Vann7 wrote:For example the Governor/PM of lugansk is a Jew
Who? Moskal or Plonitsiky?
Vann7 wrote:For example the Governor/PM of lugansk is a Jew
JohninMK wrote:All good when viewed from Kiev
KIEV (Sputnik) – The number of government troops deployed in the conflict zone in eastern Ukraine has reached 60,000 servicemen, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko said Friday. "We have increased the number of our troops in the zone of special anti-terrorism operation to 60,000 servicemen," Poroshenko said in an interview with the Inter television. Poroshenko stressed that the Ukrainian authorities have made strong efforts to arm the units with new or repaired military equipment, to train the personnel in line with Western experience, and to improve logistics and financial support of Ukrainian soldiers.
Read more: http://sputniknews.com/europe/20150626/1023899047.html#ixzz3eByByIdV
Flagship Victory wrote:Pfffft, 60,000 soldiers is nothing to brag about. Syria has what? 200,000 soldiers. Poro lies so much no one believes a word from his foul mouth
ExBeobachter1987 wrote:Flagship Victory wrote:Pfffft, 60,000 soldiers is nothing to brag about. Syria has what? 200,000 soldiers. Poro lies so much no one believes a word from his foul mouth
Donbass is much smaller than Syria. 60,000 soldiers is sufficient to keep Novorossiya from expanding.
Khepesh wrote:In Budyonovsky they say they can hear bombardment in the distance. In that part of Donetsk they should not be able to hear any bombardment unless it is heavy artillery, Pion, maybe Msta, in battery fire, and certainly not mere mortars. Also fighting reported north of Krasny Partizan. Another weekend of ukrops deadly trolling I guess...
auslander wrote:Khepesh wrote:"kotych" retracted his post about Shirokino and apologised for being too hasty.
I still think 5-6 weeks before war, but will not be surprised if it happens any day now and could even be the result of something unplanned, war is full of unexpected surprises.
I agree, one can feel the building pressure, every day the bombardments are a little stronger, every day the attacks are a little stronger, every day more troops and weapons appear along the line on Ukrops side. Both Minsk agreements were simply to stop NAF from successful conclusions of ongoing battles and give ukrop a breather. It worked both times. When the attack does come, and it will come, it's going to be hard on our boys but I have no doubts the boys will prevail.
Анатолий Шарий wrote:Gumanitarka. As a fail humiliated?
Hromadske.kh wrote:Kharkiv take the military on the streets
Новини Дніпропетровська wrote:Dnepropetrovsk. Mechnikov Hospital. Nurse separatist
PapaDragon wrote:And this is why best course of action for NAF is to dig in and wait, shelling be damned. Ukrops will have to go on the offensive because it is their only means of survival as a ideological entity.
EU is going to squeeze shamelessly Ukrainians for every and each one of those loans Kiev is taking.PapaDragon wrote:Down the road, it is entirely possible that it is EU that will be stuck with paying the bill for this mess while Russia gets everything else...
ExBeobachter1987 wrote:Flagship Victory wrote:Pfffft, 60,000 soldiers is nothing to brag about. Syria has what? 200,000 soldiers. Poro lies so much no one believes a word from his foul mouth
Donbass is much smaller than Syria. 60,000 soldiers is sufficient to keep Novorossiya from expanding.
ExBeobachter1987 wrote:PapaDragon wrote:And this is why best course of action for NAF is to dig in and wait, shelling be damned. Ukrops will have to go on the offensive because it is their only means of survival as a ideological entity.
No, they don't. Or at least Poroshenko and his government do not who have unofficially acknowledged that they cannot reconquer the Donbas.
They are satisfied by low-level fighting which keeps the Ukrainians distracted.
As long as the West supports them, they will continue with this strategy.
whir wrote:EU is going to squeeze shamelessly Ukrainians for every and each one of those loans Kiev is taking.PapaDragon wrote:Down the road, it is entirely possible that it is EU that will be stuck with paying the bill for this mess while Russia gets everything else...
PapaDragon wrote:Good, as long as this thing lasts Ukraine remains European Syria/Iraq. To survive, Ukraine needs infinitely more money than they are getting now.
No victory-no money...
ExBeobachter1987 wrote:PapaDragon wrote:Good, as long as this thing lasts Ukraine remains European Syria/Iraq. To survive, Ukraine needs infinitely more money than they are getting now.
No victory-no money...
There is no need for victory. Kiev gets support because its a proxy against Russia.
As long as Russia is perceived as a threat to European ambitions, Kiev will continue to receive support.
Of course, whether it will be enough is another question.
PapaDragon wrote:dumb fvcks need to understand that you do not get away with Nazism in 21st century.
Flagship Victory wrote:NAF territory is very small compared to insurgent territory in Syria.
Flagship Victory wrote:NAF is not allowed to attack Maidan. Therefore, I see Maidan functioning as a blockade, make Russian people angry. Anger is bad for health.
Big_Gazza wrote:Flagship Victory wrote:
The US perfectly knows Putin's personality. They know he is a very emotional person. They anticipated Putin would absorb Crimea on emotions. Putin fell right into their trap. Because of this, Putin is branded as the evil Putler in the west and Russia is branded as the Third Reich in the west. It was planned all along. Years in the making.
What utter shit. Its crystal clear that Russian support for Crimean secession caught the US unawares. They fully expected that Russia would not dare to get involved and that Ukraine would remain unified after the putsch so that Russian military agreements over Crimea could be abrogated, and that ultimately, US/NATO forces could move in to occupy the peninsula. US rage over the Russian temerity to act in defense of her vital interests stands in clear testimony to this fact.
As for your absurd assertions that Putin is "emotional"... well f*ck me, i don't even know where to start. If there is a world leader who knows how to keep a calm measured composed demeanour and to carefully measure their response to provocations, it has to be Putin.
You're simply off the planet. What are the Harperites putting into the water over there in Canuckistan????????
ExBeobachter1987 wrote:PapaDragon wrote:Good, as long as this thing lasts Ukraine remains European Syria/Iraq. To survive, Ukraine needs infinitely more money than they are getting now.
No victory-no money...
There is no need for victory. Kiev gets support because its a proxy against Russia.
As long as Russia is perceived as a threat to European ambitions, Kiev will continue to receive support.
Of course, whether it will be enough is another question.
ExBeobachter1987 wrote:Flagship Victory wrote:NAF territory is very small compared to insurgent territory in Syria.
On the other hand, the Donbass rebels control the regional capitals since the very beginning of the fighting.Flagship Victory wrote:NAF is not allowed to attack Maidan. Therefore, I see Maidan functioning as a blockade, make Russian people angry. Anger is bad for health.
That is true. Blockade and terror do a good job at slowly weakening the other side.
PapaDragon wrote:See the problem in Kiev's game plan?
Flagship Victory wrote:Wasn't capital of Donetsk oblast moved to Mariupol?
Cowboy's daughter wrote:Big_Gazza wrote:Flagship Victory wrote:
The US perfectly knows Putin's personality. They know he is a very emotional person. They anticipated Putin would absorb Crimea on emotions. Putin fell right into their trap. Because of this, Putin is branded as the evil Putler in the west and Russia is branded as the Third Reich in the west. It was planned all along. Years in the making.
What utter shit. Its crystal clear that Russian support for Crimean secession caught the US unawares. They fully expected that Russia would not dare to get involved and that Ukraine would remain unified after the putsch so that Russian military agreements over Crimea could be abrogated, and that ultimately, US/NATO forces could move in to occupy the peninsula. US rage over the Russian temerity to act in defense of her vital interests stands in clear testimony to this fact.
As for your absurd assertions that Putin is "emotional"... well f*ck me, i don't even know where to start. If there is a world leader who knows how to keep a calm measured composed demeanour and to carefully measure their response to provocations, it has to be Putin.
You're simply off the planet. What are the Harperites putting into the water over there in Canuckistan????????
Yep.
Gee your a late bloomer, I blocked him about 48 hours after signing up!auslander wrote:
First time ever, I blocked him and his buddy yesterday.