With Sukhoi fully loaded for years ahead, Mikoyan may be the only option for foreign air forces to buy low priced (due to the low ruble) Russian fighters for shortish term delivery.sepheronx wrote:Militarov wrote:sepheronx wrote:might be ideal if they get the companies to compete as it may give Russian MoD a better deal + sukhoi may come up with something better.
Although, Mikoyan hopefully gets some deals as they need it.
Thing is that Mikoyan is in deep s.hit, even this Russian MiG29SMT order was to help them keep afloat, except those MiG29Ks they havent got decent order in....decades. Unless they soon get some good solid money for project or good amount of orders they might disappear O.o
I thought the sale of the MiG-29K's and those SMT upgrades and UPG made them a lot financially more stable than before?
I bet they will save Mikoyan by ordering the MiG-35's and give further upgrade orders. They wont let Mikoyan stop existing since it is quite important.
+98
Cheetah
miketheterrible
A1RMAN
kopyo-21
pushkin
Viktor
OminousSpudd
eridan
Pincus Shain
ahmedfire
User 1592
HM1199
DerWolf
Singular_trafo
KiloGolf
auslander
william.boutros
Luq man
mack8
hoom
Rmf
Genjurooo
SeigSoloyvov
Redboy
tanino
Project Canada
triphosgene
KoTeMoRe
jaguar_br
Zivo
BKP
AK-Rex
Neutrality
Big_Gazza
artjomh
Sunbeam
Firebird
Vann7
Akula971
Isos
zg18
RTN
ult
Kimppis
x_54_u43
vultur
Hachimoto
TheArmenian
Berkut
JohninMK
marcellogo
Austin
Glyph
Mindstorm
VladimirSahin
GJ Flanker
mutantsushi
Pinto
havok
Mike E
kvs
par far
Cyrus the great
PapaDragon
chicken
max steel
Captain Nemo
Notio
franco
nemrod
magnumcromagnon
Cyberspec
Manov
2SPOOKY4U
Kyo
Morpheus Eberhardt
zepia
medo
Book.
GunshipDemocracy
Svyatoslavich
Flanky
wilhelm
Ranxerox71
collegeboy16
higurashihougi
George1
EKS
Stealthflanker
AlfaT8
Werewolf
victor1985
jhelb
flamming_python
GarryB
sepheronx
Alex555
type055
102 posters
PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
JohninMK- Posts : 15577
Points : 15718
Join date : 2015-06-16
Location : England
- Post n°601
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
ult- Posts : 837
Points : 877
Join date : 2015-02-20
- Post n°602
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
JohninMK wrote:
With Sukhoi fully loaded for years ahead, Mikoyan may be the only option for foreign air forces to buy low priced (due to the low ruble) Russian fighters for shortish term delivery.
Export versions cost the same. The value of ruble doesn't give any advantages to the foreign buyers.
Berkut- Posts : 190
Points : 215
Join date : 2015-05-05
- Post n°603
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
How about this radical idea - lets get back on topic. MiG =/= Sukhoi T-50 last i checked.
Slide from February 2014;
Top speed tested with open bays is only 800km/h (even Su-47 went supersonic with open bays, why are they screwing around) and top speed achieved overall is M1.7. What is 1000km/h though? - "supercruise" speed? I hope not...
Had 17 contacts with "Il-76" (obviously Il-78) tanker and 3 fuel transfers. RCS goals achieved and maneuverability past forth generation, probably meaning Su-27 in this case, not Su-35S and Su-30MKI/SM family.
Slide from February 2014;
Top speed tested with open bays is only 800km/h (even Su-47 went supersonic with open bays, why are they screwing around) and top speed achieved overall is M1.7. What is 1000km/h though? - "supercruise" speed? I hope not...
Had 17 contacts with "Il-76" (obviously Il-78) tanker and 3 fuel transfers. RCS goals achieved and maneuverability past forth generation, probably meaning Su-27 in this case, not Su-35S and Su-30MKI/SM family.
Werewolf- Posts : 5926
Points : 6115
Join date : 2012-10-24
- Post n°604
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
Never believe such figures.
Berkut- Posts : 190
Points : 215
Join date : 2015-05-05
- Post n°605
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
lolk.Werewolf wrote:Never believe such figures.
Please share your no doubt accurate data - i am sure it will be more accurate than a slide for MoD...
mack8- Posts : 1039
Points : 1093
Join date : 2013-08-02
- Post n°606
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
Thanks Berkut, also wonder what the blurry pics hide. Would the 800 and 1000km/h figures be IAS? They don't kiss up with M1.7 do they?
Zivo- Posts : 1487
Points : 1511
Join date : 2012-04-13
Location : U.S.A.
- Post n°607
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
Berkut wrote:How about this radical idea - lets get back on topic. MiG =/= Sukhoi T-50 last i checked.
Slide from February 2014;
Top speed tested with open bays is only 800km/h (even Su-47 went supersonic with open bays, why are they screwing around) and top speed achieved overall is M1.7. What is 1000km/h though? - "supercruise" speed? I hope not...
Had 17 contacts with "Il-76" (obviously Il-78) tanker and 3 fuel transfers. RCS goals achieved and maneuverability past forth generation, probably meaning Su-27 in this case, not Su-35S and Su-30MKI/SM family.
Werewolf wrote:Never believe such figures.
Slide from February 2014;
Top speed tested
PapaDragon- Posts : 13456
Points : 13496
Join date : 2015-04-26
Location : Fort Evil, Serbia
- Post n°608
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
^^^ Yup, 2 years ago. It would be weird if they designed aircraft that is inferior from the get-go to model from the 80's.
I would definitely like to see current numbers though...
I know, fat chance....
Werewolf- Posts : 5926
Points : 6115
Join date : 2012-10-24
- Post n°609
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
Berkut wrote:lolk.Werewolf wrote:Never believe such figures.
Please share your no doubt accurate data - i am sure it will be more accurate than a slide for MoD...
Information passed by MoD or developer themselfs are always wrong for security reasons. They are all classified to high degree especially when such parameters and data are crucial for tactics. Remember the information NII Stali gave out about M829A2 can penetrate T-72B at 6km range equipped with Kontakt5? Well if that would be true they certainly would never ever be allowed or stupid enough to give such crucial information out and would smother any informations that could leak such "facts". Information are given out either as advertizement, missinformation, or rough figure if they are bound to some specifications.
I am sure that is something that everyone can understand.
x_54_u43- Posts : 336
Points : 348
Join date : 2015-09-19
- Post n°610
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
Even if it is from the "insider", I rather doubt this is real, or just simply very washed and sanitized numbers.
It is not that hard to create info-graphics.
It is not that hard to create info-graphics.
Berkut- Posts : 190
Points : 215
Join date : 2015-05-05
- Post n°611
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
Oh you people. Always something original to say...
Werewolf- Posts : 5926
Points : 6115
Join date : 2012-10-24
- Post n°612
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
Berkut wrote:Oh you people. Always something original to say...
Guilebility won't make you more educated on anything like that.
Tests are tests and tested in restricted regimes to start with low intensity to test everything before moving on to intense and hard tests to push it to its limits, figures from several years in still low test phases won't give you anything worth discussing or believing in its capabilities or limitations.
Morpheus Eberhardt- Posts : 1925
Points : 2032
Join date : 2013-05-20
- Post n°613
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
Berkut wrote:Oh you people. Always something original to say...
Being original is very good; being gullible is very bad.
Don't have time to repeat stuff hear. Go to to the threads on Status-6, or Armata, or ... and look at my comments on this kind of matter; that may give you an idea about the nature of "slides for the MoD".
OminousSpudd- Posts : 942
Points : 947
Join date : 2015-01-03
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°614
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
Berkut, ever the edgy one.
artjomh- Posts : 150
Points : 184
Join date : 2015-07-17
- Post n°615
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
Werewolf wrote:Berkut wrote:Oh you people. Always something original to say...
Guilebility won't make you more educated on anything like that.
Neither will wishful thinking.
Zivo- Posts : 1487
Points : 1511
Join date : 2012-04-13
Location : U.S.A.
- Post n°616
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
How many flights have occurred since Feb 2014?
Berkut- Posts : 190
Points : 215
Join date : 2015-05-05
- Post n°617
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
They are at between 800-900 in total now. So 400-500 more since then.
Lemme see, what should i pick between;
a - Actual slide used for MoD presentation on the progress of the T-50 testing.
b - Random internet dudes claiming with no reason and no proof whatsoever that the slide and the info is fake despite evidence suggesting it clearly is not. Probably the same people that goggled up the "scanner leaks".
Hmm. Damn, really difficult pick this one.
Lemme see, what should i pick between;
a - Actual slide used for MoD presentation on the progress of the T-50 testing.
b - Random internet dudes claiming with no reason and no proof whatsoever that the slide and the info is fake despite evidence suggesting it clearly is not. Probably the same people that goggled up the "scanner leaks".
Hmm. Damn, really difficult pick this one.
Werewolf- Posts : 5926
Points : 6115
Join date : 2012-10-24
- Post n°618
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
Berkut wrote:They are at between 800-900 in total now. So 400-500 more since then.
Lemme see, what should i pick between;
a - Actual slide used for MoD presentation on the progress of the T-50 testing.
b - Random internet dudes claiming with no reason and no proof whatsoever that the slide and the info is fake despite evidence suggesting it clearly is not. Probably the same people that goggled up the "scanner leaks".
Hmm. Damn, really difficult pick this one.
You are just another random dude on the internet that posts info graphs and hails them as something more than they are.
Scepticism is what is always needed when it comes to politics, economy, history and military information, but you can of course believe in pure colours without shades or grey areas it is totally up to you.
Zivo- Posts : 1487
Points : 1511
Join date : 2012-04-13
Location : U.S.A.
- Post n°619
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
It just seems irrelevant to debate, given the age.
x_54_u43- Posts : 336
Points : 348
Join date : 2015-09-19
- Post n°620
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
There's been an another leak, lets see what we can glean from this, thank goodness it is in English...
Big_Gazza- Posts : 4851
Points : 4841
Join date : 2014-08-25
Location : Melbourne, Australia
- Post n°621
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
x_54_u43 wrote:There's been an another leak, lets see what we can glean from this, thank goodness it is in English...
Not sure if this childish crap is supposed to be funny...
max steel- Posts : 2930
Points : 2955
Join date : 2015-02-12
Location : South Pole
- Post n°622
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
Big_Gazza wrote:x_54_u43 wrote:There's been an another leak, lets see what we can glean from this, thank goodness it is in English...
Not sure if this childish crap is supposed to be funny...
+1. I agree with Berkut.
Berkut- Posts : 190
Points : 215
Join date : 2015-05-05
- Post n°623
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
Zivo wrote:It just seems irrelevant to debate, given the age.
Not necessary to have a debate at all - it is just an interesting snapshot into timeline of testing at a particular time, even if 2 years old. But alright - i will now to keep in mind to post only information and pictures that are no older than 1 hour in this thread. IE never post anything ever, i am sure others will be able to pull the slack.
Werewolf- Posts : 5926
Points : 6115
Join date : 2012-10-24
- Post n°624
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
Seems more like people are surrounded by yes men to often and as soon as someone disaggrees they act like someone is touching them inappropriate.
Berkut- Posts : 190
Points : 215
Join date : 2015-05-05
- Post n°625
Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3
Werewolf wrote:Seems more like people are surrounded by yes men to often and as soon as someone disaggrees they act like someone is touching them inappropriate.
You are disagreeing on straight out moronic grounds and you have yet to prove in any shape, form, or way, that the picture and info is tampered with. Burden of proof is on YOUR side.