Home
Latest images
Register
Log in
All the boasting and chest bumping is fine and dandy but the fact remains that the front line is still pretty much stuck on the Donbass region. High kill death ratio advantage does not guarantee victory.. (and victory is defined subjectively - it's relative to current costs, opportunity costs, and long term strategic implications - that is to say, every thinking brain has a definition of what victory (and defeat) looks like - not exclusive to be defined by propagandists of the West or Russia). No better example than Vietnam for the younglings. The political solution is still as far away as before hostilities began and depending on perspective, some could make the claim it's even further back.
The West completely demolished the Putin empty threat of "no-interference allowed" when the operation was launched. To go along with the obvious revelation of the complete inability of Russia to successfully stop the inflow and resupply of Ukraine by Western patrons......which is obviously, in my opinion, more so than inability... a lack of political will mixed with strategy hubris (6D chess richochet).
The biggest empty threat of all being "decision making centers - war declaration bluff" if Russia proper was attacked - but everyone knew that threat was bluff the second the "Kiev feint" ended in retreat and no one in Kiev was touched. The elites in western capitals, and the Kievan rats simply made the correct conclusions and calculations.... safe to say that they were right.
The Russian air force to this day has yet to do a single bombing run with long range tactical bombers to disable airports, railways, bridges and other critical infrastructure key to enemy reinforcement/resupply despite the fact that Ukraine destroys such infrastructure anyway if they happen to be under threat of permanent occupation. That is to say, the infrastructure for the regime is only valuable as long as it's under their control and is effectively disabled when under permanent retreat. Begs the question, why is Russia then refraining from destroying it - considering how important it's to the enemy to resupply? It's not a question of some bigger strategy at play anymore, of a campaign for the "hearts and minds" and all other plausible considerations. The reality of the matter is pretty straight forward with only one possible outcome in this regard. This shows failure to adapt to enemy strategy. You need more than a couple of calibers to disable infrastructure of this kind (and thus no viable)... that is where aerial bombing comes in. But if you're scared of losing strategic bombers to Kiev due to western intel sharing then it says all you need to know really..
None of those shortcomings, along with many other failings and deficiencies which have been discussed to death, prevent victory, but they certainly don't make it easier to achieve.
The grain saga is just embarrassing all around. To read RT articles saying: "it's good thing and here's why - explainer" makes you wonder if Langley assets are actually in control. Then again Russians are reactionary propagandists for the most part, so it's to be expected for them to fall into narrative traps, aka always one step behind due to lack of initiative.
The wishful thinking and pysop cries from Russian propagandists seeking to change Western decisions in hopes they "stop" supporting Ukraine politically with arms/supplies etc... framing it as "hopeless, losing effort"... despite consistency, has miserably failed. Mainly cause everyone with a thinking brain can see through it, as does anyone with a thinking brain spotting western psyops in action. It's a well played out book. A lot of the dimwitts here do themselves a disservice to their brain consuming such garbage daily from such characters (love being lied to by "independent analysts").... although obviously other accounts here do it purposefully because they're getting paid to. Sad state of affairs on practically every forum of discussion.
The collapse of the Ukrainian resistance continues to be aloof, just as the "imminent collapse" of the Kiev regime was for the last 8 years. It should serve as a reality check, but you can't fix stupid - sheeple love being sheeple.
The West completely demolished the Putin empty threat of "no-interference allowed" when the operation was launched. To go along with the obvious revelation of the complete inability of Russia to successfully stop the inflow and resupply of Ukraine by Western patrons......which is obviously, in my opinion, more so than inability... a lack of political will mixed with strategy hubris (6D chess richochet).
The biggest empty threat of all being "decision making centers - war declaration bluff" if Russia proper was attacked - but everyone knew that threat was bluff the second the "Kiev feint" ended in retreat and no one in Kiev was touched. The elites in western capitals, and the Kievan rats simply made the correct conclusions and calculations.... safe to say that they were right.
The Russian air force to this day has yet to do a single bombing run with long range tactical bombers to disable airports, railways, bridges and other critical infrastructure key to enemy reinforcement/resupply despite the fact that Ukraine destroys such infrastructure anyway if they happen to be under threat of permanent occupation. That is to say, the infrastructure for the regime is only valuable as long as it's under their control and is effectively disabled when under permanent retreat. Begs the question, why is Russia then refraining from destroying it - considering how important it's to the enemy to resupply? It's not a question of some bigger strategy at play anymore, of a campaign for the "hearts and minds" and all other plausible considerations. The reality of the matter is pretty straight forward with only one possible outcome in this regard. This shows failure to adapt to enemy strategy. You need more than a couple of calibers to disable infrastructure of this kind (and thus no viable)... that is where aerial bombing comes in. But if you're scared of losing strategic bombers to Kiev due to western intel sharing then it says all you need to know really..
None of those shortcomings, along with many other failings and deficiencies which have been discussed to death, prevent victory, but they certainly don't make it easier to achieve.
The grain saga is just embarrassing all around. To read RT articles saying: "it's good thing and here's why - explainer" makes you wonder if Langley assets are actually in control. Then again Russians are reactionary propagandists for the most part, so it's to be expected for them to fall into narrative traps, aka always one step behind due to lack of initiative.
The wishful thinking and pysop cries from Russian propagandists seeking to change Western decisions in hopes they "stop" supporting Ukraine politically with arms/supplies etc... framing it as "hopeless, losing effort"... despite consistency, has miserably failed. Mainly cause everyone with a thinking brain can see through it, as does anyone with a thinking brain spotting western psyops in action. It's a well played out book. A lot of the dimwitts here do themselves a disservice to their brain consuming such garbage daily from such characters (love being lied to by "independent analysts").... although obviously other accounts here do it purposefully because they're getting paid to. Sad state of affairs on practically every forum of discussion.
The collapse of the Ukrainian resistance continues to be aloof, just as the "imminent collapse" of the Kiev regime was for the last 8 years. It should serve as a reality check, but you can't fix stupid - sheeple love being sheeple.
Last edited by ATLASCUB on Fri Jul 22, 2022 11:26 pm; edited 1 time in total
Isos
. three shots and you get the range and settled the Base Plate.
