Incidents in Russia (Natural Disasters, Accidents and Emergencies)

Dforce wrote:

medo wrote:.................................

They are not throwing a pie in Putin's face, but in al Sisi's face. Security in Egypt and in Egyptian airports is Egyptian problem, not Russian. All this cancellations of flights in Egypt and evacuation of tourists is a blow for Egyptian tourism, which is one of the most important source of incomes for Egypt, for the state and for all those employed in tourism.

You see, the bombings in Syria was to protect Russia from IS attacks, or at least that is the way it was sold; I bet I can find severals on here that have voiced that line of reasonng.

However, if those bombings rather LEADS to IS attacks it will be another ball-game.

PapaDragon wrote:
Work on ISIS and moderate terrorists goes on as planned.

Dforce wrote:
Sure it does, any day now the rebels will collapse!

Neutrality wrote:

Dforce wrote:
Sure it does, any day now the rebels will collapse!

Always knew you were a little pathetic insecure excuse of a human being and this basically confirms it. As soon as Russia decides to up the game against ISIS and its proxies it wouldn't surprise me if you feel bad for them.

Kimppis wrote:Man, you gotta love the double standards

Russia conducts military operations in the Middle East -> Terorist attack against Russia -> "Hahaha, we told you that you are going to pay for your 'military adventures', Putin!"

US conducts military operations in the Middle East -> Terrorist attack against the US -> "You fucking towel heads!!! We are going to kill you all! 'Murica fuck yeah!!! Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists!"

And then we have these theories: "Putin said that there will be no losses/we are protecting the Russian people -> So right now the Kremlin is trying to hide what really happened." Yeah, let's get ahead of ourselves. The investigation is not even over yet and they are stilling planning how to respond.

And these articles that are actually defending Charlie Hebdo: "Russians have no right to be outraged! This just shows how evil Russian and its regime is! This is all about free speech and freedum. Take that, Putin!"  

Dforce wrote:

Kimppis wrote:Man, you gotta love the double standards

Russia conducts military operations in the Middle East -> Terorist attack against Russia -> "Hahaha, we told you that you are going to pay for your 'military adventures', Putin!"

US conducts military operations in the Middle East -> Terrorist attack against the US -> "You fucking towel heads!!! We are going to kill you all! 'Murica fuck yeah!!! Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists!"

And then we have these theories: "Putin said that there will be no losses/we are protecting the Russian people -> So right now the Kremlin is trying to hide what really happened." Yeah, let's get ahead of ourselves. The investigation is not even over yet and they are stilling planning how to respond.

And these articles that are actually defending Charlie Hebdo: "Russians have no right to be outraged! This just shows how evil Russian and its regime is! This is all about free speech and freedum. Take that, Putin!"  

Sorry, you are missing the point here. It does not matter what Finns think (not that I think you are represtative of the regular Fin) but what the regular Russian think; that is the goal of the USUK propaganda about the bomb.

Werewolf wrote:Wrong, ISIS is no suspect, the problem you like bln people have is that you believe in every garbage boogieman the US invents. You see ISIS as some own group with own politics, it is not, it never existed before US had not invented this group. They go hand in hand. If ISIS did this that is direct proof US did it.

Kimppis wrote:

Dforce wrote:

Sorry, you are missing the point here. It does not matter what Finns think (not that I think you are represtative of the regular Fin) but what the regular Russian think; that is the goal of the USUK propaganda about the bomb.

I'm not sure that I understood you, but I wasn't talking about the western "propaganda's" target audience (at least that wasn't my point/intention). It's blatantly double standardistic (that's probably not a word) all the same. Although I think that I agree with you for the most part. And Finns don't matter, that's for sure.  

According to British newspaper Daily Telegraph, to the crash of Flight Airbus A321 may have been involved jihadis from Britain. The publication reports that intelligence intercepted conversations of suspected terrorists, who spoke with a marked British accent.

The British Daily Telegraph newspaper reported that the crash of Flight to the A321 could be involved jihadis from Britain. According to the publication, the British intelligence intercepted conversations allegedly Britons trained in Syria.

According to unconfirmed newspaper reports, the alleged terrorists spoke with a British accent. More precisely, with an accent peculiar inhabitants of London and Birmingham. As in Egypt, they are something "marked after the explosion of the plane." This writes the Daily Telegraph, referring to the UK Government Communications Headquarters, whose officers intercepted conversation.

It is expected that the role of British jihadists "with experience with electronic devices" limited consultations on the bomb assembly.

Daily Telegraph points out that it is too early to draw conclusions about the perpetrators of the tragedy were British subjects.

Dforce wrote:Sorry, no, you are wrong, I do not feel that much for Russia.

Khepesh wrote:

Kimppis wrote:

Dforce wrote:

Sorry, you are missing the point here. It does not matter what Finns think (not that I think you are represtative of the regular Fin) but what the regular Russian think; that is the goal of the USUK propaganda about the bomb.

I'm not sure that I understood you, but I wasn't talking about the western "propaganda's" target audience (at least that wasn't my point/intention). It's blatantly double standardistic (that's probably not a word) all the same. Although I think that I agree with you for the most part. And Finns don't matter, that's for sure.  

I think he is saying you are not a "regular" Finn based on about three Finns on the old MP net and on another forum for "sofas" who are foaming at the mouth Russophobe loonies and he thinks all Finns are like that, or should be like that. Willful malicious ignorance from what I suspect is part of the UPA/OUN diaspora in UK.

Dforce wrote:

Neutrality wrote:

Dforce wrote:
Sure it does, any day now the rebels will collapse!

Always knew you were a little pathetic insecure excuse of a human being and this basically confirms it. As soon as Russia decides to up the game against ISIS and its proxies it wouldn't surprise me if you feel bad for them.

Sorry, no, you are wrong, I do not feel that much for Russia.

Kimppis wrote:Man, you gotta love the double standards

Russia conducts military operations in the Middle East -> Terorist attack against Russia -> "Hahaha, we told you that you are going to pay for your 'military adventures', Putin!"

US conducts military operations in the Middle East -> Terrorist attack against the US -> "You fucking towel heads!!! We are going to kill you all! 'Murica fuck yeah!!! Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists!"

And then we have these theories: "Putin said that there will be no losses/we are protecting the Russian people -> So right now the Kremlin is trying to hide what really happened." Yeah, let's get ahead of ourselves. The investigation is not even over yet and they are stilling planning how to respond.

And these articles that are actually defending Charlie Hebdo: "Russians have no right to be outraged! This just shows how evil Russian and its regime is! This is all about free speech and freedum. Take that, Putin!"  

Karl Haushofer wrote:

sepheronx wrote:

Karl Haushofer wrote:

Kimppis wrote:

The biggest Finnish military forum has also gotten really Russophobic

Indeed. I registered to maanpuolustus.net and got banned after only a few post, for supporting Novorossiya in the Ukrainian civil war.

It seems your government and various people in higher positions are always pushing the anti Russian sentiment and NATO agenda.  But it seems the Finnish people have a different opinion.  Not everyone of course but seems that not all Finns are brainwashed.

Only a minority, and a small minority that is.

Finland never was and never will be a pro-Russian country. I'd say our government is actually less anti-Russian than the Finnish people. In that regard Finland is the opposite of the Anglo-Saxon countries. I never thought that general American and British people hate the Russians or Russia, but their governments are Russia's mortal enemies. Whereas in Finland our government always tries to keep at least somewhat pragmatic relations with Russia, but the anti-Russian segment among common populace is very deep.

Those Finns who openly support Russia here can be into some trouble here.