+71
Azi
sepheronx
Arkanghelsk
Podlodka77
Scorpius
Cheetah
Tingsay
Rasisuki Nebia
Shaun901901
Broski
Lennox
Swede55
Mir
ALAMO
RTN
jhelb
flamming_python
Russian_Patriot_
x_54_u43
Backman
limb
Kiko
TMA1
Lurk83
lyle6
The_Observer
Atmosphere
SeigSoloyvov
lancelot
mnztr
Stealthflanker
Viktor
JohninMK
Sujoy
xeno
Mindstorm
TheArmenian
d_taddei2
AlfaT8
dino00
thegopnik
ahmedfire
AJ-47
marcellogo
Arrow
PhSt
Kimppis
miketheterrible
BenVaserlan
Vann7
Cyberspec
william.boutros
Walther von Oldenburg
GarryB
kvs
bolshevik345
LMFS
Hole
hoom
medo
ult
The-thing-next-door
franco
George1
Big_Gazza
higurashihougi
calripson
magnumcromagnon
PapaDragon
Isos
kumbor
75 posters
[Official] Armata Discussion thread #5
Hole- Posts : 11122
Points : 11100
Join date : 2018-03-25
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
- Post n°426
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #5
This project will cost more then there new subs.
calripson- Posts : 753
Points : 808
Join date : 2013-10-26
- Post n°427
2035
By 2035, America will have gone broke, the US dollar will no longer be the world reserve currency (replaced by a digital global currency), and no one will remember your inane posts.
kvs- Posts : 15858
Points : 15993
Join date : 2014-09-11
Location : Turdope's Kanada
- Post n°428
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #5
LMFS wrote:All power conversion electronics involved do not like high temperatures, batteries hate it too. With new technology for the power accumulation and SiC electronics a hybrid IFV or tank shoud be doable, the idea is clear, but all the technological pieces must fall in its right place before it turns a reality
A hybrid system is not the same as a plug-in hybrid with a large battery. Battery technology is still too crappy to use for tanks and trucks.
So there is no need to cool some bank of lithium cells. And an electricity generator in a hybrid system does not need cooling. I think you
are confusing a sine-wave power generator with a hybrid power train. That is a DC to AC system which does use electronics. A hybrid
power train is pure DC running DC electrical motors.
LMFS- Posts : 5165
Points : 5161
Join date : 2018-03-04
- Post n°429
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #5
kvs wrote:A hybrid system is not the same as a plug-in hybrid with a large battery. Battery technology is still too crappy to use for tanks and trucks.
So there is no need to cool some bank of lithium cells.
True, yet there is a need for a certain exchange storage to allow for the acceleration of the electric motors to be decoupled from the ICE operation, since the idea is that the later remains operating a the optimal regime. So of course the need for storage is minimal compared to a full electric vehicle but exists nevertheless. It can be done with flywheels or capacitors, too.
And an electricity generator in a hybrid system does not need cooling. I think you are confusing a sine-wave power generator with a hybrid power train. That is a DC to AC system which does use electronics. A hybrid power train is pure DC running DC electrical motors.
There are several types of motors that can be used, induction or BLDC normally. In any case there is the need for power electronics (like B6 bridge) managing the motor's revs and torque.
GarryB- Posts : 40548
Points : 41050
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°430
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #5
The US is reportedly preparing a groundbreaking successor to Abrams, which will overtake all competition.
What the US is best at... PR and BS.
Do they mean ground breaking because it is 120 tons?
On a positive note it is nice to see they admit they are behind... despite already spending ten times more on "defence" than the Russians do... perhaps the solution is to spend 100 times more on defence... the best solution to corruption is to try to throw more money at the problem than the criminals have the capacity to take and hide... it is like sanctions on Russia... hasn't worked yet but a few more sanctions or more money and it will work like a charm...
ahmedfire, dino00, magnumcromagnon, Big_Gazza and teh_beard like this post
lyle6- Posts : 2593
Points : 2587
Join date : 2020-09-14
Location : Philippines
- Post n°431
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #5
If diesel-electrics are really that good, then they ought to have replaced most diesel direct drives in low end torque applications a long time ago. Instead they are still relegated to niches involving very large platforms such as haul trucks for mining, and locomotives. Almost anything not involving hauling immense payloads across clear routes uses a mechanical transmission. This seems curious, since the mechanical transmission is the greatest source of failure in vehicles, and better yet, the electric motor displays superior acceleration performance at low speeds while consuming less fuel. It almost seems as if there are other considerations that give the edge to direct drives and make them far more usable than their hybrid cousins when it comes to certain tasks...
Requirements like high density of components. This one's pretty high up on the list if you're a tank and for good reason. Internal volume is at a premium for armored vehicles. A diesel-electric drive might not have a mechanical transmission but it has a bulky generator and motor set, plus the associated power electronics (necessary if you want to step up voltage and minimize ampere losses, at least) and cooling. A larger internal volume would see weight specs spiral up as you have to pile on more and more armor to maintain decent protection coverage. Its pretty telling that the Russians are considering an articulated design for their hybrid powered Armata successor - it effectively doubles the internal volume available to the vehicle while avoiding the penalties of overly long hulls. However if the same size is to be maintained, at some point it makes zero sense to go for a much efficient powerplant when an even smaller volume and weight of fuel could maintain the same range albeit much lossy. This passes the strain on your logistics but it does result in a much smaller and lighter vehicle, which in of itself poses massive advantages in other areas.
Another huge requirement is reliability. Mechanical transmissions are prone to failure, but most issues are readily fixable on the field. The technology is much more mature, and typically there are more people more familiar with mechanical issues than electrical ones. Hybrids in contrast are relatively immature technology with lots of teething yet to be resolved. The electric motors for example exhibit several failure modes that aren't necessarily found or as damaging in mechanical transmissions. There is a very real possibility for instance, that in case of strong transverse impacts on the suspension that the rotor could breach the tight armature gap and come into contact with the stator. Moisture is also a possible problem, especially since fording rivers is an essential capability and the hot windings can collect moisture from the air in cold and or humid environments.
Of course none of this means that the direct drive is to stay forever either. Eventually a much better technology would replace it, but if that is to happen the benefits must more than outweigh the cons for users to shift. Personally I'm betting on direct hydrocarbon fuel cells that combine the high energy density of hydrocarbon fuels with all the benefits of an electric drivetrain but that's just me. We'll just have to wait and see what will out eventually.
Requirements like high density of components. This one's pretty high up on the list if you're a tank and for good reason. Internal volume is at a premium for armored vehicles. A diesel-electric drive might not have a mechanical transmission but it has a bulky generator and motor set, plus the associated power electronics (necessary if you want to step up voltage and minimize ampere losses, at least) and cooling. A larger internal volume would see weight specs spiral up as you have to pile on more and more armor to maintain decent protection coverage. Its pretty telling that the Russians are considering an articulated design for their hybrid powered Armata successor - it effectively doubles the internal volume available to the vehicle while avoiding the penalties of overly long hulls. However if the same size is to be maintained, at some point it makes zero sense to go for a much efficient powerplant when an even smaller volume and weight of fuel could maintain the same range albeit much lossy. This passes the strain on your logistics but it does result in a much smaller and lighter vehicle, which in of itself poses massive advantages in other areas.
Another huge requirement is reliability. Mechanical transmissions are prone to failure, but most issues are readily fixable on the field. The technology is much more mature, and typically there are more people more familiar with mechanical issues than electrical ones. Hybrids in contrast are relatively immature technology with lots of teething yet to be resolved. The electric motors for example exhibit several failure modes that aren't necessarily found or as damaging in mechanical transmissions. There is a very real possibility for instance, that in case of strong transverse impacts on the suspension that the rotor could breach the tight armature gap and come into contact with the stator. Moisture is also a possible problem, especially since fording rivers is an essential capability and the hot windings can collect moisture from the air in cold and or humid environments.
Of course none of this means that the direct drive is to stay forever either. Eventually a much better technology would replace it, but if that is to happen the benefits must more than outweigh the cons for users to shift. Personally I'm betting on direct hydrocarbon fuel cells that combine the high energy density of hydrocarbon fuels with all the benefits of an electric drivetrain but that's just me. We'll just have to wait and see what will out eventually.
zepia likes this post
LMFS- Posts : 5165
Points : 5161
Join date : 2018-03-04
- Post n°432
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #5
lyle6 wrote:If diesel-electrics are really that good, then they ought to have replaced most diesel direct drives in low end torque applications a long time ago. Instead they are still relegated to niches involving very large platforms such as haul trucks for mining, and locomotives. Almost anything not involving hauling immense payloads across clear routes uses a mechanical transmission. This seems curious, since the mechanical transmission is the greatest source of failure in vehicles, and better yet, the electric motor displays superior acceleration performance at low speeds while consuming less fuel. It almost seems as if there are other considerations that give the edge to direct drives and make them far more usable than their hybrid cousins when it comes to certain tasks...
The reason may perfectly be superior complexity and cost, and difficulty to do proper maintenance, only when the savings are very big or the machinery very expensive it makes enough sense to get industry switching to something new. Once such pioneering applications bring the reliability up and costs down, it will expend further I guess.
GarryB- Posts : 40548
Points : 41050
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°433
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #5
Often there are other factors.... like ventilation requiring electric forklifts instead of diesel powered... or with trains some parts of the track are electrified and other parts are not so a diesel electric design makes sense.
The thing is that diesels are generally quite big and heavy for the power they generate, but for quite some time there really was no alternative because electric motors simply didn't have the torque or performance to be a real alternative.
These days batteries are not up to it to be the sole power source, but gas turbines are much smaller and lighter than any diesel engine with the same amount of power... the traditional problem has been that when you work a GT hard stopping and starting all the time like a bus does and a truck needs to in traffic then the performance drops and the fuel economy is awful, but when the GT just runs a generator and the vehicle is electric drive then things change dramatically... most of the time the GT can idle and together with the batteries drive the vehicle, but when running down hill you actually generate extra power from the wheels rather than consume power for propulsion. Heat generated from the GT can use waste heat energy for heating up the vehicle in cold climates... if you really wanted to go green the GT could run on LNG or even hydrogen... and with the latter you could have a few fuel cells to further boost performance when needed.
The thing is that diesels are generally quite big and heavy for the power they generate, but for quite some time there really was no alternative because electric motors simply didn't have the torque or performance to be a real alternative.
These days batteries are not up to it to be the sole power source, but gas turbines are much smaller and lighter than any diesel engine with the same amount of power... the traditional problem has been that when you work a GT hard stopping and starting all the time like a bus does and a truck needs to in traffic then the performance drops and the fuel economy is awful, but when the GT just runs a generator and the vehicle is electric drive then things change dramatically... most of the time the GT can idle and together with the batteries drive the vehicle, but when running down hill you actually generate extra power from the wheels rather than consume power for propulsion. Heat generated from the GT can use waste heat energy for heating up the vehicle in cold climates... if you really wanted to go green the GT could run on LNG or even hydrogen... and with the latter you could have a few fuel cells to further boost performance when needed.
lyle6- Posts : 2593
Points : 2587
Join date : 2020-09-14
Location : Philippines
- Post n°434
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #5
ahmedfire, dino00 and zepia like this post
GarryB- Posts : 40548
Points : 41050
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°435
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #5
Excellent video... if you look at 24:17 you will see the medium wave IR camera and the short wave IR camera side by side... the MWIR is like a normal IIR sensor and detects heat. The guy shows this with the heat print his hand leaves on the folder. The SWIR is more penetrating and you can see in the same image where he is showing the reminants of his hand print heat signature on the folder that the SWIR camera actually shows some details of the first page inside the folder...
When he shows the opaque glass that a human eye can't see through (that is what opaque means) you can see the normal thermal imager cannot see through it, but a normal thermal imager cannot see through normal glass either, so he could hold up a piece of clear glass and the MWIR camera would not see through that either.
The SWIR camera can see through normal glass and also opaque glass... one of the big costs of a normal thermal imager is the optical lenses because obviously you can't use normal glass. The lenses have to be made of a special crystal which is expensive.
As you can see on the shelf at 25:08 the MWIR camera is on the left and is probably four times bigger than the SWIR camera on the right, so the SWIR camera is smaller and lighter and the images displayed in the tv screens above show the SWIR view offers a video like view where you can recognise the people in view because the image has so much detail. The MWIR on the left does not have as much detail.
Of course both are fantastic for night and bad weather viewing....
Nice.
When he shows the opaque glass that a human eye can't see through (that is what opaque means) you can see the normal thermal imager cannot see through it, but a normal thermal imager cannot see through normal glass either, so he could hold up a piece of clear glass and the MWIR camera would not see through that either.
The SWIR camera can see through normal glass and also opaque glass... one of the big costs of a normal thermal imager is the optical lenses because obviously you can't use normal glass. The lenses have to be made of a special crystal which is expensive.
As you can see on the shelf at 25:08 the MWIR camera is on the left and is probably four times bigger than the SWIR camera on the right, so the SWIR camera is smaller and lighter and the images displayed in the tv screens above show the SWIR view offers a video like view where you can recognise the people in view because the image has so much detail. The MWIR on the left does not have as much detail.
Of course both are fantastic for night and bad weather viewing....
Nice.
franco- Posts : 7053
Points : 7079
Join date : 2010-08-18
- Post n°436
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #5
An unmanned version of the Armata tank will not be in the Russian army
The start of serial deliveries of the T-14 "Armata" tank to the Russian army is scheduled for 2021. This was reported by RIA Novosti with reference to the general director of Rostec Sergei Chemezov.
Recall that the newest T-14 on the Armata platform is today the world's only third post-war generation tank. In 2018, the RF Ministry of Defense and Uralvagonzavod signed a contract for the supply of 132 T-14 and T-15 units. According to Deputy Defense Minister Alexei Krivoruchko, the above-mentioned combat vehicles will be transferred to the troops by the end of next year.
During his conversation with journalists, Sergei Chemezov said that the control of the T-14 "Armata" tank systems would be as automated as possible. In particular, it will be enough for the crew to approximately aim the gun at the target, and all other adjustments will be made by the electronics.
At the same time, the head of Rostec added that there is no question of any serial production of an unmanned version of the newest tank. Tests "Almaty was" off-line, that "Uralvagonzavod" were successfully carried out previously needed for testing technologies promising robotics. The T-14 tank itself was originally created as a crew-controlled vehicle.
The start of serial deliveries of the T-14 "Armata" tank to the Russian army is scheduled for 2021. This was reported by RIA Novosti with reference to the general director of Rostec Sergei Chemezov.
Recall that the newest T-14 on the Armata platform is today the world's only third post-war generation tank. In 2018, the RF Ministry of Defense and Uralvagonzavod signed a contract for the supply of 132 T-14 and T-15 units. According to Deputy Defense Minister Alexei Krivoruchko, the above-mentioned combat vehicles will be transferred to the troops by the end of next year.
During his conversation with journalists, Sergei Chemezov said that the control of the T-14 "Armata" tank systems would be as automated as possible. In particular, it will be enough for the crew to approximately aim the gun at the target, and all other adjustments will be made by the electronics.
At the same time, the head of Rostec added that there is no question of any serial production of an unmanned version of the newest tank. Tests "Almaty was" off-line, that "Uralvagonzavod" were successfully carried out previously needed for testing technologies promising robotics. The T-14 tank itself was originally created as a crew-controlled vehicle.
GarryB, George1, dino00 and LMFS like this post
dino00- Posts : 1677
Points : 1714
Join date : 2012-10-12
Age : 37
Location : portugal
- Post n°437
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #5
Russian Federation began to promote the tank "Armata" for export - Chemezov
Moscow. December 7. INTERFAX - Tank "Armata" has all the necessary documents for sale abroad, advertising work is underway, said the head of "Rostec" Sergei Chemezov.
“Last year, the necessary permits were drawn up. We advertise this tank to foreign customers,” Chemezov told reporters, answering a question from Interfax.
https://www.militarynews.ru/story.asp?rid=1&nid=542826&lang=RU
Moscow. December 7. INTERFAX - Tank "Armata" has all the necessary documents for sale abroad, advertising work is underway, said the head of "Rostec" Sergei Chemezov.
“Last year, the necessary permits were drawn up. We advertise this tank to foreign customers,” Chemezov told reporters, answering a question from Interfax.
https://www.militarynews.ru/story.asp?rid=1&nid=542826&lang=RU
lyle6- Posts : 2593
Points : 2587
Join date : 2020-09-14
Location : Philippines
- Post n°438
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #5
The T-90A turret on the T-14. From https://twitter.com/aviakurs:
magnumcromagnon likes this post
lyle6- Posts : 2593
Points : 2587
Join date : 2020-09-14
Location : Philippines
- Post n°439
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #5
Bonus:
Winter T-14 test:
GarryB, LMFS and Hole like this post
George1- Posts : 18523
Points : 19028
Join date : 2011-12-23
Location : Greece
- Post n°440
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #5
Serial production of Armata tanks to begin before trials are over
https://tass.com/defense/1241181
https://tass.com/defense/1241181
dino00, Big_Gazza, LMFS, lyle6 and TMA1 like this post
mnztr- Posts : 2898
Points : 2936
Join date : 2018-01-22
- Post n°441
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #5
They are talking about 100 in service in 2021!!!
calripson- Posts : 753
Points : 808
Join date : 2013-10-26
- Post n°442
What is so surprising?
mnztr wrote:They are talking about 100 in service in 2021!!!
I believe the initial contract was for 134 vehicles in total. They should be producing a 100 each year. At that rate, it will still take decades to reequip with T-15 and T-14.
Big_Gazza- Posts : 4901
Points : 4891
Join date : 2014-08-25
Location : Melbourne, Australia
- Post n°443
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #5
calripson wrote:I believe the initial contract was for 134 vehicles in total. They should be producing a 100 each year. At that rate, it will still take decades to reequip with T-15 and T-14.
Russia has no intention of replacing all T-72/T-80/90 with T-14s or all BMPs with T-15s. Armata is the sharp end of the spear for dealing with the elite NATOstani units, and will be supplemented by a much larger force of modernised Soviet-era vehicles (including new-build T-90M-type variants).
mnztr- Posts : 2898
Points : 2936
Join date : 2018-01-22
- Post n°444
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #5
Yeah I don't see them needing to produce more then 100-200/year as long as they keep modding the other tanks. They have an INSANELY huge fleet of tanks, like BATSHIT huge.
The-thing-next-door- Posts : 1393
Points : 1449
Join date : 2017-09-19
Location : Uranus
- Post n°445
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #5
well with 500 or so T-14s the T-72s would probably end up fighting armored cars after nato runs out of MBTs.
magnumcromagnon, Big_Gazza, LMFS and Hole like this post
lyle6- Posts : 2593
Points : 2587
Join date : 2020-09-14
Location : Philippines
- Post n°446
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #5
mnztr wrote:Yeah I don't see them needing to produce more then 100-200/year as long as they keep modding the other tanks. They have an INSANELY huge fleet of tanks, like BATSHIT huge.
Modernized vehicles don't stay modern for very long. Eventually they would have to replace even the current crop of T-90M, T-80BVM and T-72B3 vehicles just entering service, and at this point the scope for cost effective improvements for these vehicles are all but tapped out. It would be silly to further invest taxpayer Rubles and UVZ factory space in increasingly expensive upgrades that approach the cost of mint designs and that would only prolong the competitiveness of the vehicles themselves for ever shorter periods of time like most countries in NATO are doing.
marcellogo- Posts : 680
Points : 686
Join date : 2012-08-02
Age : 55
Location : Italy
Now we are to consider that the T-14 is just one of the vehicle making part of ARMATA family.
And that the same family would be just one (and not even the principal one IMHO) of the three (or more) of the whole project.
More exactly they would go just to armored regiment /brigades while the bulk of Motor rifle regiments would have Boomerang family instead.
No hurry to phase out T-72/80/90 and ever less their chassis, that is used on Koalitsjia.
Once actual Tanks would be all modernized the involved facilities would be converted into producing T-14 & T-15.
And that the same family would be just one (and not even the principal one IMHO) of the three (or more) of the whole project.
More exactly they would go just to armored regiment /brigades while the bulk of Motor rifle regiments would have Boomerang family instead.
No hurry to phase out T-72/80/90 and ever less their chassis, that is used on Koalitsjia.
Once actual Tanks would be all modernized the involved facilities would be converted into producing T-14 & T-15.
calripson- Posts : 753
Points : 808
Join date : 2013-10-26
- Post n°448
T 14 and T 15 Production Rates
T-72 and T-90 derivatives are 1970's vintage technology at heart. It's time to shift production to modern designs. Just to replace all the tanks in the 1st Guards Tank Army will take 5 years at 100 per year not to mention T -15 in the armored units which would be another couple of hundred units. I would apply the same rationale to Su 57 production. Time to shift 100% to modern designs. No more re-polished 50 year old designs. It's 2021.
lyle6 likes this post
Isos- Posts : 11602
Points : 11570
Join date : 2015-11-07
- Post n°449
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #5
calripson wrote:T-72 and T-90 derivatives are 1970's vintage technology at heart. It's time to shift production to modern designs. Just to replace all the tanks in the 1st Guards Tank Army will take 5 years at 100 per year not to mention T -15 in the armored units which would be another couple of hundred units. I would apply the same rationale to Su 57 production. Time to shift 100% to modern designs. No more re-polished 50 year old designs. It's 2021.
The main advantage is to unify the chassi with all other vehicles of the armata family. Not to have better tanks.
T-90M is just fine to fight any other tank.
Upgrading a t-72 to BM3 standard is far less expensive than a new build t-14. When you need 2500 tanks in active service then you just can't buy 2500 t-14. That's just a wet dream. Thry have to upcradr their old tanks to have enough tanks.
mnztr- Posts : 2898
Points : 2936
Join date : 2018-01-22
- Post n°450
Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #5
The old tanks have almost unlimited development potential. When you build and operate a tank it takes a massive beating so parts are being thrown at it constantly and they need to be rebuilt several times. So upgrade is very cost effective. There is also always the question of disruptive tech. Strangely the country that has most recently delivered this is Turkey with its mind blowing use of small armed drones in Syria, Libya and NGK to wipe out armoured divisions. So Amata has raised the ante in tanks, how will NATO respond? Before you deploy 5000, maybe best to wait and see. Will they need the 152mm? Lasers? Who knows.