The Situation in the Ukraine. #11

I've been flaming the Ukro-nazi trolls on You-Tube (again) and I though that forum members might enjoy the screed...


Low brow propaganda, made by Amerikanz and Ukro-nazis, for Amerikanz and ukro-nazis...

Of course Russia is involved in helping the DPR/LPR defend themselves against Ukro-nazi aggression. These untermensch from Lvov had always intended to pursue a progom against the Russian-speaking peoples of the East and South. Both Dimitry Yarrosh and Igor Kolomoiski were openly talking about the upcoming war only days after the coup, and this was BEFORE Crimea seceeded and the Odessa massacre by Right Sector thugs.

You reich-wing Amerikanz and your Ukro-nazi goons are simply pathetic. Your endless hatred of Russia is absurd and misplaced. The country is a capitalistic democratic multi-national nation that accepts international institutions and respects (legitimate) private ownership. Putin is popular, uncorrupt and moderate (this IS the truth despite the lies and agitprop that spews from US corporate-controlled elite-owned media organs) . US-Russian relations are breaking down, not because of "Russian aggression" but due to endless neo-con inspired geo-political aggression aimed at forcing Russia to be subservient to US wishes and accepting its allocated place as a dog beneath the US table. The neo-con inspired PNAC (Project for a New American Century) is not dead, but its been adopted covertly and all US Presidents from Clinton to Obongo are following the script.

The US encouraged the corrupt Yeltsin to allow Oligarchs to asset-strip the nation and stash their cash in Western banks and invest in new York & London real estate (thus helping asset price inflation to benefit the 1%) and proceeded with de-centralizing power to the regions as part of the plan to de-stabilize and eventually fragment Russia. Madeline Albright has stated on numerous occasions that Russia should be "broken up" into three separate nations (European Russia west of Urals, Central Siberia and the far East) in order to "become more democratic" (WTF?) and to "better intergrate into the global economy and financial order" (WTF x2?). Outrageous statements, yet the US political elite don't see the problem as they believe its their doG-given right to interfere with and dominate others....

The US (beginning with Clinton) betrayed the promises to Gorbachev and are intent on expanding NATO to Russias border. They have conducted numerous colour revolutions in places like Georgia, Ukraine & Kyrgyzstan as part of their agenda, and attempted the same in Belarus. They have sponsored the worst Russophobic elements in those countries to project threats around the Russian periphery and upset Russia's efforts at regional cooperation. They have encouraged military aggression by Georgia in 2008 (as witnessed and reported by the OSCE) and have supported via their Saudi-proxies the terrorist Wahabbist movements in the Russian Caucasus (eg Chechnya), while simultaneously castigating Russia over its response to such terrorist movements.

The US has unilaterally abandoned the ABM treaty and strong-armed the Europeans to accept US ABM systems in Europe in their quest for nuclear primacy (as well as seaborne radars in the Far East). They have attempted to use the excuse of non-existent Iranian missiles and nukes to justify this, yet it is clear that the real reason is to diminish Russia & China's capabilities in a limited exchange scenario.

Witness also the small minded petty attacks on Russia's reputation by US and its elite-owned media houses. US media gave massive exposure to the Pussy Riot feminist anarchist collective (when such behaviour would be roundly condemned were it to happen in the US), engaged in a widespread smear campaign against the Sochi Winter Olympics (cries of "corruption" and fake stories about poor facilities), and politicised the child-protection laws as an "anti-gay" pogrom. Couple this with the eternal effort at unfairly presenting Russia as a undemocratic police state run by kleptocrats with no free media or independent judiciary and you have a classic example of a deliberate broad-based agitprop program.

Finally, the Neo-cons were enraged that their plans to attack Syria and overthrow the Assad government were foiled by Putin's diplomacy, and now want both revenge and to force Moscow to pull its support for Syria to enable future US plots to unfold. What better way than to continue and intensify their efforts to subvert Ukraine? They covet Ukraine and wish to turn it into a repeat of revanchist-run Poland, and have sponsored the worst of the Western Ukrainian ultra-nationalists and neo-nazi ratbags to this effect. despite popular agitprop, Russia did NOT pressure Yanukovich over the Association Agreement - Yanukovich balked when the detailed proposal made clear that Ukraine was required to sacrifice much of its trade with Russia, yet was not compensated for its losses (estimated to be >$100B). Ukraine needed cash, but the agreement offered nothing. Russia agreed to stump up cash, yet THIS is derided by the EU/US as "interference"????

Peaceful protests by disappointed citizens was soon replaced by organised violence by radical groups who engaged in widespread street fighting with riot police and occupation of public buildings, yet the collective West remained fixated on disparaging the target government. USGov figures like John McCain and Victoria "Feck the EU" Nudelman (Nuland) showed clear public US support to these violent extremist groups. Were such behavior to be seen on US streets, supported openly by Russian or Chinese officials, who can doubt that the USGov response would be a Ferguson-style show of force with extensive use of firearms and multiple fatalities, and condemnation of foreign involvement? When the Ukr government finally buckled and signed a EU-"negotiated" settlement, mystery snipers opened the way to the final stage of the coup, and the new regime included openly neo-nazis and nationalist extremists in key positions in the new power structure.

The new regime openly prepared for a confrontation with the supporters of the old government. Right Sector thugs openly murdered dozens of anti-regime activists in Odessa while the Western world simply looked away and our media presented the most banal sanitized version of events that they could get away with (consider if the victims were Jews killed by Islamist radicals - how would the coverage have differed?). Crimeans had seen enough and decided to enhance their constitutional autonomy and outrightly secede. Russia was asked to provide security in the form of "little green men" to prevent regime-stooges like Right Sector thugs or (dis)loyal elements of the Ukr military from interfering while the break was made and the Crimean public consulted to approve the move. With overwhelming support, Crimea formally seceded and rejoined the Russian Federation.

This result was a RESOUNDING defeat for both the coup regime and the neo-con plotters who had long fantasized about evicting Russia from her centuries-long presence at the Crimean naval bases, and for installing NATO forces to threaten Russia's southern underbelly. Their rage was palpable... Nuland was positively crimson with apoplexy as she saw her dreams starting to go up in smoke...

Simultaneously, the supporters of the overthrown government began to rebel against the coup. Oblasts such as Dnepropetrovsk and Kharkov were quickly overtaken by supporters of the coup regime, but Donbass was staunchly pro-Yanukovich and was most distant from Kiev, and had long borders with Russia. Loyalists were able to prevent the takeover by local regime-goons and began to prepare for the inevitable assault. It is noticeable that the regime did not even attempt to neogtiate with Donbass, but immediately sought a military solution, which the US/EU readily approved of. Did Russia provide assistance? Of course they did, but given what was happening, they acted correctly. Kiev was launching a punitive attack to crush the most visible symbol of resistance to the regime, and they had the FULL support of the US and their EU lackies.

Consider the hypocracy of the US/EU view in this regard, In Kosovo, when the US/UK was covertly supporting a known criminal militant organisation the KLA/UCK (funded with the proceeds of heroin trade and prostitution rings into southern Europe), the US/EU roundly CONDEMNED Serbian government efforts at combating the insurgents, and demanded Serbia negotiate. In 18 months of counter-terrorism fighting, only 1,200 fatalities resulted (from both sides), yet for US/EU warmongers this was sufficient to justify an all-out air-assault by NATO forces against the Serbian nation. By contrast, 3000 dead in just 6 months of Kievs unprovoked military assault was ignored by US/EU, who instead condemned Russia's efforts at helping Donbass in their defense.

The rest is history. Kiev regular military refused to fight, and their commanders were replaced with regime-stooges, but still they proved inadequate. A new National Guard was formed, and together with 'volunteer battalions" (ie paid mercenary units) full of ultra-nationalists, the assault escalated and received praise in Western media with glowing reports from the frontlines. MH17 was shotdown and Russia immediately blamed before any investigations could be performed, and the regime spewed forth its shoddy and easily-debunked agitprop to blame its enemies. Russian denials were universally treated with contempt in yet another appalling display of MSM acquiescence to the US/EU agenda.

On the battlefield however, events don't follow the mad scribbling of paid media hacks, and Ukie command incompetence doomed the regimes efforts as across the front, Ukro-Wermacht units were being smashed and contained in multiple cauldrons, and were slowly ground into meat paste. On the disaster at Illoviask and the inevitable collapse of the offensive, stories were fabricated about "Russian Invasion" yet for all of the US much-vaunted spy satellite technology, they produced ZERO EVIDENCE to back up their claims.

A ceasefire was hurriedly called to allow the Ukies to regroup, but when they lost control of the Donetsk airport they launched their assault, but it was pushed back within days and the DPR/LPR struck back, sealing the salient at Debaltseve and inflicting another crushing defeat on the Ukro-Wermacht, and inspiring yet more unsubstantiated stories of "Russian Invasion".

Russia-hating trollz on this site can scream and cry and throw an infantile tantrum as much as they want BUT THAT CANNOT CHANGE THE FACTS. The coup regime and the Poroshenko "make-over" is DOOMED. Russia has ensured that they cannot crush their enemies by military force, and the ongoing collapse of the Ukrainian economy will destroy any support they may have with the Ukrainian voting public. Yanukovich's government may have been corrupt (as are ALL governments in a country owned and controlled by a handful of selfish greedy oligarchs), but the nations economc & financial meltdown and sheer incompetence of the Kiev regime, it's divisive nationalist screed, it's oppression and repression of Russian speaking ethnic groups and its bloody-minded insistence in a military solution leading to mass military conscription and widespread draft-dodging by a war-weary public will lead to this regimes complete downfall.

Congratulations to Russia!! You have regained Crimea, defeated the neo-nazis, frustrated the like of McCain and Nudelman, and demonstrated clearly to the Chinese ruling elite the deep depravity of US foreign policy and the despicable depths to which these soulless greedy people will descend in order to promote global US hegemony and preserve their uni-polar order.

Three cheers for Putin!!! Three cheers for Russia!! Three cheers for Novorossiya!!

Breedlove?

More like Fuckhate...

This character is a certifiable psychopath and habitual liar who possesses not a scrap of personal integrity or conscience... in other words, he is a perfect choice to run the HATO global terrorist organisation.