Syrian War: News #14

SeigSoloyvov wrote:Tantul mountain was captured yesterday.

Benya wrote:I only wrote this post because time to time I got sick and tired reading your recent posts, which are aimed directly to derail the topics and spark hostility between members.

PapaDragon wrote:

eehnie wrote:

PapaDragon wrote:

eehnie wrote:

PapaDragon wrote:

eehnie wrote:

SeigSoloyvov wrote:

eehnie wrote:

SeigSoloyvov wrote:In short SAA command has realized they cannot seize Hama area from ISIs via front line assault without redeploying a large number of men, So they are focusing on the Raf road, hoping to choke ISIS out that way

One example of intoxication reversed by the facts this weekend

LoL in your head the SAA must have more men than they do and I guess the fact all their past attempts to break ISIS lines via Hama have failed but hey yeah "intoxication" alright.

Run along armchair general, because you once again have shown you know shit.

I mean gee...I wonder why the SAA forces are advancing along the Raf road....if I am "intoxicated". Hm....guess the SAA army is intoxicated also then~

Cause they are advancing EXACTLY how I said.

what a clown~

and what facts....do you know how to read a map....After they took Resafa they have been advancing down along that road ever since and all their gains are in those positions.

Oh let me be clear here because you cannot understand English!.

You see there is a road that attaches Resafa to sukan, the SAA are advancing down along this road to prevent ISis from getting supplies in Eastern Hama and if you called that "intoxication" you have something wrong with you mentally.

Which is your rank in the US forces exactly, Senior Shoe Shiner? You are not able to smell what is under your nose. You are not able to smell still the Russian/Syrian strategy.

So funny to see.

You do realize that he was right on everything that happened in previous couple of years?

Including accurately predicting Russian/Syrian strategy  

Everyone see how he was and is wrong.

Name one example.

Just one and I will apologize.

One is all it takes.

C'mon, prove me wrong, I dare ya' !!!

Time to remember you owe apologies

Do you see now more clearly how the initial comment of SeigSoloyvov was full wrong? Specially the bolded part. And the next answer? More mistakes to bold. Time talks and now we see who are the real clowns.

What a gang of intoxicators and "strategists" we have to suffer here. You are not able to smell the Russian/Syrian strategy despite having it under your nose. Not rare to see you defeated.

@eehenia

In short SAA command has realized they cannot seize Hama area from ISIs via front line assault without redeploying a large number of men

And they didn't. Russians done the work for them trough airstrikes, political pressure and settlements​.

SAA just walked in after someone else done all the work.

In the meantime SAA continues to operate in the same manner that Seig has described.

So how do I owe you an apology? If you want one then prove me wrong first.

50 years from now when Russia maybe builds half-large aircraft carrier will I owe apology too because I said now that they would not be able to do it in less than 30 years?

SeigSoloyvov wrote:Advice to people about Eehnie do not respond to him, if you respond to him you feed him best thing you can do is ignore him.

I am all for constructive chats but that guy ain't interested in them, his way or the highway.

That is my advice to you all.

eehnie wrote:

Benya wrote:..........

I'm also sick reading dirty propaganda here with negative value. Constant intoxication from a few people, likely being professionals of it. ....

eehnie wrote:Taking this position you take your side. In the side of the intoxication. Good to know.

Now we have to see if you also begin intoxicating or not.

Until now was not the case. I never said about your comments, with coincident or different oppinions, same or different oppinions never have been a problem.

And I'm so sick reading your last comment too. As consequence the things changed.

SeigSoloyvov wrote:

par far wrote:

SeigSoloyvov wrote:Tantul mountain was captured yesterday.

Hello Seig, I know you have answered this question before but the situation is a little different on the front, Turkey attacked the Kurds, on the border area recently, people are saying, the Turks did this to see what the US reaction would be, do you think the US will allow the Turks too attack the Kurds on the border areas?

No that attack was a test to see if we would oppose them advancing into that area and we did. We have troops patrolling the boarders, only way the Turks can advance from that area. Only way the turks can advance is if they are willing to go over the bodies of our soldiers, which they will never do.

This is why they are focusing military actions in the Efrin area we do not care about that at all.

Don't get me wrong a time will come where the kurds will face a full force assault from the turks, our support for them is not unlimited. Just like the kurds will be facing the SAA once ISIS is gone.

What we believe will happen is the SAA and Turks will attack at the same time, I heard Putin told the kurds something like "rejoin Syria or we will not help protect you". Kurds will not hand over the land they control without a fight, anyone who thinks otherwise needs to spend a good few months about them like I have.

You see the kurds are scared to death right now about facing either side, because once ISIS is gone there is no guarantee we will remain there. Their survival depends on us

They do not have many heavy weapons, their manpower is very very low, no air force they would get picked apart in such a fight.

So to make this clear provided we are there the kurds will never come under assault if we go they are pretty much dead and if they are smart would Accept Assad's offers about having some anatomies rights.

Has the kurds cannot fight well, for example, I had orders to seize Al-Berid I took it but the kurds with me proved ineffective in what should have been a fairly simple fight.

They do not have the skill to fight off the SAA and Turk right now even if I was ordered to train them, I doubt with such little time I'd have I could do much for them. Takes months to make even the sub-standard train soldier "decent".

Anyways hope that answered you.

JohninMK wrote:Increase barrel elevation by 35 degrees



Yes boss

par far wrote:

JohninMK wrote:Increase barrel elevation by 35 degrees

Yes boss

Would the tank not fall over, when they fire it?(In the second picture.)

SeigSoloyvov wrote:PS we have started talks with russia to hand Tan-if over.

SeigSoloyvov wrote:

JohninMK wrote:

SeigSoloyvov wrote:PS we have started talks with russia to hand Tan-if over.

Good to hear, avoids misunderstandings. Wonder if there will be a 'return to nearly as found' clause from the US?

We started Talks, there is no guarantee we will, and keep in mind FSA may try and block it.

so don't assume this is a sure thing.

eehnie wrote:

Benya wrote:I only wrote this post because time to time I got sick and tired reading your recent posts, which are aimed directly to derail the topics and spark hostility between members.

I'm also sick reading dirty propaganda here with negative value. Constant intoxication from a few people, likely being professionals of it. And still we will have to applaud a self labeled worker for the US in Syria, saying he will go to Deir Ezzor before than the Syrian and Russian Armed Forces. Well. A big NO. Will not have a nice welcome from me.

Taking this position you take your side. In the side of the intoxication. Good to know.

Now we have to see if you also begin intoxicating or not. Until now was not the case. I never said about your comments, with coincident or different oppinions, same or different oppinions never have been a problem. And I'm so sick reading your last comment too. As consequence the things changed.