Russian-Israel relations

https://www.reuters.com

( 1 ) Joint banking system and full SCO membership for Iran , increased oil sales by Iran to China - yes .

( 2 ) Sa!e of Russian fighter Jets in exchange for Iranian drones / production in Russia and their use in defensive mode in Ukraine - yes .

( 3 ) Sale of Ukrainian grain in exchange for civilian goods by barter by Russia - yes .

( 4 ) Turkish cross border retaliatory strikes against Kurdish armed gangs crossing into Turkey - yes .

( 5 ) Turkish support for non - democratic separatist Turkish / other factions in Syria or cental Asia . No .

( 6 )  Non- sectarian joint  economic development plan for Caucasian region , respecting borders . Yes .

( 7 ) Permanent Turkish military bases of occupation of Iraq / Syria , where no Kurdish separatists exist . No .

( 8 ) Sale of Turkish weapons of drones to Ukraine , conditional to their use in Ukrainian territory and not Russian speaking regions . Yes .

( 9 ) Iran buying Ukraininan grain in barter trade or medical services . Yes .

( 10 ) ..........This is not the ten commandments !  LOL .

https://www.tasnimnews.com/en/news/2023/07/12/2924748/russian-envoy-summoned-over-statement-on-iran-s-trio-islands-in-persian-gulf


Looks like both China and Russia , see fit to reject Iranian national sovereignty over the trio PG islands . Even if these Islands and even Bahrain were part of Iran in documented cases . And even if there are no Arabs residing on these Islands ! Is it all diplomatic lubricant to land a few juicy contracts ? The calculation being that Iran is cornered by them and has no retaliatory options ? And they can carve- up Iran on a plate ? It is obvious that the PGCC statements are getting very serious about their false claims on these Islands ! Do they want to put foreign or American bases on them ? Looks likely .

Iran should teach these pesky PGCC upstarts a lesson and test China and Russia too , to see if these diplomatic moves are mere economic lubricants or if they have military and expansionist plans ? Iran can do this by launching skirmishes against all these PGCC f**cked up kingdoms , to teach them a lesson and let them find out , who comes to their aid ! Will China stand with them against Iran ? Or Russia ? If so then Iran needs a new path . What you think ?

Don't see at all why Russia is involving itself in any way in this dispute and at such a time too, when it is important for it to maintain diplomatic support from all the countries of the region.

Perhaps because the PG littoral states are big potential markets and likely candidates for military bases , and Russia / China think , that Iran under sanctions can be persuaded to part with it's territory . They may then think they can station troops on these Islands , since Iran will not allow stationing of  foreign troops on it's soil . Even America , under the Shah , never made demands against Iranian territorial integrity . I think that these statements are serious enough for Iran to take action against China and Russia . Any state in a strong monopolistic position , has the potential to act in an expansionist way , no exceptions . And for China / Russia to show their hands , so early on , in their relationship with Iran , is very revealing . I think in politics , even if you shake a man's hand , with one hand , you got to have him by the Balls , with the other ! And apply pressure , as and when needed . The retaliation against China and Russia ,should be proportional . Iran should find Islands that belong legally to China and Russia , with Chinese and Russian inhabitants on them , that are claimed unjustly by other states , and give diplomatic support to these states in their unjust claims on these Islands ! If Russia and China take further practical steps , military aid , with the aim of allowing capture of these Islands , then Iran should be in a position to fully  reciprocate . For China then Taiwan comes to mind , for Russia the Islands next to Japan ......

https://m.youtube.com/shorts/Q2muJHYfmEQ


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=s2RXVHCCces&pp=ygUPQ2F0IHNjYXJlcyBiZWFy


https://m.youtube.com/shorts/SYDPD0xBagA


https://www.scfr.ir/fa/400/153157/%d8%a7%d8%b2%d8%b3%d8%b1%da%af%db%8c%d8%b1%db%8c-%d9%85%d8%b0%d8%a7%da%a9%d8%b1%d8%a7%d8%aa%d8%9b-%d8%a8%d9%87%d8%aa%d8%b1%db%8c%d9%86-%d8%b1%d8%a7%d9%87-%d8%ad%d9%84-%d9%85%d9%86%d8%a7%d9%82%d8%b4/


Here Iran advising Russia to negotiate with Japan over it's territorial integrity over the Kuril Islands ! Iran developing better economic relations with Japan ! LOL .

Kremlin says more details needed in Netanyahu’s Middle East NATO plan

"Do we need confrontational mechanisms in the Middle East? Hardly," Dmitry Peskov noted

MOSCOW, July 25. /TASS/. Russian Presidential Spokesman Dmitry Peskov wants everyone to take a breath after hearing the idea voiced on Wednesday by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about creating a NATO-style military bloc in the Middle East, and not jump to any hasty conclusions.

"We need to understand where Mr. Netanyahu is coming from before jumping to any conclusions," Peskov told reporters when asked to comment on the Israeli prime minister's initiative.

"We must understand the details of this initiative: an alliance of which states [is supposed to be created]," the spokesman said. At the same time, he stressed that NATO "has a pronounced and systemic confrontational positioning." "NATO was initially created to deter the Soviet Union, moving on to deterring the Russian Federation, something it continues to do to this day," he pointed out.

"Do we need confrontational mechanisms in the Middle East? Hardly," the Kremlin spokesman added.

Earlier, Netanyahu, speaking at a joint session of the US Senate and House of Representatives, called for the creation of a security alliance in the Middle East similar to NATO in Europe.

https://tass.com/politics/1821243

Russian State Duma condemns Knesset’s position against Palestinian statehood

https://tass.com/politics/1821217