Isos wrote:Even if it was 3 million soties, what's the point ?
After loosing a huge quantity the first if thel, they stopped going inside Ukraine with that plane.
The number of used glide bombs is something like 3-4000 thousands. The other 175000 sorties are done for what ? Nothing.
Jesus holly crisp, you are either dumber than one can imagine or just so obsessed with your idea fixes that no common sense arrives into your muddy brain.
This is a conflict on a scale nobody in NATO fought since Korean war.
No-fukin-body.
Both sides involve more than 1.5 mln soldiers spread across 1200 km frontline.
No country NATO attacked, ever, had a potential so much on pair as we are facing now.
Ukraine operated THOUSANDS air defense systems of all types and tiers, and was supplied with the shocking number of NATO produced ones.
NATO delivered more systems to 404 than France operates, including some of those being the most advanced we have in arsenals - in the case of Iris it is not even adopted in Germany yet.
All of NATO command and control subsystems are providing recon to the Ukro side - we don't have anything better to be used in a case of a major war with Russkie.
Even if we consider the most pussy shit talk you can find out there, it will turn out that Russkie total losses are in a range of 100 aircraft of all kinds. Including malfunctions, friendly fire, and sabotage.
That is on pair to what the coalition has lost in Desert Storm in fukin 2 months, facing an opponent who was a shade of Ukrainian power. And who was delivered to a coalition on a silver plate by the west European subcontractors that have built the entire AD, communication, and command system of Hussain. Every single data center, every single command station, every single communication hub location, and technical details have been provided to the coalition before the campaign, making a planning process a fukin park visit.
In Korea, coalition has lost about 3000 planes, making a thousand per year - or 3 per DAY.
In Vietnam US losses were FOUR aircraft a DAY.
Russkie losses in this 2.5 year campaign are shockingly low, and this is crystal clear to any professional.
Su-34 proved to be a formidable weapon system, delivering a giant share of all ordnance in this conflict.
Which is why those have not only being ordered at increased scale, but upgraded according to the conflict lessons learned.
You lack a single clue and historical/technical perspective on the matter, and all you can provide to this community is an endless show of arrogance.
It is actually pathetic rather than anything else, but it is your choice how to present yourself in front of multinational community.