Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+98
Cheetah
miketheterrible
A1RMAN
kopyo-21
pushkin
Viktor
OminousSpudd
eridan
Pincus Shain
ahmedfire
User 1592
HM1199
DerWolf
Singular_trafo
KiloGolf
auslander
william.boutros
Luq man
mack8
hoom
Rmf
Genjurooo
SeigSoloyvov
Redboy
tanino
Project Canada
triphosgene
KoTeMoRe
jaguar_br
Zivo
BKP
AK-Rex
Neutrality
Big_Gazza
artjomh
Sunbeam
Firebird
Vann7
Akula971
Isos
zg18
RTN
ult
Kimppis
x_54_u43
vultur
Hachimoto
TheArmenian
Berkut
JohninMK
marcellogo
Austin
Glyph
Mindstorm
VladimirSahin
GJ Flanker
mutantsushi
Pinto
havok
Mike E
kvs
par far
Cyrus the great
PapaDragon
chicken
max steel
Captain Nemo
Notio
franco
nemrod
magnumcromagnon
Cyberspec
Manov
2SPOOKY4U
Kyo
Morpheus Eberhardt
zepia
medo
Book.
GunshipDemocracy
Svyatoslavich
Flanky
wilhelm
Ranxerox71
collegeboy16
higurashihougi
George1
EKS
Stealthflanker
AlfaT8
Werewolf
victor1985
jhelb
flamming_python
GarryB
sepheronx
Alex555
type055
102 posters

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    JohninMK
    JohninMK


    Posts : 15654
    Points : 15795
    Join date : 2015-06-16
    Location : England

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  JohninMK Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:26 pm

    sepheronx wrote:
    Militarov wrote:
    sepheronx wrote:might be ideal if they get the companies to compete as it may give Russian MoD a better deal + sukhoi may come up with something better.

    Although, Mikoyan hopefully gets some deals as they need it.

    Thing is that Mikoyan is in deep s.hit, even this Russian MiG29SMT order was to help them keep afloat, except those MiG29Ks they havent got decent order in....decades. Unless they soon get some good solid money for project or good amount of orders they might disappear O.o

    I thought the sale of the MiG-29K's and those SMT upgrades and UPG made them a lot financially more stable than before?

    I bet they will save Mikoyan by ordering the MiG-35's and give further upgrade orders.  They wont let Mikoyan stop existing since it is quite important.
    With Sukhoi fully loaded for years ahead, Mikoyan may be the only option for foreign air forces to buy low priced (due to the low ruble) Russian fighters for shortish term delivery.
    avatar
    ult


    Posts : 837
    Points : 877
    Join date : 2015-02-20

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  ult Sat Jan 16, 2016 1:19 pm

    JohninMK wrote:
    With Sukhoi fully loaded for years ahead, Mikoyan may be the only option for foreign air forces to buy low priced (due to the low ruble) Russian fighters for shortish term delivery.

    Export versions cost the same. The value of ruble doesn't give any advantages to the foreign buyers. tongue
    Berkut
    Berkut


    Posts : 190
    Points : 215
    Join date : 2015-05-05

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  Berkut Sat Jan 16, 2016 4:00 pm

    How about this radical idea - lets get back on topic. MiG =/= Sukhoi T-50 last i checked.

    Slide from February 2014;

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 145290551985608682

    Top speed tested with open bays is only 800km/h (even Su-47 went supersonic with open bays, why are they screwing around) and top speed achieved overall is M1.7. What is 1000km/h though? - "supercruise" speed? I hope not...

    Had 17 contacts with "Il-76" (obviously Il-78) tanker and 3 fuel transfers. RCS goals achieved and maneuverability past forth generation, probably meaning Su-27 in this case, not Su-35S and Su-30MKI/SM family.
    Werewolf
    Werewolf


    Posts : 5931
    Points : 6120
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  Werewolf Sat Jan 16, 2016 4:24 pm

    Never believe such figures.
    Berkut
    Berkut


    Posts : 190
    Points : 215
    Join date : 2015-05-05

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  Berkut Sat Jan 16, 2016 4:52 pm

    Werewolf wrote:Never believe such figures.
    lolk.

    Please share your no doubt accurate data - i am sure it will be more accurate than a slide for MoD...
    mack8
    mack8


    Posts : 1039
    Points : 1093
    Join date : 2013-08-02

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  mack8 Sat Jan 16, 2016 5:32 pm

    Thanks Berkut, also wonder what the blurry pics hide. Would the 800 and 1000km/h figures be IAS? They don't kiss up with M1.7 do they?
    Zivo
    Zivo


    Posts : 1487
    Points : 1511
    Join date : 2012-04-13
    Location : U.S.A.

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  Zivo Sat Jan 16, 2016 8:52 pm

    Berkut wrote:How about this radical idea - lets get back on topic. MiG =/= Sukhoi T-50 last i checked.

    Slide from February 2014;

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 145290551985608682

    Top speed tested with open bays is only 800km/h (even Su-47 went supersonic with open bays, why are they screwing around) and top speed achieved overall is M1.7. What is 1000km/h though? - "supercruise" speed? I hope not...

    Had 17 contacts with "Il-76" (obviously Il-78) tanker and 3 fuel transfers. RCS goals achieved and maneuverability past forth generation, probably meaning Su-27 in this case, not Su-35S and Su-30MKI/SM family.


    Werewolf wrote:Never believe such figures.


    Slide from February 2014;

    Top speed tested
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon


    Posts : 13474
    Points : 13514
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  PapaDragon Sat Jan 16, 2016 9:41 pm


    ^^^ Yup, 2 years ago. It would be weird if they designed aircraft that is inferior from the get-go to model from the 80's.

    I would definitely like to see current numbers though... Cool

    I know, fat chance.... lol1
    Werewolf
    Werewolf


    Posts : 5931
    Points : 6120
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  Werewolf Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:28 pm

    Berkut wrote:
    Werewolf wrote:Never believe such figures.
    lolk.

    Please share your no doubt accurate data - i am sure it will be more accurate than a slide for MoD...

    Information passed by MoD or developer themselfs are always wrong for security reasons. They are all classified to high degree especially when such parameters and data are crucial for tactics. Remember the information NII Stali gave out about M829A2 can penetrate T-72B at 6km range equipped with Kontakt5? Well if that would be true they certainly would never ever be allowed or stupid enough to give such crucial information out and would smother any informations that could leak such "facts". Information are given out either as advertizement, missinformation, or rough figure if they are bound to some specifications.

    I am sure that is something that everyone can understand.
    x_54_u43
    x_54_u43


    Posts : 336
    Points : 348
    Join date : 2015-09-19

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  x_54_u43 Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:53 pm

    Even if it is from the "insider", I rather doubt this is real, or just simply very washed and sanitized numbers.

    It is not that hard to create info-graphics.
    Berkut
    Berkut


    Posts : 190
    Points : 215
    Join date : 2015-05-05

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  Berkut Sat Jan 16, 2016 11:28 pm

    Oh you people. Always something original to say...
    Werewolf
    Werewolf


    Posts : 5931
    Points : 6120
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  Werewolf Sat Jan 16, 2016 11:32 pm

    Berkut wrote:Oh you people. Always something original to say...

    Guilebility won't make you more educated on anything like that.

    Tests are tests and tested in restricted regimes to start with low intensity to test everything before moving on to intense and hard tests to push it to its limits, figures from several years in still low test phases won't give you anything worth discussing or believing in its capabilities or limitations.
    Morpheus Eberhardt
    Morpheus Eberhardt


    Posts : 1925
    Points : 2032
    Join date : 2013-05-20

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  Morpheus Eberhardt Sun Jan 17, 2016 12:10 am

    Berkut wrote:Oh you people. Always something original to say...

    Being original is very good; being gullible is very bad.

    Don't have time to repeat stuff hear. Go to to the threads on Status-6, or Armata, or ... and look at my comments on this kind of matter; that may give you an idea about the nature of "slides for the MoD".
    OminousSpudd
    OminousSpudd


    Posts : 942
    Points : 947
    Join date : 2015-01-03
    Location : New Zealand

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  OminousSpudd Sun Jan 17, 2016 12:52 am

    Berkut, ever the edgy one.
    artjomh
    artjomh


    Posts : 150
    Points : 184
    Join date : 2015-07-17

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  artjomh Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:02 am

    Werewolf wrote:
    Berkut wrote:Oh you people. Always something original to say...

    Guilebility won't make you more educated on anything like that.

    Neither will wishful thinking.
    Zivo
    Zivo


    Posts : 1487
    Points : 1511
    Join date : 2012-04-13
    Location : U.S.A.

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  Zivo Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:11 am

    How many flights have occurred since Feb 2014?
    Berkut
    Berkut


    Posts : 190
    Points : 215
    Join date : 2015-05-05

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  Berkut Sun Jan 17, 2016 2:12 am

    They are at between 800-900 in total now. So 400-500 more since then.

    Lemme see, what should i pick between;

    a - Actual slide used for MoD presentation on the progress of the T-50 testing.

    b - Random internet dudes claiming with no reason and no proof whatsoever that the slide and the info is fake despite evidence suggesting it clearly is not. Probably the same people that goggled up the "scanner leaks".

    Hmm. Damn, really difficult pick this one. dunno
    Werewolf
    Werewolf


    Posts : 5931
    Points : 6120
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  Werewolf Sun Jan 17, 2016 2:28 am

    Berkut wrote:They are at between 800-900 in total now. So 400-500 more since then.

    Lemme see, what should i pick between;

    a - Actual slide used for MoD presentation on the progress of the T-50 testing.

    b - Random internet dudes claiming with no reason and no proof whatsoever that the slide and the info is fake despite evidence suggesting it clearly is not. Probably the same people that goggled up the "scanner leaks".

    Hmm. Damn, really difficult pick this one. dunno

    You are just another random dude on the internet that posts info graphs and hails them as something more than they are.

    Scepticism is what is always needed when it comes to politics, economy, history and military information, but you can of course believe in pure colours without shades or grey areas it is totally up to you.
    Zivo
    Zivo


    Posts : 1487
    Points : 1511
    Join date : 2012-04-13
    Location : U.S.A.

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  Zivo Sun Jan 17, 2016 2:39 am

    It just seems irrelevant to debate, given the age.
    x_54_u43
    x_54_u43


    Posts : 336
    Points : 348
    Join date : 2015-09-19

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  x_54_u43 Sun Jan 17, 2016 8:45 am

    There's been an another leak, lets see what we can glean from this, thank goodness it is in English...

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Screen11
    Big_Gazza
    Big_Gazza


    Posts : 4901
    Points : 4891
    Join date : 2014-08-25
    Location : Melbourne, Australia

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  Big_Gazza Sun Jan 17, 2016 2:16 pm

    x_54_u43 wrote:There's been an another leak, lets see what we can glean from this, thank goodness it is in English...

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Screen11

    Not sure if this childish crap is supposed to be funny...
    max steel
    max steel


    Posts : 2930
    Points : 2955
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  max steel Sun Jan 17, 2016 4:40 pm

    Big_Gazza wrote:
    x_54_u43 wrote:There's been an another leak, lets see what we can glean from this, thank goodness it is in English...

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Screen11

    Not sure if this childish crap is supposed to be funny...  

    +1. I agree with Berkut.
    Berkut
    Berkut


    Posts : 190
    Points : 215
    Join date : 2015-05-05

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  Berkut Sun Jan 17, 2016 7:19 pm

    Zivo wrote:It just seems irrelevant to debate, given the age.

    Not necessary to have a debate at all - it is just an interesting snapshot into timeline of testing at a particular time, even if 2 years old. But alright - i will now to keep in mind to post only information and pictures that are no older than 1 hour in this thread. IE never post anything ever, i am sure others will be able to pull the slack. Rolling Eyes thumbsup
    Werewolf
    Werewolf


    Posts : 5931
    Points : 6120
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  Werewolf Sun Jan 17, 2016 7:32 pm

    Seems more like people are surrounded by yes men to often and as soon as someone disaggrees they act like someone is touching them inappropriate.
    Berkut
    Berkut


    Posts : 190
    Points : 215
    Join date : 2015-05-05

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  Berkut Sun Jan 17, 2016 9:09 pm

    Werewolf wrote:Seems more like people are surrounded by yes men to often and as soon as someone disaggrees they act like someone is touching them inappropriate.

    You are disagreeing on straight out moronic grounds and you have yet to prove in any shape, form, or way, that the picture and info is tampered with. Burden of proof is on YOUR side.

    Sponsored content


    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 25 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Fri Nov 22, 2024 11:00 pm