feels that by launching the missile itself they have put the point across & do not actually have to hit the target in an enemy country. Thanks.

    Remote self-destruct mechanisms are installed often during test flights, but are almost never present on operational missiles. For obvious reasons.
    avatar
    Vann7


    Posts : 5385
    Points : 5485
    Join date : 2012-05-16

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  Vann7 11/11/15, 10:27 pm

    jhelb wrote:
    Stealthflanker wrote:Then ? There are no Ballistic missile doing a "true orbit" except FOBS.

    Plus.. Apogee of Pioneer is 1375 Km above the earth.


    If the Bulava is launched against a country can the missile be aborted/destroyed in flight by the Russian Navy ? Maybe because the Navy feels that by launching the missile itself they have put the point across & do not actually have to hit the target in an enemy country. Thanks.

    Without satellite navigation the precision will be atrociuous ,it could aim at New york city and end hitting Florida. Inertial navigation is far from enough.You need satellite navigation for an acceptable precision for intercontinental nuclear missiles. Remeber that Bulava do not flight in a straight line ,because it does zig zag,left and right moves and have multiple reentry warheads the precision is in the couple of hundred meters. But because it have heavy nuclear warhead it will not matter.. it will wipe anything withing 10km radius instantly PER warhead.. and third degree burns up to 30km.
    So if you have 6 warheads ,then 10km x 6 warheads spread from the center = 60km total wipe of any country.  and with up to 6 x 30km third degree burns and radiation up to 180km from the impact zone. Nothing small indeed. one bulava could cover completely a territory of the size of Crimea if what a flat terrain with at least third degree burns and radiation on people. and one Borei submarine with x 16 bulavas if hit the right places have enough power to stop even the US navy and sink all its aircraft carriers and its escorts. with good intelligence of its positions and seriously damage them beyond repair and vaporize its crew.. really scary power. Shocked    Cool


    This is why is laughable the Claims of IRAN of their missiles that can hit Israel. They don't have
    navigational system of satellites like Russia or USA to guide with any precision their missiles. Their missiles could have the range to reach israel but the wind and air will move the missile beyond its trajectory and the missile will not have a way to check if needs corrections.

    Neither IRan or Pakistan have any chance to hit anything beyond 2,000km with any acceptable precision. If launch missiles at israel it could end in Jordan or in the sea. CHina have an incomplete nav system but with Russia Glonnass assistance they can get the same Russian preicision that is world class. India i don't think have any nav sat..so with Russia help it can also get the precision they need. Europe have a navigation system but is incomplete too.. they need American GPS help.
    Morpheus Eberhardt
    Morpheus Eberhardt


    Posts : 1925
    Points : 2032
    Join date : 2013-05-19

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  Morpheus Eberhardt 12/11/15, 03:02 am

    There are reports to the effect that the Proekt 955 submarine Vladimir Monomakh will conduct a salvo launch of two Bulava missiles in the next few days (before November 16th).
    avatar
    ult


    Posts : 837
    Points : 877
    Join date : 2015-02-20

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  ult 14/11/15, 10:19 am

    The launch was successful.

    Атомный ракетный крейсер стратегического назначения «Владимир Мономах» впервые выполнил залповый ракетный пуск двумя межконтинентальными баллистическими ракетами «Булава»
    Сегодня, 14 ноября, ракетный подводный крейсер стратегического назначения Северного флота «Владимир Мономах» (проекта 955 «Борей») под командованием капитана 1 ранга Виктора Сидоренко произвел успешную залповую стрельбу двумя межконтинентальными баллистическими ракетами (МБР) «Булава» из назначенного района в акватории Белого моря по полигону Кура на Камчатке.
    Залповая стрельба выполнена из подводного положения в соответствии с планом боевой подготовки. Параметры траектории полета двух МБР «Булава» отработаны в штатном режиме. По подтвержденным данным объективного контроля боевые блоки ракет успешно прибыли в полигон Кура на Камчатке.
    Залповый пуск двух межконтинентальных баллистических ракет подтвердил надежность функционирования всех составляющих и, в частности, автоматики ракетного комплекса «Булава» при использовании штатного боекомплекта.
    Экипаж атомного подводного ракетоносца «Владимир Мономах» при выполнении учебно-боевой задачи проявил профессионализм и высокую морскую выучку.
    https://www.facebook.com/%D0%9C%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%8B-%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B8-1492252324350852/

    Morpheus Eberhardt
    Morpheus Eberhardt


    Posts : 1925
    Points : 2032
    Join date : 2013-05-19

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  Morpheus Eberhardt 14/11/15, 12:33 pm

    Russian Ministry of Defence wrote:The strategic nuclear-powered missile cruiser "Vladimir Monomakh" performed the first salvo missile launch of two "Bulava" intercontinental ballistic missiles today, November 14.

    Strategic missile submarine cruiser of the Northern Fleet, "Vladimir Monomakh" (Proekt 955 "Borej") under the command of Captain 1st Rank Viktor Sidorenko made a successful salvo launch of two intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) "Bulava" from the designated area in the White Sea at the Kura test site in Kamchatka.

    Salvo firing from a submerged position is made in accordance with the plan of combat training. Options trajectory ICBM two "Bulava" worked normally. As confirmed to objective monitoring missile warheads successfully arrived at the Kura testing ground on the Kamchatka Peninsula.

    Salvo launch of two intercontinental ballistic missiles confirmed the reliability of the operation of all components, in particular, automatic missile complex "Bulava" when using regular ammunition.

    The crew of the nuclear submarine "Vladimir Monomakh" in carrying out combat training tasks showed high professionalism and seamanship.

    Cyberspec
    Cyberspec


    Posts : 2904
    Points : 3057
    Join date : 2011-08-07
    Location : Terra Australis

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  Cyberspec 14/11/15, 02:02 pm

    Good news...deserves an appropriate smiley russia

    A few stills

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 CTzarA_UYAA0Vs9
    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 CTzarC5UsAAsm-Z
    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 CTzarDUUsAA6SNz
    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 CTzaqymUAAAFDIp
    max steel
    max steel


    Posts : 2930
    Points : 2955
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  max steel 19/11/15, 06:20 am

    Apparently not very successfully - warheads of the first missile failed to reach their targets. Neutral pale



    One of the Bulava missiles missed its targets


    The flight of the first of the two Bulava missiles launched from Vladimir Monomakh submarine on November 14, 2015 did not hit its targets at the Kura test site. The source said that the warheads did reach "the Kamchatka region", but not the designated targets. This suggests that the miss was fairly large.
    avatar
    Project Canada


    Posts : 662
    Points : 663
    Join date : 2015-07-19
    Location : Canada

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  Project Canada 19/11/15, 01:20 pm


    First, problem with the engines, now problem with the warheads? I hope they get to fix things up soon, Bulava missiles are already in deployed status aren't they? if a nuclear war suddenly happens you wouldn't want your missiles to fail to reach their targets
    sepheronx
    sepheronx


    Posts : 8851
    Points : 9111
    Join date : 2009-08-05
    Age : 35
    Location : Canada

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  sepheronx 19/11/15, 01:29 pm

    Could be a dud.  They would have to test more launches to determin if it is an actual problem.  That said, nit every systen can be perfect like sineave. there is a reason why they test these.
    jhelb
    jhelb


    Posts : 1095
    Points : 1196
    Join date : 2015-04-03
    Location : Previously: Belarus Currently: A Small Island No One Cares About

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  jhelb 20/11/15, 05:57 am

    artjomh wrote:Remote self-destruct mechanisms are installed often during test flights, but are almost never present on operational missiles. For obvious reasons.

    artjomh, staying with thermonuclear warheads I heard from a FAS scientist in a conference (in Kensington Road) this week that countries like India and Pakistan will have to carry out several nuclear tests if they intend to develop thermonuclear devices like the P 5. Is that information correct?

    I was of the opinion that with the advent of Scalable supercomputer clustering,nuclear explosions can be Simulated down to the molecular level so no more tests are required even for designing thermonuclear weapons.

    Thanks again.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40557
    Points : 41059
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  GarryB 21/11/15, 01:55 am

    there are supercomputers that can make such calculations and programmes that can simulate the process accurately enough to not need actual tests but generally tests are required to be totally sure... and of course such computers and computer programmes are not handed out for free to anyone who wants one (though if they are... I want one)...

    It is not enough to have a powerful enough computer... you need the computer software with all the data and models and those models and data came from extensive testing of the real thing.
    avatar
    Austin


    Posts : 7617
    Points : 8014
    Join date : 2010-05-08
    Location : India

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  Austin 21/11/15, 02:18 am

    max steel wrote: Apparently not very successfully - warheads of the first missile failed to reach their targets. Neutral pale



    One of the Bulava missiles missed its targets


    The flight of the first of the two Bulava missiles launched from Vladimir Monomakh submarine on November 14, 2015 did not hit its targets at the Kura test site. The source said that the warheads did reach "the Kamchatka region", but not the designated targets. This suggests that the miss was fairly large.

    MOD has not made any official confirmation or denial , lenta quotes some unnamed sources
    max steel
    max steel


    Posts : 2930
    Points : 2955
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  max steel 23/11/15, 01:53 pm

    Media named the reasons of unsuccessful start-up "Bulava"



    Well Austin we got the reason now , Salvo launcher of strategic k-551 was damaged. Cool

    Sponsored content


    Bulava SLBM Thread: - Page 7 Empty Re: Bulava SLBM Thread:

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is 22/11/24, 08:42 pm