Russian Towns, Cities / Urban Development
George1- Posts : 18514
Points : 19019
Join date : 2011-12-22
Location : Greece
flamming_python and Hole like this post
Hole- Posts : 11115
Points : 11093
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
ALAMO likes this post
kvs- Posts : 15850
Points : 15985
Join date : 2014-09-11
Location : Turdope's Kanada
Hole wrote:It comes with trees!
I think it is in itself a nice concept. But this is a vanity project and not a practical building.
Skyscrapers do not make sense in a city like St. Petersburg. There is a height limitation and there
is no real estate pressure like Manhattan where skyscrapers make sense.
Big_Gazza, ALAMO and miketheterrible like this post
ALAMO- Posts : 7470
Points : 7560
Join date : 2014-11-25
kvs wrote:Hole wrote:It comes with trees!
I think it is in itself a nice concept. But this is a vanity project and not a practical building.
Skyscrapers do not make sense in a city like St. Petersburg. There is a height limitation and there
is no real estate pressure like Manhattan where skyscrapers make sense.
You are spoiling all the fun
But seriously, F_P described a few days ago perfectly the concept. This whole Gazprom sector is located in the middle of nowhere, just well communicated with the remaining part of Peter. It used to be a dacha area, but most of those are left for 30+ years. That is why it is so easy to make propaganda shoots, with the Lachta Tower in the background, while some suburban dacha ruins in the front.
calripson- Posts : 753
Points : 808
Join date : 2013-10-26
- Post n°230
I Agree
kvs wrote:Hole wrote:It comes with trees!
I think it is in itself a nice concept. But this is a vanity project and not a practical building.
Skyscrapers do not make sense in a city like St. Petersburg. There is a height limitation and there
is no real estate pressure like Manhattan where skyscrapers make sense.
Complete waste of money to display corporate vanity.
flamming_python- Posts : 9519
Points : 9577
Join date : 2012-01-30
It would have never cemented itself were it not for all the excessively expensive vanity projects of past Russian Tsars.
I cautiously welcome the move from being the Venice of the North towards being the Dubai of the North
As long as we don't lose our heritage while doing so.
St. Petersburg needs to become a truly global city and attract people from all over the world. Currently Moscow is the only Russian city that can claim such a title but St. Petersburg certainly has the potential
3 of the tallest skyscrapers in Europe, but well on the outskirts of the historic city, will I think encourage more people to visit it, and to do business here. Such architecture can only be found here.
GarryB, Big_Gazza and ALAMO like this post
ALAMO- Posts : 7470
Points : 7560
Join date : 2014-11-25
flamming_python wrote:To be fair, St. Petersburg itself has been a propaganda project since 1703. And it has worked very well, the city now accounts for a not insignificant fraction of the entire country's economy.
It would have never cemented itself were it not for all the excessively expensive vanity projects of past Russian Tsars.
I cautiously welcome the move from being the Venice of the North towards being the Dubai of the North
As long as we don't lose our heritage while doing so.
St. Petersburg needs to become a truly global city and attract people from all over the world. Currently Moscow is the only Russian city that can claim such a title but St. Petersburg certainly has the potential
3 of the tallest skyscrapers in Europe, but well on the outskirts of the historic city, will I think encourage more people to visit it, and to do business here. Such architecture can only be found here.
You know the drill buddy. If one takes out 2-3 biggest cities in the UK or US, half of the economy is gone either. That is nothing really spectacular or unexpected.
What shocked me, is a fact that Gazprom cluster brought 30k jobs into Peter. This is something worth distribution, as we don't talk about the grocery store assistant salary level.
But some high paid jobs, that can make a real difference.
If you can give a whole area for high added value business, build the world's tallest skyscrapers to show the real face of modern Russia ... See no disadvantages here.
I suppose those will associate any newborn business projects along with Russia, and a professional trader or agent won't be glued to either Pete or Moscow, in the very future.
If they are to pump 100bcm of gas into China, they must secure the background there. And I don't mean the Vlad only.
flamming_python- Posts : 9519
Points : 9577
Join date : 2012-01-30
ALAMO wrote:flamming_python wrote:To be fair, St. Petersburg itself has been a propaganda project since 1703. And it has worked very well, the city now accounts for a not insignificant fraction of the entire country's economy.
It would have never cemented itself were it not for all the excessively expensive vanity projects of past Russian Tsars.
I cautiously welcome the move from being the Venice of the North towards being the Dubai of the North
As long as we don't lose our heritage while doing so.
St. Petersburg needs to become a truly global city and attract people from all over the world. Currently Moscow is the only Russian city that can claim such a title but St. Petersburg certainly has the potential
3 of the tallest skyscrapers in Europe, but well on the outskirts of the historic city, will I think encourage more people to visit it, and to do business here. Such architecture can only be found here.
You know the drill buddy. If one takes out 2-3 biggest cities in the UK or US, half of the economy is gone either. That is nothing really spectacular or unexpected.
What shocked me, is a fact that Gazprom cluster brought 30k jobs into Peter. This is something worth distribution, as we don't talk about the grocery store assistant salary level.
But some high paid jobs, that can make a real difference.
If you can give a whole area for high added value business, build the world's tallest skyscrapers to show the real face of modern Russia ... See no disadvantages here.
I suppose those will associate any newborn business projects along with Russia, and a professional trader or agent won't be glued to either Pete or Moscow, in the very future.
If they are to pump 100bcm of gas into China, they must secure the background there. And I don't mean the Vlad only.
All sorts of skyscraper projects have been floated for Vladivostok over the past 10 years but the winds in the region pose a problem for such construction. Nothing insurmountable I'd imagine, but it's just added costs, and around Vladivostok there is plenty of space to expand. For now, it's still too small a city. Needs to attract some more immigration from Russia and the Asia-Pacific region. The new Sputnik satellite-town they're planning to build in between Vladivostok and Artyom might help with that; essentially gluing all 3 places into a million-people conglomerate, and with a better space for some skyscrapers too.
But basically skyscraper construction I can foresee in 4 places, and those are Moscow, St. Petersburg, Ekaterinburg (which has a few already) and Vladivostok.
ALAMO- Posts : 7470
Points : 7560
Join date : 2014-11-25
It is a smart move to relocate a part of it outside, to this Sputnik idea.
flamming_python likes this post
GarryB- Posts : 40516
Points : 41016
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
Instead of building tall and thin perhaps broad box like buildings would be better... the reduced external surface area would make heating and cooling more efficient and the outside of the buildings could have patriotic murals painted on them... or LED lights that can be used to display images like a giant TV screen...
Scorpius- Posts : 1569
Points : 1569
Join date : 2020-11-06
Age : 37
A general overview of a typical urban development from the point of view of a resident.
I will add from myself: Kupchino is considered the most depressive and unsafe area of St. Petersburg.
flamming_python likes this post
kvs- Posts : 15850
Points : 15985
Join date : 2014-09-11
Location : Turdope's Kanada
you will see the same multi-story apartment block island development. Five story walk-ups which are the pastel painted classic architecture
people love so much stopped being built 100 years ago. The main difference between North America and Europe (including Russia) is
the number of single family residential buildings. But there are plenty of apartment blocks anyway. Cities like Boston have the old style
that resembles Europe.
During the USSR period the old buildings in St. Petersburg (Leningrad) were not simply demolished but rebuilt internally. The character
of the city was protected. The "commie blocks" were built on previously undeveloped land as the city expanded. I have been there
several times in both the old parts and the newer parts. The narrator makes it sound like the commie blocks overran the classical
urban areas and made them ugly. This is simply false. The video shows lots of garbage in the yards, this is not universal to such
areas of the city and reflects the lack of effort to do cleaning. You can make the old and charming parts of the city look like shit
if you let them decay as well. After 1976 this was happening as the paint and plaster was neglected and started peeling off. The
threads on St. Petersburg architecture at the SkyScraperCity forum give a view of the situation. Over the last 20 years there has
been a dramatic improvement as neglected buildings have been restored and rebuilt.
The high rise apartment blocks built in the southern districts of the city in the 1980s are nothing like the Khruschevkas. They have
multi-bedroom apartments that include their own bath and normal sized kitchen. The ventilation is superb and you do not hear
your neighbour breathing through the paper thin walls you find in some newer US condominiums. This is based on direct experience.
The "drab facade" criticism is mostly BS. If you need bright colours to fight depression, then you have mental problems. The
quality of a residential area is in the layout of shops, parks and other recreational venues. I know of one set of residential blocks
in a city on the Volga which is literally ash grey in colour but which has localized small shops where you can buy any food you want
which is something you can't do in any of the North American suburbs.
Russians still have unrealistic perceptions of how "bad" they have it. Move to North America and see what reality tastes like. Now
that Russia has a housing market, people should vote with their mortgages and buy the quality housing they want. No more excuses
about how the dear leader is not providing.
GarryB, Big_Gazza, Hole, limb and Arkanghelsk like this post
limb- Posts : 1550
Points : 1576
Join date : 2020-09-17
Western propaganda is hell of a drug.
Meanwhile I know many Americans with PhDs working in tech who still live with housemates in 2-4 room singe story houses as large as khruschovka apartments and they gloat how good they have it in the US because they're not ruled by "criminal oligarchs" like Russia is.
Fun fact: Entire urban centers in the US can be completely owned by a single family and they have the final say whats built in their city. These rentier family owned areas tend to be very overpriced with poorly maintained and cramped housing, with terrible house managers due to lack of competition. Irvine is a perfect example. But hey, the US is based on property rights so its taboo to talk about "redistributing" anything.
flamming_python, magnumcromagnon, kvs, Maximmmm and miketheterrible like this post
calripson- Posts : 753
Points : 808
Join date : 2013-10-26
- Post n°239
Real estate
limb wrote:Majority of eastern europeans believe most americans, germans, dutch, etcstill live in 2 story 5-8 bedroom houses and drive 2 muscle cars, all while funding that with a lower middle income job.
Western propaganda is hell of a drug.
Meanwhile I know many Americans with PhDs working in tech who still live with housemates in 2-4 room singe story houses as large as khruschovka apartments and they gloat how good they have it in the US because they're not ruled by "criminal oligarchs" like Russia is.
Fun fact: Entire urban centers in the US can be completely owned by a single family and they have the final say whats built in their city. These rentier family owned areas tend to be very overpriced with poorly maintained and cramped housing, with terrible house managers due to lack of competition. Irvine is a perfect example. But hey, the US is based on property rights so its taboo to talk about "redistributing" anything.
Your observation about entire urban centers owned by a single family is spot on. In my area, a big landlord is the Rubensteins. The family owns a palatial estate in the most affluent area on acres of land. Turns out they pay very little property tax because they have it taxed under an agricultural exemption (despite being in the built-up suburbs). Seems that they grow a little hay on their property that they then sell to a livestock operator who leases adjacent municipal land for $1 a year to feed his steers.
magnumcromagnon, kvs and Arkanghelsk like this post
Arkanghelsk- Posts : 3899
Points : 3905
Join date : 2021-12-08
The ones who were there for 20 years or more tend to live as average Americans, working to live
Then again they are not the only ones going there.
A mass exodus of people from California, New York, Seattle, Chicago, Minneapolis, and other cities occured shortly after the riots of 2020
My relatives, Burmistrovs are from Vinnystia. They are in US now and are returning to Russia, specifically Crimea.
Urban development in US sucks, you're paying 2400 a month to live in a 700 square foot apartment.
The suburbs are decent but housing prices are around 500k and up for a starter family home so 3 bedroom 2 bathroom.
You can buy a new truck for 70k and pay 4 per gallon to stay bumper to bumper on death traps of US highways, people are killed there with large frequency
The US does not have cities like Novosibirsk or Kazan, or Ulyanovsk.
So smaller cities, like Boulder, Charleston, and Raleigh already are growing at pace that they become like mega cities anyway.
Russia has the blessing of having ample space to have many 500k population cities. That's the allure of Siberia right now for Kremlin development planning
GarryB, kvs and Hole like this post
Scorpius- Posts : 1569
Points : 1569
Join date : 2020-11-06
Age : 37
And here is a typical residential neighborhood of Moscow.
Hole- Posts : 11115
Points : 11093
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
franco, magnumcromagnon, kvs, Scorpius and Krepost like this post
magnumcromagnon- Posts : 8138
Points : 8273
Join date : 2013-12-05
Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan
markgreven and kvs like this post
par far- Posts : 3496
Points : 3741
Join date : 2014-06-26
miketheterrible likes this post
kvs- Posts : 15850
Points : 15985
Join date : 2014-09-11
Location : Turdope's Kanada
par far likes this post
Hole- Posts : 11115
Points : 11093
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
par far and kvs like this post
magnumcromagnon- Posts : 8138
Points : 8273
Join date : 2013-12-05
Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan
George1, kvs, Hole and Lennox like this post
owais.usmani- Posts : 1825
Points : 1821
Join date : 2019-03-27
Age : 38
GarryB, franco, flamming_python and Hole like this post
caveat emptor- Posts : 2008
Points : 2010
Join date : 2022-02-02
Location : Murrica
owners should be pressed to clean up their business. Oftentimes, it seems that region administration needs a major shake up, so they start to do their job.
It is one of the most troubled regions in Russia by many parameters (crime, pollution, AIDS prevalence, alcoholism and drug usage).
https://ngs42.ru/text/ecology/2022/02/04/70422842/
kvs likes this post
flamming_python- Posts : 9519
Points : 9577
Join date : 2012-01-30
GarryB and Firebird like this post