GarryB wrote:The western media are silent on all of this, so they either don't care or actually support the eradication of these terrorists now that some have come to western countries to live and a noticeable increase in knife crime has occurred...
I recall this beahviour in the NATO MSM before. When things are going bad for their agenda, they just ignore it. When the
agenda fulfilling "rebels" are succeeding they have plenty of gleeful coverage. I guess there are no short term plans to stage
another "chemical weapons atrocity" so there is no build-up propaganda.
But I expect them to go for this tired shtick again when a major city will be about to fall. The average NATO MSM consumer
can't tell the difference between their ass and their mouth. To this day no actual reason for chemical weapons use for
special atrocity occasions has been identified but they keep on thinking this transparent BS is plausible. The SAA fights
99.9% of the time without chemical weapons but for some nutty reason just out of the blue throws a chemical bomb at
some irrelevant civilians that has utterly zero military effect. Sure thing, there CNN et al. You are all so credible with
your hysterical accusations. Naturally, there is no real physical evidence of any such bombs being used. And there
is plenty of evidence of White Helmet jihadis staging all sorts of videos and photos and then traipsing in flipflops and with
bare hands through allegedly sarin contaminated zones. Seriously, why have a brain at all to lap this shit up?