Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues
GunshipDemocracy wrote:
meh why will treat missiles as roads
No, revenues from the sale of state property in 2019 are planned in the budget of 13 billion rubles, in 2020 - 11 billion rubles, and in 2021 privatization revenues are not planned.
The head of the Accounts Chamber also noted that there is no increase in the share of the private sector in the Russian economy, and state-owned companies are still buying up private assets. "Therefore, this is one of the fundamental elements of the new model of the economy," said Kudrin.
More:The report projects the share of natural gas in the global energy balance to increase from 22% to 26% by 2040
VIENNA, December 7. /TASS/. The Gas Exporting Countries Forum (GECF) forecasts global demand for gas to increase by 46% to 5.43 trillion cubic meters by 2040, according to the Global Gas Outlook 2040 issued by GECF on Friday.
"Global demand for natural gas will grow by 46% - from 3.7 trillion cubic meters in 2017 to 5.43 trillion cubic meters in 2040," the document said.
Generating electricity and the industrial sector will contribute the most to the growing deman.
The share of natural gas in the global energy balance will increase from 22% to 26% by 2040.
"Total production growth is expected at 1.7% annually until 2040. The United States, Russia, China and Iran will be the main contributors," the report said.
Natural gas production in GECF countries is projected to increase by one-thid, reaching around 2 trillion cubic meters by 2040.
magnumcromagnon wrote:GunshipDemocracy wrote:
meh why will treat missiles as roads
Weren't you just crying about IRBM spending taking away from civil economy, now you have the contrary and now you seem so unsure....seriously with you I'm just...
Austin wrote:He spoke about 12 National Project and investment of 23 trillions thats huge money for 6 years.
Any idea what these 12 national project are ?
No INF withdrawal is not good for Russia.
franco wrote:Russia ranked second in Bloomberg Rankings
franco wrote: Recall that Europe has decided to follow the example of Russia. In early December, the European Union decided to weaken the influence of dollars in the energy sector and prepared a package of measures to replace the US currency with the euro in settlements with suppliers of energy carriers and natural raw materials.
MOSCOW, November 27. /TASS/. Russia came in fourth globally for the number of citizens employed in the scientific field, after China, the United States and Japan, Russian Minister of Science and Higher Education Mikhail Kotyukov told a forum in Moscow on Tuesday.
"The world on the whole is in a state of transformation. It is a very powerful and dynamically evolving transformation. Given we fail to find a way around in due time, given we fail to grasp in due time what and how we need to act, we might always end up in lagging behind," the Russian president said.
"It is a very dramatic situation in the history of our country. This dramatic situation is unfolding across the world as well as in our fate," he noted.
The United Russia party should employ its legislative and administrative potential and its human resources to unite and consolidate the citizens and to find solutions to nationwide problems, Putin concluded.
GarryB wrote:... whacking out 20,000 cheap simple light 5,000km range cruise missiles would be a rather easy and relatively cheap solution for Russia... the important thing is that the reply from europe would be to need to do the same... but also a recognition that their air defences are pathetic and that a Mathias Rust could land anywhere he wanted in the EU with impunity.No INF withdrawal is not good for Russia.
GB wrote: The cost of actually creating an IADS would be bankrupting even for the US who likes to spend money on weapons... for the EU it will be eye watering and likely not affordable... let alone agreed upon.
The withdrawal is not good for Russia... but it is also not really the end of the world.... it will be much harder for the EU and Europe.... possibly too hard... they might even stand up to washington.
Russia 2018 budget surplus to be close to 3% of GDP - minister
Russia's budget surplus this year will be close to 3 per cent of GDP, the country's economy minister has said, higher than the official forecast thanks to strong oil revenues and conservative spending.
“We will now have a budget surplus of 2.5 per cent of GDP at least this year, closer to 3 per cent," Maxim Oreshkin said.
Last month the country's finance ministry raised its forecast for budget surplus to 2.5 per cent of GDP from 2.1 per cent previously. The surplus comes despite more than four years of western sanctions against Moscow targeting its most valuable industries.
Budget rules that divert excess revenue from high oil prices into a stability fund rather than directly into government coffers have helped smooth Russia's currency fluctuations and ensured more stable expenditure planning, while the Kremlin has plumped for fiscal stability over driving up growth with higher spending.
The economy is expected to grow by between 1.6 and 1.8 per cent this year.
President Vladimir Putin's administration has sought to tap large business groups to pay for huge infrastructure investments rather than increase state spending.
https://www.ft.com/content/9b20ad82-fde5-11e8-aebf-99e208d3e521
Austin wrote:[size=40]"The state defense order will be reduced - what will you do?"[/size][size=40]How "defense" turns into a "citizen"[/size]
are you serious 20,000 CMs?!Kalibr is built with ~100 unites per year. Not sure if Iskander even less. Besides Us regime doesnt care about EU.
Even if so far west didnt put enough attention to AAD in couple of years they can have top tier without problems.
In PPP west (US, EU, Au, Canada, Japan) is like 15:1, who will bankrupt first in arms race? no arms race is no good for Russia. will Russia survive? yes Russia does. But raunning marathon with backpack doesnt make it easier to run.
Kozak supported subsidizing the development of LPG car infrastructure
We want their [Russian] economy to be weaker because a strong economy supports strong military power. And we do not want a strong aggressive state to have a strong army or a strong navy. Therefore, sanctions certainly serve our interests”, the retired diplomat said.
Add to that Russia`s largest shadow economy - 40% of the whole economy is unaccounted for in official statistics.Hole wrote:Lot of the western GDP are "services" and financial (virtual) stuff. In real terms the west is maybe 3 times "bigger" than Russia.
You can´t win wars with bankers or guys that serve coffee.
THats a known fact not a new revelation, That is the motive of sanction on all the countries not just Russia but even Iran or china or Noko or others.Vann7 wrote:
Finally US diplomats admits the reason why US sanctions..
this is how honesty looks like.. from an US former top diplomat on Ukraine TV. told..
We want their [Russian] economy to be weaker because a strong economy supports strong military power. And we do not want a strong aggressive state to have a strong army or a strong navy. Therefore, sanctions certainly serve our interests”, the retired diplomat said.
Austin wrote:THats a known fact not a new revelation, That is the motive of sanction on all the countries not just Russia but even Iran or china or Noko or others.Vann7 wrote:
Finally US diplomats admits the reason why US sanctions..
this is how honesty looks like.. from an US former top diplomat on Ukraine TV. told..
We want their [Russian] economy to be weaker because a strong economy supports strong military power. And we do not want a strong aggressive state to have a strong army or a strong navy. Therefore, sanctions certainly serve our interests”, the retired diplomat said.
Russia is now more dependent on internal resources.
Sanctions are great blessing in disguise. US Economy is significant weakened now cant fight this long
Home
Latest images
Register
Log in
