The 'squad' is working its way forward through houses, shooting suppression fire randomly as per normal, even though most were carrying no visible replacement ammo. Interesting logistics there.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCGS-QtzT4U
JohninMK wrote:Video uploaded today. It gives a pretty clear idea of what the SAA is facing now in some areas, 'soldiers' that are basically one up from a local neighbourhood gang. Almost no idea on tactics leading to the injury at the end of an idiot (but he was the 'big' man with the LMG) who just stood in the middle of the road to shoot and got hit instead. No blood but no medic and a bunch of mates that didn't know what to do. Newly dead tank in the middle but not sure who it belonged to.
The 'squad' is working its way forward through houses, shooting suppression fire randomly as per normal, even though most were carrying no visible replacement ammo. Interesting logistics there.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCGS-QtzT4U
Big_Gazza wrote:JohninMK wrote:Video uploaded today. It gives a pretty clear idea of what the SAA is facing now in some areas, 'soldiers' that are basically one up from a local neighbourhood gang. Almost no idea on tactics leading to the injury at the end of an idiot (but he was the 'big' man with the LMG) who just stood in the middle of the road to shoot and got hit instead. No blood but no medic and a bunch of mates that didn't know what to do. Newly dead tank in the middle but not sure who it belonged to.
The 'squad' is working its way forward through houses, shooting suppression fire randomly as per normal, even though most were carrying no visible replacement ammo. Interesting logistics there.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCGS-QtzT4U
Stupid snackbar with the LMG... LOL... I hope he enjoys his 40 virgin goats..... (Daesh is on a budget now that oil revenue is down...)
With the increasing destruction of the supply lines forcing the militants to rely on what they already have or can get locally, both food and ammo/weapons, this could roll forward quite rapidly where the SAA deploys its forces. Problem mainly being lack of SAA resources so being spread too thinly. The militants problems are made much worse by the Syrian Government concentrating on the elimination of the militants 'officer' corps by hitting command centres and strategic get togethers, leading to the headless chicken rabble shown in that last video.PapaDragon wrote:
''Syrian Army Welcomes in New Year by Driving Out Terrorists in Key Provinces ''
The Syrian army, supported by the Russian and Syrian air strikes, has reportedly destroyed militants' positions in a whole array of provinces in the past 24 hours.
http://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20160102/1032593146/syria-army-militants.html
Big_Gazza wrote:PapaDragon wrote:
^^^ Kotemore has trademark on that one...
Damn... I thought I was being original...
Oh well
Dima wrote:Green lemon @green_lemonnn 3 hours ago
#Syria Very Interesting video. Rebels TOW ATGM deviated by a white smoke. IR Smoke grenade
The video is out of focus, but whats you guys analysis on the two explosion we see in this video?
Does the SAA tanks have any active defence system?
Another video
BM-21 GRAD @bm21_grad 2 hours ago
rare video of rebels using Fagot at night South Aleppo. Something flashes before impact. Shtora on T-90?
Britain's controversial air campaign in Syria has been branded a “non-event” after it emerged that the Air Force has carried out only one attack on the country in the last four weeks.
Since MPs voted for war over Syria on 1 December, more than a month ago, RAF Tornados and Typhoons have mounted only three strike missions – all in the first five days of the operation.
Dima wrote:Here is what the English said
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/islamic-state/12078395/RAF-bomb-raids-in-Syria-dismissed-as-non-event.html
Britain's controversial air campaign in Syria has been branded a “non-event” after it emerged that the Air Force has carried out only one attack on the country in the last four weeks.
Morpheus Eberhardt wrote:Dima wrote:Here is what the English said
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/islamic-state/12078395/RAF-bomb-raids-in-Syria-dismissed-as-non-event.html
Britain's controversial air campaign in Syria has been branded a “non-event” after it emerged that the Air Force has carried out only one attack on the country in the last four weeks.
That's one more than the number of attacks that really "happened".
short_fuze wrote:Morpheus Eberhardt wrote:Dima wrote:Here is what the English said
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/islamic-state/12078395/RAF-bomb-raids-in-Syria-dismissed-as-non-event.html
Britain's controversial air campaign in Syria has been branded a “non-event” after it emerged that the Air Force has carried out only one attack on the country in the last four weeks.
That's one more than the number of attacks that really "happened".
That's because their intended targets (hint not ISIS) are now well protected.
Dima wrote:Here is what the English said
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/islamic-state/12078395/RAF-bomb-raids-in-Syria-dismissed-as-non-event.html
Britain's controversial air campaign in Syria has been branded a “non-event” after it emerged that the Air Force has carried out only one attack on the country in the last four weeks.
Since MPs voted for war over Syria on 1 December, more than a month ago, RAF Tornados and Typhoons have mounted only three strike missions – all in the first five days of the operation.