Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+35
PhSt
ALAMO
TMA1
JohninMK
Isos
wilhelm
Swgman_BK
Arrow
par far
Kiko
Hole
GarryB
Tsavo Lion
thegopnik
T-47
mnztr
Gazputin
Firebird
Broski
kvs
LMFS
Backman
owais.usmani
limb
franco
Dr.Snufflebug
Sprut-B
Krepost
caveat emptor
George1
Mig-31BM2 Super Irbis-E
Scorpius
ludovicense
sepheronx
lancelot
39 posters

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Scorpius
    Scorpius


    Posts : 1563
    Points : 1563
    Join date : 2020-11-06
    Age : 36

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  Scorpius Sun Nov 05, 2023 8:01 pm

    par far wrote:Couple of questions about the Il-96-400M.

    When compared to the Boeing and the Airbus equivalents, how is it on fuel? Will this depend on the engines it is using? The Boeing and Airbus equivalents use only two engines.

    Are there interior pictures of the Il-96-400M? I would love to see the cockpit and the interior of the modernized Il-96-400M.

    Thanks in advance.

    The cost of one IL-96-400M is approximately $ 100-150 million less (depending on the specific model) than the cost of any of the analogues A or B.
    So the additional fuel/maintenance costs will never eat up this difference over the entire flight career of the aircraft.

    Leave the fuel efficiency requirements alone - if this were a crucial parameter, the whole world would fly on airships, not turbojet planes.

    GarryB, par far, kvs, Rodion_Romanovic, zardof, Sprut-B, Hole and like this post

    lancelot
    lancelot


    Posts : 3120
    Points : 3116
    Join date : 2020-10-18

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  lancelot Mon Nov 06, 2023 1:27 pm

    Cockpit of Il-96-400M:
    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Image82

    Looks like it has some changes from the older cockpit that I posted here.

    Image taken from this video:



    Here is an image of how the interior looks like:
    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Image83

    As I expected it isn't furnished. Since this is a test aircraft.

    GarryB, dino00, par far, kvs, zardof, Sprut-B, LMFS and like this post

    lancelot
    lancelot


    Posts : 3120
    Points : 3116
    Join date : 2020-10-18

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  lancelot Tue Nov 07, 2023 10:09 am

    The crash investigation is calling this a pilot error. But if the Airbus A320's landing gear system was operating properly in the first place there would have been no accident. The pilots then made errors in judgement in deconflicting the issues with the landing gear. I think we can attribute this accident to Western sanctions on Russian civil aviation. Thankfully no one was hurt.

    Rosaviatsia: crew errors led to the A320 landing in a wheat field
    05.11.2023

    The Federal Air Transport Agency has completed an investigation into the incident involving the landing of the Ural Airlines aircraft A320 RA-73805 on the morning of September 12 in a wheat field near the village of Kamenka, 180 kilometers from Novosibirsk. The plane was flying from Sochi to Omsk, but due to a technical malfunction during landing in Omsk, it turned around to Tolmachevo airport.

    The cause of this incident was a lack of fuel to complete the flight to the alternate airport. The department came to the conclusion that after the failure of one of the three hydraulic systems – the “green” one – the crew was unable to correctly determine the actual position of the landing gear and made an unfounded decision to fly to Novosibirsk to an alternate airfield.

    During the climb, the aircraft commander moved the landing gear selector to the “retracted” position, but in fact the landing gear was not retracted due to the lack of sufficient pressure in the hydraulic system. “When entering the Omsk airport, the hydraulic system pressure was enough to lower the landing gear and close the doors. The flight to Novosibirsk continued with the landing gear extended,” the Rosaviation document says.

    When climbing on the way to Novosibirsk, the crew clarified the flight route and the choice of approach schemes, but did not pay due attention to the increased consumption and the current fuel balance, the report noted.

    The PIC calculated the remaining fuel based on the fact that the landing gear was retracted and the doors remained open. According to his calculations, there was more than enough fuel for the flight. In fact, due to the extended landing gear, the fuel shortage for the flight to Novosibirsk was at least 1300 kg. The commander later explained that the decision to proceed to Tolmachevo was made based on safer landing conditions due to the presence of a large runway and favorable wind conditions.

    However, as experts have established, the landing distance required to land an aircraft with such a failure is 1856 meters. At the same time, the length of the runway at the Omsk airport is 2500 meters, which ensured the plane a safe landing at the destination airport. Weather conditions also made it possible to land safely at Omsk airport.

    A malfunction of the “green” hydraulic system leads to failure of the spoilers, automatic braking system, main braking system, reverse of one of the engines, and nose wheel control. Also, it becomes impossible to retract the landing gear after they are released and close the landing gear doors. In addition, information on fuel consumption and remaining fuel is displayed incorrectly.

    Experts determined that the cause of the drop in pressure in the “green” hydraulic system was a violation of the integrity due to natural wear at the sealing point of the flexible hose of the drive cylinder of the right wing of the main landing gear niche.

    Thus, several factors led to the emergency landing in the field. Firstly, the crew made an error in determining the actual position of the landing gear and doors after the failure of the “green” hydraulic system.

    Secondly, an error in calculating the required amount of fuel without taking into account the extended landing gear led to its significant underestimation, and the PIC made an unfounded decision to proceed to the alternate airfield of Novosibirsk.

    Thirdly, as noted in the report, the crew did not monitor fuel consumption and fuel balance, and there was also a non-optimal distribution of the workload among the crew as flight conditions became more difficult, which did not allow them to make an intelligent decision on further actions in the event of a drop in pressure in the “green” hydraulic system.

    However, the Federal Air Transport Agency emphasized that in the conditions in which the crew found itself after a number of mistakes had been made, the decision to land in the field was the only correct and competent one.

    Based on the results of the investigation, recommendations were made. In particular, airlines should re-study the requirements for the procedure for calculating fuel in flight and the features of calculating its balance in the event of various failures of aircraft systems and power plants.

    https://aviation21.ru/rosaviaciya-k-posadke-a320-v-pshenichnom-pole-priveli-oshibki-ekipazha/

    GarryB likes this post

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40438
    Points : 40938
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  GarryB Wed Nov 08, 2023 12:45 am

    I am assuming they landed safely... ??
    Rodion_Romanovic
    Rodion_Romanovic


    Posts : 2634
    Points : 2803
    Join date : 2015-12-30
    Location : Merkelland

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  Rodion_Romanovic Wed Nov 08, 2023 8:04 am

    GarryB wrote:I am assuming they landed safely...  ??
    Yes but not at the airport, and the aircraft is currently stranded there.
    Furthermore such aircraft loses its certificate of airworthiness if it lands outside a proper airport.
    Basically now they have to wait and see if later it would be possible to takeoff (maybe when the ground is harder in the winter), probably with a dedicated experimental permission and later several checks and structural inspections will have to be carried to ensure that the airplane is still safe to fly.

    At least there were no casualties
    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18497
    Points : 19000
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  George1 Sat Nov 11, 2023 4:09 pm

    GarryB and Hole like this post

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40438
    Points : 40938
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  GarryB Sun Nov 12, 2023 4:58 am

    Basically now they have to wait and see if later it would be possible to takeoff (maybe when the ground is harder in the winter), probably with a dedicated experimental permission and later several checks and structural inspections will have to be carried to ensure that the airplane is still safe to fly.

    I am assuming it is leased so there is no point in writing it off to collect the insurance because that would go to the leasing company wouldn't it?
    Tsavo Lion
    Tsavo Lion


    Posts : 5960
    Points : 5912
    Join date : 2016-08-15
    Location : AZ, USA

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  Tsavo Lion Mon Nov 13, 2023 4:20 am

    The MC-21 aircraft, a Russian replacement for the Airbus A320 and Boeing 737, will begin transporting passengers in 2025
    https://www.ixbt.com/news/2023/11/12/21-airbus-a320-boeing-737-2025.html
    avatar
    mnztr


    Posts : 2888
    Points : 2926
    Join date : 2018-01-21

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  mnztr Mon Nov 13, 2023 7:10 am

    par far wrote:Couple of questions about the Il-96-400M.

    When compared to the Boeing and the Airbus equivalents, how is it on fuel? Will this depend on the engines it is using? The Boeing and Airbus equivalents use only two engines.

    Are there interior pictures of the Il-96-400M? I would love to see the cockpit and the interior of the modernized Il-96-400M.

    Thanks in advance.

    If you take into account the debacle of RR engines on 787, and the severe maint issues on the P&W GTF and lesser but still significant issues on the GE LEAP engines, the fuel means nothing and the extra maint means nothing.

    Scorpius likes this post

    avatar
    mnztr


    Posts : 2888
    Points : 2926
    Join date : 2018-01-21

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  mnztr Mon Nov 13, 2023 7:21 am

    Hole wrote:Russia withdrew from the project as a partner and will from now on only deliver stuff as supplier.
    Reason 1: Chinese insisted on tech transfer, including the future PD-35 engine.
    Reason 2: Chinese are sill using a lot of western "partners" for a lot of parts of the plane, Russia was against that.

    I think they both realized that if Russia was a partner, the plane would be sanctioned to oblivion. They are more dependant on China. Russia will buy this plane for its long term needs. The wing can probably be modifed for use on the IL 96 as the requirement will be quite similar. Russia wants to retain the ability to build these..just in case. It will be the best commercial wide body available to Russia.

    Rodion_Romanovic likes this post

    Rodion_Romanovic
    Rodion_Romanovic


    Posts : 2634
    Points : 2803
    Join date : 2015-12-30
    Location : Merkelland

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  Rodion_Romanovic Tue Nov 14, 2023 12:13 pm

    https://www.flugrevue.de/zivil/neuer-vierstrahler-aeroflot-sagt-njet-zur-iljuschin-il-96-400m/

    Aeroflot says „ Njet “ to Ilyushin Il-96-400M
    Russia's state-owned company Rostec celebrates the recent maiden flight of the Ilyushin Il-96-400M as a milestone – but nobody really wants the new aircraft. Aeroflot also waves thanks: the Flag Carrier instead demands a twinjet.

    Patrick dwarf
    11/13/2023

    The Rostec press text for First flight of the Ilyushin Il-96-400M on the 1st. November was full of praise for the new jet. But that doesn't change the fact that Russia's aviation industry, apart from the PR bubbles, is more skeptical about the retreaded four-beam. Yes, it is true that there are very few companies in the world that are able to build their own wide-body passenger aircraft – namely Airbus and Boeing. Against this background, the Il-96-400M is proof of the "competence of domestic design offices and aircraft factories", as Russia's Minister of Industry and Trade Denis Manturow emphasized. But that's just one side of the coin.

    Airplane without customers

    The other side is that no one is seriously interested in the Il-96-400M in the airline executive floors, either in Russia or elsewhere. There are still no specific orders for the four-wheeler that it will ever be produced in large numbers, is currently not foreseeable. A niche existence as a technology carrier is more likely to be, which should pave the way for a better future for Russia's aircraft manufacturers. A few homeopathic orders for the state VIP transport fleet may be added, the highest of the feelings would be orders from cargo airlines. From today's point of view, it seems rather unlikely that passengers who ever pay will fly in an Il-96-400M.

    Aeroflot wakes up

    Russia's largest airline Aeroflot has already given the new Ilyushin a categorical rejection. In an interview with the Daily newspaper Wedemosti Aeroflot boss Sergei Alexandrowski emphasized some time ago that it was "irrational to integrate outdated technology into a commercially ineffective aircraft." In addition, the industry in Russia is unable to "produce the Il-96-400M in the required quantities" and the increase in production volumes to a suitable level is simple "too expensive". What Aeroflot needs instead is "a new twin-engine aircraft with advanced technology and good fuel efficiency," said Alexandrowski.

    Steam cell for new things?

    In fact, the Il-96-400M could prove to be a bridge builder on the way to such an aircraft after the CRAIC CR929 project, which was pursued together with China, was down due to sanctions. In Russia the voices are increasing, the one Reconstruction of the Il-96 from four to two engines. Rostec boss Sergei Chemesov himself heated the debate on this in October when he emphasized to the daily Izvestia that the topic was "on the agenda".

    Core problems remain

    However, a suitable Russian engine is missing for a twin-engine "Il-96neo" until further notice. The one under development Large turbofan PD-35 will be ready for series production at the earliest in 2030. In addition, the wings would have to be redesigned accordingly for the conversion. Above all, however, the bottleneck of the limited production capacities would also remain with an Il-96 two-beam –, especially since the industry will be fully equipped with the standard fuselage programs Sukhoi Superjet and Yakovlev MS-21 in the coming years will be busy, which are also not yet ready for series production.

    The issue with the wings is not that big, since Russia was already working on the design of the wings for the CR929 which has basically the same size as the il-96.

    Furthermore it was supposed to be build in a very large series and the wings were supposed to be produced only in Russia, so Russia has been planning a large production capabilities for those.

    As far as the limited production capabilities mentioned in the article, I call bs.

    Of course it is true now, but the production lines of the Amur plants were the superjets are produced and the one in Irkut for the MC21 are modern automatic lines capable of large production rates.
    Something similar has been implemented in Aviastar in Ulyanovsk for the production of il-76 military transport aircrafts.

    VASO in Voronezh is the plant responsible for widebody production. Until now, due to the lack of orders, a dedicated modern and automated production line there was not justified, since it is also very expensive, but I am sure that it will be done before the PD-35 engine will be certified.

    As far as what Aeroflot said, maybe they can survive until 2030 without new widebodies.

    People in the west forget also that Aeroflot is not the only airline there.
    I am sure that Rossiya Airlines will get some of the Il-96 that will be produced now.

    Furthermore keeping a steady assembly of aircrafts (even of only 2 aircrafts per year) of il-96 until the twin version is ready will allow the supply chain to better plan and organize the production of parts and to gradually set up the increase in production rate once the PD-35 will be ready.

    By the way, in the German article they write that Aeroflot is not going to buy il-96-400M, mentioning that  the director of Aeroflot completely rejected the plane during an interview with vedomosti from last august, but his actual words were a bit different.

    He said that they are inefficient and that they are not produced in a large serie. He is not happy with them, but he did not say that they will not buy them (also because they have no choice).

    Furthermore Aeroflot is government owned, they need to understand that each ruble, dollar or euro that they gave in the past to Boeing or Airbus has meant less money available to develop russian aircrafts and engines.

    Here the link and some extracts

    https://www.vedomosti.ru/business/characters/2023/08/13/989888-sergei-aleksandrovskii


    Vedomosti” wrote:
    August 13, 21:37 / Business / Interview

    « Without Russian aircrafts, our civil aviation has no future »
    General Director « Aeroflot »
    about a firm contract for Russian aircraft and negotiations with foreign lessors


    Over the past year and a half, the Russian aviation industry has undergone the most serious tests in its entire history: carriers not only lost the marginal western market, but also the ability to replenish their parks with foreign equipment and serve already received cars with foreign providers. The rest suffered more severely «Aeroflot», which built its work on the basis of transit passenger traffic between East Asia and Western countries, which has ceased since last spring. The company had to significantly restructure the route network and master new types of maintenance of foreign routes.

    In an interview with « Vedomosti », the general director of the national carrier, Sergey Alexandrovsky, spoke about the first firm contract in the new conditions for the supply of Russian aircraft, about the promotion of negotiations with foreign lessors, salary increase for airline employees and connection « G1 » to the « Aeroflot bonus » program.

    (...)

    – And in terms of operation, what are you preparing for?
    – New aircraft will certainly require increased attention. For this, a long period of controlled operation, joint work with the manufacturer to eliminate deficiencies – « childhood diseases », etc. is provided. Moreover, all this does not apply exclusively to Russian technology, any new type of aircraft, whether Airbus or Boeing, for the first time in operation, requires exactly the same increased attention.

    – Aircraft that are being created in Russia today, – near and mid-main. But airlines clearly need long-haul aircraft, for example, for flights to the Far East. At some point, foreign long-haul aircraft will have to be withdrawn from the park. Are you getting ready for this?

    – We have not only the Far East – there are a number of international directions. But it is clear that first of all we must ensure transport accessibility within the country. And if we start to face some kind of deficit – which we do not see yet, – then, of course, we will primarily concentrate on the needs within the country, we will ensure the transport accessibility of our regions. But I note that according to the operating statistics of the current long-haul fleet, it is clear that in some long-term period we will be able to operate it until at least 2030.

    – Does industry think about long-haul aircraft?

    – It is conceived, and we are discussing this with the manufacturer. The main thing that is necessary for the design of a long-haul aircraft, – is the engine. The project is already there, this is PD-35. Of course, « Aeroflot » expects a new long-haul aircraft from industry.

    – Il-96-300 or Il-96-400 is already quite in the past?

    – Unfortunately, industry is not able to produce them in the required quantity, and restoring production volumes is too expensive. In addition, raising obsolete technologies to a commercially inefficient – aircraft is irrational. Need a new two-engine aircraft using advanced technology and good fuel efficiency.


    Note:

    Sergey Alexandrovsky
    General Director « Aeroflot »
    Born September 9, 1976.
    1998
    graduated from Moscow State Social University with a degree in « Jurisprudence »

    kvs likes this post

    lancelot
    lancelot


    Posts : 3120
    Points : 3116
    Join date : 2020-10-18

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  lancelot Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:00 pm

    They should just design an aircraft to replace the Il-96. The Il-96 is way heavier than other more modern aircraft. For one just look at the landing gear:
    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Ilyush10

    The Il-96 has four sets of landing gear including three in the back. Now compare this with the A350:
    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 A350_f10

    The A350 has only three sets of landing gear.

    The reason the Il-96 is like this is that the aircraft was originally designed to operate from poorly paved surfaces. It uses the original Il-86 aircraft airframe and has similar landing gear. But with all the improvements made to Russian airports this is no longer necessary.

    I suspect the same thing might be true for the fuselage itself which is probably way heavier than it would be with more modern materials.

    As for Aeroflot not wanting the Il-96-400M in the short term, when they stop being able to operate a substantial chunk of their widebodies because of the sanctions they will start singing a different tune.

    owais.usmani likes this post

    kvs
    kvs


    Posts : 15821
    Points : 15956
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : Turdope's Kanada

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  kvs Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:28 pm

    If Russia can afford the fuel, then it should use it. All the "improvements" in western aircraft are downsizing BS. They reflect
    efforts to squeeze water out of a rock and not advances.

    It would be nice to see real numbers about cost of operation of the IL-96 vs the 777 or anything else. From the "so heavy" tone
    you would think it is twice as much or something.

    GarryB, Tsavo Lion, LMFS, Hole and Backman like this post

    Tsavo Lion
    Tsavo Lion


    Posts : 5960
    Points : 5912
    Join date : 2016-08-15
    Location : AZ, USA

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  Tsavo Lion Tue Nov 14, 2023 9:33 pm

    kvs wrote:If Russia can afford the fuel, then it should use it.
    she now has more oil than can be sold for profit, & the gov. subsidises Aeroflot & other airlines there anyway, so loosing $ with enefficient planes is still worth it when the rest of the economy & connectivity r at stake.
    Russia can also increase overflight/airport fees/dues on foreign airlines, if need be.
    Size & geogr. position does matter!
    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11588
    Points : 11556
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  Isos Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:39 pm

    Heavy planes aren't the priority. MS-21 is.

    JohninMK, owais.usmani and lancelot like this post

    avatar
    mnztr


    Posts : 2888
    Points : 2926
    Join date : 2018-01-21

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  mnztr Wed Nov 15, 2023 5:23 am

    GarryB wrote:
    Russia should threaten to jam such signals to swiss planes.

    This is actually a good thing... now that Russia has created its own alternative to the Swiss system they can offer it to other countries as a replacement for the Swiss system, so if a country wants all Russian compatible stuff they can go all Russian without worrying that they will lack features like Swiss messaging systems because the Swiss don't like that country that week.

    Design it so it can receive the signals from the Swiss system so there are no compatibility issues.

    .

    They should offer it much cheaper just to **** over the Swiss

    GarryB likes this post

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40438
    Points : 40938
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  GarryB Wed Nov 15, 2023 10:19 am


    I think they both realized that if Russia was a partner, the plane would be sanctioned to oblivion. They are more dependant on China.

    Russia does not need China to make planes. Most of the content of this "Chinese" plane is European so China is dependent on Europe and Russia to make these planes.

    Russia has essentially pulled out because there is too much European content that they will have to replace if they want to buy any... they don't really want to buy a lot if any.

    As far as they are concerned China should use Russian replacement components to replace western components which would make them sanction proof, but would limit sales to western countries, but western countries are unlikely to buy them anyway. You could argue that western suppliers would find western customers... well that didn't work with western components on Russian planes...

    Russia will buy this plane for its long term needs.

    Russia really doesn't need this aircraft... the main customer will be Chinese airline companies.

    It will be the best commercial wide body available to Russia.

    I doubt Russian airlines will buy any because they will have to replace all the western parts with Russian parts to make them sanction proof and the cost of that would be too high for Russian airlines to foot the bill.


    As far as the limited production capabilities mentioned in the article, I call bs.

    What normally happens in the west in such situations is that the countries military orders some planes for different purposes for which they pay for production to be set up and then production continues and airlines buy the planes that are now subsidised by their military.

    Heavy planes aren't the priority. MS-21 is.

    Heavy planes are necessary in the long run to reach countries around the world with fewer stops on the way.

    The biggest issue with airliners at the moment is engines and when that gets sorted out the planes will be built.

    Aeroflot talks about profitability... what profitability is there with sanctioned planes you can't maintain properly because spare parts are sanctioned too?

    Wrong attitude from a Russian airline... check that guys credentials to run that company.

    They should offer it much cheaper just to **** over the Swiss

    Agree... they have nothing to make Russia want to be nice to them...

    kvs, Hole and TMA1 like this post

    Tsavo Lion
    Tsavo Lion


    Posts : 5960
    Points : 5912
    Join date : 2016-08-15
    Location : AZ, USA

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  Tsavo Lion Thu Nov 16, 2023 12:33 am

    https://www.ixbt.com/news/2023/11/15/21-airbus-a320-boeing-737.html

    https://www.ixbt.com/news/2023/11/13/il76vd90-sovershil-pervyj-mezhdunarodnyj-rejs-na-novyj-ajerodrom-zenit-v-antarktide.html
    Rodion_Romanovic
    Rodion_Romanovic


    Posts : 2634
    Points : 2803
    Join date : 2015-12-30
    Location : Merkelland

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  Rodion_Romanovic Sat Nov 25, 2023 11:55 am

    https://aviation21.ru/v-sankt-peterburge-obsudili-ekspluataciyu-i-obsluzhivanie-samolyotov-ssj100/

    Operation and maintenance of SSJ100 aircraft were discussed in St. Petersburg
    24.11.2023, 17:30

    PJSC Yakovlev organized a symposium of operators of Superjet 100 aircraft in St. Petersburg, during which topical issues of maintaining airworthiness and import substitution were discussed. The event was co-organized by the largest operator of this type of aircraft, Rossiya Airlines.

    Now in Russia, 80% of passenger traffic in the segment of regional jet aircraft is transported on Superjets. Since February 2022, more than 150 new routes have appeared on which the SSJ100 carries passengers. On foreign routes, Superjet can be found in Harbin, Astana, Dubai, Istanbul, Yerevan, Tashkent, Hurghada, Tel Aviv, and Bishkek. Since the start of operation, the SSJ100 fleet has accumulated more than 1.4 million flight hours, over 820 thousand flight cycles, and transported more than 40 million passengers.

    In addition to PJSC Yakovlev and aircraft operators, the symposium was attended by manufacturers of aviation equipment, representatives of service organizations and aviation authorities. The main topic of the symposium was overcoming the consequences of sanctions imposed on the entire Russian air transport industry in 2022, the UAC reported.

    Representatives of Yakovlev and equipment manufacturers made presentations on the localization and development of repairs of foreign components, as well as on the development of new domestic components to replace imported ones. As of February 2022, Russia has mastered the maintenance of 59 components of the SSJ100 aircraft; today there are 178 such components, and another 226 components are planned to be replaced with Russian analogues, which are being created as part of the project for an import-substituted version of the aircraft.

    “Such meetings are important for continuing the high level of interaction, which has become the key to the uninterrupted operation of the Russian Superjet 100. The joint work of Yakovlev PJSC and domestic airlines ensures a consistently high level of serviceability of SSJ100 aircraft - in the third quarter of 2023 it not only did not decrease, but even increased compared to the same period last year. At the same time, we also manage to maintain the regularity of flights at a high level – about 98%. All this indicates that through joint efforts we managed to avoid a negative scenario,” said Andrey Boginsky, UAC Deputy General Director for Civil Aviation – General Director of Yakovlev PJSC.

    Also during the event, the results of the operation of the park in 2022-2023 were summed up. The imposed sanctions have significantly changed the operating model of Superjet 100 aircraft by Russian airlines. Thus, according to the Transport Clearing House, in 2022, SSJ100 passenger traffic on international routes amounted to 4.8 million passenger-kilometers, which is 263 percent more than in pre-pandemic 2019.


    Good news for the Superjet, even if I hope soon on another name (like Yak-142).
    The problem that this aircraft had at its debut was also the lack of sufficient post sale support in comparison to western aircrafts (but this was also due to the lack of participation/interest from the many foreign suppliers).


    Actually the SMO in Ukraine and subsequent sanctions have been a real benefit for the Russian aeronautical industry. The projects in question and import substitution were already planned and in development, but with many Russian airlines (including Aeroflot) still planning large orders of western planes much less money would have been available for actually implementing it and for continuing the improvement of Russian engines and components. Furthermore all of the development money should have come from the state budget, so less money would have been available for other sectors or for improving infrastructure.

    This way, instead, the russian aeronautical industry will become more self sufficient and will be for large part financed from the revenues from sale and maintenance of its own projects.

    GarryB and kvs like this post

    franco
    franco


    Posts : 7032
    Points : 7058
    Join date : 2010-08-18

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  franco Sat Nov 25, 2023 12:23 pm

    Russia lost 76 passenger aircraft due to sanctions imposed against its aviation industry. This was announced to reporters on Saturday, November 25, by the Minister of Transport of the Russian Federation, Vitaly Savelyev.

    He explained that the decision regarding aircraft that were in technical parking lots abroad took Moscow by surprise.

    “In total, we lost 76 passenger ships,” the minister said.

    According to Savelyev, there are currently 1,302 ships in the Russian Federation, 1,167 are passenger aircraft.

    Earlier, on September 21, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that sanctions in some areas are slowing down Russia, but overall they stimulate the country’s development .

    Also on September 14, the Kremlin pointed out a lack of understanding of the principle of imposing and lifting sanctions . It was emphasized that Moscow does not understand either the logic of introducing or the logic of canceling anti-Russian measures.

    Difficulties with flights abroad for Russian airlines arose in 2022 amid the risk of their planes being seized due to EU sanctions. In addition, EU countries decided to close the skies to Russia in response to Moscow’s special operation to protect Donbass since February 24. The Federal Air Transport Agency, in turn, restricted flights over Russian territory to airlines from 36 countries.

    https://iz-ru.translate.goog/1610943/2023-11-25/v-mintranse-soobshchili-o-potere-rossiei-iz-za-sanktcii-76-passazhirskikh-samoletov?main_click&_x_tr_sl=ru&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp

    GarryB and kvs like this post

    Rodion_Romanovic
    Rodion_Romanovic


    Posts : 2634
    Points : 2803
    Join date : 2015-12-30
    Location : Merkelland

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  Rodion_Romanovic Mon Nov 27, 2023 2:44 pm

    https://www.flightglobal.com/airframers/uae-targets-domestic-development-of-vrt-light-helicopters-as-russian-partnership-disolved/155922.article

    According to this article the development of VTR500 is supposed to continue in UAE without the russians because of the sanctions.

    Strange because it was close to final production. Furthermore it is Russia and not the west which has experience with coaxial rotors.

    Anyway this small helicopter (max takeoff weight around 1600 kg, a bit less than half of the MTOW of the Ka-226 and the Kazan Ansat) was supposed to have a PW200 (Pratt &Whitney ) engine .

    Russia is completely capable to continue an independent development of this small single engine helicopter, also because the VK-650V turboshaft engine is almost ready for serial production.

    This is the same engine that will go
    • on the Kazan ansat (a twin engine helicopter in a classical configuration with conventional tail rotor) replacing the Pratt & Whitney Canada PW207K, rated at 470 kW (630 shp) each,

    • and on the Kamov Ka-226, twin engine Helicopter in the typical Kamov coaxial rotor configuration, which now mount 2 × Turbomeca Arrius 2G1, rated at 435 kW (580 hp) each


    The VK-650V is also perfect for a fully domestic version of the VRT-500.
    Russia does not need foreign partners for it, also because due to the sanctions western nations will not buy from Russia anyway even if the helicopter was much better than the existing alternatives.

    Probably with UAE they will do something similar to the SSJ100, where Russia sold away the right for the western market in the version with the foreign components.

    GarryB, kvs and Kiko like this post

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40438
    Points : 40938
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  GarryB Tue Nov 28, 2023 2:04 am

    With foreign engine and components it was never going to be a good deal for Russia, so splitting now is probably not so bad really.

    Hope they don't pull this sort of shit with the Checkmate though.

    kvs, Rodion_Romanovic, Kiko and TMA1 like this post

    JohninMK
    JohninMK


    Posts : 15577
    Points : 15718
    Join date : 2015-06-16
    Location : England

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  JohninMK Tue Dec 05, 2023 12:14 am

    Look at the shape! Did someone tell Sukhoi "you done good with the way you developed the Su-27, now scale it up into an airliner"

    Zlatti71
    @djuric_zlatko
    ✈ An image of a future supersonic airliner was presented in Russia for the first time

    The rendering was shown by the scientific director of the Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute, Sergei Chernyshev, during the aeronautics congress.

    Russia is now competing with the United States in creating a flight demonstrator of a civilian airliner, Chernyshev noted. If there is a lag, it is minimal.

    Source: geopolitics

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 GAh4XikWMAAbazD?format=jpg&name=small

    kvs, LMFS, Hole and Backman like this post

    Hole
    Hole


    Posts : 11099
    Points : 11077
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 48
    Location : Scholzistan

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  Hole Tue Dec 05, 2023 12:23 pm

    Wasn´t there a project to turn the Tu-160 into a passenger plane?

    GarryB likes this post

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40438
    Points : 40938
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  GarryB Wed Dec 06, 2023 6:14 am

    They should just design an aircraft to replace the Il-96. The Il-96 is way heavier than other more modern aircraft. For one just look at the landing gear:

    Having an extra set of landing gear improves performance on the runway and allows it to operate from a wider variety of airfields because the extra set of wheels spreads the weight of the aircraft and allows it to safely operate on concrete aprons that aircraft of the same weight with fewer wheels might crack and damage.

    Western airlines might turn their noses up at such features... as they did with cloak rooms in older soviet aircraft, but getting into a nice modern western airliner in a siberian airfield with no air stairs where you walk from the terminal to the aircraft in minus 20 degree Celsius temperatures and get to the plane which has no place to put your heavy coats so you sit and sweat for hours on your way to Moscow or whereever you happen to be going.

    The airline doesn't give a shit about its passengers, it just sees the extra dozen seats it could install if it got rid of that closet, but I am sure those passengers would be happy to pay more for the better comfort.

    An extra set of main wheels will improve landing performance on ice and snow covered runways too. The extra braking would matter.

    Look at the shape! Did someone tell Sukhoi "you done good with the way you developed the Su-27, now scale it up into an airliner"

    Aerodynamics hasn't changed at all, so a combination of the Tu-160 and Su-27 with the fact that it does not need to be able to fly at high angles of attack so the engines can go on top safe from FOD from the ground... it actually looks a lot like some early designs for amphibious supersonic bombers they were working on quite some time ago.

    Rodion_Romanovic, Hole and Kiko like this post


    Sponsored content


    Russian Civil Aviation: News #5 - Page 15 Empty Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #5

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Fri Nov 08, 2024 7:02 am