kvs Thu Oct 29, 2015 5:38 pm
sepheronx wrote:I wont be able to though since technically, if it isnt 100% owned, it isnt 100% govs responsibility in its debt. As well, the companys are called state owned by name only as the state is the largest investor. But that doesnt mean much anyway. There are plenty of options and things to do that would help themselves out.
We will have to agree to disagree. And the politicians arent all knowing either. Many have their own agendas as I pointed out, and many of them have been wrong on multitude of times as I have also pointed out. Nothing wrong in that. What is wrong though is constantly screaming "The sky is falling" when it isnt even close to that (not referring you but the politicians).
Even the part the government owns does apply to debt liability. Gazprom's debt is commercial debt and the lenders take their chances.
There are no state guarantees behind Gazporm's debt. Austin totally ignores this aspect. Owning shares in companies shields the state
from liability. The worst that happens is that the share owner is left with worthless shares. Have you ever heard of shareholders required
by law to pay the debts of the company whose shares they own? No. There is no such thing. Please don't pollute this board with anymore
of your crap hysterical BS, Austin.
BTW, the CBR's peculiar counting of Russian debt demonstrates that it is a compromised outfit serving interests aside from those of Russia.
Various propaganda spigots pick up on its fluffed up government debt number and wave it in everyone's face. Of course, if they were
honest journalists they would correct the CBR nonsense and use the same definition as the USA. The US does not even count municipal
and state debt as part of the national public debt.