PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Butbutbut Russia can't make anything but VodKa modules!!11!
It must be true because I read it on Russia hating websites

You guys may want to have a look at this article
https://topwar.ru/100893-i-snova-o-protivostoyanii-t-50-pak-fa-s-raptorom-upuschennye-national-interest-detali.html
what do you think?

New g-suits (9 G's) for T-50 pilots;

http://mil.today/2016/Weapons36/

AFM PAK-FA/FGFA

http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/3962967

The first production samples of radar for PAK FA have already made

MOSCOW, January 23. /TASS/. Experimental design work (OKR) to create a radar system for the fighter fifth generation T-50 (PAK FA) is almost complete, has created the first production models. In an interview with TASS said the General Director of Scientific research Institute of instrument design (NIIP). Tikhomirov (included in the Group of ASD "Almaz-Antey") White jury.

"The corresponding R & d is at the final stage. Moreover, the head, produced by the Ryazan State instrument plant - already made the first production models of AESA (active phased array antenna - approx. TASS)," he said.
According to White, flight tests of a new radar "go without any comment". "But how long they will last, to tell now difficult in many respects, it does not depend on us," said White.
PAK FA - promising fighter fifth generation. He made the first flight in 2010. As expected, the first five production aircraft will go to the troops in 2017.

While this videos is really concerning in-flight refueling, it features T-50 prominently, it appears the all-grey aircraft is the T-50KNS, right? I am puzzled by the star markings on the nose though, as this is as far as it's known a ground tetsts airframe which never flew.

George1 wrote:Russia to Develop Main Engine for T-50 PAK FA Fighters by 2020

This one line quote show how sometime of better frequently text translated from russian to english are so obscure and ...
In this case it quit clear that main means definitive version but on a text of tents of lines you get to lost yourself in translation...

George1 wrote:Russia to Develop Main Engine for T-50 PAK FA Fighters by 2020

Flight testing starting in 2017. So they have basically completed the design and component engineering. It is all about refinement and debugging
for the next 3 years. Does not look like they are in a super hurry to deliver the product, which is very wise. A lot of internet "experts" have
time frame gut feelings detached from reality. Ten years for design and testing is very reasonable for such a device.

The English in this article is very sloppy. They talk about R&D completing by 2020 at the same time that they talk about flight testing. This
is not the correct used of the term R&D.

kvs wrote:

George1 wrote:Russia to Develop Main Engine for T-50 PAK FA Fighters by 2020

Flight testing starting in 2017. So they have basically completed the design and component engineering. It is all about refinement and debugging
for the next 3 years. Does not look like they are in a super hurry to deliver the product, which is very wise. A lot of internet "experts" have
time frame gut feelings detached from reality. Ten years for design and testing is very reasonable for such a device.

The English in this article is very sloppy. They talk about R&D completing by 2020 at the same time that they talk about flight testing. This
is not the correct used of the term R&D.

It is an attack plane.

Means it needs a lot more than the airframe to fulfil that function.

And the new engine needed to fly from carriers.

just made this xD

HM1199 wrote:just made this xD

ahahaha this was posted somewhere else recently. I want to make a snakes and ladders game now.

While im here.. is this thread just for news and minor commentary or is this where the debates also happen ?

This is a thread for discussions about PAK FA news.

If you want to discuss other aspects of its design then you are free to make another thread or find a more suitable existing thread for the topic of discussion.

What's the reason hat sukhoi chose less stealthy podded engines instead of going for a flat belly like the F-22 or MiG-1.44?

I suspect the success of body lift with the Flanker and Fulcrum series.

The widely spaced engines means more space for weapon bays but also with regard to thrust vector control engines the wide separation means much better differential control... ie with the engines together pointing one nozzle up and one down will create a tiny roll force.

Separating them by a metre or more means much more powerful roll control forces with smaller angle deflections needed.