- it must be in the public & property tax records; if it's not there or not accessible, he's hiding their names by not confirming them. He himself admitted that some of them r his distant relatives & some others he knows personally. why should it be a secret if he has nothing to hide?
What business is it of yours... mind your own business.
He is president of Russia, not the town crier whose job it is to announce who owns what and where... how about US presidents start listing all their assets... would be very interested to see what happened to all the hundreds of millions of dollars donated to the Clinton Foundation for charities like helping Haiti... it does not sound like they ended getting very much of it at their end.
He is not required to give out ownership information for any properties.
- he only claims that it's not his; he can go there anytime w/o any1's permission.
So it is his palace... according to lying cheating stealing criminals who hate him, but they can't prove he has ever visited or ever intends to go there.
I have a bridge to sell you, why don't you send me some money and we can talk about you buying it from me?
He & his friends use yachts, business jets, & palaces in his unofficial travels & recreations + expensive wrist watches, not mil. boats, aircraft, bases & gadgets.
He has friends that are rich... what a
... fire him immediately and ban him from everything... he should be in jail... wait a minute. All western leaders know Putin and Putin has 100 billion in gold bullion hidden under his mattress... shouldn't all western leaders be in jail too?
- it's more "highly likely" that Putin & those near & behind him r the biggest criminals in Russia.
Criminals that have done more for Russia than any previous Russian or Soviet leader in turning around the country and its economy and military.
Sounds like he should be getting rewarded, not demonised. Yeltsen in comparison was the criminal.
OTH, u r turning a blind eye on evidence when it doesn't suit u & admit the Kremlin propaganda as Gospel.
It is not about evidence suiting me or not, I am using UK logic that was used to prove without a doubt that Putin was guilty of international warcrimes using chem weapons... both in the UK and Syria.... both of which have turned out to be totally false surprisingly enough.
Applying the same litmus test the claims of criminal Navalny and murderer and thief Browder, I just don't think what they are suggesting is credible.
It would certainly never stand up in any real court even though the western media and youtube believe it... but as I said... this is war and they are not interested in the truth.... the truth would not only not pay the bills, but lead to an enormous pay cut for both orgs.
- she was asking the police what did they detain that guy for, fell & got a concussion. The policeman should have told her to get out of the way instead of kicking her.
She was demanding they release a known criminal and foreign agent, she should have been arrested for sedition and pepper sprayed...
his criminal record isn't worth the paper it's written on.
He embezzled 400 million dollars from a French company and repeatedly fleeces gullible Russians pretending he is fighting corruption when he is more corrupt than the people he pretends to oppose.
Many generals, admirals, scientists, designers & clergy also had criminal records but where released & rehabilitated to help in the war effort by Stalin.
They had redeeming features. Navalny is pond scum.
If Navalny is a criminal, it's because he doesn't kiss Putin's & his party's boots.
Navalny is a criminal because he breaks Russian law... repeatedly... and then violates his probation clauses and therefore breaks his probation conditions too.
Even if he was like Poroshenko or Zelensky, to the West he would still be a criminal to be dompted like the other dictators who outlived their usefulness.
Putin is voted in to power, which suggests your description of him as being a dictator is more western propaganda...
The Russian economy is no where near the worst, in fact they are in much better shape than a lot of other countries in terms of growth and debt and the things they can make and the things they have to import.
He is not finished yet... but when he is the person who takes over will be in a position of real strength thanks to the actions and decisions made by Putin during his time in office... lets hope they use that power to further improve the situation for Russians, and does some real damage to the west for its interference and the damage it has done over the decades to Russia and a lot of other countries too.
BTW comparing Putin to Poro or Zelensky is a joke right? I mean you could probably compare them with Yeltsen OK, but Ukraine and the US and UK and France and most countries on the planet can only dream of getting their own Putin.