Rodinazombie wrote:Khepesh, ive just seen the news about dnr proposing to withdraw all weapons below 100mm, but really why do they bother?
Havent they realised yet that they are just pissing in the wind? If they were dealing with an unbiased party them i could understand it but the west knows whats happening and who is responsible but it doesnt care. It has its agenda and no amount of goodwill gestures or peace proposals by the DNR will change it one bit.
That said i do support the move, i guess we have to think about what the history books of tomorrow will say. And at least when people look back in the future they cant say that the ukies werent given the chance for peace.
Edit: i just hope that NAF is damn well ready to hit them hard as soon as the ukies try to take advantage of this, if this is some more shirokino style bs then people are going to start asking questions. Im already seeing a lot of negative comments about it on vkontakte.
Its not really news, the hare was started running by Lavrov back in April http://uk.reuters.com/article/2015/04/04/uk-ukraine-crisis-lavrov-idUKKBN0MV0C420150404
Then by mid June at a Contact Group meeting it was 'virtually agreed' and after 7 July CG meeting OSCE were hoping that it would be signed at this next, still unscheduled AFAIK meeting.
The pressure is on Kiev and even if they sign up they won't do much about it, just enough for PR purposes, pulling wool over peoples eyes, like on the rest of Minsk.
As you say, in the event of 'action' (Moscow will not allow the NAF to hit first) the onus would be on the NAF either to stop the UAF in its tracks or allow it through and then crush it. The good thing about the UAF spending much of its time, money and manpower on their 'Maginot' line is that once breached, it can be easily assaulted from the rear or even ignored. There must have been an awful lot of military staff college papers written over the years on just this subject. By now, given that the NAF do not seem to have hammered them to date, the UA must feel quite comfortable in their bunkered artillery positions. The phrase 'sitting ducks' springs to mind.
If the NAF do pull back the only logical strategic reason for it would be to lure UAF into a pre-prepared trap. The tanks and mortars may move but you can bet that artillery 15km plus back isn't going anywhere and the co-ordinates are already programmed in. Also, as I have said before, in the fog of battle it is very difficult to tell just how far the shell or missile that is about to hit has come. This is especially relevant by the sea.
The NAF and its 'influencer, not controller' Moscow, will be well aware that this will make no news outside Ukraine so they must be doing it for other reasons. The timing is spot on if this is the objective as the UA will be reporting how strong they are , especially after $150M of training, the defences are complete, they need something for the RS to get active on other than Western Ukraine and next week there are serious financial issues coming to a head. Finally, as the Iran and Greece decisions are fading the Western MSN needs some news to splash, preferably about the evil Russians, in the quiet sales days in Summer.