https://www.rt.com/business/435760-russia-response-us-sanctions/
Siluanov: The dollar becomes an unreliable tool in world trade
https://rg.ru/2018/08/12/siluanov-dollar-stanovitsia-nenadezhnym-instrumentom-v-mirovoj-torgovle.html
dino00 wrote:
Russia expects budget surplus of 1.5-2% of GDP and 1.8-2% GDP growth in 2018
More:
http://tass.com/economy/1016971
Big_Gazza wrote:dino00 wrote:
Russia expects budget surplus of 1.5-2% of GDP and 1.8-2% GDP growth in 2018
More:
http://tass.com/economy/1016971
Muricans can take their well-laid plans for "sanctions from Hell" and shove them up their well-laid arses. Russia will shrug off the latest sabotage attempts, emerge stronger for it, and smirk at the useless "giant" with feet of clay.
Sack Putin? Sounds like what NATO has been aiming to do for the past decade, was NATO helping Russia find a better leader all along?
dino00 wrote:
Russian Budget Surplus Amounted To 2.5% Of GDP In January-July - Finance Ministry
The Russian budget surplus for January-July amounted to 2.5 percent of the country's gross domestic product (GDP), or 1.383 trillion rubles ($20.4 billion), the Russian Finance Ministry said Monday in its preliminary estimate.
https://www.urdupoint.com/en/business/russian-budget-surplus-amounted-to-25-of-gd-409734.html
What sanctions?
Hole wrote:Hillary has a small dick?
What is the initiative related to?
Last week, presidential aide Andrei Belousov proposed to increase additional budget revenues through the mining and chemical industries. In his opinion, companies in this sphere pay less taxes than in the oil and gas sector. According to the document, which RIA Novosti got acquainted with, this
GarryB wrote:
I think Hilary would have been less pro israel and less anti Iranian and just more anti Russian, but as he has pointed out Trump has been harder on the Russians than Obama was... but that might just be compensation because he has a small dick.
Minpromtorg discussed with companies the idea of withdrawing super profits in the budget
IMHO Trump is neither pro nor anti Russian. He is pro Trump and his oligarch comrades.
His stance as anti Russian dude is to me clearly ;political game before senate elections
@Hole - Russia definitely could buy many fighters if needed but investments in economy now is no 1 in afraid.
GarryB wrote:HiIlary has a huge dick that is totally out of control... she calls him Bill, but obviously not often enough to satisfy that wag.
Minpromtorg discussed with companies the idea of withdrawing super profits in the budget
Imagine suggesting that in the west... Apple makes trillion dollar profits around the world so they would get a super tax to spread that money around in the country they earned it in...
IMHO Trump is neither pro nor anti Russian. He is pro Trump and his oligarch comrades.
His stance as anti Russian dude is to me clearly ;political game before senate elections
He is the fool that thinks he can win his enemies over as friends if he can act like he thinks they would like to act... problem is that his enemies are talking shit and are not interested in what they say they are... they are just appealing to what they think their fan base wants...
And lets face it... they lost the last election because they are completely out of touch with what the American people want.
[/quote]@Hole - Russia definitely could buy many fighters if needed but investments in economy now is no 1 in afraid.
Building roads and high speed rail lines and bridges and tunnels makes more sense at the moment... they don't need thousands of fighter aircraft or lots of big ships right now... in an economic conflict that is just extra operational costs for capabilities they currently have no practical need for.
miketheterrible wrote:It's a good aircraft but doesn't it kind of fit in same category as SSJ?