+82
Gomig-21
Tolstoy
ALAMO
TMA1
caveat emptor
Podlodka77
Mir
lancelot
Arrow
Krepost
Russian_Patriot_
Lurk83
limb
Finty
Backman
owais.usmani
magnumcromagnon
Isos
kvs
AlfaT8
thegopnik
ahmedfire
jhelb
AMCXXL
marcellogo
Azi
ATLASCUB
archangelski
Rodion_Romanovic
hoom
LMFS
GunshipDemocracy
Singular_Transform
Hole
GarryB
GJ Flanker
mnztr
dino00
Cheetah
MC-21
gaurav
Pierre Sprey
T-47
miketheterrible
PapaDragon
TheArmenian
ult
SeigSoloyvov
AK-Rex
Tsavo Lion
OminousSpudd
Benya
David-Lanza
bojcistv
eehnie
Morpheus Eberhardt
wilhelm
andrey19900
Giulio
Svyatoslavich
d_taddei2
JohninMK
Big_Gazza
franco
sepheronx
Mike E
Cyberspec
zg18
mack8
diabetus
Werewolf
flamming_python
Mindstorm
Austin
TR1
George1
IronsightSniper
Stealthflanker
haavarla
psg
Viktor
Admin
86 posters
Tu-22M3: News
Hole- Posts : 11122
Points : 11100
Join date : 2018-03-25
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
- Post n°826
Re: Tu-22M3: News
GarryB, dino00 and magnumcromagnon like this post
Hole- Posts : 11122
Points : 11100
Join date : 2018-03-25
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
- Post n°828
Re: Tu-22M3: News
George1, Broski and Krepost like this post
Isos- Posts : 11602
Points : 11570
Join date : 2015-11-07
- Post n°829
Re: Tu-22M3: News
It's a big missile. Kinzhal can be carried in greater numbers with a longer range.
Mir- Posts : 3831
Points : 3829
Join date : 2021-06-10
- Post n°830
Re: Tu-22M3: News
Well now the guys on Russianplanes.net have noticed >>
Maxim Volkov (photo) | 2022-02-20 20:25 | #
Knowledgeable people will not comment on the suspension of the product? This is the first time I've seen this.
Yuri (photo) | 2022-02-20 21:22 | #
Really. I wonder why the rocket is lowered...
Vadim Savitsky (photo) | 2022-02-20 21:53 | #
X-32 on the central suspension. Maybe two more on the wing
Maxim Volkov (photo) | 2022-02-20 20:25 | #
Knowledgeable people will not comment on the suspension of the product? This is the first time I've seen this.
Yuri (photo) | 2022-02-20 21:22 | #
Really. I wonder why the rocket is lowered...
Vadim Savitsky (photo) | 2022-02-20 21:53 | #
X-32 on the central suspension. Maybe two more on the wing
GarryB- Posts : 40545
Points : 41045
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°831
Re: Tu-22M3: News
Pretty clear that this is a Tu-22M3 and not a Tu-22M3M. Anyway it's the first time I've seen the missile suspended in this way.
Yes, well spotted.
The missile is raised into the bomb bay. The doors can be modified to fit around the missile.
Thanks for sharing... learn something new all the time...
It's a big missile. Kinzhal can be carried in greater numbers with a longer range.
Well we don't actually know if Kinzhal has been made compatible and how it could be carried.
Stealthflanker- Posts : 1459
Points : 1535
Join date : 2009-08-05
Age : 36
Location : Indonesia
- Post n°832
Re: Tu-22M3: News
I'm curious if Tu-22M3's would also get compatibility with guided bombs. particularly the UPAB-1500. It can carry way more than Su-35 or 34's and allows bombing to be made at almost any weather condition.
GarryB likes this post
limb- Posts : 1550
Points : 1576
Join date : 2020-09-17
- Post n°833
Re: Tu-22M3: News
Why can't Tu-22s launch kinzhal, Kh-35 or Kh-59 yet?
Isos- Posts : 11602
Points : 11570
Join date : 2015-11-07
- Post n°834
Re: Tu-22M3: News
limb wrote:Why can't Tu-22s launch kinzhal, Kh-35 or Kh-59 yet?
No need to. They have small ranges and adapted for smaller stealthier planes.
The class of longer range missiles like kh-101 with 2000+km is better situated for it since it keeps the planes at safe distances.
GarryB likes this post
limb- Posts : 1550
Points : 1576
Join date : 2020-09-17
- Post n°835
Re: Tu-22M3: News
Better than only being able to drop bombs or kh-32s.Isos wrote:limb wrote:Why can't Tu-22s launch kinzhal, Kh-35 or Kh-59 yet?
No need to. They have small ranges and adapted for smaller stealthier planes.
The class of longer range missiles like kh-101 with 2000+km is better situated for it since it keeps the planes at safe distances.
psg- Posts : 76
Points : 81
Join date : 2011-02-20
- Post n°836
Re: Tu-22M3: News
I would of thought the Russian airforce, would at least upgraded 6-10 tu22 m3's to utilise the kab 500s/1500s on multiple ejector racks under the wings, inlets and internal weapons bay carriage. Plus the added svp 24 system, working with dumb bombs.
It still has so much unleashed potential in that design.
It still has so much unleashed potential in that design.
GarryB likes this post
GarryB- Posts : 40545
Points : 41045
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°837
Re: Tu-22M3: News
The original plan going back before the production of new Tu-160s was to unify the design and equipment of the Tu-95,160,22M3 where ever possible.
So of course the Bear keeps its props but radars for all three aircraft are improved and upgraded and all made the same.
The engines of the new Backfires replaced with the engines of the Blackjack and also further upgraded.
All three aircraft were supposed to get weapons upgrades with a huge new range of guided bombs and missiles to be added to their arsenal.
The decision to build PAK DA however required a brand new factory and if they had to make a new factory anyway they decided to make one with a new titanium forge so the box structure for the swing wings on the Blackjack could be produced to finish two incomplete models from the factory that made them, and extra Blackjacks could be made to bring them up to being a more viable force.
The new factory could then be used to make PAK DA bombers that could replace the Bear in the long range subsonic strategic role but obviously with stealth as well, and also the Backfire in the theatre strike role with a much heavier payload and reduced fuel requirements.
A subsonic flying wing is most efficient and allows the internal volume for lots of fuel and internal weapons, it is inherently stealthy so adding a few touches should make it reasonably stealthy without needing to be excessively expensive.
Its stealth means it can operate at more efficient altitudes, though it could still carry standoff weapons of long range.
The shift from keeping all three older aircraft to eventually having two aircraft seems to have led to a shift from the Tu-160 being a cruise missile carrier or a bomber, to the PAK DA being a theatre bomber or strategic cruise missile carrier and teh Tu-160 being a cruise missile carrier only.
Now that western civilian airliners are no longer an option it means civilian airliners get more attention, which might also translate to more emphasis on transport aircraft too...
Who knows... when production of the Tu-160 ends and PAK DA begins maybe a supersonic transport based on a modified Tu-160 might be considered... equally a flying wing civilian airliner might be another option too... certainly a flying wing would be interesting for AWACS use or inflight refuelling tanker where all the payload options are replace with extra fuel.
So of course the Bear keeps its props but radars for all three aircraft are improved and upgraded and all made the same.
The engines of the new Backfires replaced with the engines of the Blackjack and also further upgraded.
All three aircraft were supposed to get weapons upgrades with a huge new range of guided bombs and missiles to be added to their arsenal.
The decision to build PAK DA however required a brand new factory and if they had to make a new factory anyway they decided to make one with a new titanium forge so the box structure for the swing wings on the Blackjack could be produced to finish two incomplete models from the factory that made them, and extra Blackjacks could be made to bring them up to being a more viable force.
The new factory could then be used to make PAK DA bombers that could replace the Bear in the long range subsonic strategic role but obviously with stealth as well, and also the Backfire in the theatre strike role with a much heavier payload and reduced fuel requirements.
A subsonic flying wing is most efficient and allows the internal volume for lots of fuel and internal weapons, it is inherently stealthy so adding a few touches should make it reasonably stealthy without needing to be excessively expensive.
Its stealth means it can operate at more efficient altitudes, though it could still carry standoff weapons of long range.
The shift from keeping all three older aircraft to eventually having two aircraft seems to have led to a shift from the Tu-160 being a cruise missile carrier or a bomber, to the PAK DA being a theatre bomber or strategic cruise missile carrier and teh Tu-160 being a cruise missile carrier only.
Now that western civilian airliners are no longer an option it means civilian airliners get more attention, which might also translate to more emphasis on transport aircraft too...
Who knows... when production of the Tu-160 ends and PAK DA begins maybe a supersonic transport based on a modified Tu-160 might be considered... equally a flying wing civilian airliner might be another option too... certainly a flying wing would be interesting for AWACS use or inflight refuelling tanker where all the payload options are replace with extra fuel.
gc3762, lancelot and Broski like this post
George1- Posts : 18522
Points : 19027
Join date : 2011-12-23
Location : Greece
- Post n°838
Re: Tu-22M3: News
limb wrote:Why can't Tu-22s launch kinzhal, Kh-35 or Kh-59 yet?
su-35s, su-30sm. su-34 can launch them. You dont need such a big aircraft to carry those missiles
GarryB- Posts : 40545
Points : 41045
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°839
Re: Tu-22M3: News
Why can't Tu-22s launch kinzhal, Kh-35 or Kh-59 yet?
The Tu-22M3 (without inflight refuelling) is the equivalent of two F-111s that use inflight refuelling in terms of range and payload... the Americans demanded all sorts of promises from the Soviets and now the Russians over what it can or can't do... including removing the inflight refuelling probe and limiting the range of the missiles it can carry.
I rather suspect those promises will be forgotten now, but the Tu-22M3M upgrade included adding a wide range of new and existing guided air to ground weapons.
Kinzhal might be on that list but being a solid rocket motor powered weapon its performance from the Backfire wont be as impressive as it is when launched from a mach 2.4 MiG-31K at 18km altitude.
There is an interesting range of new weapons that will be available soon that will make it very well equipped I suspect.
Podlodka77- Posts : 2589
Points : 2591
Join date : 2022-01-07
Location : Z
- Post n°840
Re: Tu-22M3: News
ENG PJSC Tupolev delivered another Tu-22M3 missile carrier-bomber to the Long-Range Aviation of the Russian Aerospace Forces after repair.
The necessary maintenance work was carried out on the aircraft, and the delivery and acceptance tests were successfully completed. After the acceptance flight, the aircraft was delivered to the customer.
https://t.me/uac_ru/884
The necessary maintenance work was carried out on the aircraft, and the delivery and acceptance tests were successfully completed. After the acceptance flight, the aircraft was delivered to the customer.
https://t.me/uac_ru/884
GarryB, franco, psg, LMFS and Hole like this post
psg- Posts : 76
Points : 81
Join date : 2011-02-20
- Post n°841
Re: Tu-22M3: News
I really hope they push to get the most out of this airframe, it still has massive potential as a heavy tactical bomber, powerful ECM system, DIRCM, stand off weapons like the Groms, Glide bombs K08B, K029B and other guided bombs KAB-500s to name just a few. Also a updated version of the SVP-24
With inflight refuelling these beasts can do a hell of a lot serious damage, they have the numbers to pose a very serious threat. More so, with small and medium sized conventional cruise missiles.
With inflight refuelling these beasts can do a hell of a lot serious damage, they have the numbers to pose a very serious threat. More so, with small and medium sized conventional cruise missiles.
GarryB, flamming_python and Hole like this post
lancelot- Posts : 3175
Points : 3171
Join date : 2020-10-18
- Post n°842
Re: Tu-22M3: News
I do not get it. Why not upgrade it to Tu-22M3M?
Hole- Posts : 11122
Points : 11100
Join date : 2018-03-25
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
- Post n°843
Re: Tu-22M3: News
Still testing the protoype. Don´t know why. 4 years after the first flight. The plane got modified engines and new electronics. Shouldn´t take that long. Maybe they´re testing the use of new weapons from it (I hope so).
GarryB and psg like this post
psg- Posts : 76
Points : 81
Join date : 2011-02-20
- Post n°844
Re: Tu-22M3: News
Weapons integration and various flight profile with weapons release, takes time and lots of fine tuning.
Possible adaptable rotary weapons bay, allowing mixed loads internally and multi load external pylons, under the intakes etc.
These bombers could really do with airborne active protection system, giving them the ability to intercept incoming missiles, for self-defence.
Possible adaptable rotary weapons bay, allowing mixed loads internally and multi load external pylons, under the intakes etc.
These bombers could really do with airborne active protection system, giving them the ability to intercept incoming missiles, for self-defence.
GarryB, Hole and Podlodka77 like this post
Hole- Posts : 11122
Points : 11100
Join date : 2018-03-25
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
- Post n°845
Re: Tu-22M3: News
They should integrate the recon and jammer pods developed for the Su-34.
GarryB, psg and Podlodka77 like this post
GarryB- Posts : 40545
Points : 41045
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°846
Re: Tu-22M3: News
I always thought the Tu-22M3 was interesting enough to even warrant a long range interceptor version... its nose is enormous... imagine the size of the AESA radar you could fit there, and the electricity takeoff you could get from two 25 ton thrust jet engines would be enormous too.
They did test a jammer version of the aircraft that would be awesome for SEAD missions where a supersonic heavy jammer with ARMs could operate with the bombers, but they found the power takeoff with an Il-76 was greater so the jammers could be rather more powerful and operate from further away...
Regarding the Tu-22M3M they talked about all sorts of upgrades and changes that included lengthening the bomb bays and even changing the aircraft from four seaters to two seaters with the new automated air defence systems (as fitted to the Su-57 and PAK DA).... it will be interesting to see what they actually end up doing though the Combat Approved TV episode on the aircraft clearly showed an inflight refuelling probe on the top of the nose of the aircraft.
There has been a lot of talk about the US demanding promises about the range of missiles the Tu-22M3M will be allowed to carry, but I would expect none of those promises were written promises and even if they were, well the US rips up such agreements when it suits them, and this is currently war.
They did test a jammer version of the aircraft that would be awesome for SEAD missions where a supersonic heavy jammer with ARMs could operate with the bombers, but they found the power takeoff with an Il-76 was greater so the jammers could be rather more powerful and operate from further away...
Regarding the Tu-22M3M they talked about all sorts of upgrades and changes that included lengthening the bomb bays and even changing the aircraft from four seaters to two seaters with the new automated air defence systems (as fitted to the Su-57 and PAK DA).... it will be interesting to see what they actually end up doing though the Combat Approved TV episode on the aircraft clearly showed an inflight refuelling probe on the top of the nose of the aircraft.
There has been a lot of talk about the US demanding promises about the range of missiles the Tu-22M3M will be allowed to carry, but I would expect none of those promises were written promises and even if they were, well the US rips up such agreements when it suits them, and this is currently war.
psg, flamming_python, Big_Gazza, Hole, Broski and Podlodka77 like this post
flamming_python- Posts : 9547
Points : 9605
Join date : 2012-01-31
- Post n°847
Re: Tu-22M3: News
Thing about the Tu-22M3 is that it takes a lot longer to climb up to altitude than the MiG-31 does
This is the factor IMO that made the MiG-31 the prime Kinzhal carrier as well
But yeah a long-range interceptor version of the Tu-22M3 would still be very interesting
This is the factor IMO that made the MiG-31 the prime Kinzhal carrier as well
But yeah a long-range interceptor version of the Tu-22M3 would still be very interesting
psg- Posts : 76
Points : 81
Join date : 2011-02-20
- Post n°848
Re: Tu-22M3: News
Hands down the MiG-31 is a total beast, nothing comes near it. My second favourite is the MiG-27. Again that platform can be pushed more, in terms of other multi role capabilities, namely SEAD and rapid reaction high altitude bombing.
Always wondered why they couldn't develop the R33 missile/body into ARM and carry 6 under the belly semi-recessed like the MiG-31M, obviously the missile body size has 200+ km range.
Back to the topic, the interceptor version could be based in areas to cover AEW gaps, because of the the ability to carry alot of long range missiles it wouldn't need much support other than inflight refuelling. But that nose, would house one hell of a radar, enough room to have side mounted radars in there as well, giving full 240 degree coverage.
Always wondered why they couldn't develop the R33 missile/body into ARM and carry 6 under the belly semi-recessed like the MiG-31M, obviously the missile body size has 200+ km range.
Back to the topic, the interceptor version could be based in areas to cover AEW gaps, because of the the ability to carry alot of long range missiles it wouldn't need much support other than inflight refuelling. But that nose, would house one hell of a radar, enough room to have side mounted radars in there as well, giving full 240 degree coverage.
Hole, Broski, Belisarius and Podlodka77 like this post
GarryB- Posts : 40545
Points : 41045
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°849
Re: Tu-22M3: News
Thing about the Tu-22M3 is that it takes a lot longer to climb up to altitude than the MiG-31 does
Being rocket powered altitude and speed of launch are quite important for the Dagger... at likely 18km and a mach 2.6 launch speed probably adds quite a few kms to the range of the missile, over perhaps the 12km launch altitude the Tu-22M could manage and perhaps mach 2.0 launch speed with external Daggers fitted... even if it could probably carry four.
psg, Hole and Broski like this post
sepheronx- Posts : 8847
Points : 9107
Join date : 2009-08-06
Age : 35
Location : Canada
- Post n°850
Re: Tu-22M3: News
Indeed a lot can be done with this platform.
I remember reading years ago, some put forward that there was initial plans to put something like an upgraded Irbis-E style radar on the aircraft - some figures said it could be massive detection range with such a radar ~600km. But anyway, a radar, modified engines for better efficiency and newest equipment for EW capabilities or launching more advanced long range missiles would make the Tu-22M a platform perfect for a missile truck.
I remember reading years ago, some put forward that there was initial plans to put something like an upgraded Irbis-E style radar on the aircraft - some figures said it could be massive detection range with such a radar ~600km. But anyway, a radar, modified engines for better efficiency and newest equipment for EW capabilities or launching more advanced long range missiles would make the Tu-22M a platform perfect for a missile truck.