This is directed towards Mike E, a correction on the number of gears forward and backward. So one of you older posts stated that Armata platform has 4 gears forward and backward, I read somewhere some 5-6 months back that it was actually 8 gears forward and backward. Though I sat on the response, because I wasn't sure if the article was a victim of a bad machine translation, so I gave your word the benefit of the doubt, but yes indeed it's been confirmed that Armata has both 8 gears forward and 8 gears backward. Just a minor correction.
+70
fragmachine
par far
T-44
x_54_u43
JohninMK
ult
Khepesh
Project Canada
Neirdark
zg18
AlfaT8
OminousSpudd
Glyph
Cucumber Khan
Walther von Oldenburg
jhelb
PapaDragon
Berkut
Cyrus the great
VladimirSahin
Mak Sime
2SPOOKY4U
Mike E
Vann7
GunshipDemocracy
magnumcromagnon
Alex555
marcellogo
collegeboy16
Werewolf
Stealthflanker
Austin
volna
Brovich
berhoum
Big_Gazza
Cyberspec
George1
mack8
franco
THX-15
whir
Morpheus Eberhardt
Book.
Rmf
max steel
victor1985
Mindstorm
archangelski
Flanky
flamming_python
sepheronx
higurashihougi
Acheron
AJ-47
BKP
Kyo
Flyboy77
chicken
Viktor
KoTeMoRe
cracker
Dima
KomissarBojanchev
mutantsushi
kvs
alexZam
Zivo
Regular
xeno
74 posters
[Official] Armata Discussion thread #3
magnumcromagnon- Posts : 8138
Points : 8273
Join date : 2013-12-05
Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan
- Post n°976
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3
Mike E- Posts : 2619
Points : 2651
Join date : 2014-06-19
Location : Bay Area, CA
- Post n°977
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3
It has always been 8 in both directions - not sure why I would have mixed that up.
Thanks
Thanks
magnumcromagnon- Posts : 8138
Points : 8273
Join date : 2013-12-05
Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan
- Post n°978
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3
Mike E wrote:It has always been 8 in both directions - not sure why I would have mixed that up.
Thanks
BTW on Gurkhan's website, there's been rumors that Rhinemetal is looking at a 130mm smooth-bore cannon. Do you think there's any substance to the claim?
If it's true, then that's quite strange and perplexing, considering that there's apparently already a 140mm cannon already designed ready for service.
Mike E- Posts : 2619
Points : 2651
Join date : 2014-06-19
Location : Bay Area, CA
- Post n°979
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3
The image GurKhan showed originated from an official Rheinmettal presentation - so it has basically been confirmed.
A 130 mm makes a little sense - in that the rounds can be smaller and lighter as well. If they stick with unitary rounds, it makes sense, if not, it doesn't really do much.
I'm certain it will be ETC-based as well,countries have had the technology for a while now. I think we will see T-14 adopt an ETC very soon as well. In fact, possibly in place of the 152 mm.
A 130 mm makes a little sense - in that the rounds can be smaller and lighter as well. If they stick with unitary rounds, it makes sense, if not, it doesn't really do much.
I'm certain it will be ETC-based as well,countries have had the technology for a while now. I think we will see T-14 adopt an ETC very soon as well. In fact, possibly in place of the 152 mm.
Guest- Guest
- Post n°980
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3
magnumcromagnon wrote:Mike E wrote:It has always been 8 in both directions - not sure why I would have mixed that up.
Thanks
BTW on Gurkhan's website, there's been rumors that Rhinemetal is looking at a 130mm smooth-bore cannon. Do you think there's any substance to the claim?
If it's true, then that's quite strange and perplexing, considering that there's apparently already a 140mm cannon already designed ready for service.
Seems actually that NPzK-140 is dead, as they still want to keep 4 crew members and 140mm ammunition is separate loading ammunition, which means it requires autoloader. So i guess than that is why they want to pursue 130mm guns now, as they are most likely one piece.
ult- Posts : 837
Points : 877
Join date : 2015-02-20
- Post n°981
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3
Zivo- Posts : 1487
Points : 1511
Join date : 2012-04-13
Location : U.S.A.
- Post n°982
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3
ult wrote:
What's with the exhaust flame on startup?
PapaDragon- Posts : 13472
Points : 13512
Join date : 2015-04-26
Location : Fort Evil, Serbia
- Post n°983
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3
Zivo wrote:...................
What's with the exhaust flame on startup?
Super stronkk engine!!!
Zivo- Posts : 1487
Points : 1511
Join date : 2012-04-13
Location : U.S.A.
- Post n°984
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3
PapaDragon wrote:Zivo wrote:...................
What's with the exhaust flame on startup?
Super stronkk engine!!!
I didn't notice the first time, it's actually the APU's exhaust. That makes more sense, short pipe, plus cold start.
Cyrus the great- Posts : 306
Points : 314
Join date : 2015-06-12
- Post n°985
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3
I saw the live firing video of the Armata and it seemed to have had a lot of recoil, and I just don't know why that it is.
Last edited by Cyrus the great on Fri Feb 26, 2016 7:26 am; edited 1 time in total
Mike E- Posts : 2619
Points : 2651
Join date : 2014-06-19
Location : Bay Area, CA
- Post n°986
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3
Some people say barrel or stabilizer trouble with this particular unit, stabilizer was off, etc.
It is quite clear that the stabilizer was off in both firing videos, the barrel is not 'cushioned' at all.
It is quite clear that the stabilizer was off in both firing videos, the barrel is not 'cushioned' at all.
Cyrus the great- Posts : 306
Points : 314
Join date : 2015-06-12
- Post n°987
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3
Mike E wrote:Some people say barrel or stabilizer trouble with this particular unit, stabilizer was off, etc.
It is quite clear that the stabilizer was off in both firing videos, the barrel is not 'cushioned' at all.
They definitely should have fixed any problems with the stabilizer or the barrel before releasing the video.
magnumcromagnon- Posts : 8138
Points : 8273
Join date : 2013-12-05
Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan
- Post n°988
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3
Cyrus the great wrote:Mike E wrote:Some people say barrel or stabilizer trouble with this particular unit, stabilizer was off, etc.
It is quite clear that the stabilizer was off in both firing videos, the barrel is not 'cushioned' at all.
They definitely should have fixed any problems with the stabilizer or the barrel before releasing the video.
You do know that it's in prototype stage, and not in serial production?
GarryB- Posts : 40541
Points : 41041
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°989
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3
It might be that they were test firing the barrel without the stabiliser engaged to determine that if can fire without the stabiliser turned on.
Sort of a worst case accuracy test...
Sort of a worst case accuracy test...
George1- Posts : 18520
Points : 19025
Join date : 2011-12-22
Location : Greece
- Post n°990
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3
RuMOD to get first test batch of T-14 Armata tanks and T-15 armored vehicles (~20) in 2016-17
https://twitter.com/KURYERSAT/status/703661237905854464
https://twitter.com/KURYERSAT/status/703661237905854464
franco- Posts : 7053
Points : 7079
Join date : 2010-08-18
- Post n°991
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3
https://www.rt.com/news/333871-armata-tanks-trial-army/
-------
https://www.russiadefence.net/viewtopic.forum?t=7345
-------
https://www.russiadefence.net/viewtopic.forum?t=7345