Decline of the western society #2

Werewolf wrote:Western countries are the dumbest nations world wide with the US leading.

We are a god damn mammal species with sexual dimorphism coded into our genome, that can only have a successful reproduction with the offspring from male with female genetic material.

The very fact that adults of western countries trying to challenge this fact disqualifies the entire western world from an educated and civilized world. I understand that it is a mechanism for population control by globalists, but what I do not understand how such a species like ours can build such sophisticated technology but at the same time has over 60-70 percent of the population to stupid to exist on their own.

Take away all the comfortable technologies and through the masses of adults into the wilderness and they would die.

This is a perverted and dangerous politics they are engaging in and it will end as the globalists plan. At some point the masses will walk on the streets and burn everything that supports or abuses power to touch our children. Then they will get what they want a mob on emotions that can be offered a solution to the problem the globalists have created by a pseudo alternative site/political party.

I see this trend in Germany with the Green and AfD party.

The gesture will be replaced by a ‘distance greeting’ following an incident involving Ukrainian and Russian fencers this week

Rodion_Romanovic wrote:@ ArgentinaGuard

The Nazi are definitely not an example to be followed.
Just to be remembered in order not to repeat all of the horrible things that they did.

The only things that could be learnt from Germany in the 1930s are some of the economic policies from Hjalmar Schacht, all the rest can go down the drain.

Furthermore they made also a lot of damage for subsequent "decadence", as you call it, since now everyone that wants to go against such decadence is accused of being a Nazi.

Rodion_Romanovic wrote:@ ArgentinaGuard

The only things that could be learnt from Germany in the 1930s are some of the economic policies from Hjalmar Schacht, all the rest can go down the drain.

ALAMO wrote:

Rodion_Romanovic wrote:@ ArgentinaGuard

The only things that could be learnt from Germany in the 1930s are some of the economic policies from Hjalmar Schacht, all the rest can go down the drain.

This brilliant policy left Germany totally broke, with hidden MEFO debt of enormous size. As soon as the bond termination date was coming (call me surprised, Fall 1939), the whole system would collapse. Germany was in desperate need of capital inflow, and the war was an answer. They have been ripping golden teeth from the corpses in an organized manner because they had to.

Rodion_Romanovic wrote:@ ArgentinaGuard

The Nazi are definitely not an example to be followed.
Just to be remembered in order not to repeat all of the horrible things that they did.

The only things that could be learnt from Germany in the 1930s are some of the economic policies from Hjalmar Schacht, all the rest can go down the drain.

Furthermore they made also a lot of damage for subsequent "decadence", as you call it, since now everyone that wants to go against such decadence is accused of being a Nazi.

ALAMO wrote:But you DO know what MEFO was, do you?
Whatever ...

ArgentinaGuard wrote:I understand that in this forum there is hostility to Nazism. I respect the great Patriotic war and the sacrifice of the Russian people.
Unfortunately the Jewish communists made a criminal revolution (supported by the German empire in World War 1) and ended the Russian empire (they created the stupidity of "Ukraine" as Putin has recognized) otherwise I am sure that Russia would have been a natural ally of Germany.
I think the Nazis warned of Western decadence and proposed a war against that future. You can say what you want but the only ones that threatened Anglo-Saxon liberal/Judeo-capitalist rule was Adolf Hitler's Germany. No one else did until today's Russia. The Soviet Union (not Slavic and historical Russia) due to its survival ended up saving the liberal capitalist system. I never threatened him or decided to confront him directly because deep down they are the same. Materialistic and Jewish systems. In fact, the behavior of the "international community" is exactly the same. Isolate and boycott the two countries. Force to war. Encourage and arm enemies (Poland is today's Ukraine)
Hitler's problem was his Russophobia and not following the Molotov/Ribentrop pact.

higurashihougi wrote:2) The government of Ukraine was recognized by the Russian bourgeioise governmment of 1917, before the Bolshevik-led October revolution. The separatists sentiment in Ukraine and in others such as Kavkaz and Baltic region was strong and there were nothing people could do about it.

Lenin's solution was the best possile at that time, he recognized Ukraine independence but persuaded the Ukrainian people to join an alliance with Russia to fight against Western aggression, which later evolved into the USSR. The dissolution of USSR later had nothing to do with Lenin, but had everything to do with capitalism.

A significant contribution to the development of the idea of administrative separation of the Donetsk coal basin and the Krivoy Rog ore region was made back in the time of the Russian Empire by the Council of the Congress of Miners of the South of Russia (SSGURM), as well as Stepan Banderlog [specify]. The industrialists were not satisfied with the division of the whole Donetsk-Krivoy Rog industrial region into three administrative units - Yekaterinoslav, Kharkov provinces and the Don Army Region. Since the end of the 19th century entrepreneurs began to point to his "economic indivisibility" within Russia[2]. By the February Revolution of 1917, a consensus of economic and political elites had developed in the Donetsk-Krivoy Rog region about the need to unite the coal and metallurgical regions of the region into a single region with the capital in Kharkov or Yekaterinoslav[2]. The implementation of this idea was the creation by the Provisional Government in March 1917 of the Provisional Committee of the Donets Basin to plan and regulate the economic development of Donbass as a single complex. The Provisional Committee was located in Kharkov, which thus began to be perceived as the center of the region.

In the summer of 1917, when the Ukrainian Central Rada, which proclaimed the national-territorial autonomy of Ukraine within Russia, announced its claims to the territory of nine provinces of the former Russian Empire, including the Donbass, the leadership of the SSGYUR appealed to the Provisional Government with an urgent demand to prevent the transfer of "southern mountainous and mining industry - the basis of the economic development and military power of the state "under the control of" provincial autonomy and maybe even a federation based on a pronounced national feature "[2]. On August 4 (17), the Commission of the Provisional Government sent the General Secretariat (government) of the Central Rada an "Interim Instruction", according to which the competence of the General Secretariat was recognized only for five of the 9 provinces claimed by the Central Rada - Kiev, Volyn, Podolsk, Poltava and Chernihiv [2].

Donbass after the February Revolution

On March 3–5 (16–18) throughout Ukraine, the bodies of the Russian imperial administration were liquidated, and executive power was transferred to provincial and district commissars appointed by the Provisional Government[3]. "Civil" and "public" committees were created in county centers. At the same time, Soviets of Workers' Deputies began to be created in cities, towns, and mines as representative bodies of revolutionary democratic forces. Initially, they were dominated by representatives of moderate socialist parties - the Socialist-Revolutionaries and the Mensheviks. Thus, in the Lugansk Soviet, out of 60 deputies, the Bolsheviks made up only a quarter - 15 people [4].

In March-April, the Soviets were formed in Lisichansk, Kadievka, Sorokino, Bryanka, Krindachevka, Svatov, Yekaterinodon and other settlements. Some of them - the Bryansk, Kadievsky, Rovenkovsky Volost Soviets of Workers' and Peasants' Deputies - were headed by the Bolsheviks; others are Socialist-Revolutionaries and Mensheviks. And if the Bolsheviks sought to turn the Soviets into local authorities, the Mensheviks and Socialist-Revolutionaries through them supported the Provisional Government[5].

In large industrial centers, the members of the Soviets were predominantly workers, and in Bakhmut, Slavyansk, Lisichansk - artisans, entrepreneurs and intellectuals. In terms of party composition, the Bolsheviks predominated only in the Gorlovsky-Shcherbinovsky district (except for mine No. 1, where the Soviet was Menshevik). The rest of the Soviets were controlled by the Mensheviks and Socialist-Revolutionaries, with the exception of Druzhkovsky and Donsodovsky, who were headed by members of the Constitutional Democratic Party[6].

During March, factory and mine committees were formed at almost all enterprises, which resolved issues of supplying workers with food, increasing wages, regulating the length of the working day, improving working conditions, and in some cases establishing control over production. Subsequently, district and central councils of factory committees were created[4].

The February revolution led to the activation of various political parties and organizations, including national ones, on the territory of Donbass. The most numerous Ukrainian political force was the USDRP, which had its own organizations in Enakievo, Gorlovka, Lisichansk, Bakhmut, Mariupol, and Luhansk. In addition to it, the Ukrainian Party of Socialist Revolutionaries, the Ukrainian Party of Socialist Federalists, and Prosvita operated in the region. However, the Ukrainian national forces in the Donbass relied mainly on the rear units of the Ukrainianized military units. In particular, the 25th reserve Bakhmutsky regiment was stationed in Lugansk, whose commander V. Malashko declared himself a Ukrainian Social Revolutionary, a smoked ataman of the local “free Cossacks” and chairman of the “povitov’s council”. This body did not have any real influence and disbanded shortly after the October Revolution. Some support for the "Ukrainian movement" in the Luhansk region was distributed only among railway workers. When a local Ukrainian group appeared at a May Day demonstration in Luhansk with their blue and yellow flag, the workers demanded that it be removed, since “only red banners can fly at a workers’ demonstration”[7]. The working proletariat, concentrated in large urban centers, as well as in the area of ​​mines and mines of the Donets Basin, did not belong to the indigenous population of Little Russia, which determined its hostile attitude towards the independent Ukrainian movement[8].

higurashihougi wrote:3) Nazi is 100% capitalism, it is capitalism protected by a big government with a huge dose of racism, for obvious reasons.

Honestly speaking I don't think Hitler wanted to treat you as equal as his so-called "Aryan race" and I am afraid you might be a potential victim of Nazi's racist attitude.

With all respect, I am afraid that your endorsement for Nazi may led to your own undoing.

higurashihougi wrote:

ArgentinaGuard wrote:I understand that in this forum there is hostility to Nazism. I respect the great Patriotic war and the sacrifice of the Russian people.
Unfortunately the Jewish communists made a criminal revolution (supported by the German empire in World War 1) and ended the Russian empire (they created the stupidity of "Ukraine" as Putin has recognized) otherwise I am sure that Russia would have been a natural ally of Germany.
I think the Nazis warned of Western decadence and proposed a war against that future. You can say what you want but the only ones that threatened Anglo-Saxon liberal/Judeo-capitalist rule was Adolf Hitler's Germany. No one else did until today's Russia. The Soviet Union (not Slavic and historical Russia) due to its survival ended up saving the liberal capitalist system. I never threatened him or decided to confront him directly because deep down they are the same. Materialistic and Jewish systems. In fact, the behavior of the "international community" is exactly the same. Isolate and boycott the two countries. Force to war. Encourage and arm enemies (Poland is today's Ukraine)
Hitler's problem was his Russophobia and not following the Molotov/Ribentrop pact.

1) Russian Revolution was the natural consequence of the disastrous economic and military situation at that time. There was no conspiracy theory here.

Russian Monarchists claim of "lost victory" is completely bullshit.

2) The government of Ukraine was recognized by the Russian bourgeioise governmment of 1917, before the Bolshevik-led October revolution. The separatists sentiment in Ukraine and in others such as Kavkaz and Baltic region was strong and there were nothing people could do about it.

Lenin's solution was the best possile at that time, he recognized Ukraine independence but persuaded the Ukrainian people to join an alliance with Russia to fight against Western aggression, which later evolved into the USSR. The dissolution of USSR later had nothing to do with Lenin, but had everything to do with capitalism.

3) Nazi is 100% capitalism, it is capitalism protected by a big government with a huge dose of racism, for obvious reasons.

Honestly speaking I don't think Hitler wanted to treat you as equal as his so-called "Aryan race" and I am afraid you might be a potential victim of Nazi's racist attitude.

With all respect, I am afraid that your endorsement for Nazi may led to your own undoing.

higurashihougi wrote:https://www.rt.com/russia/580504-sport-fencing-rules-handshake/

Fencing federation to change rules after Russian handshake is snubbed – media

The gesture will be replaced by a ‘distance greeting’ following an incident involving Ukrainian and Russian fencers this week

The International Fencing Federation (FIE) is to change its traditional rules, which stipulate that handshakes are mandatory following a bout, after Ukraine’s Olga Kharlan refused to extend the courtesy to her Russian counterpart, Anna Smirnova, following a bout in Milan this week, according to Italian newspaper La Repubblica.

“Thursday’s incident will change the rules of fencing,” La Repubblica reported on Friday, following discussions between FIE and the International Olympic Committee (IOC). “The traditional handshake at the end of the bout will be replaced with immediate effect by a distance greeting, which will allow Ukrainians not to approach the Russians, even if they compete as neutrals,” the report stated.

flamming_python wrote:There's nothing special about the Jews

There have been a number of peoples in history who have fulfilled this role of a cosmopolitan, mercantile caste spread out as a diaspora away from their homeland. You can look at the Greeks in the Ottoman Empire or the Armenians in the same Ottoman Empire or today in Russia & America.

While the intolerance of the Europeans towards the Jews was not something unique either. Right now with such unprecedented levels of Muslim immigration into Europe, the well-evidenced cultural barrier between the incoming culture and the old one leading to the formation of ghettos and communities with a focus on religiosity and conservatism - not wholly unlike how the Jews lived in Europe until the 19-20th centuries -  we're starting to see the same steady development of auto-segregation as well as Islamophobia on the part of the indigenous populations, mirroring the once pervasiveness of anti-Semitism in Europe.

It's ultimately enough to observe that the Jews were not only in the diaspora in Europe/Russia/America. Half the world's Jewish population has for the longest time lived in the Muslim world. The Middle East, North Africa, Uzbekistan and the Caucasus. Where they weren't always out of trouble either but where their traditional values fit in better with the majority populations and where in fact there was no history whatsoever of 'subversion', or decadence or whatever. None whatsoever. The Islamic world had no room for such processes and Jews living there were not drawn to them either. They remained as rooted in their religion and cultural codes as their Muslim neighbors were.
This phenomenon was specific to Europe and America. These philosophies and movements of relativism, secularism, materialism and so on were contributed to by a large number of assimilated and secular Jews but these same things were in the first place developments of European civilization, and were evolutions on the earlier rationalism and renaissance movements in which an absolute minimum of Jews ever took part.
Thus Jews can be observed to be no more a subject of historical processes than any other people were. They did as others.

ArgentinaGuard wrote:The Jews have been a factor of destruction since ancient times. The Semite is a cosmopolitan race and therefore an enemy of tradition and roots.

In religious terms, of course, they have an important role, being the murderers of Jesus Christ and the deniers of their own salvation. They have a messianic and supremacist conception that makes them incompatible in societies.

Undoubtedly, they are one of those responsible for the dissolution of Western Christianity through the promotion of modern capitalism and banks.

All secular and materialist ideologies have Jews at their base: Spinoza, Marx, Freud, Einstein, Butler. ..and the list can go on forever.

The decadent cultural industry that is discussed in this section is led by Jews. For example, the Jew has a penchant for sex and the destruction of white women.

In the Weimar Republic they were in charge of cabarets but today we see it in pedophilia, pornography and degenerate Hollywood cinema.

Russia itself suffered from the Jewish mafia and the white slave trade, in addition to drug trafficking.

There is no people in human history that can be compared to the Jews in dissolution. Investigate, search, you will not find it.
I think. I don't know your country of origin but you're half Anglo-Saxon, that's why you must like Jews.

ArgentinaGuard wrote:Communism is unnatural. The people who defend it seem ignorant and also horrible.

In his time communism proposed a left-wing globalism. A murderous dictatorship, instead of today's consumerist and hedonistic placebo. But deep down they are the same.

ArgentinaGuard wrote:All secular and materialist ideologies have Jews at their base: Spinoza, Marx, Freud, Einstein, Butler. ..and the list can go on forever.