seems most agree that
setting up a high volume CPU fab to reach "commercial" volumes re 28nm or 14nm
is not only out of Russia's technical reach right now
but is also stupendously expensive .... and very time consuming
and only by selling your products at global volumes can you recoup your capital investment
and that isn't going to happen for political reasons
Russia will therefore never recoup its capital investment
and therefore the decision to do so will be 100% strategic not commercial
it is also generally agreed that 28nm and its closely related spawn 12-14nm are more than enough for Russia's needs
28nm ok for desktop units .... 12-14nm ok for mobile units
it is also agreed that Elbrus and Baikal have designed pretty good chips in both sizes
so we end up with the conclusion that producing 28nm size CPUs on less than "ideal" for commercial volumes tech
is the best current option ....
it will be relatively slow production but its only option for Russia anyway
but it would keep Baikal and Elbrus developments active
now we are debating/discussing whether this "less than ideal" production process is possible inside Russia right now ?
does seem they are close ? but the jury is out ....
meanwhile in a lot of areas "older" 90nm stuff is perfectly fine for space. military and wherever you need a robust chip
in fact it is the best option ...
so we are really talking about servers, desktops and mobile equipment re 28nm and 12-14nm
everyone seems to agree you can bring in more than enough "older" CPUs via the grey market to keep your
servers etc going ..... despite being full of potential "holes" planted by the NSA ?
but by using your own Linux based OS's and encryption you can get around this ? ....
and also keep them well cooled and don't overclock them to extend their life beyond the "warranty period"
so I seem to end up with the conclusion
that we are really on about keeping Russian CPU design alive via low volume "non-ideal" production methods
to keep Baikal, Elbrus and Skif etc developments in 28, 12-14 nm alive ?
which is strategically important ... re braindrain effect
and getting those processors into equipment used by govt and key industries
is also strategically important
yes. I've added nothing new .... just thinking aloud ....