Hate to re-post, but; https://tanknutstan.wordpress.com/2015/08/15/t-90-at-the-donbass/Werewolf wrote: What makes you think that there were any T-90's?
I highly doubt they ever actually engaged.
Hate to re-post, but; https://tanknutstan.wordpress.com/2015/08/15/t-90-at-the-donbass/Werewolf wrote: What makes you think that there were any T-90's?
PapaDragon wrote:
Shouldn't this be other way around?
And Poland still wonders why they get no respect from anyone...
''Ukraine to resell Russian electricity to Poland at double price''
http://tass.ru/en/economy/815359
Even the most famous Italians are joining the NAF!Khepesh wrote:!!!! Buratino seen in Snezhnoe, photo evidence!
- Spoiler:
No former Marine I met is that stupid. Some may have even hated Russia but they were well aware of what the country was capable of and they wouldn't underestimate it or its people. There is a law in the States that makes it a felony to lie about service in the Armed Forces. He better hope that he doesn't get caught.auslander wrote:Ivan the Colorado wrote:
I know about that button. One of the nice things about this site when I came is I didn't require an ignore button for anyone. But I guess all good things must come to an end. This guy reminds me of Jitter who was far worse than Dforce and his crew back on MP.net. Gotta give Dforce props for not deliberately going to piss off everyone here, much unlike the reputation he earned back during the Butthurt Flame War. Guess he learned his lesson after messing with you.
Loving the book by the way!
I agree, often good things do come to an end, that is one of life's tribulations. I knew he was a liar from the very first introduction post he made. There's no such thing as 'ex Marine' or 'ex Spetznaz'. Dforce to me is nothing more than an annoying summer fly buzzing around, the Bobbsie Twins about the same. This clown is begging to get banned and he knows it.
Glad you are enjoying the book! I don't know how far you are in to the tome but I will be curious to hear what you think of some events in Chapters 16 and 17 in regards to Annya Dmitrovna, Father Mitrofan and another character. When you are completely finished, let me know and I'll send you some information about the Post Scriptum, when it was written and why. I had debated on including the information in the novel but decided against it. You will understand when I send it.
Is Tochka is so easy to shot down?Khepesh wrote:Reported that Tochka-U and UAV was shot down over Donetsk last night
military maps shows an indication of ukrops air asset shot down in the region of the wasteheaps between Donetsk and Makeevka but do not say what.
http://rusvesna.su/news/1440024880
Not with anything in VSN arsenal, but Pantsir should be able to deal with Tochka, but the closest are in Rostov.....Regular wrote:
Is Tochka is so easy to shot down?
Why us? Why not send Poles, Baltics, British, Americans or some other army of a rusophobic country? I wouldn't like to see Bundeswehr in Ukraine and majority of soldiers would not like to go there either.Khepesh wrote:Annanews have put forward a scenario in whichObamaMerkel and Hollande will agree that Poroshenko launches the offensive, but then send in NATO "peacekeepers" after ukrops have complained that "Russian" forces have used chemical weapons against them, depleted uranium etc. The scenario sees NATO forces, presumably only French and German being visible, as this will be less antagonistic that Americans, advancing into Donbass at various points from Novoazovsk to Lugansk, and primarily on the coat-tails of ukrops tank thrusts that have been stalled by "Russian use of chemical weapons". The calculation being that Russia will see it as not viable to engage with NATO troops, same as what happened in Kosovo with the stand off at Prishtina, and will walk away.
I do not go with this at all as "peacekeepers" can only be used when there is at least some form of ceasefire, for instance now, not in a hot war were they will be dragged into the fighting. I also do not see France and Germany being so hostile to Russia, and cannot see their populations accepting this. But of course Germany is not an independant country as it is occupied and owned by America, but would France fall to such a level as ass licker to Washington? The article ends saying that a military downside to this for NATO is that if it did come to fighting with Russian Army, then NATO would be fucked. What I take from this scenario is that it is not really saying this will happen, but that be prepared for some really odd things to happen, and I suspect, as do many of us, a massive provocation/black flag operation, and when the dust clears, the possibility, and only the possibility of some form of "peacekeeping". So, a big game of chicken about to happen?
http://www.anna-news.info/node/41015
Well, I think it is not a 100% serious article, simply to create discussion and point out to be aware that strange and unexpected events may happen. I was surprised when I saw Bundeswehr go into Kosovo, but I think German military involvment in Ukraine is totally out of the question, also French. In a real crisis that may cause a major European war I do not see any country in Europe throwing their lives for Washington, except America's unsinkable aircraft carrier in the North Sea.Walther von Oldenburg wrote:
Why us? Why not send Poles, Baltics, British, Americans or some other army of a rusophobic country? I wouldn't like to see Bundeswehr in Ukraine and majority of soldiers would not like to go there either.
Even we baulked at air attacks on Syria, so not as reliable a poodle as previously.Khepesh wrote:Well, I think it is not a 100% serious article, simply to create discussion and point out to be aware that strange and unexpected events may happen. I was surprised when I saw Bundeswehr go into Kosovo, but I think German military involvment in Ukraine is totally out of the question, also French. In a real crisis that may cause a major European war I do not see any country in Europe throwing their lives for Washington, except America's unsinkable aircraft carrier in the North Sea.Walther von Oldenburg wrote:
Why us? Why not send Poles, Baltics, British, Americans or some other army of a rusophobic country? I wouldn't like to see Bundeswehr in Ukraine and majority of soldiers would not like to go there either.
Link?Karl Haushofer wrote:So Russia bailed Ukraine out again with coal shipments.
Khepesh wrote:Annanews have put forward a scenario in whichObamaMerkel and Hollande will agree that Poroshenko launches the offensive, but then send in NATO "peacekeepers" after ukrops have complained that "Russian" forces have used chemical weapons against them, depleted uranium etc. The scenario sees NATO forces, presumably only French and German being visible, as this will be less antagonistic that Americans, advancing into Donbass at various points from Novoazovsk to Lugansk, and primarily on the coat-tails of ukrops tank thrusts that have been stalled by "Russian use of chemical weapons". The calculation being that Russia will see it as not viable to engage with NATO troops, same as what happened in Kosovo with the stand off at Prishtina, and will walk away.
I do not go with this at all as "peacekeepers" can only be used when there is at least some form of ceasefire, for instance now, not in a hot war were they will be dragged into the fighting. I also do not see France and Germany being so hostile to Russia, and cannot see their populations accepting this. But of course Germany is not an independant country as it is occupied and owned by America, but would France fall to such a level as ass licker to Washington? The article ends saying that a military downside to this for NATO is that if it did come to fighting with Russian Army, then NATO would be fucked. What I take from this scenario is that it is not really saying this will happen, but that be prepared for some really odd things to happen, and I suspect, as do many of us, a massive provocation/black flag operation, and when the dust clears, the possibility, and only the possibility of some form of "peacekeeping". So, a big game of chicken about to happen?
http://www.anna-news.info/node/41015
Khepesh wrote:Not with anything in VSN arsenal, but Pantsir should be able to deal with Tochka, but the closest are in Rostov.....Regular wrote:
Is Tochka is so easy to shot down?
If a Tochka was involved and came down, then more likely it failed and exploded in flight same as one earlier in the year, near Pervomaisk if I remember correctly
KoTeMoRe wrote:Cowboy's daughter wrote:Cowboy's daughter wrote:[quote="Meanwhile DNR keeps the pressure on Kiev by opening the crucial coal supply railway. I wonder how the payment structure works.
KIEV, August 19. /TASS/. Donbas has started supplying anthracite coal to Ukraine by restored railroad. "On August 16-18, DTEK company made first deliveries of anthracite coal [to Ukraine] via Nikitovka-Mayorskaya railroad passage. Eight-five wagons (5,900 tons) were delivered. Resuming traffic on this part of railroad which was destroyed in military actions in 2014, will allow to increase export of coal from the confrontation zone by around 300,000 tons per month. It is planned that at the first stage, the passage will be able to let through 3 pairs of trains per day, and later the number can be increased to 7 pairs of trains and more," the company’s press service said. The Nikitovka-Mayorskaya passage is the only operating station for delivering coal from Donbas to Kiev. DTEK press service added that 300 wagons of coal cannot be delivered to Kryvui Roh thermal power station through Yasinovataya-Skotovataya railroad passage. Traffic on this part of the railroad was suspended because of continuous shellings. More than 2 million tons of coal are stored at warehouses in Donbas at the moment, DTEK said."]
Akhmetov owns this??
http://www.dtek.com/en/our-operations/locations
It's not like he can't take a plane and move between Kiev and Berlin in less than 2 hours time. Expect some grandiose statements about the bright future that awaits Ukraine by following current path.Flagship Victory wrote:It is highly unusual that Poroshenko be in Berlin on August 24 Independence Day meeting with mutti and puppi. I smell something smelly a cooking.
whir wrote:It's not like he can't take a plane and move between Kiev and Berlin in less than 2 hours time. Expect some grandiose statements about the bright future that awaits Ukraine by following current path.Flagship Victory wrote:It is highly unusual that Poroshenko be in Berlin on August 24 Independence Day meeting with mutti and puppi. I smell something smelly a cooking.
Probably because Poroshenko's visit is a last minute appointment for declining Kiev's invitation.Flagship Victory wrote:Ye but I mean why the heck he goes to Berlin on Independence Day meeting with mutti and puppi when he should be in Kiev? Perhaps false flag for offensive that day?