Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+56
Ned86
The-thing-next-door
xeno
Atmosphere
Big_Gazza
Gomig-21
william.boutros
Sprut-B
thegopnik
TMA1
Krepost
GarryB
Isos
Tsavo Lion
AMCXXL
mnztr
Kiko
mack8
George1
Scorpius
Odin of Ossetia
sepheronx
AlfaT8
lancelot
Robert.V
zepia
Department Of Defense
Sujoy
RTN
Werewolf
lyle6
Arrow
Rodion_Romanovic
Belisarius
caveat emptor
Backman
Podlodka77
magnumcromagnon
gmsmith1985
Mir
ALAMO
miketheterrible
Arkanghelsk
PhSt
LMFS
franco
flamming_python
limb
Cyberspec
x_54_u43
Hole
medo
JohninMK
bandit6
PapaDragon
Russian_Patriot_
60 posters

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    lancelot
    lancelot


    Posts : 3137
    Points : 3133
    Join date : 2020-10-18

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  lancelot Wed Aug 07, 2024 2:48 am

    caveat emptor wrote:Some confirmation for claims that AMCXXL and Lsos put forward about lost Su-34, is published on Serbian military forum by one of the members that went through all posts in the forum on Ukraine war (over 6500 pages) and found that ending with July 15, 2024 23 Su-34 were shot down, majority of them during first year of war. All with pictures and most of them with names and photos of the crew.
    Even if those numbers were true they can easily replace those airframe losses with existing production. Even at peacetime production rates.

    A much bigger issue is replacing the pilots. There is a dearth of trainer aircraft.
    Scorpius
    Scorpius


    Posts : 1568
    Points : 1568
    Join date : 2020-11-06
    Age : 37

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Scorpius Wed Aug 07, 2024 8:25 am

    caveat emptor wrote:Some confirmation for claims that AMCXXL and Lsos put forward about lost Su-34, is published on Serbian military forum by one of the members that went through all posts in the forum on Ukraine war (over 6500 pages) and found that ending with July 15, 2024 23 Su-34 were shot down, majority of them during first year of war. All with pictures and most of them with names and photos of the crew.

    Now it remains to compare this number with the number of sorties flown by the Su-34 during this period. Then compare it with the losses of the US and other countries' aviation in similar situations... Oh, wait - but they've never fought in such an air defense environment.

    sepheronx, GarryB, zardof, LMFS, lancelot, Mir, Broski and Belisarius like this post

    avatar
    Arrow


    Posts : 3439
    Points : 3429
    Join date : 2012-02-12

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Arrow Wed Aug 07, 2024 10:14 am

    The closest is probably Iraq, where the West's advantage was huge and the losses are greater than the VKS currently has after more than 2 years of war. Iraq was incomparably weaker than Ukraine.Only for a long time VKS has been operating only at the front with its own AD cover and has not ventured deep into Ukraine. There is no such need, however, if the losses were greater, Ukraine could make some ambushes deep into the territory, they still have some AD systems.
    avatar
    ALAMO


    Posts : 7459
    Points : 7549
    Join date : 2014-11-25

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  ALAMO Wed Aug 07, 2024 10:54 am

    There is nothing to compare.
    I was describing it a while ago.
    IADS system was named KARI and constructed by a French Thomson. It could provide data for up to 40 (FORTY) targets simultaneously. A whole system was designed to operate against Israel and Iran, and the fact determined a whole radar/missile coverage. Leaving a giant gaps, including the fact that a whole southern direction was de facto uncovered.
    The sole location with a serious AD was Baghdad, with 58 SAM batteries. That was more than the whole other locations combined, and almost half of ALL the Iraq SAM systems.
    Iraq was defeated even before the hostilities started, with entire secret data transfer from French, German, and Netherland subcontractors.
    Still, when the war ended, KERI still operated, and Iraq kept more than 450 SAM systems operational.
    NATO/US has never experienced an opponent with such high potential, and so little technical advantage as Russkie faced in 404. Ukrainian AD system was second only to Russian and Belarussian. They still operate more NATO-supplied systems than Germany and France, not to mention Soviet heritage ones that proved exceptional survivability and effectiveness.

    Edit : just as a background. The US has lost 10 000 aircraft in Vietnam. That is almost FOUR a DAY. I just try to imagine what you all pussies would do if applied to the situation dunno

    sepheronx, GarryB, zardof, LMFS, lancelot, Mir, Broski and Belisarius like this post

    avatar
    Arrow


    Posts : 3439
    Points : 3429
    Join date : 2012-02-12

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Arrow Wed Aug 07, 2024 11:07 am

    Edit : just as a background. The US has lost 10 000 aircraft in Vietnam. That is almost FOUR a DAY. I just try to imagine what you all pussies would do if applied to the situation wrote:

    A terrifying number, but the most interesting thing is that Vietnam had rather weaker AD than Ukraine in 2022 and beyond. Shocked

    GarryB, zardof, lancelot and Broski like this post

    avatar
    Belisarius


    Posts : 860
    Points : 860
    Join date : 2022-01-04

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Belisarius Wed Aug 07, 2024 11:24 am


    Now it remains to compare this number with the number of sorties flown by the Su-34 during this period.

    With over 100 operational Su-34s, each capable of flying multiple sorties per day, for over two and a half years, I would be surprised if the number of losses amounts to even 0.01% of the total number of combat sorties.

    GarryB likes this post

    Arkanghelsk
    Arkanghelsk


    Posts : 3899
    Points : 3905
    Join date : 2021-12-08

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Arkanghelsk Wed Aug 07, 2024 12:41 pm

    The other part - of those 23, I’d say half are from crashes and accidents

    GarryB and owais.usmani like this post

    caveat emptor
    caveat emptor


    Posts : 2003
    Points : 2005
    Join date : 2022-02-02
    Location : Murrica

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  caveat emptor Wed Aug 07, 2024 3:18 pm

    What crashes or accidents? Those don't come into this statistics. These are planes confirmed as shot down over Ukrainian territory. Some were maybe shot down by friendly fire, but that's all.
    For example, from 6 Su-35, 3 were lost due to friendly fire.

    owais.usmani likes this post

    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11593
    Points : 11561
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Isos Wed Aug 07, 2024 6:56 pm

    Belisarius wrote:

    Now it remains to compare this number with the number of sorties flown by the Su-34 during this period.

    With over 100 operational Su-34s, each capable of flying multiple sorties per day, for over two and a half years, I would be surprised if the number of losses amounts to even 0.01% of the total number of combat sorties.

    What a pathetic attempt to save the face. Copium hard...

    24 out 156 serial produced (according to wiki) is more than 10% of the fleet lost.
    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11593
    Points : 11561
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Isos Wed Aug 07, 2024 6:57 pm

    lancelot wrote:
    caveat emptor wrote:Some confirmation for claims that AMCXXL and Lsos put forward about lost Su-34, is published on Serbian military forum by one of the members that went through all posts in the forum on Ukraine war (over 6500 pages) and found that ending with July 15, 2024 23 Su-34 were shot down, majority of them during first year of war. All with pictures and most of them with names and photos of the crew.
    Even if those numbers were true they can easily replace those airframe losses with existing production. Even at peacetime production rates.

    A much bigger issue is replacing the pilots. There is a dearth of trainer aircraft.

    Tell me why replace a plane that was easily destroyed by the same plane.
    lancelot
    lancelot


    Posts : 3137
    Points : 3133
    Join date : 2020-10-18

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  lancelot Wed Aug 07, 2024 7:18 pm

    Isos wrote:Tell me why replace a plane that was easily destroyed by the same plane.
    It is called attrition. Learn about it.
    The Soviets lost a lot of T-34s during WW2. Which did not mean it was not a good tank.

    GarryB, LMFS, Mir and Broski like this post

    avatar
    william.boutros


    Posts : 175
    Points : 177
    Join date : 2015-08-13

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  william.boutros Wed Aug 07, 2024 7:23 pm

    Isos wrote:
    Belisarius wrote:

    Now it remains to compare this number with the number of sorties flown by the Su-34 during this period.

    With over 100 operational Su-34s, each capable of flying multiple sorties per day, for over two and a half years, I would be surprised if the number of losses amounts to even 0.01% of the total number of combat sorties.

    What a pathetic attempt to save the face. Copium hard...

    24 out 156 serial produced (according to wiki) is more than 10% of the fleet lost.

    Not all are in the upgraded version.
    Also, I wonder why don't they upgrade their Su24 with precision capabilities? It seems the bottle neck is in the upgrade kits and not the airframes themselves.
    caveat emptor
    caveat emptor


    Posts : 2003
    Points : 2005
    Join date : 2022-02-02
    Location : Murrica

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  caveat emptor Wed Aug 07, 2024 7:45 pm

    william.boutros wrote:

    Not all are in the upgraded version.
    Also, I wonder why don't they upgrade their Su24 with precision capabilities? It seems the bottle neck is in the upgrade kits and not the airframes themselves.

    They are already old and, practically, not used in Ukraine. They were relegated to use in Syria or donated to SyAF. They don't have many left in active service.
    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11593
    Points : 11561
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Isos Wed Aug 07, 2024 11:45 pm

    lancelot wrote:
    Isos wrote:Tell me why replace a plane that was easily destroyed by the same plane.
    It is called attrition. Learn about it.
    The Soviets lost a lot of T-34s during WW2. Which did not mean it was not a good tank.

    They better replace ka-52 that are really doing their job.

    More su-35 and more upgraded su-24 will take over su-34'only mission, which is launching glide bombs from stand off range, pretyy easily.
    avatar
    Belisarius


    Posts : 860
    Points : 860
    Join date : 2022-01-04

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Belisarius Thu Aug 08, 2024 12:39 am

    "pathetic" and "Copium" are two things that are not lacking in your comments...

    If the VKS limits itself to using no more than 50 Su-34s in the SMO, and if each aircraft makes an average of 4 combat sorties per day, we end up with over 179,000 combat sorties for the entire war. 24 losses are no more than 0.013% of the total combat sorties.

    From 2008 to 2022, Russia produced about 147 Su-34s, with an average of 10 aircraft per year Russia can replace all its lost Su-34s with peacetime production alone.

    GarryB, xeno, zardof and Hole like this post

    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11593
    Points : 11561
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Isos Thu Aug 08, 2024 12:48 am

    Even if it was 3 million soties, what's the point ?

    After loosing a huge quantity the first if thel, they stopped going inside Ukraine with that plane.

    The number of used glide bombs is something like 3-4000 thousands. The other 175000 sorties are done for what ? Nothing.

    Su-35 could launch those gliding bombs and will still be there for air superiority mission with their r-37M that actually help people on the ground.

    They even manage to enter Kursk and those su-34 aren't doing their job even though ukrainians are marching in columns right across russian fields. They used Iskanders against them when a su-34 should have been sent with 10 bombs and provide constant monitoring. Any ruble invested in that aircraft is a lost ruble.

    owais.usmani likes this post

    avatar
    Belisarius


    Posts : 860
    Points : 860
    Join date : 2022-01-04

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Belisarius Thu Aug 08, 2024 2:04 am

    The point is that you are the only person in the world who believes that an aircraft that survives 99.9% of its missions is a bad aircraft.

    Russia is dropping over 3,000 bombs PER MONTH!
    https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-ato/3868451-russia-uses-more-than-3000-bombs-against-ukraine-each-month-zelensky.html

    And a Su-34 with R-77 is more than enough to combat unmodernized Mig-29s/Su-27s armed with old R-27s.

    sepheronx, GarryB, xeno, Big_Gazza, zardof, Hole and Broski like this post

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40487
    Points : 40987
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  GarryB Thu Aug 08, 2024 7:05 am

    Even if they lost 4 million men like the nazi supporters claim it is the cost of the job.

    Russia was given no alternative, this conflict was going to happen whether Russia started it or Kiev started it, and it is happening.

    You can bandy about terms like cope and other bullshit, but at the end of the day Russia has lost men and lost weapons and lost platforms... that is what happens in real wars with peer enemies supported by super powers and also by Europe.

    Be proud of how many Russian systems your nazi friends have taken down, that is just the cost of war and a cost that has to be paid.

    And before you start whining they are adapting and changing gear and creating upgrades and changing tactics to minimise losses as far as they can but at the end of the day the only planes that can never be lost is because they are never used.

    For the loss of aircraft the nazi war machine has been crippled and is on the back foot and is being destroyed.

    Claiming the aircraft is shit or the crew are idiots or command are fools is juvenile and I can happily say it is not copium to ignore the bitching from the nazi section.

    Even if Russia didn't lose anything and there were grownups in the Ukraine who saw what western offers were for what they were at the time and where they would take the Ukraine and decided just to keep normal peaceful relations with Russia, the bad guys are still the bad guys and they are in the west and have been funding nazis for over half a century in the hopes to be able to use them... if it wasn't this it would be somewhere else.

    The west is evil and the more you try to defend them, well defend nazism all you wish... they are what they are.

    Hole, Broski and Belisarius like this post

    avatar
    ALAMO


    Posts : 7459
    Points : 7549
    Join date : 2014-11-25

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  ALAMO Thu Aug 08, 2024 2:35 pm

    Isos wrote:Even if it was 3 million soties, what's the point ?
    After loosing a huge quantity the first if thel, they stopped going inside Ukraine with that plane.
    The number of used glide bombs is something like 3-4000 thousands. The other 175000 sorties are done for what ? Nothing.

    Jesus holly crisp, you are either dumber than one can imagine or just so obsessed with your idea fixes that no common sense arrives into your muddy brain.
    This is a conflict on a scale nobody in NATO fought since Korean war.
    No-fukin-body.
    Both sides involve more than 1.5 mln soldiers spread across 1200 km frontline.
    No country NATO attacked, ever, had a potential so much on pair as we are facing now.
    Ukraine operated THOUSANDS air defense systems of all types and tiers, and was supplied with the shocking number of NATO produced ones.
    NATO delivered more systems to 404 than France operates, including some of those being the most advanced we have in arsenals - in the case of Iris it is not even adopted in Germany yet.
    All of NATO command and control subsystems are providing recon to the Ukro side - we don't have anything better to be used in a case of a major war with Russkie.
    Even if we consider the most pussy shit talk you can find out there, it will turn out that Russkie total losses are in a range of 100 aircraft of all kinds. Including malfunctions, friendly fire, and sabotage.
    That is on pair to what the coalition has lost in Desert Storm in fukin 2 months, facing an opponent who was a shade of Ukrainian power. And who was delivered to a coalition on a silver plate by the west European subcontractors that have built the entire AD, communication, and command system of Hussain. Every single data center, every single command station, every single communication hub location, and technical details have been provided to the coalition before the campaign, making a planning process a fukin park visit.
    In Korea, coalition has lost about 3000 planes, making a thousand per year - or 3 per DAY.
    In Vietnam US losses were FOUR aircraft a DAY.
    Russkie losses in this 2.5 year campaign are shockingly low, and this is crystal clear to any professional.
    Su-34 proved to be a formidable weapon system, delivering a giant share of all ordnance in this conflict.
    Which is why those have not only being ordered at increased scale, but upgraded according to the conflict lessons learned.
    You lack a single clue and historical/technical perspective on the matter, and all you can provide to this community is an endless show of arrogance.
    It is actually pathetic rather than anything else, but it is your choice how to present yourself in front of multinational community.

    GarryB, lancelot, Mir and Broski like this post

    Arkanghelsk
    Arkanghelsk


    Posts : 3899
    Points : 3905
    Join date : 2021-12-08

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Arkanghelsk Thu Aug 08, 2024 4:17 pm

    ALAMO wrote:
    Isos wrote:Even if it was 3 million soties, what's the point ?
    After loosing a huge quantity the first if thel, they stopped going inside Ukraine with that plane.
    The number of used glide bombs is something like 3-4000 thousands. The other 175000 sorties are done for what ? Nothing.

    Jesus holly crisp, you are either dumber than one can imagine or just so obsessed with your idea fixes that no common sense arrives into your muddy brain.
    This is a conflict on a scale nobody in NATO fought since Korean war.
    No-fukin-body.
    Both sides involve more than 1.5 mln soldiers spread across 1200 km frontline.
    No country NATO attacked, ever, had a potential so much on pair as we are facing now.
    Ukraine operated THOUSANDS air defense systems of all types and tiers, and was supplied with the shocking number of NATO produced ones.
    NATO delivered more systems to 404 than France operates, including some of those being the most advanced we have in arsenals - in the case of Iris it is not even adopted in Germany yet.
    All of NATO command and control subsystems are providing recon to the Ukro side - we don't have anything better to be used in a case of a major war with Russkie.
    Even if we consider the most pussy shit talk you can find out there, it will turn out that Russkie total losses are in a range of 100 aircraft of all kinds. Including malfunctions, friendly fire, and sabotage.
    That is on pair to what the coalition has lost in Desert Storm in fukin 2 months, facing an opponent who was a shade of Ukrainian power. And who was delivered to a coalition on a silver plate by the west European subcontractors that have built the entire AD, communication, and command system of Hussain. Every single data center, every single command station, every single communication hub location, and technical details have been provided to the coalition before the campaign, making a planning process a fukin park visit.
    In Korea, coalition has lost about 3000 planes, making a thousand per year - or 3 per DAY.
    In Vietnam US losses were FOUR aircraft a DAY.
    Russkie losses in this 2.5 year campaign are shockingly low, and this is crystal clear to any professional.
    Su-34 proved to be a formidable weapon system, delivering a giant share of all ordnance in this conflict.
    Which is why those have not only being ordered at increased scale, but upgraded according to the conflict lessons learned.
    You lack a single clue and historical/technical perspective on the matter, and all you can provide to this community is an endless show of arrogance.
    It is actually pathetic rather than anything else, but it is your choice how to present yourself in front of multinational community.

    Agree with all, but give su34 some better sensors and MAWS and RWR

    That’s all
    avatar
    Arrow


    Posts : 3439
    Points : 3429
    Join date : 2012-02-12

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Arrow Thu Aug 08, 2024 4:31 pm

    .It may be hard to compare it exactly because it's a different generation of equipment. Vietnam certainly had a much weaker AD than Ukraine, but also a much weaker tactical air force. Ukraine lost most of its planes plus those that the West gave them from the former Warsaw Pact countries and additionally planes that they renovated during the war. I don't know what the number is, but it was certainly quite large. The USA had such an advantage in air force that they carried out bombing campaigns like those against the Third Reich.
    Atmosphere
    Atmosphere


    Posts : 311
    Points : 315
    Join date : 2021-01-31

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Atmosphere Thu Aug 08, 2024 10:39 pm

    anyone got info on weather they upgraded Platan or not?
    Mir
    Mir


    Posts : 3794
    Points : 3792
    Join date : 2021-06-10

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Mir Fri Aug 09, 2024 9:58 am

    In both the new NVO and M variants the aircraft is basically supposed to get a completely new or upgraded avionics set. This will highly likely at the very least include an upgrade to the Platan sight.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40487
    Points : 40987
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  GarryB Fri Aug 09, 2024 10:27 am

    Agree with all, but give su34 some better sensors and MAWS and RWR

    That’s all

    With actual combat experience they seem to be upgrading everything already... it seems they know what they are doing... some jobs are just dangerous and is going to cost planes. The mission planners have to decide whether these attacks are worth the cost and I suspect most of the time they are.

    If an Su-34 gets lost but the flight manages to hit a warehouse with 100 storm shadows or ATCMS missiles and thousands of artillery rounds freshly delivered then the trade might be worth it.

    You can't really tell if it was worth it till after. It is like buying lottery tickets.

    Vietnam certainly had a much weaker AD than Ukraine, but also a much weaker tactical air force.

    The lack of guided weapons meant most attacks were direct attacks of the sort the Su-25 is used for.... and the AD of Vietnam was impressive and extensive... even if it was mostly gun based it was rather powerful and I would add effective.

    Ukraine lost most of its planes plus those that the West gave them from the former Warsaw Pact countries and additionally planes that they renovated during the war. I don't know what the number is, but it was certainly quite large.

    The Russian count is over 600 fixed wing aircraft and about 280 helicopters... of course an important difference is that America had a much larger number of aircraft in Vietnam so there was more to shoot down... but MANPADS are being thrown at the Orcs so there is no shortage of those in the Ukraine...

    The USA had such an advantage in air force that they carried out bombing campaigns like those against the Third Reich.

    Do you think they will learn the lesson that air power is going to struggle in a modern conflict, or will they sweep that under the carpet?

    This will highly likely at the very least include an upgrade to the Platan sight.

    I think  a built in thermal imager being added would be a minimum, but I also suspect new targeting pods will be added to many Russian aircraft including Su-34, Su-30, Su-35, an any light fighters (4th or 5th gen) they might adopt.

    I seem to remember the Platan was a daylight only or LLLTV system that was not intended for day/night and all weather use. It was a simple system for day bombing that was just fine in Syria at 10km altitude bombing targets with cheap dumb bombs delivered rather accurately by modern avionics systems.

    The Gefest & T system has a bomb trajectory calculation component and should be compatible with guided bombs and also dumb bombs using glide kits.

    Just because a bomb is guided does not mean you can release it anywhere and it will always hit the target.

    Glide kits have manouver limits and lift limits and drag limits which means a certain speed and altitude and direction of release is important if you want to get on target.

    USAF Air power posts moved to here.
    Atmosphere
    Atmosphere


    Posts : 311
    Points : 315
    Join date : 2021-01-31

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Atmosphere Sat Aug 10, 2024 11:42 pm

    I think the Su-34 would greatly benefit from the Al-41F1S given the weight of the new equipment, armor, and beefy cabin. This airplane is supposed to hold its own against fighterd after all.

    Sponsored content


    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 23 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Thu Nov 14, 2024 5:46 pm