Podlodka77 wrote:yes, but i don't believe that 4 were shot down as published by some "source" on wikipedia. Wikipedia is now nothing but pure propaganda..
Meanth as an general post:
Wikipedia,...twitter,....facebook,...... instagram....tiktok...western mainstream media.
Everybody knows its western biased crap/fake footage, yet everyone keeps posting shit from there on this forum.
And asking if its true and/or throwing fits about "Russia peforming poorly".
Yes, Russia take casualties, it is open War.
Ukraine is not Iraq or Afghanistan where there basically was no army to oppose NATO.
Even during the Iraq/Afghanistan invasion/deployments NATO lost dozens upon dozens of aircraft (and men) to hostile fire.
i believe after 9.11 the U.S themselves have over 7000 KIA's alone with their foreign adventures. Not mentioning the rest of the NATO allies.
But for obvious reasons it was not plastered on TV by MSM, and no social media or mobile phones of course.
Yet, everyone now expects that Russia's aircraft and vehicles and Men to be invincible?.
Not everyone comes back, But there is an job that needs to be done.
I really regret the Russian casualtys so far, But i also can not see how this could have been resolved on an non-millitary way.
Clearly, nobody wanted to listen for 8 years to Moscow's concerns on the LPR DPR and keep pressing the Genocidal nazi's in eastern Ukraine.
Nobody in NATO listened to Putin since 2006 on that NATO on Russia's border would be an red line.
There is an U.S VLS missile base already in Romania, another one to be build in Poland. Now Ukraine.... The west just laughed and continued putting troops and nuclear-capable weapons on Russia's border.
When things go bad in operations, it does not have to be an failure of someone.
It is war, shit goes wrong at times that you could not have prevented.
Everybody has 20/20 Hindsight afterwards.
Everybody wants the best fancy weapons, the best technology, and best situation.
But that luxury does not exist in any world, millitary resources (men,vehicles,aircraft, munitions) are an Finite resource.
It is spread all over an battlefield to keep equal pressure on the entire front.
Russia is waging an war against an enemy that has been propped up by NATO with anything NATO could throw at it.
near limitless NATO Weapons, Training, Command and control, Logistics, mercenaries, real-time intelligence gathering, etc.
Russia meanwhile is re-inventing the manual how an actual, open modern war is fought.
They have to take into account literally everything.
Massive logistical chains.
Battlefield deployment and maintaining battle lines. (C&C)
Combined arms fighting
Air superiority combat.
CAS/Fire support.
Drone warfare
Massive CQB enviroments that include skyscrapers/tall flats
Humanitarian considerations
Destroyed infrastructure like bridges and contructing crossings
Naval operations
Electronic Warfare
Sabotage actions.
Precision strikes with smart weapons
Seizing strategic objectives like they did with the nuclear facilities and airports.
Media/information warfare.
The list goes on...
Russia is doing an admirable job millitary wise so far judging by various sources.